Increased aquaporin 1 and 5 membrane expression in the lens epithelium of cataract patients.

In this work we have analyzed the expression levels of the main aquaporins (AQPs) expressed in human lens epithelial cells (HLECs) using 112 samples from patients treated with cataract surgery and 36 samples from individuals treated with refractive surgery, with transparent lenses as controls. Aquaporin-1 (AQP1) is the main AQP, representing 64.1% of total AQPs in HLECs, with aquaporin-5 (AQP5) representing 35.9% in controls. A similar proportion of each AQP in cataract was found. Although no differences were found at the mRNA level compared to controls, a significant 1.65-fold increase (p=0.001) in AQP1protein expression was observed in HLECs from cataract patients, with the highest differences being found for nuclear cataracts (2.1-fold increase; p<0.001). A similar trend was found for AQP5 (1.47-fold increase), although the difference was not significant (p=0.161). Moreover we have shown increased membrane AQP5 protein expression in HLECs of patients with cataracts. No association of AQP1 or AQP5 expression levels with age or sex was observed in either group. Our results suggest regulation of AQP1 and AQP5 at the post-translational level and support previous observations on the implication of AQP1 and 5 in maintenance of lens transparency in animal models. Our results likely reflect a compensatory response of the crystalline lens to delay cataract formation by increasing the water removal rate.

Rotational stability and visual quality in eyes with Rayner toric intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: To assess astigmatic reduction and rotational stability of Rayner T-flex toric intraocular lenses (IOL) (573T and 623T; Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd) in a series of cataract surgery patients with corneal astigmatism >1.50 diopters (D). METHODS: This prospective, observational study included 27 eyes from 22 consecutive patients with pre-operative regular corneal astigmatism ≥1.50 D in which Rayner T-flex toric IOL implantation was performed after phacoemulsification. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), residual refractive sphere, residual keratometric and refractive cylinder, and deviation from attempted toric IOL axis were measured. RESULTS: Mean UDVA 3 months after surgery was 0.1042±0.1290 with 20/40 or better in 96% of eyes and 20/25 or better in 52% of eyes. Mean refractive postoperative sphere was 0.25±0.37 D and mean refractive postoperative cylinder was 0.52±0.63 D. Vector analysis of attempted versus achieved visual correction showed that 100% of eyes were within ±1.00 D and 87% of eyes were within ±0.50 D. Mean change in keratometric astigmatism was 0.54±1.33 for J(0) and -0.24±1.17 for J(45) (P>.05). Twenty-five (92.6%) eyes had IOL rotation <10°. CONCLUSIONS: Rayner T-flex toric IOL implantation is an effective and reliable option to correct preexisting astigmatism in cataract surgery.

Management of an outbreak of botulism with benign clinical presentation.

Botulism is a life-threatening presynaptic disorder of the neuromuscular transmission produced by the neurotoxin elaborated by the botulinum neurotoxin-producing clostridia. We describe the management of a case series of 14 patients, members of 5 different families that were exposed to home-canned tuna and developed symptoms compatible with a mild clinical presentation of foodborne botulism. The electrophysiological study of the index case represented a reliable diagnostic test as it demonstrated a slight presynaptic dysfunction of the neuromuscular junction. Definite diagnosis was later confirmed by microbiological tests. Out of 14, only 3 patients presenting with a shorter period from symptom onset and with signs of multiple cranial neuropathies received botulinum antitoxin. All the patients remained stable and recovered progressively. Treatment with antitoxin may not be necessary in patients with late-presenting disease and mild and stable clinical picture.

Decision trees for indication of cataract surgery based on changes in visual acuity.

OBJECTIVE: To develop decision trees based on prospectively collected data for determining the appropriateness of cataract extraction. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of cataract who are on waiting lists to undergo cataract extraction by phacoemulsification. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 independent cohorts: The derivation cohort included 3691 patients, and the validation cohort included 2416 patients. Sociodemographic and clinical data, including visual acuity (VA) and the Visual Function Index 14 (VF-14), were collected before and after cataract extraction. Univariate and multivariate linear regression, and regression trees analysis were performed in the derivation cohort. Decision trees obtained in the derivation cohort were validated in the validation cohort. Final results were divided into appropriate or inappropriate indications and compared with a previously established benchmark of desirable VA and VF-14 gain in relation to preintervention VA classes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preintervention VA and changes 6 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: Among patients with simple cataract, predictors of significant improvement in VA after cataract extraction were preintervention VA and negative surgical complexity. Among patients with cataract and other ocular comorbidity, preintervention visual function and expected postintervention VA also predicted change in VA. When compared with a benchmark based on the minimal clinically important difference in VA after cataract extraction, sensitivity for the decision trees was 83% for both diagnostic groups and specificities ranged from 36.2 to 54.8. CONCLUSIONS: A simple decision tree based on changes in VA can help identify appropriate patients for cataract extraction and be used to evaluate clinical practice or for quality control.

Differences in energy and corneal endothelium between femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgeries: prospective, intraindividual, randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To compare intraoperative phacoemulsification parameters and its effect on the corneal endothelium of eyes undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) versus conventional phacoemulsification (CP) cataract surgery. METHODS: Two hundred eyes from one hundred patients were included in a prospective, non-blinded, randomized, controlled, intraindividual clinical study. One hundred eyes underwent FLACS while their one hundred fellow eyes underwent CP. All surgeries were performed using the Victus® femtosecond laser platform and Infinity® Vision System phacoemulsification machine. Primary outcome measure was endothelial cell density 6mo after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included central corneal thickness (CCT), average cell area, standard deviation, coefficient of variation and hexagonality before surgery and 6mo after surgery and endothelial cell density loss during this period were also evaluated. Intraoperative efficiency parameters [cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), total intraocular surgery time, total ultrasound time, total phacoemulsification time, total torsional energy time, total aspiration time, ultrasound energy, torsional amplitude and fluid required during surgery] were also collated. RESULTS: Data from these patients was not considered for analysis. Data from 92 patients were analysed. Postoperative endothelial cell density (cells/mm2) between groups (2211.88±392.49 CP; 2246.31±403.48 FLACS) was not statistically significant (P=0.869). Total ultrasound time, torsional energy time, CDE and fluid requirements were significantly lower the FLACS group (P<0.05). Other parameters did not show statistically significant difference between FLACS and CP. CONCLUSION: FLACS displays significant improvements in phacoemulsification parameters in comparison to CP. There are no significant differences in corneal endothelium measures between FLACS and CP.

Anterior and posterior capsule densitometry levels after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

AIM: To analyze and compare five different variables over one year follow-up (1wk, 1, 3, 6 and 12mo): anterior capsule (AC), and posterior capsule (PC) area densitometry values, AC and PC linear densitometry values, and AC opening area reduction ratio after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective comparative study. Seventy-one patients underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery on single eye between June 2014 and December 2015. A 5.0 mm diameter laser assisted anterior capsulotomy was performed on all eyes. In every post-surgery evaluation, AC opacificaction (ACO) and PC opacification (PCO) density levels were provided by Oculus Pentacam®HR using area and linear densitometry methods. Digital images were captured with a slit-lamp Topcon photographic camera and IMAGEnet® 5 software. The AC opening area on the digital images was measured using the Sketchandcalc area calculator and converted to reduction ratio levels. RESULTS: Using Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), we found no correlation (r=-0.091, P=0.46) in the twelfth month assessment between the evolution of ACO area densitometry values and PCO area densitometry values considered as independent variables. We found no correlation, using PCC (r=-0.096, P=0.43) between the evolution of ACO linear densitometry values and PCO linear densitometry values, in the twelfth month visit, working both as independent variables. AC linear densitometry levels and AC area densitometry levels continued to grow strongly from sixth to twelfth months. Analysis of the values of AC opening area reduction ratio (1wk, 1, 3, 6, 12mo) revealed statistically significant differences between the values of successive examinations but the magnitude of the change decreased. In the final period of monitoring between six and twelve months the magnitude of change was low. CONCLUSION: Our results show strong increases of Scheimpflug ACO densitometry values from the sixth to the twelfth month while capsulorhexis area reduction ratio levels displayed a considerable decrease. We found no correlation between ACO area and linear densitometry values and PCO area and linear densitometry values, in the twelfth month examination, working as independent variables.

Anterior capsule opacification after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: Clinical classification versus Scheimpflug device densitometry values.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical classification of anterior capsule opacification (ACO) after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with the mean density values of ACO provided by rotating Scheimpflug device (Pentacam HR) densitometry software and to determine which densitometry method correlates best with the clinical classification. SETTING: Ophthalmology Department, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain. DESIGN: Prospective comparative study. METHODS: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery was performed using the Victus platform between June 2014 and March 2015. Inclusion criteria were age between 55 years and 85 years, a pupil diameter larger than 6.0 mm in full mydriasis, no intraoperative complications, a curvilinear anterior capsulotomy without tears, and an intraocular lens in the correct intracapsular position at the end surgery. The ACO was measured by a clinical classification ranging from 0 to 4. In addition, ACO density was measured with the Scheimpflug device using 3 densitometry methods (area, linear, and peak). RESULTS: The study comprised 32 eyes of 32 patients. Area and linear densitometry values provided by the Scheimpflug device had a strong correlation with the values obtained by clinical classification, whereas peak densitometry values had a very weak correlation at 6 months (area densitometry: Spearman ρ = 0.78; P < .0005; linear densitometry: ρ = 0.73; P < .0005; peak densitometry ρ = 0.21; P = .2). CONCLUSION: The Scheimpflug device provided an objective measurement of ACO after cataract surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Objective optical quality analysis using double-pass technique in pterygium surgery.

PURPOSE: To analyze objective optical quality changes after pterygium surgical excision using the Optical Quality Analysis System. METHODS: Forty eyes with primary pterygium suitable for surgical treatment were included. Uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), objective scattering index (OSI), and cutoff frequency of the modulation transfer function (MTFcutoff) were recorded preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Slit-lamp measurement of pterygium size was performed to classify them: small in group 1 and medium size/large in group 2. A paired comparative study of all data that included preoperative with 1-month results (comparison A), preoperative with 6-month results (comparison B), and 1 month with sixth-month results (comparison C) was performed. RESULTS: In global analysis, uncorrected distance visual acuity and OSI showed significant changes in comparison A, all parameters in comparison B, and CDVA, OSI, and MTFcutoff in comparison C. When subdividing into groups, in group 1, there was significant improvement between preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity value and those at 1 and 6 months. Significant improvement in CDVA, OSI, and MTFcutoff values were observed in comparisons B and C. In group 2, MTFcutoff values significantly improved in comparisons B and C. The comparison of mean values between each group at each evaluation showed a lower value for MTFcutoff at 1 month after surgery. A comparative analysis of the evolution between both groups based on pterygium size did not reveal significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Pterygium can undermine visual quality, and its excision provides significant improvement even at 6 months after surgery. Optical Quality Analysis System proved useful for postoperative outcomes.

Interhospital variation in appropriateness of cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse the inter-hospital variation in the appropriateness of cataract phacoemulsification in Spain. METHODS: This observational, multicentre, prospective study involved patients aged 18-90 years. Each phacoemulsification intervention was classified as 'necessary', 'appropriate', 'uncertain' or 'inappropriate' according to explicit appropriateness criteria previously established using the RAND/UCLA methodology. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed, followed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, in order to examine the differences between hospitals. RESULTS: In total, 5063 patients from 15 hospitals were enrolled. The percentage of patients in each hospital who inappropriately underwent phacoemulsification varied from 1.2% to 24.0% (P < 0.0001). The most common inappropriate scenario was that of patients with a simple, unilateral cataract with no limitation of their visual function, with a pre-surgery visual acuity of ≥ 0.5 in both eyes, and for whom surgical correction would involve low technical complexity. CONCLUSIONS: The variation in appropriateness of phacoemulsification cannot be attributed solely to the clinical differences between the hospitals' patients. There is room for improvement in the appropriate indication of phacoemulsification. Measures based on the dissemination of appropriateness criteria might improve quality of care.

Effect of hospital on variation in visual acuity and vision-specific quality of life after cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of hospital-to-hospital variability in changes in clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes among patients undergoing cataract extraction by phacoemulsification. METHODS: Prospective observational study of 14 public hospitals. We recruited consecutive patients on waiting lists for cataract extraction. Clinical data were collected prior to the intervention and 6 weeks afterward. Subjects completed the visual function index (VF-14) prior to the procedure and 3 months afterward. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed for visual acuity and VF-14 scores. RESULTS: Substantial differences were observed across the 14 hospitals. At baseline, mean visual acuity ranged from 0.16 to 0.34, and mean VF-14 scores ranged from 48.06 to 75.89. Following cataract extraction, the mean improvement in visual acuity ranged from 0.35 to 0.57 and in VF-14 scores from 10.94 to 41.70. The ranges were even more pronounced among patients with low visual acuity or low VF-14 scores prior to the intervention. Significant differences remained in multivariate analysis. Within the multivariate analysis, the variable 'hospitals' had an R(2) of 0.069 for the visual acuity model and of 0.073 for the VF-14 model, 20% and 13%, respectively, of the total variability explained. Variation was also observed within geographic regions. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of patients undergoing cataract extractions vary widely from hospital to hospital, even within the same geographic region, explaining an important part of the results. Quality improvement efforts should concentrate on patients with low pre-intervention visual acuity or vision-related disability to reduce this variability in outcomes.