RESUMO
Background The most frequent gynecologic cancer in women is cervical cancer. The majority of incidents take place in less developed nations without access to reliable screening tools. Human papillomavirus (HPV) exposure, smoking, and immune system dysfunction are risk factors. As a result of effective screening, its incidence and death have significantly decreased in many nations. Hence, this study aims to assess the level of knowledge and awareness among parents regarding HPV, including its associated health risks and the benefits of vaccination. Methodology A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in the Riyadh region of Saudi Arabia from September to November 2023. The main tool used for gathering data was an online, self-administered survey via Google Forms. Collected data was analysed using SPSS v. 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), where all applicable statistical tests were used. Results Females exhibited higher levels of confidence and agreement with COVID-19 and HPV vaccination recommendations compared to males. A substantial percentage of males expressed strong disagreement and reduced confidence in HPV vaccination, contributing to the gender-based divergence. Individuals with higher education levels, such as university degree graduates, showed greater support for compulsory vaccines and a preference for natural immunity development in their children. Marital status played a role in vaccine-related decisions, with variations in vaccine refusal rates and difficulty discussing the HPV vaccine noted among individuals based on their marital status. Conclusion The study highlights the value of medical experts and specifically created training programs to close knowledge gaps and boost HPV vaccination rates. Demographic factors have an impact on attitudes, which highlights the need for targeted interventions.
RESUMO
Pulsed radiofrequency, short bursts of radiofrequency energy, has been used by pain practitioners as a non- or minimally neurodestructive technique, an alternative to radiofrequency heat lesions. The clinical advantages and mechanisms of this treatment remain unclear. To review the current clinical implication of the pulsed radiofrequency technique for male patients with chronic scrotal pain. We systematically searched the English literature available at the EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library from inception to 22 November 2022. Only reports on a pulsed radiofrequency application on male patients with chronic scrotal pain were included. The final analysis yielded six reports on the clinical use of pulsed radiofrequency applications in male patients with chronic scrotal pain: six full publications, three case reports, one case series, one prospective uncontrolled pilot study, and one prospective randomized, controlled clinical trial. The accumulation of these data shows that using pulsed radiofrequency generates an increasing interest in pain physicians, radiologists, and urologists for managing chronic scrotal pain. No side effects related to the pulsed radiofrequency technique were reported to date. Further research on the clinical and biological effects is justified. Large sample sizes and randomized clinical trials are warranted.