RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Stroke survivors with aphasia (impaired language/communication) have poor outcomes and gaps in the clinical implementation of best practice contribute to this. Little is known, however, about speech pathologist perspectives on the touchpoints (key moments shaping experiences) in the clinical care pathway that have the greatest impact on service delivery nor how this varies by geographical location. We explored the experiences of speech pathologists who provide aphasia services to establish priorities for improvement and design. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is the initial experience gathering and priority identification stage of an experience-based co-design (EBCD) project. Speech pathologists were recruited from 21 geographically diverse Hospital and Health Services in Queensland, Australia. Speech pathologists working in acute, rehabilitation and community services shared positive and negative experiences of delivering aphasia care in interviews and focus groups. Experiential data were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis to determine touchpoints. Priorities for service design were identified using an adapted nominal group technique. RESULTS: Speech pathologists (n = 62) participated in 16 focus groups and nine interviews and shared 132 experiences of delivering aphasia care. Providing care in teams with poor awareness of the impacts of aphasia was identified as a key challenge, as poor patient-provider communication was perceived to increase risk of adverse outcomes for patients. Speech pathologists identified areas for improvement related to their own professional needs (e.g., greater access to clinical supervision); collaborative health care (e.g., better coordination and interdisciplinary care to increase therapy time); and the service context and environment (e.g., psychological services able to support diverse communication needs). CONCLUSIONS: Speech pathologist delivery of aphasia services could be improved through increased access to clinical supervision, opportunities for peer debriefing and interdisciplinary care. Priorities for service design varied by geographical location and included: education to support care transitions (remote areas), improved referral pathways and service linkage (regional areas) and dedicated aphasia staffing (metropolitan areas). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A consumer advisory committee comprising people with aphasia (n = 3, authors K.M., K.D. and B.A.), their significant others (n = 2, authors J.D. and P.M.), and a Cultural Capability Officer (author G.B.) guided this research. The team: (1) reviewed participant information; (2) co-designed surveys and workshop resources; (3) copresented research outcomes and contributed to publications. Research questions and study design (e.g., analysis methods and assessment measures) were developed by the research team (authors L.A., V.J.P., D.A.C. and S.J.W.).
Assuntos
Afasia , Grupos Focais , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Patologia da Fala e Linguagem , Humanos , Afasia/terapia , Queensland , Entrevistas como Assunto , Feminino , Masculino , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicaçõesRESUMO
PURPOSES: People with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience increasing disability across their lifespan. Holistic rehabilitation approaches are needed to maximize their daily functioning and quality of life (QoL). The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach targets daily functioning, with established efficacy in other neurological populations. This study is part of a larger trial of CO-OP with people with PD, describing the perspectives of people with PD who received CO-OP about its effect on their lives. METHODS: People with PD participating in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) were interviewed following the CO-OP programme. Views about the feasibility, acceptability, and experiences of CO-OP were explored. Inductive thematic analysis was used to interpret the findings. RESULTS: Analysis of interviews (n = 20) identified that CO-OP drove positive change in participants' daily lives. Participants reported transfer and generalization of learned strategies, suggesting effective use of skills learned in CO-OP. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing a critical gap in PD management, findings suggest that CO-OP was perceived as effective in addressing a broad scope of PD-related issues. Findings hold particular significance for individuals experiencing long-term PD consequences, potentially offering a viable option to enhance participation and QoL. Findings support CO-OP as an implementable, acceptable, and potentially beneficial intervention in PD. Further research is warranted to establish efficacy.
People with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience increasing disability across their lifespan because of motor and "hidden" psychological difficulties.Holistic rehabilitation approaches are needed to comprehensively address heterogeneous PD-related consequences to maximize daily functioning and quality of life (QoL) for people with PD.People with PD perceived that the CO-OP approach was as a positive experience that improved their management of daily life, self-awareness, and self-efficacy.Findings support CO-OP as an implementable, acceptable, and potentially beneficial intervention for people with PD.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: People with post-stroke aphasia (language/communication impairment) and their supporters report mixed satisfaction with stroke and aphasia care. To date, however, their journey of care and the key service interactions that shape their experience have not been comprehensively explored. We aimed to investigate the lived experience of post-stroke aphasia care, across the continuum of care and by geographical location, to establish priorities for service design. DESIGN: This is the first stage of an experience-based co-design study. We purposively sampled people with aphasia (PWA) and significant others (SOs) across 21 hospital and health service sites, community groups and by self-referral. Participants shared experiences of care in online interviews and focus groups. Touchpoints (key moments that shape experience) and unmet needs were identified using qualitative thematic analysis. Priorities for service design were established using an adapted nominal group technique. SETTING: Sites spanned remote, regional and metropolitan areas in Queensland, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: PWA (n=32; mild=56%; moderate=31%; severe=13%) and SOs (n=30) shared 124 experiences of acute, rehabilitation and community-based care in 23 focus groups and 13 interviews. RESULTS: Both positive and negative healthcare experiences occurred most frequently in hospital settings. Negative experiences regularly related to communication with health professionals, while positive experiences related to the interpersonal qualities of healthcare providers (eg, providing hope) for PWA, or witnessing good rapport between a PWA and their health professional for SOs. To improve services, PWA prioritised communicatively accessible education and information and SOs prioritised access to psychological and peer support. CONCLUSIONS: We identified key aspects of post-stroke aphasia care that shape experience. The needs of PWA and SOs may be better met through health professional training in supported communication, increased service availability in regional and remote areas, communication-accessible hospital environments, increased access to psychological and peer support, and meaningful involvement of SOs in rehabilitation.
Assuntos
Afasia , Grupos Focais , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Afasia/etiologia , Afasia/reabilitação , Afasia/terapia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/métodos , Queensland , Adulto , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Satisfação do PacienteRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Aphasia is an impairment of language that occurs in 30%-40% of stroke survivors. This often chronic condition results in poor outcomes for the individual with aphasia and their family. Long-term aphasia management is limited, with few people receiving sufficient services by 6-12 months postonset. We present a protocol for the development of coproduced aphasia service elements. We will use experience-based codesign (EBCD), an approach that enables service users and providers to collaboratively develop services and care pathways. Drawing on the experiences of people with aphasia, their families and clinicians we will establish priorities for the development of new services and later work together to codesign them. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This research will be coproduced with people with aphasia (n=30-60), their families (n=30-60) and speech pathologists (n=30-60) in Queensland, Australia, using EBCD. A consumer advisory committee will provide oversight and advice throughout the research. In phase 1, we will use semistructured interviews and the nominal group technique to explore experiences and unmet needs in aphasia rehabilitation. Data will be analysed using thematic analysis and the resulting themes will be prioritised in multistakeholder focus groups. Outcomes of phase 1 will inform future research (phase 2) to codesign services. Financial costs and participant experiences of EBCD will be measured. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Human Research Ethics Committee approval for phase 1 has been obtained (HREC/2020/QRBW/61368). Results will be reported in peer-reviewed journal articles, presented at relevant conferences and, following EBCD suggested best practice, fed back to participants and community members at a celebratory event at completion of the project. The inclusion of service users in all stages of research will facilitate an integrated approach to knowledge translation. A summary of research findings will be made available to participating sites.