Evolution of Symptoms After Ustekinumab Induction Therapy in Patients With Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ustekinumab is an effective treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). Of interest to patients is knowing how soon symptoms may improve. We analyzed ustekinumab response dynamics from the ustekinumab CD trials. METHODS: Patients with CD received intravenous induction with ustekinumab ∼6 mg/kg (n = 458) or placebo (n = 457). Week 8 ustekinumab responders received subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg as the first maintenance dose or as an extended induction dose for nonresponders. Patient-reported symptom changes (stool frequency, abdominal pain, general well-being) within the first 14 days and clinical outcomes through week 44 were evaluated using the CD Activity Index. RESULTS: After ustekinumab infusion, stool frequency improvement was significantly (P < .05) greater than placebo on day 1 and for all patient-reported symptoms by day 10. In patients with no history of biologic failure or intolerance, cumulative clinical remission rates increased from 23.0% at week 3 to 55.5% at week 16 after the subcutaneous dose at week 8. Corresponding cumulative rates for patients with a history of biologic failure or intolerance increased from 12.9% to 24.1%. Neither change from baseline in CD Activity Index score nor week 8 ustekinumab pharmacokinetics were associated with week 16 response. Among all patients who received subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg q8w, up to 66.7% were in clinical response at week 44. CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab induction provided symptom relief by day 1 post-infusion. Following ustekinumab infusion and a subcutaneous 90 mg injection, clinical outcomes continued to increase through week 16 and up to week 44. Regardless of week 8 clinical status or ustekinumab pharmacokinetics, patients should receive additional treatment at week 8. CLINICALTRIALS: gov numbers, NCT01369329, NCT01369342, and NCT01369355.

Ustekinumab in paediatric patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease: UniStar study long-term extension results.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics through 240 weeks of ustekinumab treatment in paediatric patients from the long-term extension (LTE) of the phase 1, double-blind UniStar trial. METHODS: Paediatric patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD) were randomised 1:1 and stratified by body weight (<40 or ≥40 kg) to low- or high-dose intravenous ustekinumab followed by a subcutaneous maintenance dose at Week 8. At Week 16, patients were eligible to enter the LTE at the discretion of the investigator and continued maintenance dosing every 8 weeks up to Week 240. RESULTS: Of the 34 patients who entered the LTE, 25 patients with evaluable data completed Week 48, and 41.2% (14/34) achieved clinical remission at Week 48. Among the 24 patients with Week-0 C-reactive protein (CRP) levels ≥3 mg/L, 29.2% (7/24) achieved normalisation of CRP at Week 48, while imputing missing data as failures. Through Week 240, the most common adverse events were infections (n = 28) and gastrointestinal disorders (n = 26). The most common serious adverse event was worsening of CD (n = 6). Only one patient had detectable antibodies to ustekinumab. Median serum ustekinumab concentrations remained consistent through Week 48, were detectable through Week 224, and trended lower in patients <40 kg. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and pharmacokinetics through 1 year and safety and immunogenicity through 4 years of ustekinumab treatment in paediatric patients with CD were generally comparable to those previously reported in adults.

Guselkumab for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: Induction Results From the Phase 2 GALAXI-1 Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guselkumab, a selective p19 interleukin-23 antagonist, is approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional or biologic therapy. METHODS: GALAXI-1, a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, randomized patients 1:1:1:1:1 to intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, 600 mg, or 1200 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 8; intravenous ustekinumab approximately 6 mg/kg at week 0 and 90 mg subcutaneously at week 8; or placebo. Change from baseline in Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (primary end point), clinical remission, clinical response, Patient Reported Outcomes-2 remission, clinical-biomarker response, endoscopic response (major secondary end points), and safety in guselkumab-treated patients vs placebo were evaluated through week 12. Ustekinumab was a reference arm. RESULTS: Of 309 patients evaluated, approximately 50% had disease refractory to prior biologic therapy. At week 12, significantly greater reductions in Crohn's Disease Activity Index from baseline (least squares means: 200 mg: -160.4, 600 mg: -138.9, and 1200 mg: -144.9 vs placebo: -36.2; all, P < .05) and significantly greater proportions of patients achieved clinical remission in each guselkumab group vs placebo (Crohn's Disease Activity Index <150; 57.4%, 55.6%, and 45.9% vs 16.4%; all, P < .05). Greater proportions of patients receiving guselkumab achieved clinical response, Patient Reported Outcomes-2 remission, clinical-biomarker response, and endoscopic response at week 12 vs placebo. Efficacy of ustekinumab vs placebo was also demonstrated. Safety event rates were generally similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: At week 12, all 3 dose regimens of guselkumab induced greater clinical and endoscopic improvements vs placebo, with a favorable safety profile. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT03466411.

Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of ustekinumab, an antagonist of the p40 subunit of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23, as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis is unknown. METHODS: We evaluated ustekinumab as 8-week induction therapy and 44-week maintenance therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. A total of 961 patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous induction dose of ustekinumab (either 130 mg [320 patients] or a weight-range-based dose that approximated 6 mg per kilogram of body weight [322]) or placebo (319). Patients who had a response to induction therapy 8 weeks after administration of intravenous ustekinumab were randomly assigned again to receive subcutaneous maintenance injections of 90 mg of ustekinumab (either every 12 weeks [172 patients] or every 8 weeks [176]) or placebo (175). The primary end point in the induction trial (week 8) and the maintenance trial (week 44) was clinical remission (defined as a total score of ≤2 on the Mayo scale [range, 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease] and no subscore >1 [range, 0 to 3] on any of the four Mayo scale components). RESULTS: The percentage of patients who had clinical remission at week 8 among patients who received intravenous ustekinumab at a dose of 130 mg (15.6%) or 6 mg per kilogram (15.5%) was significantly higher than that among patients who received placebo (5.3%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Among patients who had a response to induction therapy with ustekinumab and underwent a second randomization, the percentage of patients who had clinical remission at week 44 was significantly higher among patients assigned to 90 mg of subcutaneous ustekinumab every 12 weeks (38.4%) or every 8 weeks (43.8%) than among those assigned to placebo (24.0%) (P = 0.002 and P<0.001, respectively). The incidence of serious adverse events with ustekinumab was similar to that with placebo. Through 52 weeks of exposure, there were two deaths (one each from acute respiratory distress syndrome and hemorrhage from esophageal varices) and seven cases of cancer (one each of prostate, colon, renal papillary, and rectal cancer and three nonmelanoma skin cancers) among 825 patients who received ustekinumab and no deaths and one case of cancer (testicular cancer) among 319 patients who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab was more effective than placebo for inducing and maintaining remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; UNIFI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02407236.).

Five-Year Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab Treatment in Crohn's Disease: The IM-UNITI Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The IM-UNITI study and long-term extension (LTE) evaluated the long-term efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of subcutaneous ustekinumab maintenance therapy in patients with Crohn's disease. Here, we report the final results of IM-UNITI LTE through 5 years. METHODS: Patients completing safety and efficacy evaluations at week 44 of the maintenance study were eligible to participate in the LTE and continue the treatment they were receiving. Unblinding occurred after completion of maintenance study analyses (August 2015), and patients receiving placebo were discontinued from the study after unblinding. No dose adjustment occurred in the LTE. Efficacy assessments were conducted every 12 weeks until unblinding and at dosing visits thereafter through week 252. Serum ustekinumab concentrations and antidrug antibodies were evaluated through weeks 252 and 272, respectively. RESULTS: Using an intent-to-treat analysis of all patients randomized to ustekinumab at maintenance baseline, 34.4% of patients in the every-8-weeks group and 28.7% in the every-12-weeks group were in clinical remission at week 252. Corresponding remission rates among patients who entered the LTE were 54.9% and 45.2%. Overall, adverse event rates (per 100 patient-years) from maintenance week 0 through the final visit generally were similar in the placebo and combined ustekinumab groups for all adverse events (440.3 vs 327.6), serious adverse events (19.3 vs 17.5), infections (99.8 vs 93.8), and serious infections (3.9 vs 3.4). Serum ustekinumab concentrations were maintained throughout the LTE. Antidrug antibodies occurred in 5.8% of patients who received ustekinumab during induction and maintenance and continued in the LTE. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving subcutaneous ustekinumab maintained clinical remission through 5 years. No new safety signals were observed. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01369355.

Ustekinumab Pharmacokinetics and Exposure Response in a Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy of antibody-based therapeutics depends on their pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic and exposure response profiles of ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin 12/interleukin 23, are known in patients with Crohn's disease, yet there are few data from patients with ulcerative colitis. We characterized ustekinumab's pharmacokinetics, exposure response, and optimal serum concentrations in patients with ulcerative colitis. METHODS: We collected data from 2 phase 3 trials (1 induction and 1 maintenance), in which patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis received an intravenous induction dose of ustekinumab (130 mg, n = 320; or approximately 6 mg/kg, n = 322). Responders were assigned randomly to groups that received subcutaneous maintenance ustekinumab (90 mg) every 8 weeks (n = 176) or 12 weeks (n = 172), or placebo (n = 175). We evaluated the association between ustekinumab concentration and efficacy, serum based on clinical effects (Mayo score), histologic features, and inflammation (measurement of C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, and fecal lactoferrin), as well as safety (infections, serious infections, and serious adverse events), during induction and maintenance therapy. Optimal serum concentrations of ustekinumab were identified using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. RESULTS: In patients with ulcerative colitis, dose-proportional serum concentrations of ustekinumab, unaffected by prior biologic or concomitant immunomodulator therapy, reached steady state by the second maintenance dose; the median trough concentration for dosing every 8 weeks was approximately 3-fold that of dosing every 12 weeks. Serum concentrations were associated with clinical and histologic features of efficacy and normalization of inflammation markers. The week-8 concentration threshold for induction of response was 3.7 µg/mL. A steady-state trough serum concentration of 1.3 µg/mL or higher was associated with a higher rate of clinical remission compared with patients who had lower serum concentrations. Serum concentrations of ustekinumab were not associated with infections, serious infections, or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of data from 2 phase 3 trials of patients with ulcerative colitis, we found that serum concentrations of ustekinumab were proportional to dose, unaffected by prior biologic or concomitant immunomodulator therapies, associated with clinical and histologic efficacy and markers of inflammation, and were not associated with safety events at doses evaluated. Ustekinumab pharmacokinetics are consistent between patients with Crohn's disease vs ulcerative colitis.

Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody to the p40 subunit of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23, was evaluated as an intravenous induction therapy in two populations with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. Ustekinumab was also evaluated as subcutaneous maintenance therapy. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients to receive a single intravenous dose of ustekinumab (either 130 mg or approximately 6 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo in two induction trials. The UNITI-1 trial included 741 patients who met the criteria for primary or secondary nonresponse to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or had unacceptable side effects. The UNITI-2 trial included 628 patients in whom conventional therapy failed or unacceptable side effects occurred. Patients who completed these induction trials then participated in IM-UNITI, in which the 397 patients who had a response to ustekinumab were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous maintenance injections of 90 mg of ustekinumab (either every 8 weeks or every 12 weeks) or placebo. The primary end point for the induction trials was a clinical response at week 6 (defined as a decrease from baseline in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score of ≥100 points or a CDAI score <150). The primary end point for the maintenance trial was remission at week 44 (CDAI score <150). RESULTS: The rates of response at week 6 among patients receiving intravenous ustekinumab at a dose of either 130 mg or approximately 6 mg per kilogram were significantly higher than the rates among patients receiving placebo (in UNITI-1, 34.3%, 33.7%, and 21.5%, respectively, with P≤0.003 for both comparisons with placebo; in UNITI-2, 51.7%, 55.5%, and 28.7%, respectively, with P<0.001 for both doses). In the groups receiving maintenance doses of ustekinumab every 8 weeks or every 12 weeks, 53.1% and 48.8%, respectively, were in remission at week 44, as compared with 35.9% of those receiving placebo (P=0.005 and P=0.04, respectively). Within each trial, adverse-event rates were similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease, those receiving intravenous ustekinumab had a significantly higher rate of response than did those receiving placebo. Subcutaneous ustekinumab maintained remission in patients who had a clinical response to induction therapy. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01369329 , NCT01369342 , and NCT01369355 .).

Combination Therapy With Infliximab and Azathioprine Improves Infliximab Pharmacokinetic Features and Efficacy: A Post Hoc Analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Among immunosuppressive- and biologic-naïve patients with moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease (CD), a higher proportion of those treated with the combination of infliximab and azathioprine achieved corticosteroid-free remission at week 26 (CSFR26) than those given infliximab monotherapy; patients given the combination therapy also had higher serum concentrations of infliximab. Enhanced benefit of combination therapy may occur through synergistic modes of action or the influence of azathioprine on infliximab pharmacokinetics. METHODS: We analyzed data from 206 patients from whom week 30 serum samples were available: 97 received infliximab monotherapy (5 mg/kg, n = 97) and 109 received combination therapy (2.5 mg/kg/day; n = 109). Proportions of patients achieving CSFR26 and mucosal healing (absence of ulcers) at week 26 were calculated for each quartile of serum concentrations of infliximab, and exposure-response relationships were compared. RESULTS: Within quartiles of serum concentrations of infliximab, CSFR26 did not differ significantly between patients who received combination therapy vs monotherapy. However, among patients in the lowest quartile of serum concentration of infliximab, twice as many patients who received infliximab monotherapy achieved CSFR26 vs combination therapy. Anti-drug antibodies were detected only in the lowest quartile of serum concentrations of infliximab-in 35.9% of patients given monotherapy and 8.3% of patients given combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Among patients with CD and similar serum concentrations of infliximab, combination therapy with azathioprine was not significantly more effective than infliximab monotherapy. Combination therapy with azathioprine appears to improve efficacy by increasing pharmacokinetic features of infliximab. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00094458.

Pharmacokinetics and Exposure Response Relationships of Ustekinumab in Patients With Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to the p40 subunit of human interleukin 12 (IL12 and IL23) that has been approved for treatment of patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). However, there are few data on its pharmacokinetic properties or the relationship between drug exposure levels and patient response. We collected data from 2 Phase 3 induction studies and 1 maintenance study to determine ustekinumab's pharmacokinetic features, relationship between exposure and response, and optimal serum concentrations for efficacy. METHODS: We collected data on serum concentrations of ustekinumab and efficacy from induction studies of patients with moderate to severe CD given ustekinumab for 8 weeks following a single intravenous dose (either 130 mg or approximately 6 mg/kg). We collected the same data from a maintenance study of patients with a response to ustekinumab in the induction study who then received subcutaneous injections (90 mg) every 8 or 12 weeks for 44 weeks. At week 44 of the maintenance study (52 weeks after treatment began), patients were evaluated for the primary endpoint of clinical remission (defined as a CD activity index score below 150 points), endoscopic markers of efficacy, and serum level of C-reactive protein. Ustekinumab concentration data were categorized into quartiles and relationships between exposure and response were assessed. Optimal concentration cutoff values were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Serum concentrations of ustekinumab over time were proportional to dose and did not differ significantly between the induction studies. In the maintenance study, ustekinumab concentration reached the steady state by the second maintenance dose; the median trough concentration was approximately threefold higher in patients given ustekinumab at 8-week intervals compared with 12-week intervals. Ustekinumab serum concentrations associated with rates of clinical remission and endoscopic efficacy endpoints, correlated inversely with level of C-reactive protein, and did not associate with use of immunomodulators. Trough concentrations of ustekinumab of 0.8 (or even up to 1.4 µg/mL) or greater were associated with maintenance of clinical remission in a higher proportion of patients than patients with lower trough concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of data from Phase 3 studies of patients with moderate to severe CD, we found serum concentrations of ustekinumab to be proportional to dose and associate with treatment efficacy. Concentrations of ustekinumab did not seem to be affected by cotreatment with immunomodulators. Clinicaltrials.gov no. NCT01369329 (UNITI 1), NCT01369342 (UNITI 2), and NCT01369355 (IM-UNITI).

Efficacy of Ustekinumab for Inducing Endoscopic Healing in Patients With Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We evaluated the ability of ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody against the p40 subunit of interleukins 12 and 23, to induce endoscopic healing in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: We performed an endoscopy substudy of 334 patients with moderate to severe CD participating in 3 randomized controlled phase 3 studies to determine the safety and efficacy of ustekinumab induction and maintenance therapy. All patients underwent colonoscopy at baseline and week 8 of the induction studies and at week 44 of the maintenance study; all colonoscopies were assessed by a blinded central reader. During the induction studies, patients were randomly assigned to groups given intravenous ustekinumab (130 mg or 6 mg/kg) or placebo. At the baseline time point of the maintenance study (week 8 of the induction studies), patients with a clinical response to ustekinumab were randomly assigned to groups given subcutaneous ustekinumab (90 mg every 12 weeks or 8 weeks) or placebo. Additional maintenance analysis populations were patients who did not respond to ustekinumab or placebo during the induction studies, and patients who responded to placebo during the induction studies; we performed a post-hoc pooled analysis of randomly assigned and non-randomly assigned patients of the maintenance study. We analyzed data from patients with an ulcer in at least 1 segment at baseline of the induction studies. The primary end point was change in the Simplified Endoscopic Activity Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD), from baseline, at week 8. We also assessed the efficacy of maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Patients given ustekinumab had a greater reduction in SES-CD from the induction baseline time point until week 8 than placebo (reduction of 2.8 in patients given ustekinumab vs a reduction of 0.7 points in patients given placebo; P = .012). Results were similar among patients in different induction studies and patients given different doses of ustekinumab. At week 44, reductions in the SES-CD from the induction baseline were greater in patients given ustekinumab (for combined groups, a reduction of 2.5; P = .176 and for every 8 weeks, a reduction of 3.1; P = .107) than patients given placebo (reduction of 1.9 points). Maintenance results were similar for the larger pooled post-hoc analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of data from 3 trials of patients with moderate to severe CD, ustekinumab (intravenous induction and subcutaneous maintenance) reduces SES-CD compared with placebo. We observed significant reductions in endoscopic disease activity at week 8 of induction therapy with ustekinumab. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01369329, NCT01369342, and NCT01369355).

Immunogenicity of golimumab and its clinical relevance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: Golimumab immunogenicity was extensively studied during clinical development. As anti-drug antibody (ADA) detection with the standard bridging EIA (original-EIA) can yield false-negative results or underestimate ADA incidence and titres due to drug interference, a more sensitive assay was needed to determine clinical impact. METHODS: A highly sensitive drug-tolerant EIA (DT-EIA) was developed and cross-validated against the original-EIA. Samples from phase-3 subcutaneous golimumab rheumatological trials (GO-FORWARD-rheumatoid arthritis, GO-REVEAL-psoriatic arthritis, GO-RAISE-ankylosing spondylitis) were then retested. Associations between ADAs and golimumab pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety were assessed. RESULTS: The DT-EIA was more sensitive than the original-EIA and capable of detecting ADAs amid golimumab concentrations far exceeding those in immunogenicity test samples. Consequently, an 8-fold increase in the incidence of ADAs was observed with the DT-EIA (31.7%) vs original-EIA (4.1%) in the studies. Most ADA-positive patients identified by the DT-EIA had lower antibody titres, while most with higher titres were previously identified as ADA-positive by the original-EIA. With the DT-EIA, ADA-positive patients generally had lower trough serum golimumab concentrations than ADA-negative patients; however, ADA impact on serum golimumab concentrations was more notable at higher ADA titres (⩾100). No impact of ADAs on clinical efficacy or injection-site reactions was evident. CONCLUSION: ADA incidence was expectedly higher using the DT-EIA vs original-EIA; newly detected ADAs were characterized mostly by low titres, with no impact on clinical efficacy or injection-site reactions, consistent with previously observed original-EIA results. Golimumab immunogenicity with the DT-EIA is consistent with existing knowledge regarding the clinical relevance of ADAs detected with the original-EIA in patients with rheumatological disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00264550, NCT00265096, NCT00265083.

Modeling near-continuous clinical endpoint as categorical: application to longitudinal exposure-response modeling of Mayo scores for golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Accurate characterization of exposure-response relationship of clinical endpoints is important in drug development to identify optimal dose regimens. Endpoints with ≥ 10 ordered categories are typically analyzed as continuous. This manuscript aims to show circumstances where it is advantageous to analyze such data as ordered categorical. The results of continuous and categorical analyses are compared in a latent-variable based Indirect Response modeling framework for the longitudinal modeling of Mayo scores, ranging from 0 to 12, which is commonly used as a composite endpoint to measure the severity of ulcerative colitis (UC). Exposure response modeling of Mayo scores is complicated by the fact that studies typically include induction and maintenance phases with re-randomizations and other response-driven dose adjustments. The challenges are illustrated in this work by analyzing data collected from 3 phase II/III trials of golimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. Visual predictive check was used for model evaluations. The ordered categorical approach is shown to be accurate and robust compared to the continuous approach. In addition, a disease progression model with an empirical bi-phasic rate of onset was found to be superior to the commonly used placebo model with one onset rate. An application of this modeling approach in guiding potential dose-adjustment was illustrated.

Challenges in longitudinal exposure-response modeling of data from complex study designs: a case study of modeling CDAI score for ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease.

Informative exposure-response modeling of clinical endpoints is important in drug development to identify optimum dose and dosing regimens. Despite much recent progress in mechanism-based longitudinal modeling of clinical data, challenges remain in clinical trials of diseases such as Crohn's disease, where a commonly used composite endpoint Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) has considerable variation in its administration and scoring between different assessors and complex study designs typically include maintenance phases with randomized withdrawal re-randomizations and other response driven dose adjustments. This manuscript illustrates the complexities of exposure-response modeling of such composite endpoint data through a latent-variable based Indirect Response model framework for CDAI scores using data from three phase III trials of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's Disease. Visual predictive check was used to evaluate model performance. Potential impacts of the study design on model development and evaluation of the E-R relationship in the induction and maintenance phases of treatment are discussed. Certain biases appeared difficult to overcome, and an autocorrelated residual error model was found to provide improvement.

Factors associated with short- and long-term outcomes of therapy for Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Our post hoc analysis assessed the association of early (at weeks 26-30) clinical, endoscopic, biologic, and pharmacokinetic outcomes with corticosteroid-free remission at week 50 (CSFR50); CSFR50 was observed in 55.2% and 65.4% of patients treated with infliximab, alone or in combination with azathioprine, respectively. METHODS: We analyzed data from 203 patients: 96 received infliximab monotherapy and 107 received combination therapy. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to set cut-off points for the week 30 trough serum infliximab concentration (SIC30) and percentage change, from baseline, in the C-reactive protein (CRP) level at week 26, to predict CSFR50. Univariate and multivariate procedures analyzed predictive parameters of CSFR50 (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]). Mucosal healing (MH, zero ulcers) and CRP normalization (<8.0 mg/L) also were assessed. RESULTS: Trough SIC30 was higher in patients with than without CSFR50. Patients given combination therapy had higher trough SIC30s than those given monotherapy. Median trough SIC30 was significantly higher in patients with than without CSFR50 among those on infliximab monotherapy (2.14 vs 0.80 µg/mL; P = .006), but not for those on combination therapy (3.56 vs 3.54 µg/mL; P=.31). In patients with increased baseline levels of CRP (n = 120), corticosteroid-free remission at week 26 (CSFR26) (OR, 4.09; 95% CI, 1.65-10.11), and trough SIC30s of 3.0 µg/mL or greater (OR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.38-7.42) were associated significantly with CSFR50. In patients evaluable for MH (n = 123), trough SIC30s of 3.0 µg/mL or greater (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.53-7.28) and CRP normalization (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.10-6.54) were associated significantly with MH at week 26 (MH26). Furthermore, CSFR26 (OR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.81-10.82) and MH26 (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.33-6.81) were associated significantly with CSFR50. CONCLUSIONS: Trough SIC30 is associated positively with MH26; CSFR26 and MH26 are independent predictors of CSFR50. Trough SIC30 of 3.0 µg/mL or greater early during maintenance treatment is an important determinant of clinical and endoscopic Crohn's disease outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094458.

Subcutaneous golimumab maintains clinical response in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Subcutaneous golimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), was evaluated as maintenance therapy in TNFα antagonist-naive adults with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis, despite conventional therapy, who responded to golimumab induction therapy. METHODS: We performed a phase 3, double-blind trial of patients who completed golimumab induction trials (Program of Ulcerative Colitis Research Studies Utilizing an Investigational Treatment, eg, PURSUIT). Patients who responded to induction therapy with golimumab (n = 464) were assigned randomly to groups given placebo or injections of 50 or 100 mg golimumab every 4 weeks through week 52. Patients who responded to placebo in the induction study continued to receive placebo. Nonresponders in the induction study received 100 mg golimumab. The primary end point was clinical response maintained through week 54; secondary end points included clinical remission and mucosal healing at both weeks 30 and 54. RESULTS: Clinical response was maintained through week 54 in 47.0% of patients receiving 50 mg golimumab, 49.7% of patients receiving 100 mg golimumab, and 31.2% of patients receiving placebo (P = .010 and P < .001, respectively). At weeks 30 and 54, a higher percentage of patients who received 100 mg golimumab were in clinical remission and had mucosal healing (27.8% and 42.4%) than patients given placebo (15.6% and 26.6%; P = .004 and P = .002, respectively) or 50 mg golimumab (23.2% and 41.7%, respectively). Percentages of serious adverse events were 7.7%, 8.4%, and 14.3% among patients given placebo, 50 mg, or 100 mg golimumab, respectively; percentages of serious infections were 1.9%, 3.2%, and 3.2%, respectively. Among all patients given golimumab in the study, 3 died (from sepsis, tuberculosis, and cardiac failure, all in patients who received 100 mg golimumab) and 4 developed active tuberculosis. CONCLUSIONS: Golimumab (50 mg or 100 mg) maintained clinical response through week 54 in patients who responded to induction therapy with golimumab and had moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis; patients who received 100 mg golimumab had clinical remission and mucosal healing at weeks 30 and 54. Safety was consistent with that reported for other TNFα antagonists and golimumab in other approved indications. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00488631.

Subcutaneous golimumab induces clinical response and remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about the efficacy of golimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -α, for treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated subcutaneous golimumab induction therapy in TNF-α antagonist-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC despite conventional treatment. METHODS: We integrated double-blind phase 2 dose-finding and phase 3 dose-confirmation trials in a study of 1064 adults with UC (Mayo score: 6-12; endoscopic subscore ≥ 2; 774 patients in phase 3). Patients were randomly assigned to groups given golimumab doses of 100 mg and then 50 mg (phase 2 only), 200 mg and then 100 mg, or 400 mg and then 200 mg, 2 weeks apart. The phase 3 primary end point was week-6 clinical response. Secondary end points included week-6 clinical remission, mucosal healing, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score change. RESULTS: In phase 2, median changes from baseline in the Mayo score were -1.0, -3.0, -2.0, and -3.0, in the groups given placebo, 100 mg/50 mg, 200/100 mg, and 400/200 mg golimumab, respectively. In phase 3, rates of clinical response at week 6 were 51.0% and 54.9% among patients given 200 mg/100 mg and 400 mg/200 mg golimumab, respectively, vs 30.3% among those given placebo (both, P ≤ .0001). Rates of clinical remission and mucosal healing and mean changes in IBDQ scores were significantly greater in both golimumab groups vs the placebo group (P ≤ .0014, all comparisons). Rates of serious adverse events were 6.1% and 3.0%, and rates of serious infection were 1.8% and 0.5%, in the placebo and golimumab groups, respectively. One patient in the 400 mg/200 mg group died as a result of surgical complications of an ischiorectal abscess. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with subcutaneous golimumab induces clinical response, remission, and mucosal healing, and increases quality of life in larger percentages of patients with active UC than placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT00487539.

Association between serum concentration of infliximab and efficacy in adult patients with ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We analyzed data collected during the Active Ulcerative Colitis Trials (ACT-1 and ACT-2) to assess relationships between serum concentrations of infliximab and outcomes of adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: We compared serum concentrations of infliximab with outcomes of 728 patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis who participated in ACT-1 or ACT-2; efficacy data were collected at weeks 8, 30, and 54 (for ACT-1 only). Relationships between serum concentration of infliximab and efficacy outcomes were assessed using trend, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. We also evaluated factors that affected the relationship between exposure and response. RESULTS: Median serum concentrations of infliximab at weeks 8, 30, and/or 54 were significantly higher in patients with clinical response, mucosal healing, and/or clinical remission than in patients who did not meet these response criteria. There were statistically significant relationships between quartile of infliximab serum concentration and efficacy at these time points (P < .01). Infliximab therapy was effective for a smaller proportion of patients in the lowest quartile, and these patients had lower serum levels of albumin and a higher incidence of antibodies to infliximab than patients in other quartiles. Although the relationship between exposure to infliximab and response varied among patients, approximate serum concentrations of 41 µg/mL infliximab at week 8 of induction therapy and 3.7 µg/mL at steady-state during maintenance therapy produced optimal outcomes in patients. CONCLUSIONS: Serum concentrations of infliximab are associated with efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis; however, complex factors determine the relationship between exposure to this drug and response. A prospective evaluation of the value of measuring serum concentrations of infliximab should be performed before these data can be included in patient management strategies. Clinicaltrials.gov numbers: NCT00036439 and NCT00096655.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses of Ustekinumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease.

PURPOSE: Ustekinumab, a fully human immunoglobulin G1κ monoclonal antibody that antagonizes human interleukin-12/23p40, is an effective therapy for several immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including Crohn's disease (CD). This work characterizes the population pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure-response (E-R) relationships of ustekinumab in patients with CD using data from four Phase IIb/III clinical studies. METHODS: Serum ustekinumab concentration-time data from 1673 patients after IV and/or SC administration of ustekinumab were fitted simultaneously using nonlinear mixed effects modeling to develop a population PK model, which was subsequently used to evaluate simulation scenarios. Logistic regression E-R models were used to assess relationships between serum ustekinumab concentrations and clinical remission after induction (n = 1910) and maintenance (n = 387) treatment. FINDINGS: Ustekinumab PK properties are well described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Typical values of PK parameters for a 70-kg patient were: clearance, 0.192 L/d; volume of distribution at steady state, 4.62 L; and intercompartmental clearance, 0.287 L/d. Ustekinumab terminal elimination t1/2 was 19 days, and bioavailability after SC administration was 78.3%. Ustekinumab clearance was not affected by coadministration of immunosuppressive agents or corticosteroids. Body weight, serum albumin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist failure status, sex, race (Asian vs non-Asian), and anti-ustekinumab antibody status significantly affected ustekinumab disposition; however, the effects of these covariates on ustekinumab exposure were not clinically relevant. The population PK model predicts that a milligram/kilogram dosing approach will result in lower ustekinumab exposure in patients with lower body weight. A positive E-R relationship was established between ustekinumab concentration and efficacy outcomes. The treatment effect of ustekinumab after induction therapy was more pronounced among patients with higher baseline CRP concentrations relative to those with lower values. IMPLICATIONS: In patients with CD, ustekinumab disposition after IV and SC administration was biexponential and consistent with those in patients with ulcerative colitis. Prior treatment with TNF antagonists or the concomitant use of immunosuppressive agents or corticosteroids had no effect on ustekinumab disposition. None of the covariates that affected ustekinumab clearance had a clinically meaningful impact on ustekinumab exposure. E-R models support recommended posology of ustekinumab in adults with CD; however, an ∼6 mg/kg IV induction dose in pediatric patients with lower body weights may not provide exposure that matches that in adult patients. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifiers: NCT00771667, NCT01369329, NCT01369342, and NCT01369355.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Model Simulations: Predicted Exposure and Efficacy for Maintenance Doses of Intravenous Golimumab Every 6 or 8 Weeks in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.

PURPOSE: Golimumab is approved to treat moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis when given intravenously at weeks 0 and 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W) with concomitant methotrexate. These analyses assessed whether a shorter dosing interval could ameliorate diminished efficacy experienced by a small proportion of patients toward the end of the dosing interval. METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response modeling simulations were performed for intravenous golimumab 2 mg/kg at weeks 0 and 4, then Q8W or every 6 weeks (Q6W) through 1 year. A 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model with linear clearance developed based on GO-FURTHER (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Golimumab, an Anti-TNFα Monoclonal Antibody, Administered Intravenously, in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy) study data was used for pharmacokinetic simulations. A latent-variable indirect exposure-response model developed based on GO-FURTHER American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%/50%/70% improvement (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, respectively) data was used to predict clinical endpoints of ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 response rates. FINDINGS: For Q6W and Q8W dosing, respectively, predicted median golimumab steady-state trough (Ctrough,ss) concentrations were 0.57 and 0.24 µg/mL, and Cmax at steady state values were 33.1 and 32.9 µg/mL. Predicted peak median ACR20 steady-state response rates were 76.7% (Q6W) and 75.6% (Q8W). Predicted median ACR20 response rates at Ctrough,ss increased by 4.7 percentage points with Q6W (73.7%) versus Q8W (69.0%) dosing. Greater improvement in ACR20 response rates at trough time points was predicted in patients with lower golimumab trough serum concentrations. Consistent findings were observed for ACR50/ACR70 response rates. IMPLICATIONS: These simulations suggest that intravenous golimumab Q6W dosing increases golimumab Ctrough,ss, which may improve clinical response in the small proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with waning efficacy at the end of the standard dosing interval. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT00973479. Clinicaltrialsregister.eu: EudraCT 2008-006064-11.

Ustekinumab in Paediatric Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease: Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy Results from UniStar, a Phase 1 Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety/tolerability, and efficacy of ustekinumab in children with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. METHODS: In this Phase 1, multicentre, 16-week, double-blind, induction dose-ranging study [NCT02968108], patients aged 2-<18 years [body weight ≥10 kg] were randomised [1:1] to one of two weight range-based intravenous induction doses: 130 mg vs 390 mg in patients ≥40kg and 3 mg/kg vs 9 mg/kg in patients <40kg. At Week 8, all patients received a single subcutaneous ustekinumab maintenance dose of 90 mg in patients ≥40kg or 2 mg/kg in patients <40kg. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were randomised and treated with ustekinumab [n = 23 lower dose; n = 21 higher dose]; median [interquartile range] age was 13.0 [12-16] years. Pharmacokinetics were similar to those in adults with Crohn's disease. However, serum ustekinumab concentrations were lower among those with body weight <40 kg compared with patients ≥40 kg and the reference Phase 3 adult population. Through Week 16, 73% of patients reported ≥1 adverse event [82.6% lower vs 62% higher dose]; two discontinued due to adverse events [one in each group]. Serious adverse events occurred in 16% [26% lower, 5% higher dose], with Crohn's disease exacerbation being the most frequent. At Week 16, 22%/29% [lower/higher dose] achieved clinical remission [Paediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index ≤10]. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics/safety profiles were generally consistent with those observed in adults with Crohn's disease. These results suggest a different dosing regimen may be required for patients <40 kg from that employed in this study; additional pharmacokinetic analyses may be needed in this population.