Evaluation of a new portable corneal topography system for self-measurement using smartphones: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Herein, we propose the use of the "KeraVio Ring", which is a portable, selfie-based, smartphone-attached corneal topography system that is based on the Placido ring videokeratoscope. The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare corneal parameters between KeraVio Ring and conventional corneal tomography images. METHODS: We designed the KeraVio Ring as a device comprising 3D-printed LED rings for generating Placido rings that can be attached to a smartphone. Two LED rings are attached to a cone-shaped device, and both corneas are illuminated. Selfies were taken using the KeraVio Ring attached to the smartphone without assistance from any of the examiners. Captured Placido rings on the cornea were analysed by intelligent software to calculate corneal parameters. Patients with normal, keratoconus, or LASIK-treated eyes were included. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) was also performed for each subject. RESULTS: We found highly significant correlations between the steepest and flattest keratometry, corneal astigmatism, and vector components obtained with the KeraVio Ring and AS-OCT. In subjects with normal, keratoconus, and LASIK-treated eyes, the mean difference in corneal astigmatism between the two devices was -0.8 ± 1.4 diopters (D) (95% limits of agreement (LoA), -3.6 to 2.0), -1.8 ± 3.7 D (95% LoA, -9.1 to 5.5), and -1.5 ± 1.3 D (95% LoA, -4.0 to 1.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The experimental results showed that the corneal parameters obtained by the KeraVio Ring were correlated with those obtained with AS-OCT. The KeraVio Ring has the potential to address an unmet need by providing a tool for portable selfie-based corneal topography.

Repeatability assessment of anterior segment measurements in myopic patients using an anterior segment OCT with placido corneal topography and agreement with a swept-source OCT.

BACKGROUND: The precision of anterior segment biometric measurements in eyes has become increasingly important in refractive surgery. The purpose of this study is to assess the repeatability of the automatic measurements provided by a new spectral-domain optical coherence tomograph (SD-OCT)/Placido topographer (MS-39, CSO) and its agreement with a swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) biometer (CASIA SS-1000, Tomey) in patients with myopia. METHODS: The right eye of 235 subjects was scanned 3 times with both devices. The evaluated parameters included central corneal radius of the steep meridian, central corneal radius of the flat meridian, mean central corneal radius, thinnest corneal thickness, central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, corneal volume and diameter. The intraobserver repeatability of the MS-39 measurements was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), within subject standard deviation, coefficient of repeatability, coefficient of variation and repeated-measures analysis of variance of the 3 repeated measurements. The agreement between the two devices was evaluated by 95% limits of agreement (LoA). RESULTS: The majority of the parameters acquired from MS-39 showed high repeatability. The repeatability of corneal diameter was slightly lower than the other measurements, although the ICC remained high. Agreement with the CASIA SS-1000 was good, indicated by the Bland-Altman plots with narrow 95% LoA values for all parameters assessed. CONCLUSIONS: The high repeatability of automatic measurements by the new device supports its clinical application in eyes with myopia, and the good agreement between the two devices indicates they could be used interchangeably for the parameters evaluated.

Comparison of Preoperative Parameter Measurements Using an Optical Biometer, Automated Keratometer, and a Placido-Based Topographer Module.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the agreement of corneal power, corneal astigmatism, axis location, and astigmatic vector component measurements using a Lenstar LS900, a T-cone add-on, and an ARK 1S autorefractor, furthermore, to assess instrument agreement in a subset of astigmatic eyes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of keratometric readings from 3 instruments for 66 eyes undergoing cataract surgery at the Maryland Veterans Affairs Medical Center from November 2014 to 2015. Agreement in corneal power, mean corneal power, axis location, and astigmatic vector components (J0, J45) between devices was evaluated. Comparability was assessed using intraclass correlation, analysis of variance (ANOVA) one-way analysis, Bland-Altman analysis, and power vector analysis. Intraclass correlation was then assessed for a subset of 42 eyes with corneal astigmatism greater than or equal to 1 D. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation between instruments was 0.941 for corneal power, 0.788 for corneal astigmatism, 0.932 for J0, and 0.809 for J45. The ANOVA one-way repeated P values comparing Kf, Ks, Km, corneal astigmatism, axis location, J0, and J45 were all greater than 0.05. Power vector analysis showed nearly all values between instruments to be within ±0.5 D. Finally, the intraclass correlation between instruments in eyes with ≥1 D of corneal astigmatism as measured by the T-cone was 0.946 for corneal power, 0.837 for corneal astigmatism, 0.948 for J0, and 0.950 for J45. CONCLUSIONS: The high level of agreement between all devices indicates the instruments may be used interchangeably. Our data suggest that this may also be true for the subset of eyes with greater than or equal to 1 D in astigmatism, highlighting the toric intraocular lens population.

Comparison of keratometric measurements between color light-emitting diode topography and Scheimpflug camera.

BACKGROUND: To determine the agreement of measurements between color light-emitting diode corneal topography (Cassini) and Scheimpflug camera keratometry (Pentacam HR). METHODS: The current retrospective study investigated 117 right eyes of 117 healthy patients before cataract surgery from June 2017 to July 2017. Steep K, flat K, mean K, astigmatism, and axis for both anterior and posterior corneal surface were measured using the two devices. The measured values were converted into J vectors such as J0 and J45. The mean difference for those measurement values were compared between the two instruments, and the agreement was evaluated using the Bland-Altman plot I. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in mean K (44.21D [43.34 to 45.34] and 44.30D [43.30 to 45.10] by Cassini and Pentacam [P = 0.004]) and astigmatism (0.90D [0.58 to 1.30] and 0.70D [0.40 to 1.30] by Cassini and Pentacam [P = 0.002]) on the anterior corneal surface and flat K (- 6.21D [- 6.39 to - 6.07] and - 6.30D [- 6.5 to - 6.10] by Cassini and Pentacam [P < 0.001]), mean K (- 6.39D [- 6.54 to - 6.25] and - 6.40D [- 6.60 to - 6.30] by Cassini and Pentacam [P = 0.019]), and astigmatism (0.33D [0.22 to 0.47] and 0.30D [0.15 to 0.40] by Cassini and Pentacam [P = 0.002]) on the posterior corneal surface. The mean difference (= Cassini - Pentacam) with 95% limit of agreement for mean K and astigmatism of the anterior corneal surface were 0.082D (- 0.60 to 0.76) and 0.11D (- 0.73 to 0.95) for measurements obtained by the two instruments, respectively. Regarding keratometric values from the posterior corneal surface, the mean differences for flat K, mean K, and astigmatism were - 0.081D (- 0.42 to 0.26), - 0.030D (- 0.32 to 0.26), and 0.067D (- 0.33 to 0.46), respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients for steep K, flat K, mean K, and vector J0 were higher than 0.9 in the anterior cornea. Positive correlation in steep K, flat K, mean K, astigmatism, and J0 was found between two devices in both anterior and posterior cornea (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal refractive power and astigmatism tend to be higher when measured using Cassini than Pentacam HR in both anterior and posterior cornea. The two different devices might not be used interchangeably. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered. Registration number: KC17RESI0439 .

Repeatability of Noninvasive Keratograph 5M Measurements Associated With Contact Lens Wear.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the intrarater repeatability of the measurements of tear meniscus height (TMH), noninvasive keratograph tear break-up time (NIKBUTs), and ocular redness measurements obtained with the Keratograph 5M (K5M) in a sample of soft silicone hydrogel contact lens (CL) wearers over 15 days. METHODS: Prospective study over two consecutive weeks. Three measurements of TMH, NIKBUTs (NIKBUT first and NIKBUT average), and ocular redness were obtained in different sessions; the first day (baseline, at 8 hr of wear, and after lens removal) and the last day of wear-15th day (at 8 hr of wear and after lens removal). The repeatability of measurements were assessed by two intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) forms; single measurement [ICC (2,1)] and multiple measurements (k=3) [ICC (2, k)]. RESULTS: Sixty-four eyes were analyzed. The repeatability of baseline TMH [ICC (2,1) greater than 0.90; coefficient of repeatability (CR)=0.06 mm] and after and during CL wear [ICC (2,k) greater than 0.90; CR≤0.07 mm] were excellent. The repeatability of baseline NIKBUT average [ICC (2,k)=0.89 (0.82-0.93); CR=6.07 sec] was maintained after CL removal but was poorer during CL wear. The repeatability of baseline NIKBUT first [ICC (2,k) =0.80 (0.69-0.87); CR=8.74 sec] was maintained after CL removal and during CL wear at moderate-good level. CONCLUSIONS: Intrarater repeatability of TMH, NIKBUTs, and ocular redness performed by K5M after CL wear remains stable when three measurements are performed. However, intrarater repeatability during CL wear decreased only for NIKBUT average and was not affected by time of use (15 days).

Pentacam Accuracy in Discriminating Keratoconus From Normal Corneas: A Diagnostic Evaluation Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the diagnostic ability of Pentacam indices for keratoconus and identifying the best index for differentiating diseased from normal cases. METHOD: In this study, 150 keratoconus patients and 150 refractive surgery candidates with a definitive diagnosis of normal healthy corneas were enrolled. Initially, the placido disk topography imaging was performed. The keratoconus and normal corneas were defined based on placido disk topographic data from Rabinowitz-McDonnell. After complete eye examinations for all participants, they underwent Pentacam imaging, and corneal surface topographic indices were extracted. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the best indices for differentiating diseased from healthy corneas, and the receiver operating curve was calculated to determine the diagnostic capability of each index. RESULTS: Among the studied indices, the keratoconus index (KI), index of vertical asymmetry (IVA), thinnest point (TP), and maximum keratometry (Kmax) were found capable of detecting keratoconus. Among these, IVA was the best index, with an area under curve (AUC) of 95.24%. The best cutoff point for IVA was 0.20 µm, and its sensitivity and specificity were 87.50% and 96.30%, respectively. Comparison of the AUC of different indices showed that only TP and IVA significantly differed (P=0.002). The combination of KI, IVA, Kmax, and TP indices leads to correct detection in 78% of cases. CONCLUSION: Measuring corneal topographic indices using Pentacam can be helpful in the diagnosis of keratoconus. According to the results of this study, IVA is the best diagnostic index for keratoconus. However, it is recommended to use a combination of Pentacam indices for more accurate differentiation of keratoconus from normal cases.

Intrasubject Repeatability and Interdevice Agreement of Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements by Orbscan and Pentacam in Different Grades of Keratoconus.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the repeatability of anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements by Orbscan and Pentacam imaging devices in different grades of keratoconus. METHODS: One examiner performed 3 consecutive ACD measurements with both devices on 74 eyes of 42 keratoconus patient. Repeatability was assessed using intrasession test-retest variability. Within-subject SD was determined for repeatability, and the coefficient of variation was calculated for each measurement. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was also determined to assess the variance of repeated data. RESULTS: Overall, the three ACD measurements were not significantly different either with Pentacam or Orbscan. The ICC index values were greater than 90% with both devices, and it significantly reduced at higher grades of keratoconus with Pentacam. Interdevice differences were statistically significant. The interdevice agreement with ACD measurements was 0.981, and the agreement was lower at higher grades of keratoconus. The 95% limits of agreement between the 2 devices for ACD was from -0.19 to 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate acceptable repeatability for ACD measurements with both Orbscan and Pentacam in keratoconus patients. The progression of keratoconus has no significant effect on repeatability results of these devices. The good agreement between them allows their interchangeable use.

Comparison of Holladay equivalent keratometry readings and anterior corneal surface keratometry measurements in keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of the anterior corneal simulated keratometry (SimK) and the Holladay equivalent keratometry reading (EKR) provided by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR) with the keratometry (K) provided by a Placido system (T-Cone topography) in keratoconus and control eyes. METHODS: This prospective study included 40 consecutive patients with keratoconus and 40 voluntary participants with no ocular complaints. Any patients with corneal scar, corneal trauma, history of corneal surgery or contact lens usage were excluded from the study. Mean SimK and Holladay EKR measurements were taken with Pentacam HR in the 2, 3, and 4.5 mm corneal zones, and these values were compared with the T-Cone mean K value with the Placido topography system attachment on the Lenstar LS 900. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired Student's t test and the Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was determined between the Placido K and the Scheimpflug EKR 2, 3, 4.5 mm and SimK values in the keratoconus group (p < 0.05). In the analyses which showed a difference between the SimK and Holladay EKR, it was observed that as the diameter of the corneal zone increased, the 95% LoA values were extended. No statistically significant difference was determined between the SimK and EKR 2 mm values (p > 0.05). In the control group, there was no statistically significant difference between any of the keratometric values. CONCLUSION: In diseases which affect the posterior corneal surface, such as keratoconus, it is thought that because of the asymmetrical peripheral placement of the corneal apex, as the corneal diameter increases there could be an error increase of 1-3 mm in keratometric systems evaluating the anterior surface.

Corneal power measurement with a new aberrometer/corneal topographer in eyes after small incision lenticule extraction for myopia.

PURPOSE: To assess corneal power measurements obtained by the OPD SCAN III Topographer in eyes with prior myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. METHODS: Sixty untreated myopic eyes of sixty subjects and forty previous myopic SMILE surgery eyes of forty subjects were consecutively enrolled in the present study. Manifest refraction, OPD SCAN III and Pentacam HR were performed. Keratometric measurements assessed by OPD SCAN III-simulated keratometry, average pupil power and effective central corneal power (ECCP) were compared with mean keratometry (Km) obtained by Pentacam HR in the untreated group and the clinical history method (CHM) in the treated group. RESULTS: In the untreated group, no statistically significant differences were revealed between all corneal power measurements obtained with OPD SCAN III and Km. In the treated group, all the corneal power measurements were statistically different from the CHM except for the Haigis method and the Shammas method, while ECCP had a statistically but not clinically significant overestimation of 0.42 D with 95% limit of agreement (LOA) of - 0.81 D to 1.64 D. The three modified ECCP had better prediction performance with narrower 95% of LOA lying in (- 1.20, 1.20 D) (- 1.22, 1.23 D) and (- 0.90, 1.00 D), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ECCP provided with OPD SCAN III could be used as an alternative option for the CHM after specific modifications in eyes with previous myopic SMILE surgery when the preoperative data are unavailable considering the narrowest agreement between the modified ECCP and the CHM. Otherwise, caution must be raised considering the wide LOA.

Normative Pentacam anterior and posterior corneal elevation measurements: effects of age, sex, axial length and white-to-white.

PURPOSE: To provide normal corneal elevation data for a large Caucasian population and to determine the impacts on these data of age, sex, axial length (AXL) and horizontal white-to-white (WW). SETTING: Centro Internacional de Oftalmología Avanzada, Madrid, Spain. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional, observational. METHODS: In this retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study, anterior and posterior corneal elevations were measured in 789 right eyes of subjects with no ocular disease at the thinnest corneal location in relation to a fixed 8-mm best-fit sphere using the Pentacam, and AXL and WW were measured with the IOLMaster. A multiple linear regression model was used to assess the effects of age, sex, AXL and WW on the elevation data. RESULTS: Mean subject age was 50.5 ± 15 years (range 17-93 years); 64% were women. Mean anterior and posterior corneal elevations were 1.99 ± 1.75 µm (- 7 to 10 µm) and 7.70 ± 5.7 µm (- 6 to 28 µm). Anterior corneal elevations were higher by 0.165 µm and 0.033 µm for every mm reduction in AXL and every year reduction in age, respectively. Sex and WW were not significant predictors of anterior elevations (R2 = 7.7%). Posterior corneal elevation increased by 0.186 µm/year of age, 0.707 µm/mm reduction in WW and 0.819 µm/mm reduction in AXL. This variable was also 0.866 µm greater in men (R2 = 34.4%). CONCLUSION: Anterior corneal elevations decrease with age and are higher for shorter AXL but are not influenced by sex or WW. Posterior corneal elevations increase with age, decreasing AXL, decreasing WW and are higher in men.

Agreement and Repeatability of Two Biometers to Measure Anterior Segment Components: Refractive Error Effect.

BACKGROUND To assess the repeatability and agreement between a new high-resolution optical coherence tomographer (OCT) and a Scheimpflug topographer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty phakic and healthy participants were measured in this study, and one eye per participant was analyzed. Depending on their refractive error, each participant was allocated into a myopic, hyperopic, or emmetropic group. The Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), and the Sirius Scheimpflug topographer (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy) were used to take all measurements. RESULTS The repeatability of these instruments to measure the anterior chamber depth, angle-to-angle, thinnest pachymetry, and both nasal and temporal angles was smaller than 0.15 mm, 0.40 mm, 10 µm, and 10 degrees, respectively. However, the repeatability of the Scheimpflug instrument to measure the apex pachymetry was about 15 µm, and for the OCT, it was about 4 µm for all groups. On average, the Sirius Scheimpflug instrument measured shallower anterior chamber depth (about 0.10 mm), shorter angle-to-angle (about 0.5 mm), thinner corneas (approximately 10 µm), and narrower angles (around 5 degrees) for all refractive groups. CONCLUSIONS The repeatability of the Cirrus OCT and Sirius Scheimpflug instrument was good and independent of the refractive error. Nevertheless, to judge whether these instruments could be used interchangeable, clinical criteria are needed.

Repeatability of Anterior Curvature Metrics in Healthy and Keratoconic Eyes with a Portable Handheld Topographer.

SIGNIFICANCE: This is a prospective observational investigation that studies the repeatability of several outcomes obtained with the Keratron Scout in healthy and keratoconic corneas. In addition, we have been able to determine the "noise" values of the instrument, which can be very useful when evaluating possible progression in keratoconus (KCN). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the repeatability of several anterior curvature metrics provided by a portable and handheld Placido disk-based topographer in healthy and keratoconic eyes. METHODS: One eye from 50 keratoconic patients and 50 eyes from healthy patients were included in this prospective observational study. Two consecutive sessions (with three scans per session) were performed, and the following parameters were analyzed with a Keratron Scout topographer: flat keratometry, steep keratometry, flat corneal axis, corneal astigmatism, and flat and steep asphericities. In addition, in the KCN cohort, indices derived from the Cone Location and Magnitude Index were also recorded. Intrasession (first session, all three measurements) and intersession (one measurement from each session, selected randomly) statistics were calculated. The following variables were calculated: within-subject standard deviation, coefficient of repeatability (R), coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: In healthy eyes, the intrasession and intersession ICCs were high (0.947 to 0.999), and for both flat keratometry and steep keratometry, the within-subject standard deviation was 0.08 and R was 0.24 diopters. Repeatability was slightly lower in the KCN group, but the ICC was greater than 0.95, whereas the R for flat keratometry was 0.41 diopters. CONCLUSIONS: The Keratron Scout provides repeatable measures for the studied metrics in healthy and keratoconic eyes.

Assessment of Tear Film Using Videokeratoscopy Based on Fractal Dimension.

SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed automated approach for estimating the quality of the tear film closes the gap between the manual and automated assessment, translating the high-speed videokeratoscopy technology from scientific laboratories to a clinical practice. PURPOSE: To develop and test a new method for characterizing Tear Film Surface Quality with high-speed videokeratoscopy utilizing a fractal dimension approach. METHODS: The regularity of the reflected pattern in high-speed videokeratoscopy (E300; Medmont) depends on tear film stability. Thus, determining tear film stability can be addressed by estimating the fractal dimension of the reflected pattern. The method is tested on 39 normal subjects. The results of the fractal dimension approach are compared with those obtained using previously proposed automated method, based on a gray-level co-occurrence matrix approach, and with subjective results obtained by two operators that were assessing the video recordings in ideal conditions. RESULTS: Fractal dimension method was less affected by eye movements and changes in the videokeratoscopic image background than gray-level co-occurrence matrix method. Median difference of the noninvasive break-up time between manual and automated methods was 0.03 s (IQR = 4.47 s) and 0.0 s (IQR = 2.22 s) for gray-level co-occurrence matrix and fractal dimension approaches, respectively. Correlation coefficient with manual noninvasive break-up time was r = 0.86 (P < 0.001) for gray-level co-occurrence matrix approach, and r = 0.82 (P < 0.001) for fractal dimension approach. Significant statistical difference was found between noninvasive break-up measurements of manual and gray-level co-occurrence matrix method (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method has the potential to characterize tear film dynamics in more detail compared to previous methods based on high-speed videokeratoscopy. It showed good correlation with manual assessment of tear film.

Intrasession Repeatability and Intersession Reproducibility Measurements Using VX120 Multidiagnostic Unit.

OBJECTIVE: The VX120 multidiagnostic unit is a multidiagnostic instrument that combines several functions: autorefraction, keratometry, corneal topography, aberrometry, pachymetry, and noncontact tonometry. The purpose of this study was to determine the intrasession repeatability and the intersession reproducibility of all parameters measured by the VX120 multidiagnostic unit in a sample of normal healthy eyes. METHODS: Three repeated measurements in the right eye of the volunteers were taken with VX120. Repeatability of the sphere, cylinder, axis, anterior corneal powers (K flat and K steep, 3-mm pupil), high- and low-order aberration root mean square (HOA-RMS and LOA-RMS, 3-mm pupil), eccentricity, white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and central corneal thickness (CCT) (2-mm central) was analyzed. Within-subject SD (Sw), precision, repeatability, coefficient of variation (CV), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. RESULTS: The CV was low for K flat and K steep, WTW, ACD, and CCT with a range from 0.34% to 1.16%. The CV was higher for sphere, cylinder, HOA-RMS, and LOA-RMS and eccentricity with a range among 6.92% to 54.24%. The ICC showed high values in all parameters except in HOA-RMS (0.720-0.776) and eccentricity (0.889) in first session with moderate agreement. Comparing the intrasession repeatability of first and second session, statistically significant differences (P<0.01) were found between both sessions just to the CV for all parameters (except cylinder values) measured with VX120. However, nonstatistically significant differences (P>0.13) were found for Sw, precision, and repeatability values. CONCLUSIONS: The VX120 multidiagnostic unit provides repeatable measurements in anterior corneal power (K flat and K steep), WTW, ACD, and CCT. However sphere, cylinder, HOA-RMS, LOA-RMS, and eccentricity showed worse repeatability. Intersession reproducibility showed good results with little differences between sessions in healthy subjects.

Topographic indices and pachymetry in healthy adolescents obtained with Sirius topographer.

PURPOSE: To determine the normal values for the Sirius corneal topography, of some topographic indices and corneal pachymetry, in a healthy young adolescent population. METHODS: A total of 176 students (mean age 12.95 ± 0.82 years) took part in this study. 352 eyes were imaged through Sirius topographer. Anterior and posterior meridians, mean pupillary power, central corneal thickness, minimum corneal thickness, and anterior and posterior asymmetry indices were analyzed. Correlations between corneal parameters and differences between anterior and posterior corneal surfaces were evaluated. RESULTS: Average anterior meridian was 43.37 D (± 1.46); average posterior meridian was 6.16 D (± 0.24); central corneal thickness was 550.81 ± 29.88 micron, minimum corneal thickness was 547.36 ± 29.93 micron; mean pupillary power was 42.95 ± 1.46 D, SIf was - 0.035 ± 0.46, and SIb was 0.012 ± 0.091. Anterior and posterior corneal curvatures correlated negatively with MPP (r = - 0.99; p = 0.000 and r = - 0.85 p = 0.000, respectively). Anterior curvature correlated positively with posterior curvature (r = 0.891; p = 0.000). Positive correlations were found for SIf and SIb (r = 0.58; p = 0.000). Negative correlations were found for SIf and corneal pachymetry (r = - 0.23; p = 0.000) and for SIb and corneal pachymetry (r = - 0.19; p = 0.012). The difference between anterior meridian average and posterior meridian average was 1.29 ± 0.12 and was significative (p < 0.001). No differences between genders were found. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide normal standards for corneal values in adolescents and could represent a useful tool for future comparative studies in this age-group population.

Freeform optical design for a nonscanning corneal imaging system with a convexly curved image.

Most existing techniques that are typically used by specialists to image the cornea are based on point, slit, or annular scanning due to a narrow field of view. The difficulty in achieving a larger field of view comes from the convex shape of the human eyeball. Field curvature for a refractive imaging system with positive power is typically negative and thus a concave image surface. In order to view the full cornea and sclera with snapshot imaging, we calculate qualified two- and three-mirror solutions from Seidel aberration theory. A three-mirror solution is further optimized as a high-resolution off-axis imaging system using freeform surfaces, which can obtain a full-field tailored image shell without scanning. The lateral resolution on the cornea is about 10 µm with good modulation transfer function (MTF) and spot performance. To ease the assembly, a monolithic design is achieved with slightly lower resolution, leading to a potential mass production solution.

Intrasession repeatability of ocular anatomical measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the intrasession repeatability of anterior chamber depth (ACD), central (CCT) and peripheral corneal thickness (PCT), white-to-white diameter (WTW), and irido-corneal angle (IA) measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes. METHODS: A total of 107 eyes of 107 patients ranging in age from 23 to 65 years were examined with the VX120 system (Visionix-Luneau Technologies). Three consecutive measurements were obtained with this device to assess the intrasession repeatability of ACD, CCT, PCT at different nasal and temporal locations, WTW, and nasal and temporal IA. Data analysis included the calculation of within-subject standard deviation (Sw), intrasubject precision (1.96xSw), coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The Sw and CV for ACD was 0.03 mm and 1.16%, respectively, with an ICC of 0.992. The Sw values for central and peripheral pachymetric measurements were below 9 µm, with CV of less than 1.6% and ICC of 0.976 or higher. For IA measurements, Sw values of 0.84 or lower were found, with a CV between 1 and 2%, and an ICC of more than 0.970. The Sw for WTW was 0.24 mm and the CV was 1.95%. No statistically significant correlations were found between any anatomical parameter evaluated and their Sw and CV values associated (-0.220 ≤ r ≤ 0.204, p ≥ 0.125). CONCLUSIONS: The VX120 system is able to provide repeatable measurements of anatomical parameters in healthy eyes. Inter-observer repeatability should be evaluated in future studies.

Comparison between corneal elevation maps using different reference surfaces with Scheimpflug-Placido topographer.

The purpose of this study was to compare the anterior and posterior elevation measurements using different reference surfaces (spheric, aspheric, and aspherotoric) with Scheimpflug-Placido topography in simple myopic and keratoconus patients. 600 eyes of 600 patients undergoing screening for keratorefractive surgery (500 simple myopic, 100 keratoconus stage 1 and 2) in Sohag refractive center, Egypt, were examined by Scheimpflug-Placido topography (Sirius, CSO, Italy) for both the anterior and posterior corneal elevation maps using the spheric, aspheric, and aspherotoric reference surfaces. 100 keratoconic eyes showed higher discriminating power using the aspherotoric reference surface in both the anterior and posterior elevation maps. The use of aspherotoric reference surface gives more data for eyes with keratoconus and its use is more informative in screening.

Comparison of the measurements of a novel optical biometry: Nidek AL-Scan with Sirius and a ultrasound biometry.

To investigate the accuracy of the measurements of Nidek AL-Scan by comparing with Sirius (CSO, Florence, Italy), a corneal tomography which also employs the Scheimpflug principle, and a commonly used device, ultrasound biometry (UB) (Aviso A/B, Quantel Medical, MT, USA). Right eyes of 85 healthy volunteers (58 women 27 men) with a mean age of 39.24 ± 14.37 years (range 15-68) were enrolled into this comparative prospective study. Average K 2.4, average K 3.3, CCT (central corneal thickness), WTW (white to white distance), ACD (anterior chamber depth) and AL (axial length) were obtained from the AL-Scan and compared with average SimK, CCT, WTW (horizontal anterior chamber diameter) and ACD obtained from Sirius and also compared with ACD and AL obtained from UB. The statistically significant difference was found between all of the measurements (p < 0.001) except the average keratometry values (K2.4, K3.3, SimK) (p = 0.083). There was a perfect correlation between keratometry, CCT and AL measurements of the devices (ICC = 0.977, 0.954, 0.923, respectively) and there was a strong correlation between the WTW measurements of AL-Scan and Sirius (ICC = 0.865). While ACD parameter of AL-Scan and UB showed a perfect correlation (ICC = 0.977), there was a moderate correlation between AL-Scan and Sirius and also between UB and Sirius (ICC = 0.608 and 0.664, respectively). There was a high correlation between the all measurements, besides ACD, of AL-Scan and Sirius and they can be used interchangeably for average keratometry and WTW confidently. However, ACD and CCT have a broader 95 % LoA (-0.039 to 0.744 and -24.985 to 3.691, respectively). In addition, AL-Scan and UB were in good agreement regarding ACD, while differences in AL measurements of UB and AL-Scan were clinically important (95 % LoA = -0.091 to 0.703). Furthermore, UB and Sirius have a moderate agreement regarding ACD (95 % LoA = -0.047 to 0.680).

Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in healthy eyes using four different optical devices.

AIM: The aim of the study is to compare the measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) performed by two examiners with four different methods at different times inter- and intra-individually. METHODS: Thirty healthy people were included in the study. In these measurements, an optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), an optic coherence tomography (OCT), a specular microscopy (SM), and a corneal topography (CT) were used. Two examiners performed the measurements in a consecutive manner. After 1-7 days of the first measurements, the second measurements were performed again consecutively. The mean of three measurements was taken in each session for all devices. RESULTS: In OCT measurements, there was a significant difference between two examiners in both sessions (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were found between two examiners in first and second sessions in SM, CT, and OLCR measurements. When each examiner's measurements were compared to two sessions, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05, for all) except the SM measurements of the first examiner (p = 0.041). When the first measurements of two examiners were compared, the smallest values were of OCT. At the first session of two examiners, there was a significant difference between OCT and CT measurements, and between OCT and OLCR (p < 0.001, p = 0.002 for the first examiner and p < 0.001 for the second examiner, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that CCT measurements made by CT and OLCR methods were almost same and highly correlated for both the examiners' measurements. CCTs measured by OCT were on average 30 µm thinner than CT and OLCR.