Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.597
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Ind Med ; 67(8): 753-763, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38884609

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is recognition of the growing prevalence of alternative work arrangements, contingent jobs, and work secured through an app. However, there have been few systematic efforts to understand the impact of these forms of work on individuals and households. METHODS: The data derive from the California Work and Health Survey administered to a sample of the working age population of the state solicited through random-digit dialing of cell phone numbers. 4014 individuals completed the survey, 26% of those with an in-service cell phone number. We present odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals from logistic regression estimating the impact of being an independent contractor, in other forms of alternative work arrangements, in contingent jobs, and in work secured through an app, on economic and health status and working conditions in main jobs, with and without adjustment for covariates. RESULTS: Several of the forms of work analyzed are associated with lower earnings and higher rates of wage theft, household poverty, benefit recipiency, and expectation of hardships in food, housing, and medical care in the immediate future. Association between the forms of work and current health status is less consistent. However, several forms of work are associated with working conditions known to be risk factors for subsequent health problems. CONCLUSIONS: Public policy to mitigate the adverse impacts of work, largely developed in the 20th Century when there was an identified workplace, may be insufficient to protect workers' well-being for alternative work arrangements, contingent jobs, and work secured through an app.


Asunto(s)
Empleo , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Aplicaciones Móviles , Humanos , Adulto , California , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Modelos Logísticos , Adolescente , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Salarios y Beneficios/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 67(8): 696-711, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38837271

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This review synthesizes evidence from etiologic and intervention studies of workplace-related determinants of mental health in workers in food and bar workers in the hospitality industry in Western high-income countries. METHODS: Peer-reviewed literature published between January 2000 and August 2023 was gathered from five bibliographic databases. Any study design was eligible. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools for appraisal. RESULTS: A narrative analysis was conducted for 26 included studies (total n = 15,069 participants) across Australia (3), Ireland (1), Norway (1), Spain (2), the United States (17) and the United Kingdom (2). Individual and task-related factors such as high emotional job demands and low job control were associated with high burnout and depression. Uncivil and hostile interpersonal interactions with customers, management, and colleagues were found to contribute to poor mental health outcomes, including depression, anxiety, and burnout. CONCLUSION: Findings from included studies highlight the impact of workplace culture, including management practices and workplace social support, on mental health. Organization-level interventions may therefore be most effective for addressing individual, interpersonal, and organizational determinants of mental health in food and bar occupations, particularly when implemented as part of broader organizational efforts to support health and wellbeing. Industry-wide policy changes may also be necessary to address structural concerns, including job and financial insecurity, job strain and access to benefits, such as secure sick leave and minimum contract hours.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Países Desarrollados , Salud Mental , Lugar de Trabajo , Humanos , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Cultura Organizacional , Apoyo Social , Ansiedad/psicología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Industria de Alimentos
3.
Public Health ; 231: 64-70, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636278

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Workplace-related factors are associated with the risk of depression. Despite implementation of workplace health promotion (WHP) programmes in China to promote the physical and mental well-being of workers, the relationship between WHP and depression has received limited attention. This study investigated the association between WHP service utilisation and depressive symptoms among workers. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional survey. METHODS: A researcher-designed questionnaire was used to collect information on socio-demographic and occupational characteristics, WHP service utilisation, and mental health status. The Lasso method was used for variable selection to achieve dimension reduction, and logistic regression was used to assess the association between WHP service utilisation and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: The analysis included 11,710 workers, of whom 17.0% had depressive symptoms. Lasso regression resulted in 6 of 18 WHP services showing significant negative associations with depressive symptoms, including occupational safety training, mental health services, health check-ups, sports activities, fitness rooms, and healthy canteens. The logistic regression results showed that, after adjusting for sociodemographic and occupational factors, utilisation of these six services was associated with a decreased likelihood of depressive symptoms. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.96) for occupational safety training, aOR: 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68-0.99) for mental health services, aOR: 0.80 (95% CI: 0.71-0.90) for health check-ups, aOR: 0.68 (95% CI: 0.57-0.80) for sports activities, aOR: 0.59 (95% CI: 0.47-0.74) for fitness rooms and aOR: 0.72 (95% CI: 0.59-0.87) for healthy canteens. CONCLUSIONS: Utilisation of WHP services was associated with a lower prevalence of depressive symptoms. Implementation of WHP services and the provision of a supportive workplace environment should be prioritised to benefit the mental health of workers.


Asunto(s)
Depresión , Promoción de la Salud , Lugar de Trabajo , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/epidemiología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , China/epidemiología , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Servicios de Salud del Trabajador/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38896152

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The utilization of psychotherapeutic consultation at work (PT-A) has so far been investigated in large enterprises (LEs). These differ structurally from small(est) and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Differences in the user profiles of a PT­A with regard to psychosomatic health, work-related self-efficacy, and work ability depending on company size have hardly been investigated. This study also examined differences in the employees' perception of the psychosocial safety climate (PSC) in the company, which represents management's efforts to promote mental health. METHODS: As part of the Early Intervention in the Workplace intervention study called "friaa", employees from LEs and SMEs interested in a PT­A were surveyed throughout Germany from September 2021 to January 2023. Using t­ and χ2-tests, differences between employees in LEs (n = 439) and SMEs (n = 109) were examined with regard to the ICD-10 F diagnostic code ("International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems"; mental and behavioral disorders), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-2), level of functioning (GAF), somatic symptom burden (SSS-8), health (VR-12), ability to work (WAI), self-efficacy (SOSES), and psychosocial safety climate (PSC-4). The association between these variables and especially the PSC­4 were investigated using correlation analysis. RESULTS: Both groups showed similar levels of stress. From the employees' perspective, psychosocial issues were addressed significantly more frequently in LEs than in SMEs with a medium effect size. The study provided initial indications that in LEs there were positive correlations of the PSC­4 with SOSES and WAI and negative ones with PHQ­9 and SSS­8. DISCUSSION: The comparable psychological strain on employees in LEs and SMEs points to the need for behavioral and structural preventive measures regardless of the company size. Mainly in SMEs, organizational communication of psychosocial health should be given greater priority.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Psicofisiológicos , Humanos , Alemania , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/terapia , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/psicología , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/epidemiología , Psicoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39098026

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been a diversification of working styles. The concept of workers' well-being is no longer limited to material wealth, such as how satisfied they are with their wages. Psychological enrichment, encompassing factors like motivation and interpersonal relationships, is also important. This study was established to develop a scale to evaluate the well-being of workers, named the Abundance Index for Workers (AIW). This new concept proposed by the authors comprehensively considers both job-related resources and personal and societal resources. METHODS: This study was carried out as part of the Tsukuba Salutogenic Occupational Cohort Study (T-SOCS). We utilized data from a survey targeting workers affiliated with institutions under the Tsukuba Science City Network, examining aspects of their daily life, work, and mental health. The deviation scores for each survey item were averaged to calculate an overall score. The correlations of the comprehensive score with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) index for depression and the Single-item Presenteeism Question (SPQ) index for presenteeism were analyzed to determine criterion-related validity. RESULTS: The number of participants analyzed was 2,745. Factor analysis categorized the data into three factors: workplace mental health, societal resources, and lifestyle habits. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.688. There were correlations of -0.363 (p < 0.001) between the total score and SPQ, and -0.558 (p < 0.001) between the total score and PHQ-9, suggesting a degree of criterion-related validity. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we designed a test battery that assesses workers' well-being based on job-related resources and the richness of societal resources. The internal consistency of this battery was not as high as expected due to the broad scope of well-being. Although it is difficult to evaluate workers' well-being on a single scale, we believe that the AIW functions well as a test battery by combining scales with different attributes, which enables well-being to be captured from as many different perspectives as possible. This tool is designed to assist individuals in evaluating their own well-being and recognizing factors that can enhance it. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable; this study is not an intervention trial.


Asunto(s)
Salud Laboral , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Japón , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Presentismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Estilo de Vida
6.
Occup Environ Med ; 79(2): 116-119, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34880045

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This cohort study including essential workers, assessed the risk and incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the second surge of COVID-19 according to baseline serostatus and occupational sector. METHODS: Essential workers were selected from a seroprevalence survey cohort in Geneva, Switzerland and were linked to a state centralised registry compiling SARS-CoV-2 infections. Primary outcome was the incidence of virologically confirmed infections from serological assessment (between May and September 2020) to 25 January 2021, according to baseline antibody status and stratified by three predefined occupational groups (occupations requiring sustained physical proximity, involving brief regular contact or others). RESULTS: 10 457 essential workers were included (occupations requiring sustained physical proximity accounted for 3057 individuals, those involving regular brief contact, 3645 and 3755 workers were classified under 'Other essential occupations'). After a follow-up period of over 27 weeks, 5 (0.6%) seropositive and 830 (8.5%) seronegative individuals had a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, with an incidence rate of 0.2 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.6) and 3.2 (95% CI 2.9 to 3.4) cases per person-week, respectively. Incidences were similar across occupational groups. Seropositive essential workers had a 93% reduction in the hazard (HR of 0.07, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.17) of having a positive test during the follow-up with no significant between-occupational group difference. CONCLUSIONS: A 10-fold reduction in the hazard of being virologically tested positive was observed among anti-SARS-CoV-2 seropositive essential workers regardless of their sector of occupation, confirming the seroprotective effect of a previous SARS-CoV2 exposure at least 6 months after infection.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral/normas , Reinfección/diagnóstico , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Reinfección/epidemiología , Suiza/epidemiología
7.
J Korean Med Sci ; 37(3): e22, 2022 Jan 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35040297

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the health status of healthcare workers (doctors and nurses) compared to those in the general population based on the National Health Insurance Service database and the cause of death data from Statistics Korea. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 104,484 doctors and 220,310 nurses working in healthcare facilities from 2002 to 2017, and who had undergone at least one general medical examination. Based on the subject definition, the subject data were extracted from the National Health Insurance healthcare facility database and qualification database. We collected medical use details included in the research database, general medical examination results, medical history included in the health examination database, and additional data on the cause of death from the National Statistics database to analyze the main cause of death and mortality. RESULTS: In terms of the major causes of death and mortality among healthcare workers, the mortality rate associated with intentional self-harm, injury, transportation accident, heart disease, addiction, and falling was significantly higher than that in the general population. Further, the prevalence of respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases was high. When analyzing the proportional mortality ratio (PMR) by cause of death for healthcare workers, the PMR values for death related to malignant neoplasm was the highest. In terms of diseases, both doctors and nurses had higher rates of infectious diseases such as maternal sepsis, rubella, and measles. CONCLUSION: The health status of healthcare workers differs from that of the general population. Thus, it is important to consider the occupational characteristics of healthcare personnel. This study is unique in that it was conducted based on medical use indicators rather than survey data.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad/tendencias , Salud Laboral/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Personal de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , República de Corea/epidemiología
8.
Int J Cancer ; 149(10): 1768-1786, 2021 11 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34270795

RESUMEN

Evidence for the human health effects of pesticides is needed to inform risk assessment. We studied the relationship between occupational insecticide use and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) by pooling data from nine case-control studies participating in the InterLymph Consortium, including 7909 cases and 8644 controls from North America, the European Union and Australia. Insecticide use was coded using self-report or expert assessment, for insecticide groups (eg, organophosphates, pyrethroids) and active ingredients (eg, malathion, permethrin). Associations with insecticides were estimated using logistic regression to produce odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all NHL and NHL subtypes, with adjustment for study site, demographic factors and use of other pesticides. Occupational insecticide use, overall, was not associated with risk of NHL. Use of organophosphate insecticides was associated with increased risk of all NHL and the subtype follicular lymphoma, and an association was found with diazinon, in particular (ever use: OR = 2.05, 95%CI: 1.24-3.37). The carbamate insecticide, carbaryl, was associated with risk of all NHL, and the strongest associations were found with T-cell NHL for ever-use (OR = 2.44, 95%CI: 1.13-5.28) and longer duration (>8 years vs never: OR = 2.90, 95%CI: 1.02-8.25). There was no association of NHL with other broad groups of insecticides, including organochlorines and pyrethroids, and some inverse associations were estimated in relation to historical DDT use. Our findings contribute to the totality of evidence available to help inform risk decisions by public health and regulatory agencies of importance given continued, widespread use of organophosphate and carbamate insecticides.


Asunto(s)
Insecticidas/envenenamiento , Linfoma no Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Unión Europea , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/etiología , Linfoma no Hodgkin/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , América del Norte , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Oportunidad Relativa , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(7): 250-253, 2021 Feb 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33600383

RESUMEN

Certain hazard controls, including physical barriers, cloth face masks, and other personal protective equipment (PPE), are recommended to reduce coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) transmission in the workplace (1). Evaluation of occupational hazard control use for COVID-19 prevention can identify inadequately protected workers and opportunities to improve use. CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health used data from the June 2020 SummerStyles survey to characterize required and voluntary use of COVID-19-related occupational hazard controls among U.S. non-health care workers. A survey-weighted regression model was used to estimate the association between employer provision of hazard controls and voluntary use, and stratum-specific adjusted risk differences (aRDs) among workers reporting household incomes <250% and ≥250% of national poverty thresholds were estimated to assess effect modification by income. Approximately one half (45.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 41.0%-50.3%) of non-health care workers reported use of hazard controls in the workplace, 55.5% (95% CI = 48.8%-62.2%) of whom reported employer requirements to use them. After adjustment for occupational group and proximity to others at work, voluntary use was approximately double, or 22.3 absolute percentage points higher, among workers who were provided hazard controls than among those who were not. This effect was more apparent among lower-income (aRD = 31.0%) than among higher-income workers (aRD = 16.3%). Employers can help protect workers from COVID-19 by requiring and encouraging use of occupational hazard controls and providing hazard controls to employees (1).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Programas Obligatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Voluntarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Accesibilidad Arquitectónica/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Máscaras/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Equipo de Protección Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Lugar de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
10.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 33(2): 101-107, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33878284

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic may adversely impact the mental health of health care workers (HCWs). To address this issue, it is essential to determine levels of anxiety, depression, and traumatic stress, and sources of stress, and to identify subgroups of HCWs at a higher risk of adverse mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of symptoms of mental illness in HCWs in the area surrounding Detroit, Michigan. The online survey included questions about demographics, health and clinical factors, and sources of stress. Several tools were used to assess psychiatric symptoms among HCWs, including the Perceived Stress Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item assessment, and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5. The adequacy of personal protective equipment, patient resources, and training for highly contagious diseases were rated. RESULTS: The sample (N = 129) was predominantly female (51.2%) and White (65.9%), with 30.2% screening positive for clinical follow-up to assess anxiety, 20.9% for moderate to severe depression, and 16.3% for elevated traumatic stress. Differences were found by self-reported psychiatric diagnosis and chronic conditions, and role on treatment teams. CONCLUSIONS: Frontline HCWs demonstrate high levels of stress and trauma symptoms. Timely screening and accommodations may be needed during health care crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Estrés Laboral , Estrés Psicológico , Adulto , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/etiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Personal de Salud/psicología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Michigan/epidemiología , Evaluación de Necesidades , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Estrés Laboral/diagnóstico , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estrés Laboral/etiología , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , SARS-CoV-2 , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático/etiología , Trastornos de Estrés Traumático/prevención & control , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología
11.
Occup Environ Med ; 78(9): 691-696, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34162718

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the reporting quality of randomisation and allocation methods in occupational health and safety (OHS) trials in relation to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) requirements of journals, risk of bias (RoB) and publication year. METHODS: We systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed between 2010 and May 2019 in 18 OHS journals. We measured reporting quality as percentage compliance with the CONSORT 2010 checklist (items 8-10) and RoB with the ROB V.2.0 tool (first domain). We tested the mean difference (MD) in % in reporting quality between CONSORT-requiring and non-requiring journals, trials with low, some concern and high RoB and publications before and after 2015. RESULTS: In 135 articles reporting on 129 RCTs, average reporting quality was at 37.4% compliance (95% CI 31.9% to 43.0%), with 10% of articles reaching 100% compliance. Reporting quality was significantly better in CONSORT-requiring journals than non-requiring journals (MD 31.0% (95% CI 21.4% to 40.7%)), for studies at low RoB than high RoB (MD 33.1% (95% CI 16.1% to 50.2%)) and with RoB of some concern (MD 39.8% (95% CI 30.0% to 49.7%)). Reporting quality did not improve over time (MD -5.7% (95% CI -16.8% to 5.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Articles in CONSORT-requiring journals and of low RoB studies show better reporting quality. Low reporting quality is linked to unclear RoB judgements (some concern). Reporting quality did not improve over the last 10 years and CONSORT is insufficiently implemented. Concerted efforts by editors and authors are needed to improve CONSORT implementation.


Asunto(s)
Salud Laboral/normas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/normas , Sesgo de Selección , Sesgo , Humanos , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución Aleatoria , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo
12.
Occup Environ Med ; 78(1): 15-21, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33033106

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This paper assessed the impact of working in casual employment, compared with permanent employment, on eight health attributes that make up the 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey, separately by sex. The mental health impacts of casual jobs with irregular hours over which the worker reports limited control were also investigated. METHODS: Longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, over the period 2001-2018, were used to investigate the relationship between the eight SF-36 subscales and workers' employment contract type. Individual, household and job characteristic confounders were included in dynamic panel data regression models with correlated random effects. RESULTS: For both men and women, health outcomes for casual workers were no worse than for permanent workers for any of the eight SF-36 health attributes. For some health attributes, scores for casual workers were higher (ie, better) than for permanent workers (role physical: men: ß=1.15, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.20, women: ß=1.79, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.80; bodily pain: women: ß=0.90, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.54; vitality: women: ß=0.65, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.18; social functioning: men: ß=1.00, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.73); role emotional: men: ß=1.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.89, women: ß=1.24, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.24). Among women (but not men), mental health and role emotional scores were lower for irregular casual workers than for regular permanent workers but not statistically significantly so. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no evidence that casual employment in Australia is detrimental to self-assessed worker health.


Asunto(s)
Empleo/clasificación , Estado de Salud , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Australia , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad
14.
Med Sci Monit ; 27: e929454, 2021 Jun 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34188013

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) broke out in China. This study was to investigate the situation of mental health status among medical staff following COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted through structured questionnaires to collect the demographical information of the participating medical staff via WeChat following COVID-19 crisis. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), impact of events scale revised (IES-R), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scale were used to evaluate depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and sleep quality, respectively. 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS A total of 597 medical staff's information was included for the statistical analysis, and found 45.23% of subjects had PTSD symptoms, the mean PSQI score was 6.320±3.587. The results of multivariable analysis implied that medical workers who did not participate in the Hubei aid program (ß=4.128; 95% CI, 0.983-7.272; P=0.010) and PTSD symptoms (ß=7.212; 95% CI, 4.807-9.616; P<0.001) were associated with a higher tendency to depression. The PSQI score was linearly related to the CES-D score (ß=1.125; 95% CI, 0.804-1.445; P<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that medical workers who did not participate in the Hubei aid program, no traumatic experience before COVID-19 outbreaks, and PTSD symptoms may affect the tendency to depression in females, but not in males. PSQI score was linearly related to the CES-D score both in males and females. CONCLUSIONS The medical staff with PTSD symptoms and higher PSQI score may have a higher tendency to depression following COVID-19 outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Depresión , Cuerpo Médico , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , China/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico/psicología , Cuerpo Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores Sexuales , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/epidemiología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(5): 398-402, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33616281

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Commercial fishing is the most hazardous occupation in the United States. While the epidemiology of adult injuries and fatalities are well documented, injuries to children (<18 years old) are not described. The purpose of this report was to describe the characteristics of nonfatal injuries to children involved in commercial fishing. METHODS: Nonfatal commercial fishing injuries to children were identified in the Alaska Fishermen's Fund. The Alaska Fishermen's Fund is an emergency fund payor of last resort. Data on nonfatal injuries to victims aged 17 or younger were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize demographics and injury characteristics. RESULTS: Forty-four nonfatal child injury claims were made between 2012 and 2016. The mean age at the time of claim was 15.6 years (SD = 1.8) and 84% were male. The most common types of injuries among children were sprains and strains and the most commonly injured body parts were upper extremities and the trunk. Most injuries occurred in salmon fisheries. CONCLUSIONS: Children are participating in commercial fishing. Based on the results of this analysis, children are also experiencing occupational injuries. The results of this analysis underscore the need for additional safety and health information, guidance for supervisors, and intervention to prevent injuries to children participating in commercial fishing.


Asunto(s)
Explotaciones Pesqueras/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Adolescente , Alaska/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/etiología
16.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(2): 149-161, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33231897

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Individual attributes including disability and sex/gender have the potential to intersect and determine the likelihood of unmet workplace support needs. Our study compares unmet workplace support needs between workers with and without a disability, and according to disability type and sex/gender differences. METHODS: Workers with (n = 901) and without (n = 895) a disability were surveyed to examine their need and use of workplace supports including job accommodations, work modifications and health benefits. A multivariable logistic model was conducted to examine the relationship between disability status, disability type and sex/gender and unmet workplace support needs. The model included interaction terms between sex/gender × physical disability, sex/gender × nonphysical disability, and sex/gender × physical and nonphysical disability. RESULTS: Among participants with a disability, 24% had a physical disability, 20% had a nonphysical disability (e.g., cognitive, mental/emotional or sensory disability) and 56% had both physical and nonphysical disability. Over half of the respondents were women (56%). Results from the multivariable model showed that nondisabled women were more likely to report unmet workplace support needs when compared to nondisabled men (odds ratio [OR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.10). Findings also showed an intersection between the number and type of disability and sex/gender; women with both a physical and nonphysical disability had the greatest likelihood of reporting unmet workplace support needs when compared to nondisabled men (OR = 2.73; 95% CI, 1.83-4.08). CONCLUSIONS: Being a woman and having one or more disabilities can determine unmet workplace support needs. Strategies to address workplace support needs should consider the intersection between disability and sex/gender differences.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Apoyo Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
17.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(5): 323-337, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33616241

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Roughly 10% of injured workers experience work injuries that result in permanent impairment and a permanent partial disability (PPD) award. This study aimed to characterize and quantify long-term employment outcomes for injured workers, by the degree of whole body impairment (WBI) and by participation in several workers' compensation (WC)-based return-to-work (RTW) programs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 43,968 Washington State workers were followed for up to 10 years after WC claim closure (2009-2017). Degree of impairment was classified as: (1) no PPD award, (2) PPD award with WBI < 10%, or (3) PPD award with WBI ≥ 10%. State wage files were used to construct employment outcomes for regression, modeling: (1) time to first RTW, (2) time to first RTW interruption, (3) RTW volatility, and (4) employment gaps. RESULTS: Wage patterns and employment outcomes differed significantly by the degree of impairment. Compared to other workers, workers with WBI ≥ 10% had delayed RTW, shorter average times to first RTW interruption, and higher rates of both RTW interruptions and quarters without wages. Time to first RTW averaged over a year, increasing with the degree of impairment. About 9% overall-and 27% of workers with ≥10% WBI-had no observed wages after claim closure. In adjusted models, workers with WBI ≥ 10% had significantly poorer employment outcomes, compared to workers with no PPD award (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: State wage files provide an efficient approach to identifying RTW patterns. Workers with permanent impairment were at substantially higher risk of poor employment outcomes. WC-based RTW programs may promote better employment outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Reinserción al Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Salarios y Beneficios/estadística & datos numéricos , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Laboral/economía , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/economía , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Washingtón/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
18.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(3): 198-207, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33373058

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Injury prevention is an important goal for electric utility line workers who are among the top 10 U.S. occupational groups sustaining fatal injuries on the job. METHODS: Using narrative text fields, we identified 10 high-risk tasks among electric utility line workers. We performed a case-control study of task-injury associations using data from the Electric Power Research Institute Occupational Health and Safety Database (1995-2013). RESULTS: Drawn from 12,323 line worker injuries, cases were individuals with a major injury (5 or more days lost work) matched to controls, individuals with a minor injury (less than 1 day lost work), on company and year of injury. Conditional logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Some tasks associated with higher odds for major injuries among line workers included: climbing up/down ladder/stairs/elevator (OR = 4.3; 95% CI = 2.6, 7.4); climbing down poles and transmission towers (OR = 5.5; 95% CI = 3.6, 8.4); entering/stepping out/approaching utility trucks, bucket, or vaults (OR = 5.8; 95% CI = 4.0, 8.4); and performing repetitive work/overtime (OR = 5.5; 95% CI = 3.2, 9.5). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge gained can be used to focus efforts and plan efficient preventive measures that reduce injury rates, time lost from work, and costs within the electric power industry.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Electricidad , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/etiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Bases de Datos Factuales , Instalación Eléctrica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/prevención & control , Oportunidad Relativa , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Administración de la Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(7): 551-566, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34003502

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This article reports the results of a rapid scoping review of the literature on COVID-19 transmission risk to workers in essential sectors such as retail, health care, manufacturing, and agriculture, and more particularly the experiences of workers in precarious employment and social situations. METHODS: Following scoping review methods, we included 30 studies that varied in terms of methodology and theoretical approaches. The search included peer-reviewed articles and grey literature published between March and September 2020. RESULTS: Based on the studies reviewed, we found that COVID-19 infection and death rates increased not only with age and comorbidities, but also with discrimination and structural inequities based on racism and sexism. Racial and ethnic minority workers, including migrant workers, are concentrated in high-risk occupations and this concentration is correlated to lower socioeconomic conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic appears in the occupational health and safety spotlight as an exacerbator of already existing socioeconomic inequalities and social inequalities in health, especially in light of the intersection of issues related to racism, ethnic minority status, and sexism. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides early evidence about the limitations of institutions' responses to the pandemic, and their capacity to provide a safe and decent working environment for all workers, regardless of their employment status or the social protections they may enjoy under normal circumstances. It is also important to think about these issues in the postpandemic context, when conditions of precariousness and vulnerability persist and possibly worsen.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Ocupaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , COVID-19/transmisión , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/virología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(2): 73-77, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33355943

RESUMEN

Globally, migrant and immigrant workers have borne the brunt of the COVID-19 pandemic as essential workers. They might be a Bulgarian worker at a meat processing plant in Germany, a Central American farmworker in the fields of California, or a Filipino worker at an aged-care facility in Australia. What they have in common is they are all essential workers who have worked throughout the coronavirus pandemic and have been infected with coronavirus at work. COVID-19 has highlighted the inequitable working conditions of these workers. In many instances, they are employed precariously, and so are ineligible for sick leave or social security, or COVID-19 special payments. If these are essential workers, they should get at least the same health and safety benefits of all nonessential workers. Improving the working and living conditions of migrant workers can and should be a positive outcome of the coronavirus pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Migrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/transmisión , Estudios Transversales , Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Beneficios del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud del Trabajador/provisión & distribución , Factores de Riesgo , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad Social/estadística & datos numéricos , Valores Sociales , Factores Socioeconómicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA