Pseudoachalasia: a diagnostic challenge. When to consider and how to manage?

Pseudoachalasia accounts for up to 4% of patients who present with achalasia-like picture and most often relates to occult malignancy at the cardia or gastroesophageal junction. Thus, any delay in diagnosis might lead to more advanced disease and less chance for curative therapy, not to mention the risk of serious complications resulting from the treatment of supposed achalasia instead of the true underlying cause. The entity should be suspected in patients with advanced age of onset, a shorter duration of symptoms, profound weight loss and difficulty in passing the gastroesophageal junction on endoscopy. The diagnosis of pseudoachalasia can be challenging as upper endoscopy with biopsy might be false negative in 25% of cases and lesions cannot always be detected on computerized tomography scan. Endoscopic ultrasound and guided biopsy play an increasingly important role in the workup of this condition. Treatment of pseudoachalasia depends on the underlying cause. The aim of this review is to highlight the clinicopathological features that distinguish pseudoachalasia from achalasia and the most appropriate diagnostic workup as well as the subsequent management for this condition.

Comparison of gastric emptying parameters between asymptomatic volunteers and patients with functional dyspepsia in Middle Eastern population.

OBJECTIVE: To derive the normal reference values for Middle East population using a standard method, and to validate its performance in functional dyspepsia. METHODS: A prospective study was designed to derive gastric emptying parameters in 36 healthy control subjects. We measured the lag phase, half time, and gastric retention at the first, second, and third hours. Values were compared to 49 patients with functional dyspepsia. This study was carried out between July 2005 and August 2009 at Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups at lag phase. Dyspeptic patients had significantly higher gastric retention at the first, second, and third hours (p=0.045, p=0.003, p=0.002). Gastric retention at the third hour was the most sensitive parameter detecting 16 patients (32.6%). Only 3 patients (6.1%) had increased gastric retention at the first hour and normal retention at the third hour. Twelve patients (24.5%) had delayed half time; these patients had increased gastric retention either at the first or third hour. CONCLUSION: Measurement of gastric retention at the first, second, and third hour is enough to identify delayed-early and late phases of gastric emptying in functional dyspepsia patients.