Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 50(6): 989-1000, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18037099

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: C.E.R.A. (methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta), a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, was developed to provide stable control of hemoglobin (Hb) levels at extended administration intervals in patients with chronic kidney disease. We examined its efficacy for Hb level correction when administered once every 2 weeks in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive dialysis patients. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, phase 3 study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Dialysis patients (age >or= 18 years). INTERVENTION: Patients (n = 181) were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive intravenous C.E.R.A. once every 2 weeks or epoetin 3 times weekly. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was Hb level response rate (increase in Hb level >or= 1 g/dL [10 g/L] versus baseline and Hb level >or= 11 g/dL [110 g/L] without blood transfusion during the 24-week correction period) in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: Hb response rates (intent-to-treat population) were 93.3% with C.E.R.A. and 91.3% with epoetin. Similar results were found in the per-protocol population. Peak mean Hb levels were 12.28 +/- 1.13 (SD) g/dL (122.8 +/- 11.3 g/L) with C.E.R.A. and 12.19 +/- 1.24 g/dL (121.9 +/- 12.4 g/L) with epoetin. Mean change in Hb levels from baseline to the end of the correction period were 2.70 +/- 1.45 g/dL (27 +/- 14.5 g/L) with C.E.R.A. and 2.56 +/- 1.31 g/dL (25.6 +/- 13.1 g/L) with epoetin. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. LIMITATIONS: Open-label study design, 3:1 randomization, limited peritoneal dialysis population, descriptive statistics, and lack of formal prespecified comparison to epoetin. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous C.E.R.A. once every 2 weeks may be as safe and effective as 3-times-weekly epoetin for correcting anemia in dialysis patients. These results show the utility of intravenous C.E.R.A. administered once every 2 weeks in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive dialysis patients.


Assuntos
Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Portadores de Fármacos/uso terapêutico , Eritropoetina/uso terapêutico , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Anemia/etiologia , Anemia/metabolismo , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Portadores de Fármacos/efeitos adversos , Eritropoetina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipertensão/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Trombose/induzido quimicamente , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
NDT Plus ; 3(Suppl_2): ii2-ii8, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20508857

RESUMO

Background. Monitoring changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the recommended method for assessing the progression of kidney disease. The aim of this study was to assess the decline of graft function defined by the annualized change in GFR and the factors which affect it.Methods. Four thousand four hundred and eighty-eight patients, transplanted during the years 1990, 1994, 1998 and 2002 in 34 centres in Spain with allograft survival of at least 1 year, were included in the study. GFR was estimated using the four-variable equation of the Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases (MDRD) study. Linear mixed effects model was applied to determine the relation between the covariates and the annualized change in GFR after transplantation.Results. The average GFR at 12 months was 51.4 +/- 18.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2); most patients were in stage 3 of chronic kidney disease classification. The average patient slope, calculated in a linear model with varying-intercept and varying-slope without covariates, was -1.12 +/- 0.05 mL/min/year (slope +/- standard error). Some variables were related to both the 12-month GFR (intercept) and the slope: recipient gender, hepatitis C virus (HCV) status, estimated GFR (eGFR) at 3 months and proteinuria at 12 months. Some variables were only related to the slope of eGFR: time on dialysis, primary renal disease and immunosuppression. Others affected only the 12-month GFR: donor age, delayed graft function, acute rejection and systolic blood pressure at 12 months. Higher graft function at 3 months had a negative impact on the GFR slope. Cyclosporine-based immunosuppression had a less favourable effect on the rates of change in allograft function.Conclusions. There was a slow decline in GFR. Poor graft function was not associated with an increased rate of decline of allograft function. Immunosuppression with cyclosporine displayed the worst declining GFR rate.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA