Is Post COVID-19 cholangiopathy an appropriate indication for liver transplantation?

The effect of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, which has infected more than 765 million people in the world to date, has decreased gradually, but the effect of late complications after the disease has begun to increase. Post-coronavirus disease 2019 cholangiopathy can be considered as one of the late complications identified in patients recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection. A 38-year-old man was admitted to our emergency department with fever up to 39,5ºC, dry cough, anosmia, and dyspnea for 4 days. In the chest computed tomography, extensive opacity areas were compatible with multifocal pneumonia. A throat swab confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patient was treated in the intensive care unit with mechanical ventilator support during 4 weeks. A significant increase in cholestasis enzymes was observed in the patient's control blood. The results of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography and liver biopsy performed for the etiology of the patient were compatible with post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy. Liver transplantation from a living donor was performed in the patient whose cholangiopathy continued in the first year of follow-up. The patient's clinical course was positive after liver transplantation. It emphasizes that despite the improvement in the lung involvement of COVID-19, the virus can cause long-term liver damage. Liver transplantation may sometimes be required in the treatment of post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy, as in our patient. The persistence of the patient's liver disease for approximately 1 year after Covid-19 and its positive course after liver transplantation show that post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy is a suitable indication for transplantation. The persistence of elevated cholestasis enzymes and bilirubin values after recovery from COVID-19 may help identify patients with post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy in the early period. Early recognition of the occurrence of post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy is important to decide the appropriate course of action.

Comparison of functional dyspepsia with organic dyspepsia in terms of attachment patterns.

AIM: Functional dyspepsia, originates from gastroduodenal region, is described as resistant and recurring dyspeptic symptoms with unknown etiology. Although there is some evidence in support of a relationship between functional dyspepsia and psychopathology, attachment patterns of functional dyspepsia patients have not been studied yet. In our study, we aimed to compare attachment patterns of functional dyspepsia patients with organic dyspepsia patients and healthy volunteers. METHOD: 43 patients diagnosed with functional dyspepsia, 38 patients with organic dyspepsia and 42 healthy volunteers matched in terms of age, sex and education were included in the study. All participants were evaluated using a socio-demographic and clinical data questionnaire, the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire and the Adult Attachment Scale. RESULTS: There was no difference in sociodemographic features among the three groups. Functional dyspepsia group exhibited significantly higher Trait Anxiety scores compared to organic dyspepsia and control groups. Control group showed significantly higher secure attachment styles compared to functional dyspepsia and organic dyspepsia groups, there was no difference between groups in non-secure attachment styles according to triple attachment model. Dimensionally, functional dyspepsia group showed more avoidant attachment patterns than organic dyspepsia groups and organic dyspepsia group showed more avoidant attachment patterns than control group. CONCLUSION: According to our findings, Functional dyspepsia patients are more anxious than organic dyspepsia patients and healthy volunteers. Non-secure attachment patterns were seen generally in all dyspeptic patients while avoidant attachment patterns are more prominent in functional dyspepsia patients.

Mean platelet volume in patients with biliary and non-biliary acute pancreatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a systemic inflammatory disease. We aimed to detect whether there was a change of mean platelet volume (MPV) level on onset and remission patients with biliary and non-biliary acute pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our emergency service patients diagnosed with biliary and nonbiliary AP were analyzed retrospectively. Laboratory results measured in onset and remission were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Total number of patients enrolled in our study was 331 (177 female). 194 cases were classified as biliary and 137 were as non-biliary AP. Average age and numbers of female patients of biliary cases were higher than that of nonbiliary cases. Initial MPV values were lower than remission values in all patients with AP. In biliary group initial MPV was 8.42 ± 1.04 and remission value was 8.71 ± 1.12. In nonbiliary group initial MPV was 8.07 ± 1.02 and remission value was 8.4 ± 1.06. In both groups on onset had lower mean MPV levels than those in remission (P = 0.0001 both of them). CONCLUSIONS: MPV values were higher than initial values in remission period in patients both of groups. MPV was lower in non-biliary AP group than biliary AP group that can be an indicator of early-onset infection.