Raloxifene and selective cell cycle specific agents: a case for the inclusion of raloxifene in current breast cancer treatment therapies.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients are at increased risk of osteoporosis. Contributing factors include age and/or chemotherapy. The selective estrogen modulator, raloxifene (RAL), effective in the prevention of breast cancer and approved for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis, may prove beneficial in current breast cancer treatment modules. The purpose of this study was to evaluate RAL in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and trimetrexate (TMX) to determine the most effective sequence in which to administer these cell cycle specific agents while taking into consideration the cellular mechanism of action. The goal was to maintain cytotoxicity to breast cancer cells and capitalize on the selective estrogen receptor modulatory effects of RAL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MCF-7 cells were exposed to (i) TMX, 5-FU or RAL alone, or (ii) RAL 24 h prior to 5-FU followed 2 h later by TMX, or (iii) 5-FU 2 h prior to TMX followed 24 h later by RAL. The cell viability was determined using the Quick Cell Proliferation Assay. RESULTS: The growth rate of MCF- 7 cells exposed to early RAL was 68.25 +/- 4.11% that of the control, however, late RAL exposure produced a growth of 34.75 +/- 4.79% that of the control. Late RAL maintained the cytotoxicity of the regimen. The findings were further supported by cell flow cytometry and Western blot analysis data. CONCLUSION: RAL given prior to 5-FU/TMX significantly compromised cytotoxicity to breast cancer cells.

The protection against trimetrexate cytotoxicity in human bone marrow by sequence-dependent administration of raloxifene, 5-fluorouracil/trimetrexate.

BACKGROUND: Currently, one of the most effective strategies for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer is the use of drugs that block estrogen action in the breast. The success of the first clinically relevant selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), tamoxifen, provided the foundation for further testing of this drug to reduce breast cancer incidence in high-risk women. However, the negative effects associated with the long-term use of tanrhoxifen have initiated the search for compounds that are more effective but less toxic. The discovery of raloxifene (RAL), which functions as a potent antiestrogen in the breast but an estrogen receptor (ER) agonist in the bone and cardiovascular system with very little uterotropic activity, provided an alternative strategy to the targeted use of tamoxifen. The aim of this study was to evaluate RAL in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/trimetrexate (TMX) to determine the most effective regimes and cellular mechanism of action to mitigate trimetrexate cytotoxicity in human bone marrow cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cell viability was performed using the Quick Cell Proliferation Assay by exposing the cells to TMX, 5-FU and RAL alone; RAL 24 h prior to 5-FU followed 2 h by TMX, and 5-FU 2 h prior to TMX followed 24 h by RAL determined the sequence-dependent interaction between TMX, 5-FU and RAL on the proliferation. RESULTS: The growth rate in MCF-7 in late RAL was 34.75 +/- 4.79% of the control, whereas in bone marrow the same drug combination exhibits a significant protection against TMX cytotoxicity with late RAL yielding 51.25 +/- 4.43% of the control. The findings were also supported by Cell flow cytometry and Western blot analysis. CONCLUSION: Sequence-dependent administration of RAL in combination with 5-FU/TMX can act against TMX toxicity in human bone marrow, while not affecting the maximum inhibitory effect of TMX in breast cancer.

Leucovorin enhances cytotoxicity of trimetrexate/fluorouracil, but not methotrexate/fluorouracil, in CCRF-CEM cells.

BACKGROUND: Increased response rates in studies of patients with colon cancer have indicated that the cytotoxic effects of fluorouracil (5-FU) are potentiated by leucovorin (LV) and by methotrexate (MTX). However, preliminary studies using a sequential combination of MTX, LV, and 5-FU showed no additional potentiation. PURPOSE: We hypothesized that the lack of additional cell kill with this combination could be due to competition of LV with MTX for cellular uptake and reduced folate polyglutamylation. We have tested this possibility by comparing the cytotoxicity of drug combinations containing MTX with that of drug combinations containing trimetrexate (TMTX), an antifolate that does not compete with LV for uptake or polyglutamylation. METHODS: Human lymphocytic leukemia CCRF-CEM cells were exposed to MTX or TMTX for 24 hours and to 5-FU during the last 4 hours of antifolate exposure. LV was administered 30 minutes before 5-FU. RESULTS: After 20 hours of exposure to TMTX or MTX, intracellular levels of phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate were elevated to a similar degree, and these levels did not decrease after a 30-minute exposure to LV. No additional cell kill was observed when LV was added to the MTX/5-FU combination, but cytotoxicity was enhanced when LV was added to the TMTX/5-FU combination. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the hypothesis that the lack of additional cell kill when high-dose LV is added to the MTX/5-FU combination may be due to competition of MTX with LV for cellular uptake and/or competition of MTX or its polyglutamates with polyglutamylation of reduced folates. Inasmuch as TMTX does not compete with LV and reduced folates for uptake and polyglutamylation, the synergy obtained with the combination of TMTX plus 5-FU and high-dose LV further supports this hypothesis.

Trimetrexate inhibits progression of the murine 32Dp210 model of chronic myeloid leukemia in animals expressing drug-resistant dihydrofolate reductase.

Expression of drug-resistant forms of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) in hematopoietic cells confers substantial resistance of animals to antifolate administration. In this study, we tested whether the chemoprotection conferred by expression of the tyrosine-22 variant DHFR could be used for more effective therapy of the 32Dp210 murine model of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Administration of the maximum tolerated dose of trimetrexate (TMTX) with the nucleoside transport inhibitor prodrug nitrobenzylmercaptopurine ribose-5'-monophosphate (NBMPR-P) inhibited 32Dp210 tumor progression in mice engrafted with transgenic tyrosine-22 DHFR marrow and improved survival of tumor-bearing animals as long as drug administration was continued. NBMPR-P coadministration was necessary for maximal tumor inhibition, as administration of TMTX alone delayed but did not prevent tumor progression. The chemoprotection afforded by engraftment with transgenic tyrosine-22 DHFR marrow was necessary for effective chemotherapy, as normal mice lacking transgenic marrow could not tolerate the higher TMTX dose (60 mg/kg/day) administered to mice with transgenic marrow, and the decreased dose of TMTX with NBMPR-P tolerated by normal tumor-bearing animals did not inhibit tumor progression or improve animal survival. We conclude that TMTX with NBMPR-P inhibits tumor progression in the 32Dp210 model of CML in animals engrafted with drug-resistant tyrosine-22 DHFR transgenic marrow, and that based on this model the introduction of a drug-resistant DHFR gene into marrow combined with TMTX and NBMPR-P administration may provide an effective treatment for CML.

Trial of sequential trimetrexate, fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin in previously treated patients with gastrointestinal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Trimetrexate (TMTX) is a dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, which, like methotrexate (MTX), has been shown to potentiate fluorouracil (FU) cytotoxicity by increasing phosphoribosylpyrophosphate (PRPP) levels. We investigated the safety and efficacy of a sequential TMTX/FU/leucovorin (LV) combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with advanced gastrointestinal carcinoma (mostly colorectal) received variable doses of TMTX followed 24 hours later by FU/LV (500 mg/m2 of each drug). Almost all patients had received previous chemotherapy. The initial 19 patients were treated on a 3-week-on/1-week-off schedule without any significant toxicity; the remaining patients were treated for 6 consecutive weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. TMTX was escalated in 30-mg/m2 increments from 20 to 110 mg/m2 in separate patient cohorts. When the 110-mg/m2 dose of TMTX was reached, the FU dose was escalated from 500 mg/m2 to 600 mg/m2. RESULTS: The partial response (PR) rate in assessable patients with colorectal cancer (all previously treated) was 20% (seven of 35; 95% confidence interval, 7% to 33%), and with other gastrointestinal cancers was one of four patients. Median survival has not been reached with a median follow-up of 13.5 months. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 110 mg/m2 for TMTX, 500 mg/m2 for FU, and 500 mg/m2 for LV on a 6-weeks-on/2-weeks-off cycle. The principal toxicities were grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, which occurred in 17% of patients, and hypersensitivity reactions, which occurred in 26% of patients. CONCLUSION: TMTX can be administered at maximal doses in combination with FU and LV without increasing toxicity. The PR rate of 20% in advanced colorectal carcinoma patients previously treated with chemotherapy is encouraging and merits further study.

Trimetrexate in relapsed T-cell lymphoma with skin involvement.

PURPOSE: Methotrexate (MTX) is active against lymphomas, but transport or polyglutamylation mutations confer MTX resistance. Because trimetrexate (TMTX) enters cells by passive diffusion and is not polyglutamylated, its activity in relapsed T-cell lymphoma was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed relapsed T-cell lymphoma involving the skin, had received more than one previous regimen, were older than 16 years, had normal organ function, and had no CNS disease or serious infections, including human immunodeficiency virus. TMTX (200 mg/m(2)) was given intravenously every 14 days without topical or systemic corticosteroids. Patients who responded received up to 12 doses. RESULTS: Twenty patients were assessable for response. Median age was 59 years (range, 45 to 87 years); 13 patients were men. Three patients had anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, 15 had mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome (14 with large-cell transformation), and two had peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Serum lactate dehydrogenase was high in 35%, and beta-2 microglobulin was more than 3.0 mg/L in 35% of patients. The median number of previous regimens was three (range, two to 15) and included MTX in five patients. Disease was refractory to the regimen immediately preceding TMTX in 85% of patients. Responses were complete in one and partial in eight patients (overall response rate, 45%). Two of five patients previously treated with MTX responded. Grade 3 or 4 mucositis was observed after 4%, infection after 3%, neutropenic fever after 6%, neutrophils less than 100/microL after 4%, and platelets less than 10,000/microL after 3% of TMTX doses. CONCLUSION: TMTX is active with acceptable toxicity in this population and merits further investigation.

Phase II study of trimetrexate, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: A phase II study to evaluate the response rate and toxicities of a trimetrexate, fluorouracil (5FU), and leucovorin regimen in patients with advanced incurable colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer who had not been treated for advanced disease received the following chemotherapy regimen weekly for six courses every 8 weeks: trimetrexate 110 mg/m2 intravenously (I.V.) on day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 I.V. on day 2 (24 hours later), 5FU 500 mg/m2 on day 2 immediately following leucovorin, and oral leucovorin 15 mg every 6 hours for seven doses starting 6 hours after 5FU. Patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty patients were assessable for response, and all 36 were assessable for toxicity. Two patients (7%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 13 (43%) a partial response (PR), for an overall response (OR) rate of 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32% to 68%). Analysis by intent to treat demonstrated a 42% OR rate (95% CI, 26% to 58%). At final analysis, 16 patients were alive. The median survival duration for the entire cohort was 53.4 weeks. Gastrointestinal toxicity was most common, with 21 patients (58%) having grade 3/4 diarrhea and 12 patients (34%) grade 3/4 nausea. Hematologic toxicity was generally low grade, although two patients died of sepsis. CONCLUSION: The combination of trimetrexate with 5FU and leucovorin is active in metastatic colorectal cancer. Gastrointestinal toxicity with this regimen is most prominent, but is manageable.

A meta-analysis of salvage therapy for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative efficacies of alternative antipneumocystis agents in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia unresponsive to primary drug treatment with a combination product of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole or parenteral pentamidine. METHODS: Meta-analysis of 27 published clinical drug trials, case series, and case reports involving P carinii pneumonia. Data extracted included underlying disease, primary antipneumocystis treatment, days of failed primary treatment, salvage regimen, use of systemic corticosteroids and antiretroviral drugs, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: In 497 patients with microbiologically confirmed P carinii pneumonia (456 with HIV or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome), initial antipneumocystis treatment failed and they therefore required alternative drug therapy. Failed regimens included trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (160 patients), intravenous pentamidine (63 patients), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and/or pentamidine (258 patients), aerosolized pentamidine (6 patients), atovaquone (3 patients), dapsone (3 patients), a combination product of trimethoprim and dapsone (2 patients), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole followed by a combination of clindamycin and primaquine phosphate (2 patients). Efficacies of salvage regimens were as follows: clindamycin-primaquine (42 to 44 [88%-92%] of 48 patients; P<10(-8)), atovaquone (4 [80%] of 5), eflornithine hydrochloride (40 [57%] of 70; P<.01), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (27 [53%] of 51; P<.08), pentamidine (64 [39%] of 164), and trimetrexate (47 [30%] of 159). CONCLUSION: The combination of clindamycin plus primaquine appears to be the most effective alternative treatment for patients with P carinii pneumonia who are unresponsive to conventional antipneumocystis agents.

Therapeutic options for the treatment of colorectal cancer following 5-fluorouracil failure.

Therapeutic options after failure of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for the treatment of colorectal cancer include regional treatments, different 5-FU-based regimens, and different chemotherapy regimens. Of the regional treatments, resection of hepatic metastases is the most satisfactory because of the potential for long-term survival; however, the number of candidates for this option is limited. Responses are possible if 5-FU is administered by prolonged infusion, but the addition of other chemotherapeutic agents (eg, nitrosoureas, mitomycin C, or cisplatin) is less likely to induce objective responses. The new topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan has promising activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Depending on the status of the patient population, objective response rates of 15% to 30% have been reported in patients with colorectal cancer that has progressed or rapidly recurred following 5-FU-based treatment.

Trimetrexate: review and current clinical experience in advanced colorectal cancer.

Unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in both the United States and Europe. To date, no chemotherapeutic regimen for this disease has demonstrated a definitive survival advantage compared with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (LV). However, recent trials have raised the possibility that the combination of trimetrexate (TMTX) plus 5-FU/LV may improve response rates and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Trimetrexate is a nonclassical antifolate that has demonstrated antitumor activity against a number of malignancies, including those resistant to the classical antifolate methotrexate. While the single-agent activity of TMTX remains modest in metastatic colorectal cancer, the combination of TMTX/5-FU/LV has shown significant activity in several phase II trials. Reported studies include a phase II trial in chemotherapy failures that demonstrated a 20% response rate, and two multicenter phase II trials in previously untreated patients that demonstrated 50% and 38% overall response rates, respectively. Diarrhea was the dose-limiting toxicity in all trials, although a regimen of scheduled loperamide was quite effective in mitigating this complication. These studies are being followed up with two confirmatory phase II studies in chemorefractory patients and two randomized phase III trials comparing TMTX/5-FU/LV with standard 5-FU/LV.

Biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil with antifolates.

The cytotoxic activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) can be modulated by coadministration of antifolates or leucovorin (LV). Although a recent meta-analysis concluded that a sequential combination of methotrexate (MTX) and 5-FU was superior to 5-FU alone in terms of response rate and survival, combination MTX and 5-FU therapy has not been actively pursued by many leading cancer centers. We have subsequently investigated the combination of trimetrexate (TMTX) plus 5-FU/LV. Unlike MTX, TMTX does not compete with LV for uptake or polyglutamylation. In a phase I clinical study, combination TMTX/5-FU/LV was well tolerated and produced an overall response rate of 20% in previously treated colorectal cancer patients. In a follow-up phase II clinical study, this combination was highly active in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a 50% overall response rate. Currently, a phase III clinical trial is in progress comparing this regimen with combination 5-FU/LV.

Where do we stand with 5-fluorouracil?

For nearly four decades, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer. Due to the lack of other agents with significant activity, tremendous efforts have been undertaken to increase the efficacy of 5-FU by investigating alternative schedules of delivery and biomodulation. However, bolus 5-FU in combination with folinic acid (FA), either as the Mayo Clinic or Roswell Park protocol, still represents the standard treatment for adjuvant and first-line palliative chemotherapy of colorectal cancer. In a recent meta-analysis, infusional protocols of 5-FU demonstrated increased response rates (14% to 22%) and a marginal, but significant survival benefit of 3 weeks (11.3 to 12.1 months). In view of the much higher costs and complicated management of infusional 5-FU regimens, this marginal survival benefit does not yet allow protracted 5-FU application to be defined as standard therapy. However, protracted 5-FU infusion in combination with radiation can be considered standard therapy as adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, since it has demonstrated a significant increase in survival. In the future, oral 5-FU prodrugs may be substituted for infusional 5-FU. Furthermore, current data indicate that 5-FU will also be an essential component of combination chemotherapy protocols with the new active agents oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and raltitrexed. Preclinical studies show synergistic antitumor activity of 5-FU with these agents, which corresponds well with clinical response rates of 50% in untreated and 15% to 25% in 5-FU-refractory patients. Moreover, 5-FU-based pro-drug-active drug systems serve as excellent models for tumor-targeted gene therapy.

A toxicity study of trimetrexate used in combination with cyclosporine as acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in HLA-mismatched, related donor bone marrow transplants.

This study evaluated the acute toxicity of trimetrexate (TMTX) used in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) for prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing allogeneic marrow transplantation from HLA-mismatched, related donors. TMTX has a mechanism of action similar to that of methotrexate (MTX); however, unlike MTX, TMTX is not primarily dependent on renal excretion. Patients were conditioned for transplant with cyclophosphamide, anti-thymocyte globulin, and total body irradiation. TMTX, 10 mg/m2 i.v., was administered on days 1, 3, 6, 11, 18, 25, 32, and 39 after transplant. CsA, 1.5 mg/kg i.v., was administered every 12 hr beginning on day-1. Eleven patients with hematologic malignancies or aplastic anemia (median age = 34 yr) received TMTX. Toxicity assessed included nausea, vomiting, fever, rash, time to myeloid and platelet engraftment, mucositis, and hepatic and renal dysfunction. Toxicity of TMTX was not different from that observed with MTX in a similar patient population. One patient died on day 16 before engraftment. The other 10 patients all engrafted and all developed acute GVHD at a median time of 11 days after transplant. The major manifestation of acute GVHD was in the skin, and all but one patient responded to primary therapy with corticosteroids. Seven patients have survived a median of 447 days after transplant. No significant toxicity from TMTX was observed. Further trials are warranted to define the role of TMTX in marrow transplantation.

Trimetrexate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential in the treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.

Trimetrexate is a folinic acid analogue structurally related to methotrexate, whose primary mechanism of action is believed to be inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase. This reduces the production of DNA and RNA precursors and leads to cell death. Trimetrexate is lipophilic and can passively diffuse across cell membranes including those of Pneumocystis carinii and its mammalian host. To minimise toxicity, trimetrexate must be coadministered with calcium folinate (leucovorin calcium), a reduced folate coenzyme, which is transported into, and protects, mammalian host cells but not P. carinii cells. In noncomparative trials trimetrexate was effective in the treatment of P. carinii pneumonia (PCP) in patients with AIDS who were intolerant of or refractory to cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and pentamidine treatment. In these patients, 2- to 4-week survival rates of 48 to 69% were reported. In a comparative trial in the initial therapy of PCP, trimetrexate was less effective than cotrimoxazole in moderate to severe disease as evidenced by a significantly higher failure rate. Trimetrexate was better tolerated than cotrimoxazole when used in this setting, however. Significantly fewer patients receiving trimetrexate plus calcium folinate discontinued treatment because of adverse events than did patients receiving cotrimoxazole. The most common adverse effect associated with trimetrexate is myelosuppression (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia); this is mitigated by coadministration of calcium folinate and is generally reversible upon dosage reduction or discontinuation. Other adverse effects include increases in serum aminotransferase levels, anaemia, fever, rash/pruritus, and increased alkaline phosphatase or serum creatinine levels. Further research into the use of trimetrexate, including its efficacy as prophylaxis, in combination with other agents and as an oral formulation, is needed to clearly define its role in the treatment of PCP and to identify patients most likely to benefit. Currently, trimetrexate should be considered as an alternative treatment option in immunocompromised patients with moderate to severe PCP who have not responded to or are intolerant of first-line therapy.

The effects of combined antifolates on inhibition of growth of murine leukemia cells cultured in vitro.

The synergistic effect of trimetrexate (TMTX) and sulphonamide derivatives of quinazoline on the cultured 5178Y murine leukemia cells was examined. On exposure to the slightly inhibitory concentrations of TMTX (0.1 nM) in combination with 2-desamino-2-methyl-10-propargyl-5,8-dideaza-pteroyl-sulphoglyc ine (DMPDDSF) (0.02 microM) a synergistic inhibitory effect of the antifolates on cell growth was observed. These two drugs in the same combination caused also synergistic inhibition of de novo synthesis of thymidylate in intact cells as measured by tritium release from [5-(3)H]deoxyuridylate. This was accompanied by a marked reduction in intracellular concentration of 5,10-methylenetetrahydro-pteroyl-polyglutamate (5,10CH2H4PteGlu(n)) (0.2 microM) and dihydropteroyl-polyglutamate (0.12 microM). In these conditions de novo biosynthesis of purine was decreased by 50%. These observations show that growth inhibition by combined antifolates is mediated by intracellular depletion of the substrate of thymidylate synthase -- 5,10CH2H4PteGlu(n). The results obtained strongly suggest that under certain conditions inhibition of thymidylate synthesis by DMPDDSF is intensified by prior application of TMTX -- an inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase.

Selectivity in human breast cancer and human bone marrow using trimetrexate in combination with 5-fluorouracil.

The growth inhibitory effect of trimetrexate (TMQ) is maintained in MCF-7 breast cancer but is decreased in Hs 824.T human bone marrow cells by a priming- and non-toxic 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) dose. Incubation of MCF-7 breast cells with 10 microM TMQ alone or in combination with 10 M 5-FU (TMQ 2 h prior to 5-FU [TMQ/5-FU] or 5-FU 2 h prior to TMQ[5-FU/TMQ]) resulted in similar inhibitory effects but dissimilar effects occurred in Hs 824.T bone marrow. In breast cancer, the percentage differences among TMQ and TMQ/5-FU, TMQ and 5-FU/TMQ, and TMQ/5-FU and 5-FU/TMQ on growth rates, respectively, were 3.56%, 2.35%, and 1.68%. The percentage differences on growth rates of TMQ and TMQ/5-FU, TMQ and 5-FU/TMQ, and TMQ/5-FU and 5-FU/TMQ in bone marrow, respectively, were 5.76%, 30.03% (significant protection by 5-FU, i.e. the inhibitory effect of 5-FU/TMQ < or = TMQ), and 35.78% (sequence dependent). The growth rates of breast cancer and bone marrow cells in the presence of 5-FU were 96.03 +/- 1.17% and 94.59 +/- 1.15%, respectively, of control rates. These studies suggest that (a) TMQ and 5-FU combinations on the growth of MCF-7 breast cancer cells are independent of sequence of administration and best related to TMQ and (b) a priming- and non-toxic 5-FU dose protects against TMQ toxicity in human bone marrow while not affecting the maximum inhibitory effect of TMQ in breast cancer.

Phase II clinical trial of 5-fluorouracil, trimetrexate, and leucovorin (NFL) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Advanced pancreatic cancer has limited treatment options. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is frequently used in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Preclinical studies suggest synergism between trimetrexate (TMTX),5-FU, and leucovorin (NFL). AIM: We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the activity and safety of NFL in pancreatic cancer. METHOD: Eligible patients (n = 21) with untreated advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with 110 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) THTX on day 1 and 200 mg/m2 IV leucovorin prior to 500 mg/m2 IV 5-FU on day 2. Oral leucovorin (15 mg every 6 h for seven doses) started intravenous 24 h later. RESULTS: Treatment was administered for 6 wk followed by a 2-wk rest period. Response was evaluated every 8 wk. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Most patients (80%) had distant metastases. Forty-five cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The most common serious toxicities were Grade 3 diarrhea (23.8%) and nausea and vomiting (14.2%). The response rate was 4.1% (95% CI, 0-23%), median survival was 6.8 mo, and 1-yr survival was 19%. CONCLUSION: Treatment with NFL is well-tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The median survival and 1-yr survival in these patients with poor prognosis compares favorably with other treatment options.

[New analogues of methotrexate].

New antifolate antimetabolites are currently developed and three analogues of methotrexate (MTX) (Trimetrexate, Edatrexate, TNP-351) are undergoing clinical trials in Japan. Trimetrexate characteristically enters cells primarily by passive transport, which is different from the mechanism of MTX. The increased therapeutic efficacy of Edatrexate is expected, because of the higher concentration of polyglutamates than MTX in tumor cells. TNP-351 is a novel antifolate, which has a different chemical structure from other antifolates. The current state of clinical trials of three antifolates and the indications for chemotherapy of lung cancer are reviewed.

Dosing guidelines for foscarnet and trimetrexate.

The P & T Committee at Trinity Lutheran Hospital, a 320-bed, community/teaching hospital in Kansas City, MO, has developed dosing and monitoring guidelines for foscarnet sodium (Foscavir) and trimetrexate glucuronate (Neutrexin)--two drugs used to treat patients with opportunistic infections associated with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Presented in this Experience Brief is a short discussion of these drugs, the rationale for guideline development, and the actual dosing and monitoring protocols devised.

Treatment of a solid tumor using engineered drug-resistant immunocompetent cells and cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Multimodal therapy approaches, such as combining chemotherapy agents with cellular immunotherapy, suffers from potential drug-mediated toxicity to immune effector cells. Overcoming such toxic effects of anticancer cellular products is a potential critical barrier to the development of combined therapeutic approaches. We are evaluating an anticancer strategy that focuses on overcoming such a barrier by genetically engineering drug-resistant variants of immunocompetent cells, thereby allowing for the coadministration of cellular therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy, a method we refer to as drug-resistant immunotherapy (DRI). The strategy relies on the use of cDNA sequences that confer drug resistance and recombinant lentiviral vectors to transfer nucleic acid sequences into immunocompetent cells. In the present study, we evaluated a DRI-based strategy that incorporates the immunocompetent cell line NK-92, which has intrinsic antitumor properties, genetically engineered to be resistant to both temozolomide and trimetrexate. These immune effector cells efficiently lysed neuroblastoma cell lines, which we show are also sensitive to both chemotherapy agents. The antitumor efficacy of the DRI strategy was demonstrated in vivo, whereby neuroblastoma-bearing NOD/SCID/γ-chain knockout (NSG) mice treated with dual drug-resistant NK-92 cell therapy followed by dual cytotoxic chemotherapy showed tumor regression and significantly enhanced survival compared with animals receiving either nonengineered cell-based therapy and chemotherapy, immunotherapy alone, or chemotherapy alone. These data show there is a benefit to using drug-resistant cellular therapy when combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy approaches.