Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Phytother Res ; 36(4): 1600-1615, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35302264

RESUMO

Childhood undernutrition contributes to up to 45% of deaths in children under age 5. Moringa oleifera (moringa) leaves are nutrient dense and promote breastmilk production. We performed a systematic review assessing the impact of moringa leaf supplementation in humans and animals on the outcomes of iron, vitamin A status, the measures of growth, and/or breastmilk production. Our inclusion/exclusion criteria were as follows; inclusion: quantitative primary data assessing the effect of moringa leaf supplementation on humans or animals including any of the outcomes defined earlier with no exclusion for geography, age, or language. Exclusion: full text not available. Our search yielded 148 unique studies; among them, 33 were included (seven human studies and 26 animal studies). Quality assessment by Effective Public Health Practice Project guidelines was strong for one study and moderate for all other studies. In humans, moringa at higher (14-30 g/day) not lower (<10 g/day) doses improved hemoglobin (Hgb) in children with iron deficiency anemia, improved Hgb and vitamin A status in postmenopausal women, and increased BMI in HIV+ underweight adults. Moringa (0.5 g/day) also increased breastmilk volumes. In animals, moringa increased milk production in two of three studies, inconsistently affected growth, and had no effect on iron status. Evidence on moringa supplementation's utility is limited but promising. Larger, more rigorous trials are needed to characterize its impact.


Assuntos
Moringa oleifera , Animais , Criança , Suplementos Nutricionais , Feminino , Humanos , Ferro , Leite , Extratos Vegetais , Folhas de Planta , Vitamina A
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 58(8): 1483-1488, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36496264

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Controversies in management of biliary atresia (BA) after hepatoportoenterostomy (HPE) lead to variable treatment protocols. We implemented standardized medical management after HPE, customizing the use of antibiotics and corticosteroids based on patient-specific factors. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 20 consecutive infants underwent HPE for BA and were compared to a historical cohort. Analysis of successful biliary drainage 3 months after HPE (defined as serum total bilirubin <2 mg/dL) was the primary endpoint; survival with native liver at 2 years was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Sixteen of 20 (80%) infants had successful bile drainage, compared to 8 of 20 (40%) infants in the historical cohort (P = 0.0225). Sixteen of 20 patients in the new protocol have reached 2 years of age or required liver transplantation. Among the sixteen, 11 (68.8%) are alive with native livers versus 10 of 20 (50%) in the historical cohort (P = 0.0970). CONCLUSION: This preliminary report suggests the potential benefit of tailored use of postoperative antibiotics and corticosteroids in improving biliary drainage after HPE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Assuntos
Atresia Biliar , Lactente , Humanos , Atresia Biliar/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bile , Portoenterostomia Hepática/métodos , Drenagem , Corticosteroides , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Rural Health ; 37(3): 602-623, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33305886

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non-Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness of existing interventions targeting cancer screening uptake in this high-risk population. The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake and/or continuing participation in screened cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate) in Appalachia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and gray literature using a combination of MeSH and free-text search terms related to breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; mass screening; health promotion; and Appalachia. We identified 3,014 articles of which 15 articles were included. We assessed methodological quality using validated tools and analyzed findings using narrative synthesis. FINDINGS: Fifteen studies reported uptake and/or continued participation in screening interventions; these focused on cervical (n = 7), colorectal (n = 5), breast (n = 2), and lung (n = 1) cancers in Appalachia. Interventions included diverse components: mass media campaigns, community outreach events, community health workers, interpersonal counseling, and educational materials. We found that multi-strategy interventions had higher screening uptake relative to interventions employing 1 intervention strategy. Studies that targeted noncompliant populations and leveraged existing community-based organization partnerships had a substantial increase in screening participation versus others. CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent need for further research and implementation of effective cancer prevention and screening interventions to reduce disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality in Appalachian populations.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias , Região dos Apalaches/epidemiologia , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA