Geographic Variation of Antidementia and Antipsychotic Medication Use Among US Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.

BACKGROUND: Several antidementia medications have been approved for symptomatic treatment of cognitive and functional impairment due to Alzheimer disease. Antipsychotics are often prescribed off-label for behavioral symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the basis for regional variation in antidementia and antipsychotic medication use. SETTING: US nursing homes (n=9735), hospital referral regions (HRR; n=289). SUBJECTS: Long-stay residents with dementia (n=273,004). METHODS: Using 2018 Minimum Data Set 3.0 linked to Medicare data, facility information, and Dartmouth Atlas files, we calculated prevalence of use and separate multilevel logistic models [outcomes: memantine, cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI), antipsychotic use] estimated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CIs for resident, facility, and HRR characteristics. We then fit a series of cross-classified multilevel logistic models to estimate the proportional change in cluster variance (PCV). RESULTS: Overall, 20.9% used antipsychotics, 16.1% used memantine, and 23.3% used ChEIs. For antipsychotics, facility factors [eg, use of physical restraints (aOR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.05-1.11) or poor staffing ratings (aOR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.06-1.14)] were associated with more antipsychotic use. Nursing homes in HRRs with the highest health care utilization had greater antidementia drug use (aOR memantine: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.44-1.96). Resident/facility factors accounted for much regional variation in antipsychotics (PCV STATE : 27.80%; PCV HRR : 39.54%). For antidementia medications, HRR-level factors accounted for most regional variation (memantine PCV STATE : 37.44%; ChEI PCV STATE : 39.02%). CONCLUSION: Regional variations exist in antipsychotic and antidementia medication use among nursing home residents with dementia suggesting the need for evidence-based protocols to guide the use of these medications.

Antidementia Medication Use in Nursing Home Residents.

BACKGROUND: Antidementia medication can provide symptomatic improvements in patients with Alzheimer's disease, but there is a lack of consensus guidance on when to start and stop treatment in the nursing home setting. METHODS: We describe utilization patterns of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) and memantine for 3,50,197 newly admitted NH residents with dementia between 2011 and 2018. RESULTS: Overall, pre-admission use of antidementia medications declined from 2011 to 2018 (ChEIs: 44.5% to 36.9%; memantine: 27.4% to 23.2%). Older age, use of a feeding tube, and greater functional dependency were associated with lower odds of ChEI initiation. Coronary artery disease, parenteral nutrition, severe aggressive behaviors, severe cognitive impairment, and high functional dependency were associated with discontinuation of ChEIs. Comparison of clinical factors related to anti-dementia drug treatment changes from pre to post NH admission in 2011 and 2018 revealed a change toward lower likelihood of initiation of treatment among residents with more functional dependency and those with indicators of more complex illness as well as a change toward higher likelihood of discontinuation in residents having 2 or more hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: These prescribing trends highlight the need for additional research on the effects of initiating and discontinuing antidementia medications in the NH to provide clear guidance for clinicians when making treatment decisions for individual residents.

To treat or not to treat: a comparative effectiveness analysis of oral anticoagulant outcomes among U.S. nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation are at high risk for ischemic stroke, but most are not treated with anticoagulants. This study compared the effectiveness and safety between oral anticoagulant (OAC) users and non-users. METHODS: We conducted a new-user retrospective cohort study by using Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments linked with Medicare claims. The participants were Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation residing in US nursing homes between 2011 and 2016, aged ≥ 65 years. The primary outcomes were occurrence of an ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (effectiveness), occurrence of intracranial or extracranial bleeding (safety) and net clinical outcome (effectiveness or safety outcomes). Secondary outcomes included total mortality and a net clinical and mortality outcome. Cox proportional hazards and Fine and Grey models estimated multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and sub-distribution hazard ratios (sHRs). RESULTS: Outcome rates were low (effectiveness: OAC: 0.86; non-users: 1.73; safety: OAC: 2.26; non-users: 1.75 (per 100 person-years)). OAC use was associated with a lower rate of the effectiveness outcome (sHR: 0.69; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.61-0.77), higher rates of the safety (sHR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.58-1.84) and net clinical outcomes (sHR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.13-1.28) lower rate of all-cause mortality outcome (sHR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.59-0.61), and lower rate of the net clinical and mortality outcome (sHR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.59-0.61). Warfarin users, but not DOAC users, had a higher rate of the net clinical outcome versus OAC non-users. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the benefits of treatment with OACs to prevent ischemic strokes and increase longevity, while highlighting the need to weigh apparent benefits against elevated risk for bleeding. Results were consistent with net favorability of DOACs versus warfarin.

Identifying and addressing health-related social needs: a Medicaid member perspective.

BACKGROUND: Multiple state and national health care organizations have invested in activities to screen for and address the health-related social needs (HRSNs) of their patients. However, patient perspectives concerning HRSN screening discussions and facilitated referrals to supports are largely unexplored. The main objectives of this study were to explore the ways in which Massachusetts Medicaid (MassHealth) members engage with their health care clinicians to discuss HRSNs, to identify common needs discussed, and to describe whether members feel these needs are being addressed by health care clinicians and staff. METHODS: The study team performed a cross-sectional, qualitative research study that included in-depth, open-ended interviews with 44 adult MassHealth members. Interviews were conducted between June and October 2022. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and systematically coded for analysis, and common themes were reported. The data collected for this study were part of a larger independent evaluation of MassHealth's 2017-2022 Section 1115 Demonstration that granted authority from CMS to implement health care delivery system reforms in Massachusetts. RESULTS: In this qualitative study of Medicaid members, some reportedly felt comfortable freely discussing all of their clinical and social needs with their health care clinicians, while others noted feelings of apprehension. Several members recalled being asked about their HRSNs in various clinical or community settings, while others did not. The majority of members endorsed having an unmet HRSN, including housing, nutrition, financial, or transportation issues, and many barriers to addressing these HRSNs were discussed. Finally, many members cited a preference for discussing HRSNs with community-based care coordinators and social workers at the community partner organizations rather than with their health care clinicians. Community-based care coordinators were lauded as essential facilitators in making the connection to necessary resources to help address HRSNs. CONCLUSIONS: Study results highlight an opportunity to increase the effectiveness of HRSN screening and referral practices within the health care setting through relationship building between Medicaid members and diverse interdisciplinary care teams that include staff such as community health workers. Continued investment in cross-sector partnerships, screening workflows, and patient-clinician relationships may contribute to establishing an environment in which members can comfortably discuss HRSNs and connect with needed services to improve their health.

Trade-offs in locational choices for care coordination resources in accountable care organizations.

BACKGROUND: Care coordination is central to accountable care organizations (ACOs), especially in Medicaid where many patients have complex medical and social needs. Little is known about how to best organize care coordination resources in this context, particularly whether to centralize them. We examined how care coordinators' location, management, and colocation of both (within ACO headquarters, practice sites, or other organizations) relate to care quality and coordination. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of surveys administered to a sample of practice sites covering all 17 Medicaid ACOs in Massachusetts ( n = 225, response rate = 64%). We applied controlled, cluster-robust regressions, adjusting the significance threshold for the number of ACO clusters, to assess how clinical information sharing across settings, care quality improvement, knowledge of social service referral, and cross-resource coordination (i.e., the ability of multiple resources to work well together) relate to where care coordinators were physically located and/or managed. RESULTS: Centralizing care coordinators at ACO headquarters was associated with greater information sharing. Embedding care coordinators in practices was associated with greater care quality improvement. Embedding coordinators at other organizations was associated with less information sharing and care quality improvement. Managing coordinators at practice sites and other organizations were associated with better care quality improvement and cross-resource coordination, respectively. Colocating the two functions showed no significant differences. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Choosing care coordinators' locations may present trade-offs. ACOs may strategically choose embedding care coordinators at practice sites for enhanced care quality versus centralizing them at the ACO to facilitate information sharing.

Association of Social Determinants of Health With Adherence to Second-generation Antipsychotics for People With Bipolar Disorders in a Medicaid Population.

BACKGROUND: About 7 million people, 2.8% of US adults, have bipolar disorder (BD). While second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) are indicated as acute and maintenance treatments for BD, therapeutic success requires medication adherence and reported nonadherence estimates to range as high as 60%. Identifying patient risk factors for nonadherence is important for reducing it. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify the associations of risk factors, including social determinants of health, with SGA nonadherence among patients with BD. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of 2015-2017 MassHealth Medicaid data, we examined several definitions of adherence and used logistic regression to identify risk factors for nonadherence (medication possession ratio <0.8) among all adults aged 18-64 diagnosed with BD who could be followed for 12 months following SGA initiation. RESULTS: Among 5197 patients, the mean (±SD) age was 37.7 (±11.4) years, and 42.3% were men. Almost half (47.7%) of patients were nonadherent to SGAs when measured by medication possession ratio. The prevalence of nonadherence peaked at middle age for men and younger for women. Nonadherence was less common among Massachusetts' Department of Mental Health clients (odds ratio=0.60, 95% confidence limit: 0.48-0.74) and among those who used other psychotropic medications (odds ratios between 0.45 and 0.81); in contrast, increase in neighborhood socioeconomic stress was associated with increased odds of nonadherence. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Adherence to SGA treatment is suboptimal among people with BD. Recognizing risk factors, including those related to social determinants of health, can help target interventions to improve adherence for people at high risk and has implications for adherence-based quality measures.

The Medical Home Initiative in Italy: an Analysis of Changes in Healthcare Utilization.

BACKGROUND: Seventeen medical homes (MHs) were established in the Local Health Authority (LHA) of Parma (about 450,000 residents), Emilia Romagna, Italy, between 2011 and 2016. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of MH implementation on healthcare utilization. DESIGN: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study (01/2011-12/2017) using the Parma LHA administrative healthcare database. PARTICIPANTS: Residents for ≥1 year and older than 14 years of age with a documented primary care physician (PCP) in Parma LHA. INTERVENTION: MH exposure status was classified for each resident as either receiving care from a PCP that (1) eventually practices in an MH (pre-MH), (2) is currently in an MH (post-MH), or (3) does not join an MH (non-MH). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risks of ordinary inpatient hospital admissions, day hospital admissions, admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs), all-cause emergency department (ED) visits, and deferrable ED visits were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression and risks of all-cause 30- and 90-day readmissions for congestive heart failure (CHF) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were compared using logistic regression. KEY RESULTS: Prior to MH implementation, the risk of all-cause ED visits for pre-MH residents was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92-0.94) that of non-MH residents. After MH implementation, the relative risk for post-MH versus non-MH was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.85-0.87) and, over time, post-MH versus pre-MH was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92-0.94). Hospitalization risks were generally lower among the pre-MH and post-MH, compared to non-MH. However, hospitalizations and HF or COPD readmissions were not generally lower post-MH compared to pre-MH. CONCLUSIONS: This MH initiative was associated with a 7% reduction in risk of ED visits. More research is necessary to understand if ED visit risk will continue to improve and how other aspects of healthcare utilization might change as more MHs open and the length of exposure to MHs increases.

Angiotensin blockade therapy and survival in pancreatic cancer: a population study.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most aggressive and challenging cancer types to effectively treat, ranking as the fourth-leading cause of cancer death in the United States. We investigated if exposures to angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors after PC diagnosis are associated with survival. METHODS: PC patients were identified by ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes among the 3.7 million adults living in the Emilia-Romagna Region from their administrative health care database containing patient data on demographics, hospital discharges, all-cause mortality, and outpatient pharmacy prescriptions. Cox modeling estimated covariate-adjusted mortality hazard ratios for time-dependent ARB and ACE inhibitor exposures after PC diagnosis. RESULTS: 8,158 incident PC patients were identified between 2003 and 2011, among whom 20% had pancreas resection surgery, 36% were diagnosed with metastatic disease, and 7,027 (86%) died by December 2012. Compared to otherwise similar patients, those exposed to ARBs after PC diagnosis experienced 20% lower mortality risk (HR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.89). Those exposed to ACE inhibitors during the first three years of survival after PC diagnosis experienced 13% lower mortality risk (HR=0.87; 95% CI: 0.80, 0.94) which attenuated after surviving three years (HR=1.14; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.45). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large population study suggest that exposures to ARBs and ACE inhibitors after PC diagnosis are significantly associated with improved survival. ARBs and ACE inhibitors could be important considerations for treating PC patients, particularly those with the worst prognosis and most limited treatment options. Considering that these common FDA approved drugs are inexpensive to payers and present minimal increased risk of adverse events to patients, there is an urgent need for randomized clinical trials, large simple randomized trials, or pragmatic clinical trials to formally and broadly evaluate the effects of ARBs and ACE inhibitors on survival in PC patients.

Complex Patients Have More Emergency Visits: Don't Punish the Systems That Serve Them.

IMPORTANCE: Better patient management can reduce emergency department (ED) use. Performance measures should reward plans for reducing utilization by predictably high-use patients, rather than rewarding plans that shun them. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a quality measure for ED use for people diagnosed with serious mental illness or substance use disorder, accounting for both medical and social determinants of health (SDH) risks. DESIGN: Regression modeling to predict ED use rates using diagnosis-based and SDH-augmented models, to compare accuracy overall and for vulnerable populations. SETTING: MassHealth, Massachusetts' Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program. PARTICIPANTS: MassHealth members ages 18-64, continuously enrolled for the calendar year 2016, with a diagnosis of serious mental illness or substance use disorder. EXPOSURES: Diagnosis-based model predictors are diagnoses from medical encounters, age, and sex. Additional SDH predictors describe housing problems, behavioral health issues, disability, and neighborhood-level stress. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: We predicted ED use rates: (1) using age/sex and distinguishing between single or dual diagnoses; (2) adding summarized medical risk (DxCG); and (3) further adding social risk (SDH). RESULTS: Among 144,981 study subjects, 57% were women, 25% dually diagnosed, 67% White/non-Hispanic, 18% unstably housed, and 37% disabled. Utilization was higher by 77% for those dually diagnosed, 50% for members with housing problems, and 18% for members living in the highest-stress neighborhoods. SDH modeling predicted best for these high-use populations and was most accurate for plans with complex patients. CONCLUSION: To set appropriate benchmarks for comparing health plans, quality measures for ED visits should be adjusted for both medical and social risks.

Prevalence and the factors associated with oral anticoagulant use among nursing home residents.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Anticoagulants are indicated for treatment and prevention of several clinical conditions. Prior studies have examined anticoagulant utilization for specific indications and in community-dwelling populations. Decision-making regarding anticoagulant prescribing in the nursing home setting is particularly challenging because advanced age and clinical complexity places most residents at increased risk for adverse drug events. To estimate the prevalence of oral anticoagulant (OAC) use (overall, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)) and identify factors associated with oral anticoagulant use among the general population of residents living in nursing homes. METHODS: This point prevalence study was conducted among 506,482 residents in US nursing homes on 31 October 2016 who were enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service. Covariates including demographics, clinical conditions, medications, cognitive impairment and functional status were obtained from Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments and Medicare Part A and D claims. Oral anticoagulant use was identified using dispensing dates and days supply information from Medicare Part D claims. Robust Poisson models estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for associations between covariates and 1) any anticoagulant use, and 2) DOAC versus warfarin use. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Overall, 11.8% of residents used oral anticoagulants. Among users, 44.3% used DOACs. Residents with body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2 (aPR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.61 -1.71), with functional dependency in activities of daily living, polypharmacy and higher CHA2 DS2 -VASc risk ischaemic stroke scores, had a higher prevalence of oral anticoagulant use. Women (aPR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.76-0.79), residents with limited life expectancy (aPR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.76-0.83), those with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment (aPR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.65-0.68), those using NSAIDs or antiplatelets, and non-white racial/ethnic groups had a lower prevalence of anticoagulant use. Residents with higher levels of polypharmacy, BMI and age had a lower prevalence of DOAC use (versus warfarin). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Approximately one in eight general nursing home residents use oral anticoagulants and among oral anticoagulant users, only slightly more residents used warfarin than DOACs. The lower prevalence of anticoagulation among women and non-white racial/ethnic groups raises concerns of potential inequities in quality of care. Lower oral anticoagulant use among residents with limited life expectancy suggests possible deprescribing at the end of life. Further research is needed to inform resident-centred shared decision-making that explicitly considers treatment goals and individual-specific risks and benefits of anticoagulation at all stages of the medication use continuum.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin: a National Cohort Study of Nursing Home Residents.

BACKGROUND: Research comparing direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin has excluded nursing home residents, a vulnerable and high-risk population. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus warfarin. DESIGN: New-user cohort study (2011-2016). PATIENTS: US nursing home residents aged > 65 years with non-valvular atrial fibrillation enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare for > 6 months. EXPOSURES: Initiators of DOACs (2881 apixaban, 1289 dabigatran, 3735 rivaroxaban) were 1:1 propensity matched to warfarin initiators. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes included ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (i.e., ischemic cerebrovascular event), bleeding (extracranial or intracranial), other vascular events, death, and a composite of all outcomes. Absolute rate differences (RD) and cause-specific hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Subgroup analyses were performed by alignment of DOAC dosing with labeling. KEY RESULTS: Median age (84 years), CHA2DS2-Vasc (5), and ATRIA risk scores (3) were similar across medications. Clinical outcome rates were similar for dabigatran and rivaroxaban users versus warfarin users. However, ischemic cerebrovascular event rates were higher among dabigatran and rivaroxaban users that received reduced dosages without an indication. Overall, apixaban users had higher ischemic cerebrovascular event rates (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.00-3.45) and lower bleeding rates (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.49-0.88), but outcome rates varied by dosing alignment. Mortality rates (per 100 person-years) were lower for apixaban (RDs - 9.30; 95% CI - 13.18 to - 5.42), dabigatran (RDs - 10.79; 95% CI - 14.98 to - 6.60), and rivaroxaban (RDs - 8.92; 95% CI - 12.01 to - 5.83) versus warfarin; composite outcome findings were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Among US nursing home residents, the DOACs were each associated with lower mortality versus warfarin. Misaligned DOAC dosing was common in nursing homes and was associated with clinical and mortality outcomes. Overall, DOAC users had lower rates of adverse outcomes including mortality compared with warfarin users.

Metformin exposure and survival in head and neck cancer: A large population-based cohort study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Observational clinical studies of metformin for prevention and treatment of several cancer types have reported mixed findings. Although preclinical studies have suggested metformin may reduce head and neck cancer (HNC) proliferation, clinical evidence is limited. The objective of this large population-based study was to evaluate the relationship between metformin exposure following HNC diagnosis and all-cause mortality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Italian Emilia-Romagna Regional administrative healthcare database, which includes demographic, hospital and outpatient prescription information for ~4.5 million residents. Included patients were followed from the first hospital discharge (index) during the study period (01/2003-12/2012) with a diagnosis of HNC. Metformin exposure and select covariates were operationalized in a time-dependent manner during follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the covariate-adjusted time-dependent association between metformin exposure and all-cause mortality. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Among 7872 patients diagnosed with HNC, 708 (9.0%) were exposed to metformin after HNC diagnosis, and 3626 (46.1%) died during follow-up (median follow-up: 35.2 months). In the covariate-adjusted model, the all-cause mortality rate appeared lower (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.61-1.09) among metformin exposed patients during the 2 years post-diagnosis, while the all-cause mortality rate appeared higher (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.94-1.53) among exposed patients after 2 years post-diagnosis. Metformin was protective among patients ≤60 years of age (HR for the period of 0-2 years post-diagnosis: 0.22, 95% CI 0.09-0.56; HR for the period ≥2 years post-diagnosis: 0.56, 95% CI 0.26-1.22) but not in those >60 years. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In this population-based study of metformin in HNC, we found a modest protective association between metformin exposure and all-cause mortality in the 2-year post-diagnosis period. Age appeared to modify the association between metformin and HNC survival.

Geographic Variation in the Initiation of Commonly Used Opioids and Dosage Strength in United States Nursing Homes.

OBJECTIVES: To examine and quantify geographic variation in the initiation of commonly used opioids and prescribed dosage strength among older US nursing home residents. METHODS: We merged 2011 Minimum Data Set 3.0 to Medicare claims and facility characteristics data to conduct a cross-sectional study among long-stay nursing home residents who initiated short-acting opioids commonly used in nursing homes (oxycodone, hydrocodone, or tramadol). We examined geographic variation in specific opioids initiated and potentially inappropriate doses (≥50 mg oral morphine equivalent/d) across hospital referral regions (HRRs). Multilevel logistic models quantified the proportional change in between-HRR variation and associations between commonly initiated opioids and inappropriate doses after adjusting for resident characteristics, facility characteristics, and state. RESULTS: Oxycodone (9.4%) was initiated less frequently than hydrocodone (56.2%) or tramadol (34.5%) but varied dramatically between HRRs (range, 0%-74.5%). In total, resident/facility characteristics and state of residence, respectively explained 84.1%, 58.2%, 59.1%, and 46.6% of the between-HRR variation for initiating oxycodone, hydrocodone, tramadol, and inappropriate doses. In all cases, state explained the largest proportion of between-HRR variation. Relative to hydrocodone, residents initiating oxycodone were more likely (adjusted odds ratio, 5.00; 95% confidence interval, 4.57-5.47) and those initiating tramadol were less likely (adjusted odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.31) to be prescribed potentially inappropriately high doses. CONCLUSIONS: We documented extensive geographic variation in the opioid and dose initiated for nursing home residents, with state explaining the largest proportion of the observed variation. Further work is needed to understand potential drivers of opioid prescribing patterns at the state level.

Postacute Care Setting, Facility Characteristics, and Poststroke Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize research comparing poststroke health outcomes between patients rehabilitated in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and those in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) as well as to evaluate relations between facility characteristics and outcomes. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and CINAHL searches spanned January 1, 1998, to October 6, 2016, and encompassed MeSH and free-text keywords for stroke, IRF/SNF, and study outcomes. Searches were restricted to peer-reviewed research in humans published in English. STUDY SELECTION: Observational and experimental studies examining outcomes of adult patients with stroke rehabilitated in an IRF or SNF were eligible. Studies had to provide site of care comparisons and/or analyses incorporating facility-level characteristics and had to report ≥1 primary outcome (discharge setting, functional status, readmission, quality of life, all-cause mortality). Unpublished, single-center, descriptive, and non-US studies were excluded. Articles were reviewed by 1 author, and when uncertain, discussion with study coauthors achieved consensus. Fourteen titles (0.3%) were included. DATA EXTRACTION: The types of data, time period, size, design, and primary outcomes were extracted. We also extracted 2 secondary outcomes (length of IRF/SNF stay, cost) when reported by included studies. Effect measures, modeling approaches, methods for confounding adjustment, and potential confounders were extracted. Data were abstracted by 1 author, and the accuracy was verified by a second reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two studies evaluating community discharge, 1 study evaluating the predicted probability of readmission, and 3 studies evaluating all-cause mortality favored IRFs over SNFs. Functional status comparisons were inconsistent. No studies evaluated quality of life. Two studies confirmed increased costs in the IRF versus SNF setting. Although substantial facility variation was described, few studies characterized sources of variation. CONCLUSIONS: The few studies comparing poststroke outcomes indicated better outcomes (with higher costs) for patients in IRFs versus those in SNFs. Contemporary research on the role of the postacute care setting and its attributes in determining health outcomes should be prioritized to inform reimbursement system reform.

Hospitalization rates during potentially inappropriate medication use in a large population-based cohort of older adults.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The temporal relationship between potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and hospitalization remains uncertain. We examined whether current PIM use increases the rate of hospitalization and estimated the rate of hospitalization during exposure to individual PIMs. METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study of 1 480 137 older adults was conducted using the 2003-2013 Italian Emilia-Romagna Regional administrative healthcare database (~4.5 million residents), which includes demographic, hospital and outpatient prescription information. Each day of follow-up was defined as exposed/unexposed to PIMs that 'should always be avoided', according to the Maio criteria, an Italian modified version of the Beers criteria. The study outcome was all-cause hospitalizations. Crude PIM-related hospitalization rates were calculated for individual PIMs. Repeated-events Cox proportional hazards models with time-dependent covariates estimated adjusted hazard ratios for hospitalization during PIM exposure, as defined by three versions of the Maio criteria (v2007, v2011, v2014). RESULTS: During >10 million person-years of follow-up, 54.2% of individuals used ≥1 PIM and 10.9% of all person-time was exposed to v2014 PIMs. Among 1 604 901 hospitalizations, 15.6% occurred during v2014 PIM exposure. Crude hospitalization rates during v2014 PIM-exposed and unexposed person-time were 228.1 and 152.1 per 1000 person-years, respectively. The PIM with the highest rate of hospitalization was ketorolac, while nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs had the most exposure time. The hazard of hospitalization was 16% greater (hazard ratio = 1.16; 95% confidence interval 1.14, 1.18) among patients exposed to v2014 PIMs. The v2007 and v2011 estimates were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In this large population-based cohort of older adults, we found a 16% increased hospitalization risk associated with PIM exposure.

Adherence to Guidelines for Hepatitis B, Pneumococcal, and Influenza Vaccination in Patients With Diabetes.

IN BRIEF This single-center, cross-sectional study was designed to assess adherence to national guidelines for the immunization of patients with diabetes and to evaluate predictors of vaccination with the hepatitis B, influenza, and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines. In patients considered to be at increased risk for infection and infectious disease complications because of their history of diabetes, extensive nonadherence to immunization recommendations for all three vaccines was found. Nonadherence to the 2011 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' recommendation for hepatitis B vaccination was ubiquitous. Allocation of health care resources to increase vaccine coverage should remain a priority, with a focus on spreading awareness of the hepatitis B vaccine recommendation for people with diabetes.