Impact of COVID-19 on ophthalmic surgical procedures in sub-Saharan Africa: a multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on healthcare and ophthalmology services globally. Numerous studies amongst various medical and surgical specialties showed a reduction in patient attendance and surgical procedures performed. Prior published ophthalmic literature focused on specific types of procedures and were usually single centre. The current study attempts to quantify the impact on a larger scale, namely that of sub-Saharan Africa, and to include all ophthalmic subspecialties. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the surgical records from 17 ophthalmology centres in seven countries located in East, Central, West and Southern Africa. The date of declaration of the first lockdown was used as the beginning of the pandemic and the pivot point to compare theatre records one year prior to the pandemic and the first year of the pandemic. We examined the total number of surgical procedures over the two year period and categorized them according to ophthalmic subspecialty and type of procedure performed. We then compared the pre-pandemic and pandemic surgical numbers over the two year period. RESULTS: There were 26,357 ophthalmic surgical procedures performed with a significant decrease in the first year of the pandemic (n = 8942) compared to the year prior to the pandemic (n = 17,415). The number of surgical procedures performed was lower in the first year of the pandemic compared to the year prior to the pandemic by 49% [Incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.51, 95% CI 0.41-0.64), 27% (0.73, 0.55-0.99), 46% (0.54, 0.30-0.99), 40% (0.60, 0.39-0.92) and 59% (0.41, 0.29-0.57) in sub-Saharan Africa (4 regions combined), West, Central, East and Southern Africa, respectively]. The number of surgical procedures in the different sub-specialty categories in sub-Saharan Africa (4 regions combined) was significantly lower in the first year of the pandemic compared to the year prior to the pandemic, except for glaucoma (IRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-1.01), oncology (0.71, 0.48-1.05), trauma (0.90, 0.63-1.28) and vitreoretinal (0.67, 0.42-1.08) categories. CONCLUSION: This study provides insight into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in multiple regions and countries on the African continent. The identification of which surgical subspecialty was most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in each region allows for better planning and resource allocation to address these backlogs.

Tubercular Uveitis in Uveitis Cases in a High TB and HIV Setting: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: The diagnosis of tubercular uveitis (TBU) is difficult. The lack of a diagnostic gold standard has contributed to challenges in determining the true prevalence and clinical predictors of TBU. We aimed to determine the proportion of TBU cases in adults with uveitis and to examine clinical features associated with TBU. Methods: A prospective cohort study of adult uveitis cases after exclusion of other specific etiologies. The diagnosis of TBU was based on a composite reference of: any clinical signs of uveitis; exclusion of other causes of uveitis; and positive QuantiFERON-Gold test, tuberculin skin test, and/or ocular TB polymerase chain reaction. Results: Of 79 cases analyzed, 49 (62%) had TBU. Female sex (P = 0.001) and chronic uveitis (P = 0.006) cases were more common in the TBU group than the non-TBU group whereas diffuse choroiditis (P = 0.010) and HIV-positive (P = 0.001) cases were less common. Choroidal granulomas (P = 0.176) and serpiginous-like choroiditis (P = 0.292) were more common in TBU group, albeit not significantly. On univariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio, 5.1; P = 0.002), negative HIV status (odds ratio, 0.2; P = 0.001), and chronic uveitis (odds ratio, 4.1; P = 0.008) were associated with TBU. A negative HIV test was associated with TBU on multivariate analysis (P = 0.049). Conclusions: A high proportion of cases had TBU. Our study did not significantly confirm some of the clinical features associated with TBU reported in other studies. Translational Relevance: Our study highlights the difficulties in determining the proportion and clinical predictors of TBU, especially in the absence of a gold standard diagnostic test.

Global prevalence and clinical outcomes of tubercular uveitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tubercular uveitis (TBU) is an inflammation/infection of the eye secondary to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. The difficulty in making the diagnosis has resulted in variable prevalence and clinical response rates. We aimed to determine the global prevalence of TBU in uveitis patients stratified by TB high-burden countries (HBCs) and non-HBCs and by geographic regions and the clinical response of TBU to antitubercular treatment We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of TBU studies published in PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE, up to June 30, 2020. A random effects model was used for all meta-analyses. Of 5,018 articles identified, 70 prevalence studies (65,607 uveitis and 3,166 TBU cases) and 18 clinical outcome studies (1,570 TBU cases; 1,304 responded to anti-tubercular therapy [ATT]) were analyzed. The overall weighted prevalence of TBU was 4.0% (95% CI, 3-5); in TB HBCs it was 7.0% (95% CI, 5-11), non-HBCs 3.0% (95% CI, 2-4), and sub-Saharan Africa 11.0% (95% CI, 8-15). The overall weighted clinical response was 82.0% (95% CI, 75-89). Despite the difficulty in diagnosing TBU, the prevalence is expectantly higher in HBCs, and sub-Saharan Africa and the clinical outcome is poor. Standardization of diagnostic criteria and ATT is warranted in future cohort studies.