Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 121
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Women Health ; 60(3): 249-259, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31264530

RESUMEN

In 2013, California passed legislation to expand the scope of pharmacist practice, including authorizing pharmacists to prescribe hormonal contraception. Pharmacist-prescribed contraception was largely unavailable across the state in 2017. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to offering this service in California independent pharmacies. To do so, we thematically analyzed qualitative data from structured interviews with 36 pharmacists working in independent pharmacies in 2016-17. We found that pharmacists anticipated general benefits from expanding their roles to prescribe contraception, including increasing health care access and decreasing costs. In contrast, described barriers were concrete, including lack of financial incentives and business risks for independent pharmacies. Specific barriers to prescribing hormonal contraception included time required to screen and counsel women about contraception and concerns that pharmacist-prescribed contraception would increase liability and lead to patients seeking health care less frequently. This study suggests that incentives and barriers identified by the respondents are likely to have varied and unequal impacts, with immediate barriers being potentially prohibitive for pharmacists to prescribe contraception. For independent pharmacies, perceived business risks and lack of insurance reimbursement may outweigh professional support for prescribing contraception, limiting the public health impact of legislation that should increase contraceptive access.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Anticonceptivos Orales/administración & dosificación , Anticoncepción Hormonal/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Actitud del Personal de Salud , California , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Farmacias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Investigación Cualitativa
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 571, 2019 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31412944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of psychotropic substances is controlled in most parts of the world due to their potential of abuse and addiction. Diazepam is one of the psychotropic substances which can be dispensed in community pharmacies in Tanzania. As per good dispensing practices and pharmacy laws, diazepam in the community pharmacies should strictly be stored in a controlled box and dispensed only by prescription. However, to our understanding little had been reported on availability and dispensing practices of diazepam in Tanzania. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study which involved 178 randomly selected registered community pharmacies in Kinondoni district was conducted from January to March 2018. Simulated client approach was used to assess the availability and dispensers practice about dispensing of diazepam. Location of pharmacies was categorized as being at the centre or periphery of the Kinondoni district. Chi-squared test was used for the analysis of categorical data using SPSS version 23. The p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULT: The total of 178 community pharmacies were visited, the majority of the dispensers (89.1%) encountered were female. Most (69.1%) of the studied pharmacies were located at the centre of Kinondoni district. Diazepam was available in 91% of community pharmacies and 70% of dispensers issued diazepam without prescription. CONCLUSION: Diazepam was available in most of the community pharmacies in Kinondoni district, and the majority of the dispensers dispensed diazepam without prescription. This calls for the regulatory authorities to be more vigilant on the availability of diazepam and enhance the provision of ethical pharmacy practice in the community pharmacies.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Diazepam , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Farmacéuticos , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Diazepam/provisión & distribución , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/provisión & distribución , Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tanzanía
3.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 58(1): 113-116, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29290339

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To initiate a call to action for community pharmacists and key stakeholders to encourage comprehensive and consistent education and certification for contraception services, especially in states where laws have been enacted for pharmacist prescribing of hormonal contraceptives. DATE SOURCES: Websites for several boards of pharmacy that have implemented pharmacist training for contraceptive prescribing. SUMMARY: From the authors' perspective of helping to implement laws that allow pharmacist prescribing of contraception in Oregon and Colorado, lessons learned have shown that it is better to have 1 consistent resource for pharmacist certification for the following reasons: 1) Boards of pharmacy are able to ensure patient safety because all pharmacists are providing the same level of care to every patient; 2) retail chain pharmacies and pharmacy managers are assured that all their pharmacists, regardless of state, are trained in a similar and appropriate manner; and 3) pharmacists can be reimbursed through medical insurance for the patient encounter because payers are able to identify and credential pharmacists who pass an approved and accredited certification program. CONCLUSION: New laws allowing pharmacists to prescribe contraception are expanding to other states, and the implementation of these laws provides an important increase in pharmacists' scope of practice. This exciting new prospect allows the pharmacy community of each state an opportunity to coordinate and learn from each other on best practices for implementation. Having a consistent training program was identified as being one key aspect of successful implementation.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Fertilización/efectos de los fármacos , Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Anticoncepción , Educación en Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Rol Profesional
4.
Consult Pharm ; 33(5): 240-246, 2018 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29789045

RESUMEN

Increasingly, pharmacists are providing advanced, patient-centered clinical services. However, pharmacists are not currently included in key sections of the Social Security Act, which determines eligibility to bill and be reimbursed by Medicare. Many state and private health plans also cite the omission from Medicare as the rationale for excluding reimbursement of pharmacists for clinical services. This has prompted forward-thinking pharmacists to seek opportunities for reimbursement in other ways, allowing them to provide value to the health care system, while carving out unique niches for pharmacists to care for patients.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/economía , Medicare/economía , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/economía , Farmacéuticos/economía , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/legislación & jurisprudencia , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/organización & administración , Honorarios y Precios , Regulación Gubernamental , Humanos , Medicare/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Formulación de Políticas , Rol Profesional , Salarios y Beneficios/economía , Estados Unidos
5.
CMAJ ; 189(4): E146-E152, 2017 Jan 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27503864

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Uptake of influenza vaccination in Canada remains suboptimal despite widespread public funding. To increase access, several provinces have implemented policies permitting pharmacists to administer influenza vaccines in community pharmacies. We examined the impact of such policies on the uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination in Canada. METHODS: We pooled data from the 2007-2014 cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (n = 481 526). To determine the impact of influenza vaccine administration by pharmacists, we estimated the prevalence ratio for the association between the presence of a pharmacist policy and individual-level vaccine uptake using a modified Poisson regression model (dependent variable: vaccine uptake) with normalized weights while controlling for numerous health and sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: Across all survey cycles combined, 28.8% of respondents reported receiving a seasonal influenza vaccine during the 12 months before survey participation. Introduction of a policy for pharmacist administration of influenza vaccine was associated with a modest increase in coverage (2.2%) and an individual's likelihood of uptake (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.08). INTERPRETATION: Uptake of influenza immunization was modestly increased in Canadian jurisdictions that allowed pharmacists to administer influenza vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Canadá , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Farmacéuticos/normas
6.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 57(6): 661-669, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28807659

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Gaps in vaccination coverage leave populations vulnerable to illnesses. Since the 1990s, there has been a growing movement to improve vaccination access by giving pharmacists the authority to administer vaccines according to state laws. Understanding the variation of pharmacist vaccination laws over time is critical to understanding the effect of improving access to vaccination services. METHODS: We identified relevant statutes and regulations with the use of Westlaw legal databases. A 4-stage coding process identified 220 legal variables of pharmacist vaccination authority. Each jurisdiction's laws were coded against these 220 legal variables. The resulting legal dataset was then evaluated to determine whether jurisdictions expanded or restricted pharmacist vaccination authorities over time. RESULTS: From 1971 to 2016, jurisdictions made 627 changes to statutes and regulations relating to pharmacist vaccination authority. There were 85 expansions, 3 restrictions, and 22 regulatory clarifications. Eight changes were deemed to be unclear, and 479 changes did not substantively alter the scope of pharmacist vaccination authority. CONCLUSION: Collectively, the laws in 50 states and DC paint a clear picture: the scope of pharmacists' vaccination authority is expanding. Jurisdictions are allowing pharmacists to administer more vaccines to younger patients with less direct prescriber oversight. This clear expansion of pharmacist vaccination authority stands in contrast to the reservations expressed by some physician groups for pharmacists as vaccination providers. However, laws in some states still do not permit pharmacists to vaccinate according to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Regulación Gubernamental , Planificación en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Farmacias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Rol Profesional , Gobierno Estatal , Vacunación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/tendencias , Atención a la Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Planificación en Salud/tendencias , Política de Salud/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Farmacias/tendencias , Farmacéuticos/tendencias , Formulación de Políticas , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacunación/tendencias
7.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 57(6): 677-685, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28807658

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: California Senate Bill 41 (SB41), effective January 2012, is a human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus prevention measure designed to expand syringe access among injection drug users (IDUs) by allowing pharmacies to sell syringes without a prescription. This study assesses self-reported implementation of SB41 and characterizes barriers amenable to intervention. DESIGN: Interviewer-administered survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Fresno and Kern Counties, CA. Pharmacists and other pharmacy staff (n = 404) at 212 pharmacies. OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported nonprescription pharmacy sales to known or suspected IDUs. RESULTS: Overall, 29.3% of participants said their pharmacy would sell nonprescription syringes to a known or suspected IDU, whereas a far higher proportion (79.3%) would sell nonprescription syringes to a person with diabetes. More than one-half said that their pharmacy requires nonprescription syringe purchasers to enter their signature and name and address in a log book although that is not required under SB41. Fewer than 2 out of 3 participants (61.1%) knew that it is legal to sell nonprescription syringes to IDUs. That knowledge, as well as having syringe sales practices based on both store policy and discretion, were positively associated with IDU syringe sales after controlling for other factors. Working at an independent pharmacy, agreeing that only people with "medical conditions" such as diabetes should be able to buy syringes, and viewing syringe sales to IDUs as "not good business" were independently but negatively associated with IDU syringe sales. CONCLUSION: This study complements an earlier syringe purchase trial documenting low participation in voluntary nonprescription syringe sales under SB41 in Fresno and Kern Counties. In the absence of legislation requiring mandatory syringe sales, interventions should be developed to increase knowledge of the law and frame addiction as a medical condition, with a special focus on independent pharmacies. Informational interventions should stress the need to eliminate log book documentation requirements, which may serve as a barrier to IDU purchase.


Asunto(s)
Comercio/economía , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/economía , Consumidores de Drogas , Farmacias/economía , Farmacéuticos/economía , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/economía , Jeringas/economía , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , California/epidemiología , Comercio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Consumidores de Drogas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/economía , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Política de Salud , Hepatitis C/economía , Hepatitis C/prevención & control , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Farmacéuticos/psicología , Opinión Pública , Autoinforme , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/epidemiología , Volición
8.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 57(6): 670-676.e1, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28823544

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The states of California and Massachusetts are leading the effort to prohibit the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies in the United States. The process of adopting these tobacco-free pharmacy laws remains understudied. This study qualitatively explores the process of adopting and enforcing tobacco-free pharmacy laws. METHODS: Researchers performed qualitative semistructured telephone interviews with 23 key informants who were involved in the effort to adopt and implement tobacco-free pharmacy laws in California and Massachusetts. A content analysis was used to study the process of adopting tobacco-free pharmacy laws as well as barriers and facilitators during the process. Two researchers independently coded the interview transcripts and written responses to identify key categories and themes that emerged from the interviews. RESULTS: The qualitative study results suggest that the process of adopting the tobacco-free pharmacy laws was fairly smooth, with a few barriers. Local youth groups and independent pharmacies played an important role in raising public awareness and attracting media attention. The results also highlighted the need to regulate the sale of e-cigarettes as a part of tobacco-free pharmacy laws. CONCLUSION: As the number of cities that have adopted tobacco-free pharmacy laws grows, banning tobacco sales in pharmacies is becoming less controversial and more normative to both pharmacy retailers and the public. Our findings inform the ongoing discussion about tobacco-free pharmacy laws and are useful for decision-makers from communities that are considering such laws.


Asunto(s)
Comercio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Farmacias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Productos de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Concienciación , California , Comercio/economía , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/economía , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Política de Salud/economía , Promoción de la Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Massachusetts , Farmacias/economía , Farmacéuticos/economía , Farmacéuticos/psicología , Formulación de Políticas , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Opinión Pública , Investigación Cualitativa , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Productos de Tabaco/economía , Productos de Tabaco/provisión & distribución
9.
Rev Hist Pharm (Paris) ; 65(393): 65-76, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29611669

RESUMEN

The aim of this article is to present the history of pharmacy in Portugal during the first half of the twentieth century, considering two contemporary issues : the industrialization of medicines in Portugal, with regard to law and regulation of medicines and professional activity (emphasizing community pharmacy) and other relevant issues concerning pharmacy and public health.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/historia , Industria Farmacéutica/historia , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Industria Farmacéutica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Historia de la Farmacia , Historia del Siglo XX , Servicios Farmacéuticos/historia , Servicios Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Portugal
10.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 41(1): 1-6, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25490606

RESUMEN

Society in America, like many others, continues to wrestle with the problem of misuse and abuse of prescription opioids. The implications of this struggle are widespread and involve many individuals and institutions including healthcare policymakers. State Medicaid pharmacy programs, in particular, undergo significant scrutiny of their programs to curtail this problem. While recent efforts have been made by government agencies to both quantify and offer methods for curbing this issue, it still falls to each state's policymakers to protect its resources and the population it serves from the consequences of misuse and abuse. This paper details the history of one state Medicaid's management of this issue at the pharmacy benefit level. Examples of various methods employed and the results are outlined and commentary is provided for each method. Regardless of the methods used to address this issue, the problem must still be a priority at all levels, not just for payers.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/provisión & distribución , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos , Política de Salud , Humanos , Legislación de Medicamentos , Medicaid , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias , Estados Unidos
11.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 55(4): 398-404, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26115380

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of a 2009 policy change in British Columbia (BC) that allowed pharmacists to independently renew certain prescriptions for chronic conditions. DESIGN: Population-based analysis. SETTING: BC, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All residents of BC (more than 3.9 million). INTERVENTION: Prescription drug use data were collected from the PharmaNet database. This database contains a record of all ambulatory prescription drug dispensations in BC including a variable indicating whether a pharmacist renewed the prescription. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We studied pharmaceutical and physician insurance claims datasets for all BC residents for 2 years following the 2009 policy change. We assessed the number and types of drugs renewed by pharmacists, and whether these complied with the policy. Further, we matched pharmacist-renewed prescriptions to equivalent potentially renewable prescriptions and assessed the impact on ambulatory physician visits. RESULTS: Over the first 2 years, pharmacists renewed 150,950 prescriptions in BC. Almost one-half of these renewals did not appear to match the conditions set out in the new regulatory policy (n = 69,970, 47%). Those that did match the conditions (n = 80,980, 53%) represented a very small proportion of the 47 million prescriptions that pharmacists could have renewed (0.17%). The most frequently renewed medications were treatments for dyslipidemias, hypertension, diabetes, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Pharmacist-renewed prescriptions were preceded by a 30% relative decrease in ambulatory physician visits in the week before dispensing, but there was also a 17% relative increase in visits in the week following the pharmacist-renewed prescription. CONCLUSION: Overall, the use of pharmacist renewals was very low and one-half of the renewals were not policy-concordant. Pharmacist renewals were associated with the intended reductions in physician visits before dispensing, but there was also an unintended increase in visits after dispensing. These findings suggest that future policies such as this one need to be differently designed and closely monitored.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Atención a la Salud , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Farmacéuticos , Rol Profesional , Colombia Británica , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/normas , Bases de Datos Factuales , Atención a la Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención a la Salud/normas , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Legislación Farmacéutica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Visita a Consultorio Médico , Farmacéuticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Farmacéuticos/normas , Formulación de Políticas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo
12.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 55(1): 31-40, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25575149

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess implementation of California Senate Bill SB41 in two inland California counties where prevalence of injection drug use is among the highest in the nation. DESIGN: Syringe purchase trial. SETTING: Fresno and Kern counties, California. PARTICIPANTS: All 248 community pharmacies in the counties. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Successful or unsuccessful syringe purchase attempt. RESULTS: Only 52 (21.0%) syringe purchase attempts were successful. The proportion of successful attempts did not vary by county or by data collector ethnicity. The most common reasons for unsuccessful syringe purchase attempts were prescription requirements (45.7%), the requested syringe size was not available (10.7%), and the pharmacy did not sell syringes (9.7%). In addition, some syringe purchase attempts (4.1%) were unsuccessful because the data collector was asked to purchase more syringes than allowed by law. Although 80% and 78% of Fresno and Kern residents, respectively, live within a 5-minute drive of a community pharmacy, less than one-half live within a 5-minute drive of a community pharmacy that sold syringes. CONCLUSION: SB41 has not resulted in broad pharmacy-based syringe access in California's inland counties, where a disproportionate number of cases of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections are associated with injection drug use. Additional steps by legislative bodies, regulatory agencies, and professional organizations are needed to actively engage pharmacies in expanding nonprescription syringe sales to reduce HIV transmission among injection drug users.


Asunto(s)
Comercio/economía , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/economía , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Farmacéuticos/economía , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/epidemiología , Jeringas/economía , Actitud del Personal de Salud , California/epidemiología , Competencia Clínica , Comercio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/economía , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Farmacéuticos/psicología , Rol Profesional , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/economía
13.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 54(3): 285-8, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24770374

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the extent to which state and national professional pharmacy associations have implemented formal policies addressing the sale of tobacco and alcohol products in community pharmacies. METHODS: To determine existence of tobacco and alcohol policies, national professional pharmacy associations (n = 10) and state-level pharmacy associations (n = 86) affiliated with the American Pharmacists Association (APhA) and/or the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) were contacted via telephone and/or e-mail, and a search of the association websites was conducted. RESULTS: Of 95 responding associations (99%), 14% have a formal policy opposing the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies and 5% have a formal policy opposing the sale of alcohol in pharmacies. Of the associations representing major tobacco-producing states, 40% have a formal policy against tobacco sales in pharmacies, significantly more than the 8% of non-tobacco state associations with such policies. CONCLUSION: Among national professional pharmacy associations, only APhA and ASHP have formal policy statements opposing the sale of both tobacco and alcohol in pharmacies. Most state-level professional pharmacy associations affiliated with these two national organizations have no formal policy statement or position.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholes/efectos adversos , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Nicotiana/efectos adversos , Farmacias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Asociación , Política de Salud , Humanos , Estados Unidos
14.
J Urban Health ; 90(2): 276-83, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22718357

RESUMEN

The two main legal sources of clean needles for illicit injection drug users (IDUs) in California are syringe exchange programs (SEPs) and nonprescription syringe sales (NPSS) at pharmacies. In 2004, California became one of the last states to allow NPSS. To evaluate the implementation of NPSS and the California Disease Prevention Demonstration Project (DPDP), we conducted syringe purchase tests in San Francisco (SF) and Los Angeles (LA) between March and July of 2010. Large differences in implementation were observed in the two cities. In LA, less than one-quarter of the enrolled pharmacies sold syringes to our research assistant (RA), and none sold a single syringe. The rate of successful purchase in LA is the lowest reported in any syringe purchase test. In both sites, there was notable variation among the gauge size available, and price and quantity of syringes required for a purchase. None of the DPDP pharmacies in LA or SF provided the requisite health information. The findings suggest that more outreach needs to be conducted with pharmacists and pharmacy staff. The pharmacies' failure to disseminate the educational materials may result in missed opportunities to provide needed harm reduction information to IDUs. The varied prices and required quantities may serve as a barrier to syringe access among IDUs. Future research needs to examine reasons why pharmacies do not provide the mandated information, whether the omission of disposal options is indicative of pharmacies' reluctance to serve as disposal sites, and if the dual opt-in approach of NPSS/DPDP is a barrier to pharmacy enrollment.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Jeringas/provisión & distribución , Comercio , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Los Angeles , Programas de Intercambio de Agujas , Investigación Cualitativa , San Francisco , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa , Jeringas/economía
17.
Acta Pol Pharm ; 70(2): 339-43, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23614291

RESUMEN

On January 1, 2012, the law of 12 May 2011 on the reimbursement of medicines, food products of special nutritional purpose and medicinal products, intended to tighten up the reimbursement system, came into force in Poland. The new legislative act has significantly altered the previous principles of retail marketing of products subject to publicly financed reimbursement. First of all, the prices of reimbursed products have been unified through the introduction of fixed margins and prices and a ban--completely unknown until now--on using free market sales practices. These regulations are intended to lead to the abolition of price competition and its replacement with competition as to the quality of services provided by pharmacies. At the same time, entities engaged in retail marketing of medicinal products have been imposed a number of new obligations and highly repressive penalties for failure to fulfill them. The paper analyzes the legislative changes and points out the consequences, both those which can already be seen and the predictable ones. The assumed priority and criterion of evaluation of the reimbursement policy in question is its impact on the functioning of pharmacies which, according to the premises of Polish pharmaceutical law, should play the role of public health protection institutions.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Política de Salud/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Costos , Costos de los Medicamentos , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Competencia Económica , Costos de la Atención en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Motivación , Polonia , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía
18.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 17(3): 197-204, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22497265

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Emergency contraception (EC) has been freely accessible in Swiss pharmacies since November 2002. Today some groups are still concerned that free access might result in less use of efficient contraceptive methods, overuse and more risky sexual behaviour. METHODS: Profiles of EC users one and six years after deregulation were analysed with regard to age, contraceptive methods used, reasons for EC use, and last contact with a gynaecologist. Data were collected from a centrally located pharmacy. Written official assessment forms concerning 1500 women (750 in 2004 and 750 in 2009) were analysed. RESULTS: Free access to EC use had no impact on regular contraceptive behaviour. The percentage of pill and condom users was very high (85%). The percentage of EC-users without any contraception (17-18%) was the same over the years. In 2009, condom rupture was reported more frequently (p < 0.001). In addition significantly more women had used EC previously in their history. CONCLUSION: Free access to EC has not resulted in less use of efficient contraceptive methods. In the context of falling abortion rates our results are reassuring. This also applies to adolescents, who mainly used EC as a back-up method and seldom in the context of unprotected intercourse.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Anticoncepción Postcoital , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Sexual , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suiza
19.
Ceska Slov Farm ; 60(6): 269-75, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Checo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22312849

RESUMEN

In the Czech Republic, special non-prescription over-the-counter (OTC) drugs are defined as the preparations which, according to their registration, can be sold over the counter without a prescription outside pharmacies. The paper outlines the development of the question of human and veterinary OTC drugs (lists of special OTC drugs, good practice of sellers of special OTC drugs) and compares the number and structure (indication group, selected medicinal products, dosage form) of human and veterinary drugs included into this group.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicamentos sin Prescripción , Animales , República Checa , Humanos , Drogas Veterinarias
20.
Expert Rev Mol Diagn ; 21(8): 751-755, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34130575

RESUMEN

Introduction: Pharmacy-based point-of-care testing has long had the potential to improve patient access to timely care, but adoption has been slowed by financial and regulatory barriers. The COVID-19 pandemic reduced or temporarily eliminated many of the barriers to pharmacy-based testing. This review examines how the changes brought on by may impact pharmacy-based testing after the pandemic.Areas covered: This review searched peer-reviewed, lay, and regulatory literature to explore the implementation of pharmacy-based COVID-19 testing. This includes a review of regulatory and financial changes that removed barriers to testing. Additionally, it reviews the literature related to the growth of pharmacy-based testing.Expert opinion: It is clear that the COVID-19 pandemic created an awareness and opportunity for pharmacy-based point-of-care testing. The changes made in response to the pandemic have the potential to increase the role of pharmacy-based testing, but additional regulatory changes and wider pharmacy adoption are still needed to maximize the value of such services.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19 , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/organización & administración , COVID-19/epidemiología , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/economía , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/economía , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mecanismo de Reembolso
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA