Quantitative analysis of the three gut microbiota in UC and non-UC patients using real-time PCR.

BACKGROUND: and study aims: Gastrointestinal microbiota are closely related to the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed at quantification of F. prausnitzii, Provetella, and Peptostreptococcus in UC and non-UC patients using Real-Time PCR and a new set of primers were also validated for this purpose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, the relative abundance of microbial populations between the UC and non-UC subjects were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). DNA extraction from biopsies and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA gene-targeted species-specific primers was performed to detect the anaerobic bacterial species. The qRT-PCR was used to show the relative change in the bacterial populations of F. prausnitzii, Provetella, and Peptostreptococcus in the UC and non-UC subjects. RESULTS: Our data for detection of the anaerobic intestinal flora showed Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Provetella and Peptostreptococcus were the predominant microflora in the controls and showed significant differences (p = 0.002, 0.025 and 0.039, respectively). The qRT-PCR analyses of F. prausnitzii, Provetella and Peptostreptococcus were 8.69-, 9.38- and 5.77-higher, respectively, in the control group than in the UC group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed decreased abundance of F. prausnitzii, Provetella and Peptostreptococcus in the intestine of UC patients in comparison to non-UC patients. Quantitative RT-PCR, as a progressive and sensitive method, could be useful for evaluation of bacterial populations in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases to attain appropriate therapeutic strategies.

Longitudinal Analyses of Gut-Associated Bacterial Microbiota in Ulcerative Colitis Patients.

BACKGROUND: The normal colonic microbiota is associated with the etiology of ulcerative colitis (UC). Several bacterial species are associated with the initiation and amplification of disease process. However, the etiology and mechanism of UC are poorly understood. The present study aimed to investigate, characterize, and compare the main composition of the mucosa-associated intestinal microflora in colonoscopic biopsy specimens of UC and non-UC patients. METHODS: Aerobic and facultative-anaerobic mucosa-associated bacteria were isolated and diagnosed from colonoscopic biopsy specimens of 40 UC patients and 40 patients without UC. Patients were selected as control from the same centers and colonoscopy was carried out for other reasons (mainly colorectal screening). Isolation and characterization for aerobic and facultative-anaerobic intestinal bacteria were carried out by conventional culture techniques. DNA extraction from biopsies and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA with gene-targeted and species-specific primers was performed for detection of anaerobic bacterial species. RESULTS: Several species of mucosa-associated aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria were found in biopsy specimens and there were no significant differences between UC patients and non-UC patients. Our investigation for detection of the anaerobic intestinal flora showed Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Prevotella, and Peptostreptococcus productus were the predominant microflora in controls and have significant differences (P = 0.002, 0.025 and 0.039, respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the first investigation of the intestinal mucosa-associated microflora in patients with UC in Iran. These results, although limited by sample size, allow a better understanding of changes in mucosa-associated bacterial flora in these patients, showing that decrease of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Provetella, and Peptostreptococcus productus in the intestinal tract may translate into a reduction in the important role of this beneficial bacterial species, which can lead to reduced protection of the gut mucosa and UC development.