Pembrolizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus placebo plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-412): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite multimodal therapy, 5-year overall survival for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is about 50%. We assessed the addition of pembrolizumab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced HNSCC. METHODS: In the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-412 trial, participants with newly diagnosed, high-risk, unresected locally advanced HNSCC from 130 medical centres globally were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab (200 mg) plus chemoradiotherapy or placebo plus chemoradiotherapy. Randomisation was done using an interactive response technology system and was stratified by investigator's choice of radiotherapy regimen, tumour site and p16 status, and disease stage, with participants randomly assigned in blocks of four per stratum. Participants, investigators, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignments. Local pharmacists were aware of assignments to support treatment preparation. Pembrolizumab and placebo were administered intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 17 doses (one before chemoradiotherapy, two during chemoradiotherapy, 14 as maintenance therapy). Chemoradiotherapy included cisplatin (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously once every 3 weeks for two or three doses and accelerated or standard fractionation radiotherapy (70 Gy delivered in 35 fractions). The primary endpoint was event-free survival analysed in all randomly assigned participants. Safety was analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03040999, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between April 19, 2017, and May 2, 2019, 804 participants were randomly assigned to the pembrolizumab group (n=402) or the placebo group (n=402). 660 (82%) of 804 participants were male, 144 (18%) were female, and 622 (77%) were White. Median study follow-up was 47·7 months (IQR 42·1-52·3). Median event-free survival was not reached (95% CI 44·7 months-not reached) in the pembrolizumab group and 46·6 months (27·5-not reached) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·83 [95% CI 0·68-1·03]; log-rank p=0·043 [significance threshold, p≤0·024]). 367 (92%) of 398 participants treated in the pembrolizumab group and 352 (88%) of 398 participants treated in the placebo group had grade 3 or worse adverse events. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (108 [27%] of 398 participants in the pembrolizumab group vs 100 [25%] of 398 participants in the placebo group), stomatitis (80 [20%] vs 69 [17%]), anaemia (80 [20%] vs 61 [15%]), dysphagia (76 [19%] vs 62 [16%]), and decreased lymphocyte count (76 [19%] vs 81 [20%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 245 (62%) participants in the pembrolizumab group versus 197 (49%) participants in the placebo group, most commonly pneumonia (43 [11%] vs 25 [6%]), acute kidney injury (33 [8%] vs 30 [8%]), and febrile neutropenia (24 [6%] vs seven [2%]). Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants in the pembrolizumab group (one participant each from aspiration pneumonia, end-stage renal disease, pneumonia, and sclerosing cholangitis) and six (2%) participants in the placebo group (three participants from pharyngeal haemorrhage and one participant each from mouth haemorrhage, post-procedural haemorrhage, and sepsis). INTERPRETATION: Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy did not significantly improve event-free survival compared with chemoradiotherapy alone in a molecularly unselected, locally advanced HNSCC population. No new safety signals were seen. Locally advanced HNSCC remains a challenging disease that requires better treatment approaches. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (DESTINY-Breast02): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the single-arm, phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 trial, trastuzumab deruxtecan showed robust activity in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who were refractory or resistant to trastuzumab emtansine; a population with scarce effective treatments. In DESTINY-Breast02, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan with treatment of physician's choice in this patient population. METHODS: This randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial was conducted at 227 sites (hospitals, university hospitals, clinics, community centres, and private oncology centres) in North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, Brazil, Israel, and Türkiye. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had unresectable or HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, previously received trastuzumab emtansine, disease progression, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate renal and hepatic function. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (intravenously at 5·4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or treatment of physician's choice using block randomisation. Treatment of physician's choice was either capecitabine (1250 mg/m2; orally twice per day on days 1-14) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 then 6 mg/kg once per day) or capecitabine (1000 mg/m2) plus lapatinib (1250 mg orally once per day on days 1-21), with a 21-day schedule. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival based on blinded independent central review in the full analysis set. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03523585. FINDINGS: Between Sept 6, 2018, and Dec 31, 2020, 608 patients were randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=406; two did not receive treatment) or treatment of physician's choice (n=202; seven did not receive treatment). 608 (100%) patients were included in the full analysis set. The median age was 54·2 years (IQR 45·5-63·4) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 54·7 years (48·0-63·0) in the treatment of physician's choice group. 384 (63%) patients were White, 603 (99%) were female, and five (<1%) were male. The median follow-up was 21·5 months (IQR 15·2-28·4) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 18·6 months (8·8-26·0) in the treatment of physician's choice group. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was 17·8 months (95% CI 14·3-20·8) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group versus 6·9 months (5·5-8·4) in the treatment of physician's choice group (HR 0·36 [0·28-0·45]; p<0·0001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (293 [73%] of 404 with trastuzumab deruxtecan vs 73 [37%] of 195 with treatment of physician's choice), vomiting (152 [38%] vs 25 [13%]), alopecia (150 [37%] vs eight [4%]), fatigue (147 [36%] vs 52 [27%]), diarrhoea (109 [27%] vs 105 [54%]), and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (seven [2%] vs 100 [51%]). Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 213 (53%) patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan versus 86 (44%) receiving treatment of physician's choice; whereas drug-related interstitial lung disease occurred in 42 (10%; including two grade 5 death events) versus one (<1%). INTERPRETATION: DESTINY-Breast02 shows the favourable benefit-risk profile of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer, as previously reported in DESTINY-Breast01, and is the first randomised study to show that one antibody-drug conjugate can overcome resistance to a previous one. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of olaparib in BRCA-mutated, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting: final analysis of LUCY.

PURPOSE: The interim analysis of the phase IIIb LUCY trial demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of olaparib in patients with germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC), with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.11 months, which was similar to that in the olaparib arm of the phase III OlympiAD trial (7.03 months). This prespecified analysis provides final overall survival (OS) and safety data. METHODS: The open-label, single-arm LUCY trial of olaparib (300 mg, twice daily) enrolled adults with gBRCAm or somatic BRCA-mutated (sBRCAm), HER2-negative mBC. Patients had previously received a taxane or anthracycline for neoadjuvant/adjuvant or metastatic disease and up to two lines of chemotherapy for mBC. RESULTS: Of 563 patients screened, 256 (gBRCAm, n = 253; sBRCAm, n = 3) were enrolled. In the gBRCAm cohort, median investigator-assessed PFS (primary endpoint) was 8.18 months and median OS was 24.94 months. Olaparib was clinically effective in all prespecified subgroups: hormone receptor status, previous chemotherapy for mBC, previous platinum-based chemotherapy (including by line of therapy), and previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor use. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nausea (55.3%) and anemia (39.2%). Few patients (6.3%) discontinued olaparib owing to a TEAE. No deaths associated with AEs occurred during the study treatment or 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSION: The LUCY patient population reflects a real-world population in line with the licensed indication of olaparib in mBC. These findings support the clinical effectiveness and safety of olaparib in patients with gBRCAm, HER2-negative mBC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials registration number: NCT03286842.

Impact of opioid analgesics on survival in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the effects of concurrent opioid analgesic (OA) use with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: In this observational retrospective study, we included advanced cancer patients who received ICIs at Hacettepe University Hospital's Department of Medical Oncology between June 2018 and January 2023. RESULTS: Our study included 375 recurrent or metastatic cancer patients treated with ICIs in the first, second line, or beyond. There were no significant differences between the OA-treated and OA-untreated groups regarding median age, age group, gender, primary tumor location, ICI type, or the presence of baseline liver and lung metastases. However, the OA-treated group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of patients who had received three or more prior treatments before initiating ICIs (p = 0.015). OA-Untreatment was significantly correlated with prolonged mPFS (6.83 vs. 4.30 months, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.44-0.79, p < 0.001) and mOS (17.05 vs. 7.68 months, HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates an association between the concurrent use of OAs and reduced OS and PFS in patients treated with ICIs. While OA treatment serves as a surrogate marker for higher disease burden, it may also suggest a potential biological relationship between opioids and immunotherapy efficacy.

The efficacy of palbociclib and ribociclib in the first-line treatment of metastatic hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer in male patients: a Turkish oncology group (TOG) study.

INTRODUCTION: Male breast cancer, comprising approximately 1% of all breast cancer cases, often leads to the exclusion of male patients as a criterion in clinical trials. While the efficacy of Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors has been established in metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR +) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2 -) breast cancer in women, limited data exist on their effectiveness in male patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of palbociclib or ribociclib in male patients with breast cancer. METHODS: This study is a multicenter, retrospective study. We included male patients with HR + and HER2-metastatic breast cancer who received palbociclib or ribociclib as first-line treatment. Our primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rates (ORR), and drug-related adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 46 male patients from 27 institutions were enrolled. The median age at initiation of CDK 4/6 inhibitors was 63.64 ± 13.69 years, with a median follow-up of 21.33 (95% CI 14.92-27.74) months. The ORR were 84% for palbociclib and 76.2% for ribociclib. The mPFS for the entire cohort was 28.06 months (95% CI 18.70-37.42). No significant difference in PFS was observed between palbociclib and ribociclib (mPFS: 24.46 months (95% CI 11.51-37.42) vs 28.33 months (95% CI 14.77-41.88), respectively, p = 0.211). No new adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that palbociclib and ribociclib are effective and safe options for first-line treatment in male patients with HR + /HER2 - metastatic breast cancer. However, further prospective studies are warranted to establish their efficacy in this population.

Real-world evaluation of nivolumab in patients with non-nasopharyngeal recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: a retrospective multi-center study by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG).

OBJECTIVES: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) represent a significant global health concern due to high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite therapeutic advances, the prognosis for advanced or recurrent cases remains challenging. Nivolumab obtained approval for recurrent or metastatic HNC based on the Phase III CheckMate 141 trial. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world outcomes of nivolumab in patients with non-nasopharyngeal HNC. DESIGN: In this multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed 124 patients with recurrent or metastatic non-nasopharyngeal HNC who received nivolumab in the second-line setting and beyond. Data were collected from 20 different cancer centers across Turkey. The effectiveness and safety of the treatment and survival outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Nivolumab exhibited favorable clinical responses, yielding an objective response rate of 29.9% and a disease control rate of 55.7%. Safety assessments revealed a generally well-tolerated profile, with no instances of treatment discontinuation or mortality due to side effects. Survival analysis disclosed a median overall survival (OS) of 11.8 (95% CI 8.4-15.2) months. Multivariate analysis revealed that ECOG-PS ≥ 1 (HR: 1.64, p = 0.045), laryngeal location (HR: 0.531, p = 0.024), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 3.5 (HR: 1.97, p = 0.007) were independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with recurrent or metastatic non-nasopharyngeal HNC in real-world settings. Further studies are needed on factors affecting response to treatment and survival outcomes.

Immunogenicity of two doses of inactive COVID-19 vaccine and third booster dose mRNA vaccine in patients with cancer receiving active systemic therapy.

We aimed to evaluate the seroconversion rates after two doses of inactive COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac) and the benefit of a third dose mRNA vaccine booster in patients with cancer receiving active treatment. Patients with solid tumors receiving active treatment (n = 101) and patients with no-cancer (n = 48) as the control group were included in the study. All the patients and controls had received two doses of CoronaVac and a third booster dose of the mRNA vaccine (Bnt162b2). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor Binding Domain IgG antibody levels after the second and third dose were measured with quantitative ELISA. The median age of the patients was 66 (IQR 60-71). 79% of the patients were receiving chemotherapy, and 21% were receiving immunotherapy at the time of vaccination. Antibody levels measured after two doses of CoronaVac were significantly lower in patients with cancer than in the control group (median 0 µg/ml [IQR 0-1.17 µg/ml] vs median 0.91 µg/ml [IQR 0-2.24 µg/ml], respectively, P = .002). Seropositivity rates were 46.5% in patients with cancer and 72.9% in the control group (P = .002). Antibody measurement was performed in 26 patients after the third dose. Seroconversion rate increased from 46.5% to 88.5% (P < .001), and the antibody titers significantly increased with the third-dose booster (median 0 µg/ml [IQR 0-1.17 µg/ml] after two doses vs 12.6 µg/ml [IQR 1.8-69.1 µg/ml] after third booster dose, P < .001). Immunogenicity of CoronaVac is low in patients with cancer receiving active treatment, and administering a third dose of an mRNA vaccine is effective in terms of improving seroconversion rates.

Prognostic factors of overall and prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with 177 Lu-PSMA-617. A single-center prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is characterized by heterogeneity among patients as well as therapy responses due to diverse genetic, epigenetic differences, and resistance mechanisms. At this stage of the disease, therapy modalities should be individualized in light of the patients' clinical state, symptoms, and genetic characteristics. In this prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients with mCRPC treated with 177 Lutetium labeled PSMA-617 therapy (PSMA-RLT), as well as baseline and therapy-related parameters associated with survival. METHODS: This prospective study included 52 patients who received two to six cycles of PSMA-RLT. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-progression-free survival (PFS). 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 68 Ga-PSMA (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computer Tomography (PET/CT) scans were performed for a comprehensive assessment of tumor burden and heterogeneity. Biochemical, imaging, clinical, and therapy-related parameters were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and Cox regression analyses to predict OS and PFS. RESULTS: Median OS and PSA-PFS were 17.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.2-20.2) and 6.6 months (95% CI: 4.5-8.8), respectively. Primary resistance to PSMA-RLT (hazard ratio [HR]: 12.57, 95% CI: 2.4-65.2, p: 0.003), <30% PSA response rate after first cycle of PSMA-RLT (HR: 1.016, 95% CI: 1.006-1.03, p: 0.003), FDG > PSMA disease (HR: 4.9, 95% CI: 1.19-20.62, p: 0.03), PSA doubling time (PSA DT) of ≤2.4 months (HR: 15.7, 95% CI: 3.7-66.4, p: <0.0001), and low hemoglobin levels (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41-0.83, p: 0.003) were correlated with poor OS in the multivariate analysis. Bone scintigraphy > PSMA disease (HR: 5.6; 95% CI: 1.8-17, p: 0.002) and high C-reactive protein (HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.7, p: 0.001) were significant predictive biomarkers for PFS in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: PSA response rate and pattern to PSMA-RLT are the most important predictors of survival in patients receiving PSMA-RLT. Being a strong predictive biomarker, combined FDG and PSMA PET can be helpful for the decision of PSMA-RLT eligibility.

Comparison of PD-L1 and VISTA expression status in primary and recurrent/refractory tissue after (chemo)radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: PD-L1 and VISTA are thought to play a role in escape from the immune system, tumor progression, and treatment response in tumoral tissue. The current study aimed to evaluate the effects of radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on PD-L1 and VISTA expression in head and neck cancers. METHODS: PD-L1 and VISTA expression were compared between the primary biopsy taken at the time of diagnosis and refractory tissue biopsies of patients who received definitive CRT or recurrent tissue biopsies of patients who had surgery followed by adjuvant RT or CRT. RESULTS: In total, 47 patients were included. Radiotherapy had no effect on the expression levels of PD-L1 and VISTA in patients with head and neck cancer (p = 0.542 and p = 0.425, respectively). A positive correlation was found between PD-L1 and VISTA expression (p < 0.001; r = 0.560). PD-L1 and VISTA expression in the first biopsy were found to be significantly higher in clinical lymph node-positive patients compared to node-negative patients (PD-L1 p = 0.038; VISTA p = 0.018). The median overall survival of patients with ≥ 1% VISTA expression in the initial biopsy was significantly shorter than that of patients with < 1% VISTA expression (52.4 vs. 110.1 months, respectively; p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: It was found that PD-L1 and VISTA expression did not change with RT or CRT. Further studies are needed to evaluate the relationship of PD-L1 and VISTA expression with RT and CRT.

The incidence and risk factors for acute kidney injury in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Recent observational studies reported acute kidney injury (AKI) events in over 10% of the patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, these studies included patients treated in high-resource settings and earlier lines. Therefore, we aimed to assess the AKI rates and predisposing factors in ICI-treated patients from a limited resource setting. We evaluated 252 patients with advanced cancer for this retrospective cohort study. AKI events were defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. The median age was 59 years. The melanoma (18.3%), non-small cell lung cancer (14.7%) and renal cell carcinoma (22.6%) patients comprised over half of the cohort. During the follow-up, 45 patients (17.9%) had at least one AKI episode. In multivariable analyses, patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) [odds ratio (OR), 3.385; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.510-7.588; P = 0.003], hypoalbuminemia (OR, 2.848; 95% CI, 1.225-6.621; P = 0.015) or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor use (OR, 2.236; 95% CI, 1.017-4.919; P = 0.045) had increased AKI risk. There was a trend towards increased AKI risk in patients with diabetes (OR, 2.042; 95% CI, 0.923-4.518; P = 0.78) and regular proton pump inhibitors use (OR, 2.024; 95% CI, 0.947-4.327; P = 0.069). In this study, we observed AKI development under ICIs in almost one in five patients with cancer. The increased AKI rates in CKD, hypoalbuminemia or RAAS inhibitor use pointed out a need for better onco-nephrology collaboration and efforts to improve the nutritional status of ICI-treated patients.

Impact of adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2 positive breast cancer patients: a multicenter real-life HER2PATH study.

AIM: To investigate the pathological complete response (pCR) achieved after neoadjuvant therapy with versus without adding pertuzumab (P) to trastuzumab (H) plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) patients in a real-life setting. METHODS: A total of 1528 female HER2+ BC patients who received NCT plus H with or without P were included in this retrospective real-life study. Primary endpoint was pCR rate (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Clinicopathological characteristics, event-free survival (EFS) time, and relapse rates were evaluated with respect to HER2 blockade (NCT-H vs. NCT-HP) and pCR. RESULTS: Overall, 62.2% of patients received NCT-H and 37.8% received NCT-HP. NCT-HP was associated with a significantly higher pCR rate (66.4 vs. 56.8%, p < 0.001) and lower relapse (4.5 vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001) in comparison to NCT-H. Patients with pCR had a significantly lower relapse (5.6 vs. 14.9%, p < 0.001) and longer EFS time (mean(SE) 111.2(1.9) vs. 93.9(2.7) months, p < 0.001) compared to patients with non-pCR. Patients in the NCT-HP group were more likely to receive docetaxel (75.0 vs. 40.6%, p < 0.001), while those with pCR were more likely to receive paclitaxel (50.2 vs. 40.7%, p < 0.001) and NCT-HP (41.5 vs. 32.1%, p < 0.001). Hormone receptor status and breast conservation rates were similar in NCT-HP vs. NCT-H groups and in patients with vs. without pCR. Invasive ductal carcinoma (OR, 2.669, 95% CI 1.596 to 4.464, p < 0.001), lower histological grade of the tumor (OR, 4.052, 95% CI 2.446 to 6.713, p < 0.001 for grade 2 and OR, 3.496, 95% CI 2.020 to 6.053, p < 0.001 for grade 3), lower T stage (OR, 1.959, 95% CI 1.411 to 2.720, p < 0.001) and paclitaxel (vs. docetaxel, OR, 1.571, 95% CI 1.127 to 2.190, p = 0.008) significantly predicted the pCR. CONCLUSIONS: This real-life study indicates that adding P to NCT-H enables higher pCR than NCT-H in HER2+ BC, while pCR was associated with lower relapse and better EFS time.

Treatment efficacy of ribociclib or palbociclib plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Background: Ribociclib, palbociclib and abemaciclib are currently approved CDK4/6 inhibitors along with aromatase inhibitors as the first-line standard-of-care for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Methods: The authors report retrospective real-life data for 600 patients with estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who were treated with ribociclib and palbociclib in combination with letrozole. Results & conclusion: The results demonstrated that the combination of palbociclib or ribociclib with letrozole has similar progression-free survival and overall survival benefit in real life for the patient group with similar clinical features. Specifically, endocrine sensitivity may be a factor to be considered in the treatment preference.

Role of sarcopenia on survival and treatment-related toxicity in head and neck cancer: a narrative review of current evidence and future perspectives.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to provide an up-to-date summary of sarcopenia and its clinical implications for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: We conducted a literature review of recent studies investigating the prevalence of sarcopenia in HNC patients, its detection using MRI or CT scans, and its association with clinical outcomes such as disease-free and overall survival time, radiotherapy-related side effects, cisplatin toxicity, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Sarcopenia, characterized by low skeletal muscle mass (SMM), is a prevalent condition in HNC patients and can be effectively detected using routine MRI or CT scans. Low SMM in HNC patients is associated with increased risks of shorter disease-free and overall survival times, as well as radiotherapy-related side effects such as mucositis, dysphagia, and xerostomia. In addition, cisplatin toxicity is more severe in HNC patients with low SMM, leading to higher dose-limiting toxicity and treatment interruptions. Low SMM may also predict higher risks of surgical complications in head and neck surgery. Identifying sarcopenic patients can aid physicians in better riskstratifying HNC patients for therapeutic or nutritional interventions to improve clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia is a significant concern for HNC patients and can impact their clinical outcomes. Routine MRI or CT scans can effectively detect low SMM in HNC patients. Identifying sarcopenic patients can aid physicians in better risk-stratifying HNC patients for therapeutic or nutritional interventions to improve clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to explore the potential of interventions to mitigate the negative effects of sarcopenia in HNC patients.

The association between pan-immune-inflammation value and survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: A significant portion of patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) relapse despite multimodality treatment denoting the need for biomarkers. The pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) is a recently developed blood count-based prognostic biomarker. We evaluated the relationship between PIV and survival in locally advanced HNSCC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: A total of 199 patients who underwent CRT at Hacettepe University Oncology Hospital were included. The relationship between clinical and laboratory parameters with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed by multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The median age was 59 years and 90.5% of the patients were male. 66.8% of the patients had laryngeal primaries, and 78.9% had T3-T4 disease. 84.9% of the patients received CRT with cisplatin. The optimal PIV threshold value was calculated as 404 in ROC analyses. This PIV value had 75.8% sensitivity and 70.4% specificity for OS prediction (AUC 0.781; 95% CI 0.715-0.846; p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, high PIV levels (≤ 404 vs. > 404, HR 2.862; 95% CI 1.553-5.276; p = 0.001), higher NLR (≤ 2.5 vs. > 2.5, HR 1.827; 95% CI 1.017-3.281; p = 0.044) levels and ECOG performance score of 2 (HR 2.267; 95% CI 1.385-3.711; p = 0.001) were associated with shorter OS. These factors were associated with shorter DFS also (HR for PIV 2.485, 95% CI 1.383-4.467, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: We observed shorter OS and DFS in locally advanced HNSCC patients with high PIV levels. If prospective studies support our findings, the PIV score could be a prognostic biomarker in HNSCC.

Adjuvant treatment with paclitaxel plus trastuzumab for node-negative breast cancer: real-life experience.

Background: In node-negative HER2-overexpressed breast cancers, adjuvant paclitaxel plus trastuzumab treatment is a successful de-escalation approach with excellent survival outcomes. Methods: All patients with HER2+ breast cancer treated in our centers were retrospectively reviewed. Results: We analyzed 173 patients who were treated with adjuvant paclitaxel plus trastuzumab. The mean tumor size was 2.2 cm. There were eight invasive disease events or death: four distant recurrences (2.3%), three locoregional recurrences (1.7%) and one death without documented recurrence after a 52 month follow-up. The 3-year disease-free survival and recurrence-free interval rate was 96.6%. Conclusion: This real-life experience with adjuvant paclitaxel plus trastuzumab demonstrated few distant recurrences and is compatible with the APT trial findings.

Lay abstract In oncology practice, there have been some efforts to avoid the toxicity of combination chemotherapies and reduce the amount of treatment given in recent decades. These strategies have been studied especially for patients with a specific subtype of early-stage breast cancer. We present the results from patients treated in our centers and discuss them in relation to the literature.

Infectious complications of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in patients with hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors plus endocrine therapy (ET) improved the survival outcomes and became the standard of care in the treatment of metastatic hormone-positive breast cancer. However, these combinations increased the risk of neutropenia compared with ET alone. While the infection-related mortalities did not seem to be increased, the exact risk of infections with CDK 4/6 inhibitor and ET combinations is relatively understudied. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of CDK 4/6 inhibitor clinical trials to assess the infection risk of adding CDK4/6 inhibitors to ET. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We systemically searched the PubMed database for relevant clinical trials. For each study, all grade and grade 3 or higher infections, upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), urinary tract infections (UTI), pneumonia, and febrile neutropenia rates were recorded whenever available. The hazard ratios (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of infection risk were calculated via the generic inverse-variance method with a random-effects model. RESULTS: Nine eligible studies were included in the analyses (MONALEESA-2,3,7, MONARCH-2,3, MONARCH plus, PALOMA-1,2,3). In the meta-analysis of these studies, CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus ET arms were associated with increased all grade infections (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.56-2.01, p < 0.00001), grade 3 or higher infections, (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.28-2.43, p = 0.0005), UTIs (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.19-2.12, p = 0.002), and febrile neutropenia (HR 4.28, 95% CI 1.73-10.62, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, we observed that adding CDK4/6 inhibitors to ET significantly increased the risk of all grade, grade 3 or higher infections, and urinary tract infections. We propose that closer follow-up for infections should be considered for metastatic breast cancer patients using CDK 4/6 inhibitors. This may help clinicians to recognize infections earlier which prevents early death from infection.

HER2-low breast cancer could be associated with an increased risk of brain metastasis.

PURPOSE: The HER2-low breast cancer is a newly recognized entity with the clinical characteristics is yet to be defined. We hypothesized that HER2-low breast cancer could lead to an increased rate of brain metastases in patients with localized breast cancer. We tested this hypothesis in a large cohort of breast cancer patients with long follow-up. METHODS: We included 2686 adult breast cancer patients followed up in Hacettepe University Cancer Center. Patients with 1 + positive HER2 expression and 2 + HER2 expression with a negative FISH were categorized as HER2-low disease. We evaluated the brain metastasis risk with binary logistic regression analyses and reported odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: During a median 95.4 (IQR 72.6-123.1) month follow-up, 184 patients developed brain metastasis (6.9%). The brain metastases were developed in 5.1% of the patients with HER2-negative disease, 8.5% of the patients with HER2-low disease, and 10.1% of the patients with HER2-positive disease. A multivariable binary logistic regression model demonstrated an increased risk of brain metastasis in patients with HER2-low disease (OR: 1.611, 95% CI 1.055-2.460, p = 0.027) and in HER2-positive patients (OR: 1.837, 95% CI 1.308-2.580, p < 0.001). Additionally, HR + -HER2-low disease was associated with a decreased DFS compared to HR + -HER2-negative disease (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed an increased risk of brain metastasis in localized breast cancer patients with HER2-low disease. We think that a high level of vigilance and a low threshold for brain imaging could benefit HER2-low breast cancer patients similar to the patients with HER-positive disease.

The burden of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions in older cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy is a common problem in older cancer patients, although the data about polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescription practices is limited in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the polypharmacy frequency and drug-drug interactions in older cancer patients (≥65 years) treated with ICIs. METHODS: A total of 70 geriatric patients with advanced cancer were included. The polypharmacy was defined as regular use of 5 or more drugs. The START/STOPP Criteria Version 2 was used for the potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) and potential prescription omissions (PPO). The Medscape Drug Interaction Checker was used for potential drug-drug interactions. RESULTS: The patients had a median of 6 regular drugs, and polypharmacy was present in 77.1%. The polypharmacy risk was significantly increased in patients over 75 years of age (p = 0.028) and with opioid use (p = 0.048). The 50% of patients had category D or X interactions. Patients with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index had significantly increased risk for drug interactions (CCI ≤10 vs. >10, p = 0.017). The PIMs were present in 44.3% and the PPOs in 68.6% of the patients. While the overall survival and immune related adverse events were similar according to polypharmacy, in patients using seven or more drugs, the acute kidney injury risk was increased (HR: 4.667, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed a high rate of polypharmacy and inappropriate prescription practices in ICI-treated patients. These issues pointed out the need for improved general medical care and attention for better comedication management in ICI-treated patients.

The use of fulvestrant before chemotherapy improves survival in hormone-positive breast cancer: a real-life study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of fulvestrant and its affecting clinical factors, including the optimal sequencing of fulvestrant and chemotherapy in a real-life cohort. METHODS: The data of 256 metastatic hormone-positive breast cancer patients treated with fulvestrant were evaluated. The association of clinical factors with survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 57 years. More than half of the patients used fulvestrant in later lines and after chemotherapy (75.8%). The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all cohort were 6.05 ± 0.56 and 29.70 ± 1.61 months, respectively. Primary endocrine resistance (HR: 1.989, 95% CI: 1.430-2.766, <0.001), use of fulvestrant after chemotherapy (HR: 1.849, 95% CI: 1.182-2.891, p = 0.007) and visceral metastases (HR: 1.587, 95% CI: 1.128-2.233, p = 0.008) were associated with decreased OS in multivariate analyses. Sixteen patients were treated with trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination. The overall response rate (p = 0.340), disease control rate (p = 0.076), and OS (p = 0.289) and PFS (p = 0.276) were similar to overall cohort. DISCUSSION: In our experience, fulvestrant treatment was associated with comparable OS to clinical trials in a large cohort of patients. Patients treated with fulvestrant before chemotherapy were garnered significantly more benefit.

Clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with solid tumors: Turkish National Registry Data.

We present demographic, clinical, laboratory characteristics and outcomes of the patients with solid malignancies and novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) collected from the National COVID-19 Registry of Turkey. A total of 1523 patients with a current or past diagnosis of solid tumors and diagnosed with COVID-19 (confirmed with PCR) between 11 March and 20 May 2020 were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Median age was 61 (range: 18-94), and 752 (49%) were male. The most common types of cancers were breast (19.8%), prostate (10.9%) and colorectal cancer (10.8%). 65% of the patients had at least one comorbidity. At least one COVID-19-directed therapy was given in 73% of the patients.. Hospitalization rate of the patients was 56.6% and intensive care unit admission rate was 11.4%. Seventy-seven (5.1%) patients died within 30 days of diagnosis. The first multivariate model which included only the demographic and clinical characteristics showed older age, male gender and presence of diabetes and receipt of cytotoxic therapy to be associated with increased 30-day mortality, while breast and prostate cancer diagnoses were associated with lower 30-day mortality. In the second set, we further included laboratory parameters. The presence of leukocytosis (OR 6.7, 95% CI 3.3-13.7, P < .001), lymphocytopenia (OR 3,1, 95% CI 1,6-6,1, P = .001) and thrombocytopenia (OR 3,4 95% CI 1,5-8,1, P = .005) were found to be associated with increased 30-day mortality. Relatively lower mortality compared to Western countries and China mainly results from differences in baseline risk factors but may also implicate the importance of intensive supportive care.