Comparison of surgical versus percutaneously created arteriovenous hemodialysis fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the results between percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas (p-AVFs) created with the Ellipsys device (Ellipsys Vascular Access System; Avenu Medical, San Juan Capistrano, Calif) and surgical arteriovenous fistulas (s-AVFs). METHODS: A single-center retrospective comparative study of the first 107 patients who had undergone p-AVF creation with the Ellipsys system from May 2017 to May 2018 with an equal number of consecutive patients who had undergone s-AVF creation in our center during the same period. The primary endpoints included the maturation and patency rates. The secondary endpoints were reintervention, risk of infection, and the incidence of steal syndrome and aneurysm formation. RESULTS: The demographic, hypertension, and diabetes data were similar for both groups. The only difference between the two groups was that more p-AVF patients had already been receiving hemodialysis (61% vs 47%; P < .05). The p-AVFs showed superior maturation rates at 6 weeks (65% vs 50%; P = .01). The primary patency rates were greater for the s-AVFs at 12 months (86% vs 61%; P < .01). However, primary patency was comparable between the two groups at 24 months (52% vs 55%; P = .48). No significant difference was found in the secondary patency rates at 12 (90% vs 91%) and 24 (88% vs 91%) months. At the 2-year follow-up point, the rate of percutaneous reintervention was similar; however, the s-AVFs had required more frequent surgical revision (36% vs 17%; P = .01). Issues with wound healing and infection were also more frequent with s-AVFs (9% vs 0.9%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Fistulas created percutaneously with the Ellipsys system showed superior maturation rates and similar patency with s-AVFs created in an experienced high-volume vascular surgery practice. p-AVFs had a lower risk of wound healing issues, infection, and surgical revision. Larger, prospective, randomized multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Midterm results of percutaneous arteriovenous fistula creation with the Ellipsys Vascular Access System, technical recommendations, and an algorithm for maintenance.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report our midterm results of percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) creation using the Ellipsys (Avenu Medical, San Juan Capistrano, Calif) device and to present technical recommendations and our algorithm of pAVF maintenance. METHODS: A single-center comprehensive database of all consecutive predialysis and end-stage renal disease patients who had a pAVF creation with the Ellipsys device was reviewed retrospectively. Study end points included technical success, maturation, functional patency, and required interventions. RESULTS: Between May 2017 and July 2019, there were 234 patients (mean age, 64 years; 148 male [63%]) who had a pAVF created. Technical success was achieved in 232 individuals (99%), and average duration of the procedure was 15 minutes (7-35 minutes). Average follow-up was 252 days (range, 83-696 days). The 1-year primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were 54%, 85%, and 96%, respectively. Average pAVF flow was 923 mL/min (range, 425-1440 mL/min). There were no significant adverse events related to the procedure. Only three patients (1%) required a later conversion of the pAVF anastomosis to a surgical fistula. Twenty-four (10%) patients required superficialization of deep outflow veins because of difficult cannulation. Average maturation time was 4 weeks (range, 1-12 weeks). Fourteen patients (6%) had early (<2 weeks after creation) cannulation of the pAVF. CONCLUSIONS: The Ellipsys pAVF device allows the rapid and safe creation of a reliable autogenous access. Rates of technical success, patency, and maturation were excellent. For patients unsuited for a distal radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula, it should be considered the next preferred access option.

Effects of L-Carnitine on Mineral Metabolism in the Multicentre, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled CARNIDIAL Trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of L-carnitine has been proposed in haemodialysis (HD) when deficiency is present to improve anaemia resistant to erythropoietin stimulating agent, intradialytic hypotension or cardiac failure. We tested the effects of L-carnitine supplementation on parameters of chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder. METHODS: CARNIDIAL was a randomized, double-blinded trial having included 92 incident HD subjects for a 1-year period to receive L-carnitine versus placebo. Determinant factors of C-terminal fibroblast growth factor 23 (cFGF23) and intact FGF23 were studied including Klotho level. The L-carnitine effect on mineral metabolism was analyzed between groups by mixed linear models for repeated measurements. RESULTS: Klotho was below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) in 55% of the 163 samples. In multivariate analysis, cFGF23 was positively correlated with calcium and phosphate and was higher in subjects having Klotho > LLOQ. No correlation existed between Klotho and phosphate and phosphate was even higher in subjects having Klotho > LLOQ (p < 0.001). Both forms of FGF23 were not related to iron markers nor to IV iron dose. No L-carnitine effect was detected on parathyroid hormone (PTH) or FGF23 during the study period where PTH slightly decreased over time, whereas FGF23 increased. But calcium and phosphate increased more in the L-carnitine group. CONCLUSION: L-carnitine supplementation increased calcium and phosphate plasma concentrations with no detected downregulation effect on PTH and FGF23. (Clinical Trial 00322322, May 5, 2006).

L-carnitine treatment in incident hemodialysis patients: the multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled CARNIDIAL trial.

BACKGROUND: L-carnitine levels decrease rapidly and steadily with duration of hemodialysis, and carnitine depletion can impair response to recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). The study hypothesis was that L-carnitine supplementation during the first year of hemodialysis would improve this response. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: From October 2006 through March 2010, this multicenter, randomized, double-blinded study assigned 92 incident hemodialysis patients to receive placebo or 1 g of intravenous L-carnitine after each dialysis session for 1 year. The primary outcome measure compared the groups for rHuEPO resistance index (EPO-RI), defined as weekly rHuEPO doses (IU/kg body weight divided by hemoglobin level) (g/dl). RESULTS: In the L-carnitine group, carnitine concentration increased from a mean ± SD of 79 ± 51 µmol/L to 258 ± 137 µmol/L; in the placebo group, it declined from 68 ± 25 µmol/L to 53 ± 24 µmol/L (interaction group × time, P<0.001). Carnitine deficiency affected about 30% of the patients in the placebo group during the study period. EPO-RI varied from 15.8 ± 11.3 to 9.5 ± 5.8 IU/kg per g/dl in the placebo group and from 20.6 ± 12.8 to 15.6 ± 15.9 IU/kg per g/dl in the L-carnitine group, for a mean variation of -3.94 ± 12.5 IU/kg per g/dl and -2.98 ± 15.5 IU/kg per g/dl, respectively (P=0.7). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the EPO-RI course was similar in each group (difference between groups, P=0.10; interaction group × time, P=0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Carnitine levels decrease by about 11% ± 33% during the first year of hemodialysis. Treatment of incident hemodialysis patients with L-carnitine does not improve their response to rHuEPO.

Presentation and outcome of patients with systemic amyloidosis undergoing dialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Light chain (AL) and secondary (AA) amyloidosis usually present as a systemic disease frequently involving the kidney and leading to ESRD. Data regarding patients with AA or AL amyloidosis undergoing dialysis remain scarce. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We retrospectively studied patients with AA or AL amyloidosis who started dialysis in five French centers between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2005. RESULTS: We identified 19 patients with AL and 20 patients with AA amyloidosis undergoing dialysis. Patients with AL amyloidosis had shorter time from diagnosis to dialysis (25.2 versus 69.3 mo, P < 0.05) and more extrarenal amyloidosis, especially cardiac (63.2 versus 5%, P < 0.0001). Mean duration of follow-up was 37.4 and 31.8 mo for patients with AL and AA amyloidosis, respectively. Fifteen patients (78.9%) with AL and three patients (15%) with AA amyloidosis died on dialysis. Median survival was shorter in patients with AL (26 mo) than AA amyloidosis [not definable (ND)] (P < 0.02). Sepsis and cardiac deaths were the main causes of mortality. Prognosis factors for death at 1 yr were AL type (P < 0.01), cardiac amyloidosis [odds ratio (OR) = 18, P < 0.01], heart failure (OR = 8, P < 0.04), and shorter time from diagnosis to dialysis (6.1 versus 56 mo, P < 0.03). Multivariate analysis indicated that AL type (P = 0.02), but not cardiac amyloidosis was independently associated with global mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients with amyloidosis undergoing dialysis, especially AL type, is probably better than previously reported. However, mortality is higher in AL than AA type, especially in the setting of cardiac involvement.