Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation vs Solifenacin or Standard Urotherapy for Overactive Bladder Dry in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: We investigated the efficacy and safety of high-dose vitamin D supplementation (VDS) plus standard urotherapy (SU) in managing overactive bladder dry in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3-arm, randomized clinical trial was performed at an academic center in China between January 2023 and June 2023. Eligible patients (n=303) were randomized to receive 8 weeks of high-dose VDS (vitamin D3 drops encapsulated as soft capsules, 2400 IU/d) plus SU (VDS + SU group; n=100), solifenacin (5-10 mg/d) plus SU (SOL + SU group; n=102), or SU alone (SU group; n=101). Reduction in voiding frequency was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes encompassed improvement in urgency, nocturia, quality of life score, pediatric lower urinary tract symptom score, and participant satisfaction. Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded within each group. RESULTS: Participants had a median age of 82.0 months and their baseline mean vitamin D level was 22.64 ng/mL. The VDS + SU group showed greater improvements in voids/d than the SOL + SU group (median difference 3.0; 95% CI, 2.0 to 3.5; P < .001) and the SU group (median difference 4.0; 95% CI, 3.0 to 5.0; P < .001) after intervention. The VDS + SU group also showed the greatest improvement in quality of life and pediatric lower urinary tract symptom scores. Patient satisfaction was similar between the SOL + SU and SU groups. The VDS + SU group did not exhibit a heightened risk of treatment-emergent adverse events compared to the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose VDS plus SU was effective and well-tolerated in managing overactive bladder dry in children, suggesting its potential as a novel therapeutic option for this population.

Separation and simultaneous estimation of enantiomers and Diastereomers of muscarinic receptor antagonist Solifenacin using stability-indicating Normal-phase HPLC technique with chiral stationary phase amylose tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate).

The R,S-enantiomer impurity and diastereomer impurities (S,S-isomer and R,R-isomer) of the solifenacin (S,R-enantiomer) were effectively separated and quantified simultaneously utilizing normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with a chiral stationary phase consisting of amylose tris (3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) coated on silica-gel (Chiralpak, AD-H). The enantiomeric and stereo-selective separation was achieved within a run time of 35 minutes using a mobile phase of 'n-hexane, ethanol, and diethylamine' in an isocratic elution mode with a detection wavelength of 220 nm. The validation attributes assessed were accuracy (which showed excellent recoveries between 97.5% and 100.4%) and linearity (which was proven in the range of 0.081-1.275 µg.mL-1 , with a linear regression of 0.999). The stress testing experiments proved that the developed methodology by the HPLC technique has stability-indicating characteristics, as all closely eluting peak pairs were separated well with a resolution of 2.3 and without any interference. The proposed methodology was highly efficient in separating and simultaneously determining the chiral impurities (enantiomers and diastereomers) of the solifenacin in the release and stability sample analyses of drug substances and tablets in pharmaceutical formulations.

Efficacy and safety of solifenacin combined with biofeedback in children with overactive bladder.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder is a common chronic urological disorder in children, liable to impact normal social activities, disrupt sleep and even impair self-esteem. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of solifenacin combined with biofeedback for paediatric overactive bladder. METHOD: Forty-five children with overactive bladder were enrolled and divided into three groups: 15 patients in Group A were treated with solifenacin, 15 cases in Group B with biofeedback, and the other 15 patients in Group C with the combination of solifenacin plus biofeedback. Each group was subdivided into the non-urge incontinence (non-UI) and urge incontinence (UI) groups. The remission rates were compared among the three groups at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks from the beginning of treatment. The side effects of solifenacin were recorded and followed up. RESULT: After 2 weeks since initial treatment, the complete response rates were 33.3% (5/15), 20.0% (3/15), and 53.3% (8/15) in the three groups. At 4 weeks, the complete remission rates were 46.7% (7/15), 33.3% (5/15), and 60.0% (9/15) respectively. Moreover, the complete remission rates of the UI groups were higher than the non-UI groups (p < 0.05). At 8 weeks, the complete response rates were 53.3% (8/15), 40.0% (6/15), and 67.7% (10/15). At 12 weeks, the complete response rates were 67.8% (10/15), 60.0% (9/15), and 86.7% (13/15). The complete response rates were higher and urodynamic parameters were improved obviously in group C than the other two groups (p < 0.05) during the follow-ups. The median voiding frequency decreased and median functional bladder capacity increased obviously in Group C after 4 weeks (p < 0.05). Dry mouth was observed in 2 patients (4.4%). 2 patients experienced constipation (4.4%), and neither case was severe. The symptoms of these four patients had relieved by reducing the dose of solifenacin. CONCLUSION: Solifenacin combined with biofeedback had good efficacy and compliance for children experiencing overactive bladder. It took only 2 weeks to achieve the complete response rate over 50%, especially for the improvement of UI symptoms.

Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Peroneal Electrical Transcutaneous Neuromodulation vs Solifenacin in Treatment-naïve Patients With Overactive Bladder.

PURPOSE: We investigated the safety and efficacy of peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation using the URIS neuromodulation system in a home-based setting in comparison with standard treatment using solifenacin in treatment-naïve female patients with overactive bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients were screened, of whom 77 were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to 12 weeks of treatment with daily peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation or solifenacin 5 mg. The primary endpoint was safety; efficacy assessments included proportion of responders, defined as subjects with ≥50% reduction in bladder diary-derived variables; Overactive Bladder-Validated 8-question Screener, and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions questionnaire; and treatment satisfaction after 12 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Seventy-one out of 77 randomized patients completed the study. In the peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation group 6/51 (12%) patients reported a treatment-related adverse event vs 12/25 (48%) in the solifenacin group (P < .001). No clinically significant changes were observed in any other safety endpoint. The proportions of responders in the peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation group vs the solifenacin group were 87% vs 74% with respect to Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale grade 3 urgency episodes, 87% vs 75% with respect to grade 3+4 urgency episodes, and 90% vs 94% with respect to urgency incontinence episodes. In post hoc analyses we observed significant improvement over time in multiple efficacy variables in both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation is a safe and effective method for overactive bladder treatment associated with a significantly lower incidence of treatment-related adverse events compared to solifenacin and a considerably better benefit-risk profile.

Pharmacological Management of Ureteral Stent-related Symptoms: A Systematic Review, Bayesian Network Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression.

PURPOSE: Ureteral stents are commonly used for the treatment of ureteral obstruction, most often urolithiasis. Their use may be associated with significant bothersome symptoms and discomfort. Prior studies have examined the effects of various medication regimens on ureteral stent symptoms. This study utilized Bayesian network meta-analysis to analyze all available evidence on the pharmacological management of ureteral stent-related symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In December 2022 a systematic review was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines on randomized prospective studies on pharmacological management of ureteral stent-related symptoms reporting outcomes using the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire score on urinary symptoms and pain. The data were analyzed in Review Manager 5.3 and R Studio where a Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. Treatments were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve and mean difference vs placebo with 95% credible intervals. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were analyzed. These were used to build networks which were modeled to run 100,000 Markov Chain Montecarlo simulations each. Drug-class analysis revealed the most effective class for each domain: for urinary symptoms, sexual performance, general health, and work performance-combined α-blocker and anticholinergic and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors; for pain-combined anticholinergic and pregabalin. The following were the most effective drugs and dosages for specific symptoms: for urinary symptoms-combined silodosin 8 mg+solifenacin 10 mg; for pain-combined silodosin 8 mg+solifenacin 10 mg; for sexual performance-tadalafil 5 mg. Combined silodosin 8 mg+solifenacin 10 mg+tadalafil 5 mg has the best general health scores while solifenacin 10 mg had the best work experience scores. CONCLUSIONS: This network meta-analysis demonstrated that the most effective drug therapy is different for each symptom domain. It is important to consider a patient's chief complaint and domains in order to ascertain the optimal medication regimen for each patient. Further iterations of this analysis can be strengthened by trials that directly compare more of these drugs instead of relying on indirect evidence.

Real world co-prescribing contraindicated drugs with fluconazole and itraconazole.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate co-prescribing of contraindicated drugs with fluconazole and itraconazole using real-world nationwide data. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed using claims data collected by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) of Korea during 2019-2020. To determine the drugs that should be avoided in patients taking fluconazole or itraconazole, Lexicomp® and Micromedex® were used. The co-prescribed medications, co-prescription rates, and potential clinical consequences of the contraindicated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 197 118 prescriptions of fluconazole, 2847 co-prescriptions with drugs classified as contraindicated DDI by either Micromedex® or Lexicomp® were identified. Further, of the 74 618 prescriptions of itraconazole, 984 co-prescriptions with contraindicated DDI were identified. Solifenacin (34.9%), clarithromycin (18.1%), alfuzosin (15.1%), and donepezil (10.4%) were frequently found in the co-prescriptions of fluconazole, whereas tamsulosin (40.4%), solifenacin (21.3%), rupatadine (17.8%), and fluconazole (8.8%) were frequently found in the co-prescriptions of itraconazole. In 1105 and 95 co-prescriptions of fluconazole and itraconazole, accounting for 31.3% of all co-prescriptions, potential DDIs were associated with a risk of corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation. Of the total 3831 co-prescriptions, 2959 (77.2%) and 785 (20.5%) were classified as contraindicated DDI by Micromedex® alone and by Lexicomp® alone, respectively, whereas 87 (2.3%) were classified as contraindicated DDI by both Micromedex® and Lexicomp®. CONCLUSIONS: Many co-prescriptions were associated with the risk of DDI-related QTc prolongation, warranting the attention of healthcare providers. Narrowing the discrepancy between databases that provide information on DDIs is required for optimized medicine usage and patient safety.

Urobiome changes differ based on OAB treatment in adult females.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Representatives of two classes of oral medication are often used to treat urgency urinary incontinence (UUI): solifenacin, an M3-receptor-selective antimuscarinic, and mirabegron, a beta-3 agonist. Two previous asynchronous drug-specific studies suggested different interactions between these medications and the urobiome despite identical methodologies, including recruitment, sample procurement, medication dose escalation strategy, determination of 12-week responders versus nonresponders, and data collection. This analysis compares data from these two studies using a uniform analytic approach. METHODS: Urine was collected aseptically via transurethral catheter from consenting participants for subsequent processing by the Expanded Quantitative Urine Culture (EQUC) protocol in two cohorts (n=50 and n=47) that were demographically similar. Species accumulation curves were generated to compare the total number of unique species detected. Indices that measure richness, evenness, and/or abundance were used to compare alpha (within sample) diversity. The Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity Index was used to determine between sample (beta) diversity. RESULTS: The majority of the 40 species detected in the pre-treatment urobiomes were detected in both cohorts. Both pre-treatment urobiomes were substantially similar in species richness, evenness, and diversity. Differences in pre-treatment urobiomes were associated with treatment response for solifenacin-treated participants only. In contrast, the pre-treatment urobiomes of mirabegron-treated participants were not associated with treatment response. Changes in the post-treatment urobiomes were detected in both cohorts with an increase in richness for both solifenacin (5-mg dose only) and mirabegron. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment urobiome characteristics were associated with treatment response in participants treated with solifenacin, but not mirabegron. Differences exist in urobiome response after treatment with two medications that have known differences in mechanism of action.

Efficacy of frankincense-based herbal product in urinary incontinence: A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled clinical trial.

Urinary incontinence is a silent epidemic that has a serious impact on a person's quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of frankincense-based herbal product (FHP) in urinary incontinence compared with placebo and solifenacin. In this randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 120 postmenopausal women with mixed urinary incontinence were randomized to one of the three groups of FHP, placebo, and standard treatment (solifenacin). Frequency, amount of leakage, and score of urinary incontinence as well as the QOL were measured at the end of the second and fourth weeks and 2 weeks after the interruption of the treatment. The ICIQ-UI SF and I-QOL questionnaires were used for the measurements. Mean frequency of urinary incontinence and amount of leakage significantly decreased in the FHP and solifenacin groups in the fourth week compared to the placebo group. In addition, 2 weeks after treatment completion, the effects of the FHP were significant compared to the solifenacin group. Due to the effect of FHP on improving the QOL and also the prolonged effect of this drug, the use of FHP in urinary incontinence, as a complementary treatment could be suggested.

Comparative assessment of efficacy and safety of approved oral therapies for overactive bladder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

bladder based on a systematic review and network meta-analysis approach. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials databases were systematically searched. The search time frame was from database creation to June 2, 2022. Randomized controlled double-blind trials of oral medication for overactive bladder were screened against the protocol's entry criteria. Trials were evaluated for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, and data were statistically analyzed using Stata 16.0 software. RESULT: A total of 60 randomized controlled double-blind clinical trials were included involving 50,333 subjects. Solifenacin 10mg was the most effective in mean daily micturitions and incontinence episodes, solifenacin 5/10mg in mean daily urinary urgency episodes and nocturia episodes, fesoterodine 8mg in urgency incontinence episodes/d and oxybutynin 5mg in voided volume/micturition. In terms of safety, solifenacin 5mg, ER-tolterodine 4mg, mirabegron, vibegron and ER-oxybutynin 10mg all showed a better incidence of dry mouth, fesoterodine 4mg, ER-oxybutynin 10mg, tolterodine 2mg, and vibegron in the incidence of constipation. Compared to placebo, imidafenacin 0.1mg showed a significantly increased incidence in hypertension, solifenacin 10mg in urinary tract infection, fesoterodine 4/8mg and darifenacin 15mg in headache. CONCLUSION: Solifenacin showed better efficacy. For safety, most anticholinergic drugs were more likely to cause dry mouth and constipation, lower doses were better tolerated. The choice of drugs should be tailored to the patient's specific situation to find the best balance between efficacy and safety.

HYPERACTIVE BLADDER SYNDROME SECONDARY TO BAROTRAUMA AND CHRONIC STRESS.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To improve the results of treatment of hyperactive bladder syndrome in men of working age on the background of barotrauma and stress, as a consequence of combat trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: An analysis of the questionnaire and the results of the clinical examination of 32 patients, injured servicemen and people who were injured in combat zones was carried out. The drug solifenacin succinate was used in the treatment complex, which is a specific antagonist of M3 subtype cholinergic receptors. Its influence allows you to achieve relaxation of the bladder detrusor and reduce the contractility of hyperactive bladder. RESULTS: Results: The main criterion for the effectiveness of the treatment was a decrease in the number of urgent cases, the frequency of urination and manifestations of nocturia by 50% or more, which was considered a positive effect. At the same time, the positive effect was differentiated as follows : an improvement of these parameters by 75% or more from the initial value which is a good result; reduction of symptoms in the range of 50-75% is satisfactory; less than 50% is an unsatisfactory result. A positive effect from the treatment after 8 weeks was observed in 88% of patients, of which 52% had a good result and 36% had a satisfactory result. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The proposed complex of treatment of hyperactive bladder syndrome as a result of combat trauma against the background of barotrauma with neurological consequences and chronic stress allows to achieve a pronounced clinical effect in the vast majority of male patients of working age. And the diagnostic complex allows you to emphasize aspects of clinical vigilance, both for doctors of a specialized branch and of doctors of a general direction.

[Assessment of prescribing practices in overactive bladder pharmacotherapy across different specialties of India: a prescription trend analysis].

PURPOSE: To assess the prescribing practices for overactive bladder (OAB) pharmacotherapy based on the prescription trend analysis across different specialties of India. METHOD: s: IQVIA (Quintiles and IMS Health) secondary sales audit (SSA), as well as a prescription audit for antimuscarinics and beta-3 adrenoceptor agonists (mirabegron) from 2014 to 2021, were analyzed. The data includes SSA data of various antimuscarinics like solifenacin, oxybutynin, tolterodine, darifenacin, trospium and mirabegron change in the prescription trend of antimuscarinics and mirabegron across different specialties; prescribers overlap analysis for solifenacin and mirabegron among Indian urologists were also analyzed. RESULTS: Urologists prescription rates of OAB drugs were 65% in 2016 and 54% in 2021. The rate of OAB medication prescription by non-urologist was highest from the surgeon (11%), followed by gynecologists (9%) and consultant physicians (8%) in 2021. In addition, among OAB medication prescription rates for antimuscarinics were 100% in 2016 and 58% in 2021 whereas for mirabegron, it was 0% in 2016 and 42% in 2021. Solifenacin was most frequently prescribed anticholinergics, followed by oxybutynin, tolterodine, darifenacin, and trospium. The proportion of prescribers of OAB medication among urologists was 38% in 2016 and 33% in 2021. Exclusive prescribers of solifenacin were 748 in 2018 and 739 in 2021 at the urologist, whereas for mirabegron, it was 961 in 2018 and 934 in 2021. The compound annual growth rate for prescription of the last 6 years (from 2016-2021) for solifenacin and mirabegron was -3% and 8% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Urology remained a top prescribing specialty for OAB drugs, although prescription share increased at surgeon and consultant physician. OAB medicines prescriptions by urologists are shifting from leading antimuscarinic solifenacin to beta-agonist mirabegron. Data from this study will ultimately lead to the OAB medication preference by the specialist that could lead to more advanced OAB management.

Dementia Associated with Anticholinergic Drugs Used for Overactive Bladder: A Nested Case-Control Study Using the French National Medical-Administrative Database.

PURPOSE: We analyzed the relationship between use of anticholinergic drugs to treat overactive bladder (OAB) and risk of incident dementia in older patients, overall and for each drug separately. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study using the French National Medical-Administrative Database. We identified incident dementia cases and controls from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2018 in individuals aged ≥60 years. Controls were matched 5:1 to cases by date of case diagnosis (index date), age, sex, and income. We set a 5-year exposure period ending 2 years before the index date (lag-time period to avoid protopathic bias). We quantified cumulative exposure to flavoxate, oxybutynin, solifenacin, trospium, and fesoterodine using defined daily doses (DDDs). We performed conditional logistic regression analyses adjusted for factors known to be associated with OAB and/or dementia including obesity, diabetes, stroke, coronary heart disease, and psychotic disorders. RESULTS: We analyzed 4,810 cases and 24,050 matched controls with a median age of 82 years. OAB anticholinergic use was associated with an increased risk of dementia (adjusted OR [aOR]=1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.37) with a cumulative dose-response: aOR=1.07 (95% CI 0.91-1.25) for 1-90 DDDs, aOR=1.29 (1.05-1.58) for 91-365 DDDs and aOR=1.48 (1.22-1.80) for >365 DDDs. Considering each OAB anticholinergic separately showed a particularly marked increased risk of dementia for oxybutynin and solifenacin, but no increased risk for trospium. CONCLUSIONS: When treating OAB in older patients, OAB anticholinergics should be used with caution, taking into account the patient's cognitive status, the anticholinergic load, and the different therapeutic options.

Mirabegron vs. solifenacin in control of endoscopically inserted ureteral stent-related symptoms.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Mirabegron vs. solifenacin to treat LUTS resulting from DJ-stent insertion. METHODS: A total of 97 patients who had DJ-stent inserted for urinary stone disease were randomly divided into three groups according to received treatment. Group A took Mirabegron 50 mg daily, group B took solifenacin 5 mg daily from the 4th day after stent placement until the stent was removed, and group C only was hydrated well. All patients were evaluated by USSQ and IPSS at 4th day post-insertion of ureteral stent, follow-up day before removing of stent and post-removal of stent. RESULTS: The USSQ urinary symptom scores at day 4 comparing to day of removal of stent showed significant difference in between study groups (32 ± 6-13 ± 6 vs. 31 ± 6-14 ± 4 in Mirabegron and solifenacin, respectively) and without significant difference in control group. The USSQ body pain score significantly decreased in both Mirabegron and solifenacin groups at day of stent removal comparing to day 4 post-insertion of DJ with insignificant decreasing in the control group. Quality of life scores showed significant improving in Mirabegron and solifenacin group, and there was no difference in control group at 4 and 14 days after treatment. No severe complications were observed in either group. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: In our series, we indicate that Mirabegron and solifenacin can be used to improve symptoms caused by the insertion of DJ-stent without significant difference.

Solifenacin Treatment After Intradetrusor Injections With Botulinum Toxin in Patients With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.

BACKGROUND: Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) is treated with antimuscarinics as first-line treatment. For patients with contraindications or unresponsive, intradetrusor injections with botulinum toxin (BoNT) are a safe and effective but expensive option. STUDY QUESTION: Our study evaluated whether adding solifenacin to the intradetrusor injection of BoNT A could boost the effect of BoNT in patients with NDO due to multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury refractory to antimuscarinics alone and/or lead to less frequent injections. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective study on 49 patients assigned alternatively to group A, undergoing BoNT injections, and group B, adding solifenacin. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: We gathered data from urodynamic testing and questionnaire assessments before and 3 months after injections and reinjections. We analyzed 39 patients who achieved total continence and a minimum 24-month follow-up period. RESULTS: After treatment, both groups had statistically significant improvement of overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq) score, post void residue (PVR), and peak detrusor pressure (Pdet). Reinjection was needed after a mean 8.2 months for group A and 11.7 months for group B. We analyzed the improvement rate of parameters compared between the 2 groups-group B had greater OABq score improvement (A = 17.25 ± 5.07, B = 20.44 ± 4.51, P = 0.0485), as well as for maximum bladder capacity (A = 11.05 ± 7.04 mL, B = 19.39 ± 6.43 mL, P = 0.0005); differences in Pdet change (A = 51.72 ± 16.57 cmH 2 O, B = 50.80 ± 16.33 cmH 2 O, P = 0.7635) and PVR change (A = 17.67 ± 12.63 mL, B = 12.30 ± 8.32 mL, P = 0.126) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that adding solifenacin improves patient satisfaction, increases the interval between reinjections, thus lowering costs, and improves maximum bladder capacity. Pdet was kept in safe ranges, but no statistically significant conclusions could be drawn regarding Pdet and PVR decrease related to adding solifenacin. Although our study is limited by the small series of patients and lack of randomization and placebo control group, the BoNT-solifenacin combination could be considered in NDO in terms of cost-effectiveness. Further studies would be beneficial.

Risk of delirium associated with antimuscarinics in older adults: A case-time-control study.

BACKGROUND: Older adults are at an increased risk of delirium because of age, polypharmacy, multiple comorbidities and acute illness. Antimuscarinics are the backbone of the pharmacological management of overactive bladder. However, the safety profiles of antimuscarinics vary because of their dissimilarities to muscarinic receptor-subtype affinities and are associated with differential central anticholinergic adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine delirium risk in new users of oxybutynin and solifenacin in older adults (≥ 65 years). In the secondary analyses, we examined the risk of delirium by type and dose of antimuscarinic. METHOD: We applied a case-time-control design to investigate delirium risk in older adults who started taking oxybutynin and solifenacin. We used a nationwide inpatient hospital data (2005-2016), National Minimum Data Set, maintained by the Ministry of Health, New Zealand (NZ), to identify older adults with a new-onset diagnosis of delirium. Eligible patients were older adults aged 65 at entry into the cohort on 1/1/2006. We used dispensing claims data to determine antimuscarinic treatment exposure. The antimuscarinic included in the study were new users of oxybutynin and solifenacin. These two antimuscarinics are subsidised by the Pharmaceutical Management Agency and are the most frequently used antimuscarinic in NZ. A conditional logistic regression model was used to compute matched odds ratios (MORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In the case-time-control design, we made separate analyses to evaluate the dose-response risk of delirium. RESULTS: We identified 4818 individuals (mean age 82.14) from 2005 to 2015 with incident delirium and were exposed to at least one of the antimuscarinic of interest. The case-time-control matched odds ratio (MOR) for delirium with oxybutynin was (2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-3.96). Solifenacin was not associated with delirium (0.89 95%CI 0.64-1.23). In the sensitivity analyses, the case-time-control MOR for delirium using a shorter risk period (0-3 days) did not change the results. The dose-response risk of delirium was significant for oxybutynin (0.05, 95%CI 0.02-0.08) but not for solifenacin (-0.01, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.00). In addition, in the subgroup analyses, a statistically significant association of delirium was found for oxybutynin but not for solifenacin in the non-dementia cohort (2.11,95% CI 1.08-4.13) and the dementia cohort (1.25, 95%CI 0.05-26.9). CONCLUSION: The study found that oxybutynin but not solifenacin is associated with a risk of new-onset delirium in older adults. The higher blockade of M1 and M2 receptors by oxybutynin is likely to contribute to delirium than solifenacin, which is highly selective for the M3 receptor subtype. Therefore, the treatment choice with an M3 selective agent must be given due consideration, particularly in those with pre-existing cognitive impairment.

Two green chromatographic methods for the quantification of tamsulosin and solifenacin along with four of their impurities.

Modern analytical procedures often include impurity profiling to verify the potency, safety, and effectiveness of new formulations. We had to develop techniques based on green analysis since the detrimental influence of solvents and chemicals on the environment has now become a serious concern. Two selective, sensitive, and green liquid chromatography methods were established and fully validated for quantitation of tamsulosin hydrochloride and solifenacin succinate along with four of their official and/or related impurities namely; tamsulosin sulfonic acid, tamsulosin impurity H, solifenacin impurity A and solifenacin impurity C. The first used high-performance thin-layer chromatography with silica gel 60 F254 plates as the stationary phase and an elution system of ethyl acetate:butanol:glacial acetic acid (10.0:0.4:0.1, by volume) and a scanning wavelength of 225.0 nm. The second method depended on HPLC with diode array detection. Chromatographic separation was accomplished on a Zorbax SB C18 (250 × 4.6 mm2 , 5 µm) column utilizing a mixture of 10.0 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate (pH 3.0, adjusted by o-phosphoric acid) and methanol, at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min in a gradient elution mode and then the separated peaks were scanned at a wavelength of 225.0 nm. To assess the greenness profile, three distinct methodologies were applied.

Solifenacin-induced acute urticaria and angioedema: a rare adverse effect.

Antimuscarinics are first-line medication for management of overactive bladder with solifenacin being commonly prescribed. Angioedema is the swelling of mucosa and submucosal tissue. There are no published case reports of drug-induced angioedema involving solifenacin. We report a case of a 41-year-old man with spinal cord injury who presented with oedema of face, lips, tongue and associated pruritic urticaria after taking 5 mg of solifenacin. All other possible causes including food allergy, insect bite, hereditary angioedema, use of NSAIDs, ACE inhibitors and antibiotics were ruled out. The temporal association between solifenacin and angioedema and complete resolution of symptoms after discontinuing the drug suggest that solifenacin was the most probable cause of angioedema in our patient.

Impact of Bladder Wall Thickness on the Outcomes of Antimuscarinic Treatment in Women with Overactive Bladder.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of bladder wall thickness (BWT) (using transabdominal ultrasound) on the outcomes of antimuscarinic treatment in women with overactive bladder. METHODS: A total of 102 female patients with symptoms of OAB were recruited. All patients completed the Overactive Bladder version 8 (OAB-V8) (Arabic validation) and the International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF). Patients completed the urodynamic study (UDS) including uroflowmetry and PVR and measures of BWT by transabdominal ultrasound. The patients were classified into 2 major groups: G1 (patients with BWT <5 mm) and G2 (patients with BWT ≥5 mm). The patients were re-evaluated after 3-month medication with solifenacin 10-mg oral tablet. RESULTS: At baseline, the results of OAB-V8 and ICIQ-SF were significantly higher in G2 than G1 (p < 0.001). Regarding UDS, volume at 1st desire to void, volume at strong desire to void, and MBC were significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (p = 0.001). Intravesical pressure at strong desire and patients' number of DO were significantly increased in G2 (p < 0.05 and p = 0.001, respectively). After treatment, there was an improvement in both groups regarding OAB-V8, ICIQ-SF, bladder volume at 1st desire to void, bladder volume at strong desire to void, bladder volume at DO, MBC, intravesical pressure at strong desire, and the patients' number with DO (decreased), and these improvements were statistically significant in group 1 compared to group 2 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: BWT showed a significant association with both OAB symptom scores and UDS parameters. The decrease in BWT is associated with a significantly higher response to solifenacin therapy regarding the UDS results.

Therapeutic efficacy and cognitive adverse events of overactive bladder medication in patients with central nervous system Disorders-A cohort study.

PURPOSE: This cohort study evaluates therapeutic efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of various overactive bladder (OAB) medications for patients with central nervous system (CNS) disorders. METHODS: Patients with OAB and CNS disorders were prospectively enrolled. They were randomly allocated to 3 different treatment subgroups: (1) mirabegron 50 mg once daily (2) solifenacin 5 mg per day, and (3) combined solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 50 mg once daily. Efficacy and safety questionnaires and objective parameters were compared among the subgroups, and subgroups between baseline and 3 and 6 months after treatment. AEs, including cognitive dysfunction, were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS: 102 patients (mean age, 71.8 ± 8.7 years) were enrolled, including 35, 36, and 31 patients received mirabegron monotherapy, solifenacin monotherapy, and combination therapy, respectively. OAB symptoms scores all significantly improved 3 months after treatment in different subgroup. However, PVR increased and VE decreased significantly after treatment in patients receiving solifenacin monotherapy and combination therapy. Dry mouth and constipation were the most common AEs, especially in the solifenacin and combination subgroups. Mild incidence of AEs was noted in patients receiving mirabegron monotherapy. No significant change in MMSE was noted among the subgroups after treatment. CONCLUSION: OAB medication had good therapeutic efficacy in patients who had OAB with CNS disorders, especially in cerebrovascular accident and parkinsonism. No OAB medication or their combination affected cognitive function, whereas minimal AEs were noted with mirabegron. Mirabegron could be recommended as the first choice for managing OAB in these patients.

Critical role of hippocampal muscarinic acetylcholine receptors on memory reconsolidation in mice.

Over the years, experimental and clinical evidence has given support to the idea that acetylcholine (Ach) plays an essential role in mnemonic phenomena. On the other hand, the Hippocampus is already known to have a key role in learning and memory. What is yet unclear is how the Ach receptors may contribute to this brain region role during memory retrieval. The Ach receptors are divided into two broad subtypes: the ionotropic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and the metabotropic muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Back in 2010, we demonstrated for the first time the critical role of hippocampal α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in memory reconsolidation process of an inhibitory avoidance response in mice. In the present work, we further investigate the possible implication of hippocampal muscarinic Ach receptors (mAchRs) in this process using a pharmacological approach. By specifically administrating agonists and antagonists of the different mAchRs subtypes in the hippocampus, we found that M1 and M2 but not M3 subtype may be involved in memory reconsolidation processes in mice.