Gradual tapering TNF inhibitors versus conventional synthetic DMARDs after achieving controlled disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: first-year results of the randomised controlled TARA study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two tapering strategies after achieving controlled disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), during 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: In this multicentre single-blinded (research nurses) randomised controlled trial, patients with RA were included who achieved controlled disease, defined as a Disease Activity Score (DAS) ≤ 2.4 and a Swollen Joint Count (SJC) ≤ 1, treated with both a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) and a TNF inhibitor. Eligible patients were randomised into gradual tapering csDMARDs or TNF inhibitors. Medication was tapered if the RA was still under control, by cutting the dosage into half, a quarter and thereafter it was stopped. Primary outcome was proportion of patients with a disease flare, defined as DAS > 2.4 and/or SJC > 1. Secondary outcomes were DAS, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) and functional ability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI]) after 1 year and over time. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were randomly assigned to tapering csDMARDs (n = 94) or tapering anti-TNF (n = 95). The cumulative flare rates in the csDMARD and anti-TNF tapering group were, respectively, 33 % (95% CI,24% to 43 %) and 43 % (95% CI, 33% to 53 % (p = 0.17). Mean DAS, HAQ-DI and EQ-5D did not differ between tapering groups after 1 year and over time. CONCLUSION: Up to 9 months, flare rates of tapering csDMARDs or TNF inhibitors were similar. After 1 year, a non-significant difference was found of 10 % favouring csDMARD tapering. Tapering TNF inhibitors was, therefore, not superior to tapering csDMARDs. From a societal perspective, it would be sensible to taper the TNF inhibitor first, because of possible cost reductions and less long-term side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR2754.

Comparison of disease activity measures in early psoriatic arthritis in usual care.

OBJECTIVES: To compare responsiveness and longitudinal validity of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI), Psoriatic ArthritiS Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), GRAppa Composite scorE (GRACE) and Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) in usual care PsA patients, within 1 year after diagnosis. METHODS: Data collected in the Dutch southwest early PsA cohort (DEPAR) were used. Responsiveness was assessed using effect size (ES), standardized response mean (SRM), and discrimination between different general health states. Longitudinal validity was tested using mixed models with outcomes health-related quality of life (HRQOL), productivity and disability. RESULTS: Responsiveness was highest for PASDAS, with ES 1.00 and SRM 0.95, lowest for DAPSA, with ES 0.73 and SRM 0.71, and in between for DAS28, CPDAI and GRACE. Differences in general health were best discriminated with PASDAS and GRACE. Patients reporting stable or worsening general health could not be distinguished by DAS28 or CPDAI. Discrimination was better using DAPSA, but worse than when using PASDAS and GRACE. Longitudinal evolvement of HRQOL and productivity had the highest association with low disease activity according to GRACE, followed by PASDAS, MDA, DAPSA, DAS28, with the lowest association for CPDAI. CONCLUSION: PASDAS and GRACE were superior with respect to responsiveness, and together with MDA best related to longitudinal evolvement of HRQOL, productivity and disability. Responsiveness and longitudinal validity of most outcomes were inferior for DAS28, DAPSA and CPDAI. As alternatives to the continuous measure DAPSA, use of PASDAS or GRACE should be considered.

The IMPACT study: A clustered randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of a referral algorithm for axial spondyloarthritis.

BACKGROUND: A substantial number of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but early recognition of these patients is difficult for general practitioners (GPs). The Case Finding Axial Spondyloarthritis (CaFaSpA) referral strategy has shown to be able to identify patients with CLBP at risk for axSpA, but its impact on clinical daily practice is yet unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of the CaFaSpA referral strategy on pain caused by disability in primary care patients with CLBP. METHODS: Within this clustered randomized controlled trial 93 general practices were randomized to either the CaFaSpA referral model (intervention) or usual primary care (control). In each group primary care patients between 18 and 45 years with CLBP were included. The primary outcome was disability caused by CLBP, measured with the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) at baseline and four months. Secondary outcome was the frequency of new axSpA diagnosis. Descriptive analyses were performed, and a linear mixed-effects model was used. RESULTS: In total 679 CLBP patients were included of which 333 patients were allocated to the intervention group and 346 to the control group. Sixty-four percent were female and mean age was 36.2 years. The mean RMDQ score at baseline was 8.39 in the intervention group and 8.61 in the control group. At four months mean RMDQ score was 7.65 in the intervention group and 8.15 in the control group. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.50). Six (8%) out of the 75 finally referred patients, were diagnosed with axSpA by their rheumatologist. CONCLUSIONS: The CaFaSpA referral strategy for axSpA did not have an effect on disability after four months caused by CLBP. However, the strategy is able to detect the axSpA patient within the large CLBP population sufficiently. Trial registration number: NCT01944163, Clinicaltrials.gov.

Time to minimal disease activity in relation to quality of life, productivity, and radiographic damage 1 year after diagnosis in psoriatic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: In a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who received usual care, we investigated the impact of time elapsed to minimal disease activity (MDA) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity, and radiographic damage throughout the first year after diagnosis. METHODS: Data collected in the Dutch southwest early PsA cohort (DEPAR) study were analyzed. These three-monthly data encompassed disease activity, HRQOL was measured with the Short Form 36 (SF36) Physical Component Scale (SF36-PCS) and Mental Component Scale, and productivity was measured with the Productivity Cost Questionnaire. Radiographic damage was scored at baseline and at 12 months with the PsA-modified Sharp/van der Heijde score. Patients were classified by time to MDA as in early (within 3 months), late (at 6-12 months), and never MDA in the first year. RESULTS: We included 296 patients who had had their 1-year outpatient visit (mean age 51 years, 53% male). Ninety-six (32%) were classified as early MDA, 78 (26%) as late MDA, and 98 (33%) as never MDA. Data of 24 patients (8%) were missing. SF36-PCS and productivity scores improved after gaining MDA, but remained low in never MDA patients. At 1 year, SF36-PCS and productivity scores were similar in early and late MDA patients. Radiographic progression rate was low and similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: Gaining MDA was associated with considerable improvement in HRQoL and functioning, irrespective of time to first MDA. In the one third of patients not in MDA in the first year, the disease had a substantial health impact.

Influence of Disease Manifestations on Health-related Quality of Life in Early Psoriatic Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a multifaceted disease. Affecting joints, skin, entheses, and dactylitis, its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) could be substantial. We aim to assess HRQOL in patients newly diagnosed with PsA and analyze its associations with disease manifestations. METHODS: Data collected at time of diagnosis from patients with PsA included in the Dutch south-west Early Psoriatic Arthritis cohort (DEPAR) study were used. HRQOL was assessed using 8 domains of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Patients were classified based on primary manifestation in arthritis subtypes (i.e., mono-, oligo-, or polyarthritis) and other subtypes (i.e., enthesitis, dactylitis, and axial disease). In all patients, presence of arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, psoriasis, and chronic inflammatory back pain was determined. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine associations of PsA manifestations with HRQOL. RESULTS: Of 405 patients, primary manifestation was peripheral arthritis in 320 (78 monoarthritis, 151 oligoarthritis, and 91 polyarthritis), enthesitis in 37, axial disease in 9, and dactylitis in 39. Mean scores of SF-36 domains were lower than the Dutch reference population and similar across arthritis subtypes. A higher number of enthesitis locations and tender joints, and presence of chronic back pain, were independently associated with worse SF-36 scores. Psoriasis and dactylitis were not associated with worse scores. CONCLUSION: HRQOL was diminished in PsA at time of diagnosis compared to the Dutch reference population, and tender joints, enthesitis at clinical examination, and back pain as indicators of pain affected HRQOL.

Burden of Psoriatic Arthritis According to Different Definitions of Disease Activity: Comparing Minimal Disease Activity and the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Treat-to-target strategies have improved outcomes in rheumatic diseases. In psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the proposed targets are the multidimensional target minimal disease activity (MDA) and the articular target Disease Activity index for PsA (DAPSA). The aim of this study was to compare the disease burden of PsA in patients with low disease activity according to the 2 definitions, MDA and DAPSA low disease activity (DAPSA-LDA), 1 year after diagnosis. METHODS: We obtained data on MDA, DAPSA-LDA and disease burden 1 year after diagnosis for patients included in the Dutch southwest early PsA cohort. Disease burden was assessed in 2 domains: "Body functions," including the Short Form 36 bodily pain (SF-36 BP) measure, and "Activity," including the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). RESULTS: Among the 292 patients included, 48% achieved MDA and 74% achieved DAPSA-LDA. Average scores for Body functions and Activity were better in patients who achieved MDA and those who achieved DAPSA-LDA. The scores were significantly better in the 46% of patients who achieved both MDA and DAPSA-LDA than in the 29% of patients who achieved only DAPSA-LDA. The average SF-36 BP score was higher in patients achieving both targets (73.8; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 71.1-76.5) than in patients achieving only DAPSA-LDA (57.6; 95% CI 54.5-60.8). Similarly, mean HAQ scores measuring Activity were 0.21 (95% CI 0.15-0.26) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.53-0.72), respectively. CONCLUSION: Among patients with newly diagnosed PsA, 48% achieved MDA and 74% achieved DAPSA-LDA after 1 year of receiving usual care. The average disease burden was better in patients who achieved MDA and those who achieved DAPSA-LDA. Also, patients who achieved only DAPSA-LDA reported worse outcomes than those who also achieved MDA.

Psychosocial predictors of DMARD adherence in the first three months of treatment for early arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To induce disease remission, early arthritis patients should adhere to their disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in the first months after diagnosis. It remains unknown why some patients are non-adherent. We aimed to identify patients at risk for non-adherence in the first 3 months of treatment. METHODS: Adult DMARD-naive early arthritis patients starting synthetic DMARDs filled out items on potential adherence predictors at baseline. Adherence was measured continuously. Non-adherence was defined as not opening the electronically monitored pill bottle when it should have been. Items were reduced and clustered using principal component analysis. The most discriminating items were identified with latent trait models. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to find non-adherence predictors. RESULTS: 301 patients agreed to participate. Adherence was high and declined over time. Principal component analysis led to 7 dimensions, while subsequent latent trait models analyses led to 15 dimensions. Two dimensions were associated with adherence, one dimension was associated with non-adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Information seeking behavior and positive expectations about the course of the disease are associated with adherence. Patients who become passive because of pain are at risk for non-adherence. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Rheumatologists have cues to identify non-adherence, and may intervene on non-adherence through implementing shared decision making techniques.

Does non-adherence to DMARDs influence hospital-related healthcare costs for early arthritis in the first year of treatment?

INTRODUCTION: Non-adherence to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is suspected to relate to health care costs. In this study we investigated this relation in the first year of treatment. METHODS: In a multi-center cohort study with a one year follow up, non-adherence was continuously measured using electronic monitored medication jars. Non-adherence was defined as the number of days with a negative difference between expected and observed opening of the container. Cost measurement focused on hospital costs in the first year: consultations, emergency room visits, hospitalization, medical procedures, imaging modalities, medication costs, and laboratory tests. Cost volumes were registered from patient medical files. We applied multivariate regression analyses for the association between non-adherence and costs, and other variables (age, sex, center, baseline disease activity, diagnosis, socioeconomic status, anxiety and depression) and costs. RESULTS: Of the 275 invited patients, 206 were willing to participate. 74.2% had rheumatoid arthritis, 20.9% had psoriatic arthritis and 4.9% undifferentiated arthritis. 23.7% of the patients were more than 20% non-adherent over the follow-up period. Mean costs are € 2117.25 (SD € 3020.32). Non-adherence was positively related to costs in addition to baseline anxiety. CONCLUSION: Non-adherence is associated with health care costs in the first year of treatment for arthritis. This suggests that improving adherence is not only associated with better outcome, but also with savings.

[A woman with speech and swallowing disorder]. / Een vrouw met spraak- en slikstoornissen.

A 78-year-old woman with a history of rheumatoid arthritis has been developing progressive speech and swallowing problems since 3 weeks. A CT scan of her head and neck showed a subluxation of the dens, which caused basilar invagination. This severe complication of rheumatoid arthritis is rare. Dynamic imaging and neurologic survey are recommended in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.