Incidence and Significance of Deep Venous Reflux in Patients Treated with Saphenous Vein Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Venous ablation (VA) of the saphenous vein is the most common procedure performed for venous insufficiency. The incidence of concomitant deep venous reflux (DVR) in patients undergoing VA is unknown. Our hypothesis is that patients undergoing saphenous VA with concomitant DVR exhibit a higher clinical, etiology, anatomy, and pathophysiology (CEAP) stage and less relief after VA compared to patients without DVR. METHODS: Electronic medical records of patients treated with saphenous VA at a tertiary care center from March 2012 to June 2016 were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on presence or absence of DVR on initial ultrasound (US) before saphenous VA. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared. A telephone survey was conducted to assess long-term symptomatic relief, compliance with compression, and pain medication use. Subgroup analysis of patients with post-thrombotic versus primary DVR was performed. RESULTS: 362 patients underwent 497 ablations, and the incidence of DVR (>1 sec) was 20% (N = 71). Patients with DVR were significantly more likely to be male (46.4% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.021) and of Black race (21.2% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.0001) compared to patients without DVR. Patients with DVR were more likely to have a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (15.1% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.045), but there was no difference in other comorbidities. There was no significant difference in presenting symptoms, CEAP stage, or symptom severity based on numeric rating scale (NRS) (0-10) for pain and swelling. Clinical success of saphenous VA was comparable between the 2 groups, but patients with DVR were more likely to develop endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) II-IV (6% vs. 1%, P = 0.002). After a mean follow-up of 26 months, there was still no difference in pain or swelling scores, but patients with DVR were more likely to use compression stockings and used them more frequently. Only 11 of 71 patients with DVR had a history of DVT. Patients with post-thrombotic DVR were significantly older than patients with primary DVR (67.3 vs. 57.2, P = 0.038) and exhibited a trend toward more advanced venous disease (C4-C6: 45.4% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.439). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 20% of patients undergoing saphenous VA demonstrated DVR, which was more common in Black men. Presence of DVR is associated with increased risk of EHIT after saphenous VA but does not seem to impact disease severity or clinical relief after ablation. Larger studies are needed to understand outcome differences between post-thrombotic and primary DVR.

Association of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter indexed to patient height with symptomatic presentation and mortality.

BACKGROUND: The current guidelines have recommended repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) according to the maximal AAA diameter and/or its growth rate. However, many studies have suggested that the AAA diameter alone is not sufficient to predict the risk of rupture or symptomatic presentation. Several investigators have attempted to relate the AAA diameter to the body surface area in predicting for rupture. However, these calculations have not resulted in conclusive evidence. We sought in the present analysis to introduce a novel diameter-to-height index (DHI) and test its utility in predicting for symptomatic presentations, including rupture and 30-day and 5-year mortality. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2003-2020) was used to identify patients who had undergone open or endovascular AAA repair. The DHI was defined as the AAA diameter in centimeters divided by the height in centimeters, yielding a score of 1 to 10. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the risk of symptomatic presentation, including rupture and 30-day mortality. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted, and survival analysis techniques were used to determine the hazard of 5-year mortality. RESULTS: A total of 64,595 patients were identified, of whom, 16.3% had presented with symptomatic AAAs, including rupture. Endovascular AAA repair was performed for 69.8% of the symptomatic AAAs and 84.3% of asymptomatic AAAs (P < .001). The symptomatic group were more likely to be women (24.6% vs 19.8%; P < .001) and Black (7.81% vs 4.44%; P < .001). The mean DHI was higher in the symptomatic group than in the asymptomatic group (mean DHI, 3.92 ± 1.1 vs 3.24 ± 0.7; P < .001). The adjusted odds of a symptomatic presentation increased with an increasing DHI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-1.83; P < .001). Active smoking increased the risk of a symptomatic presentation (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.28-1.51; P < .001). However, the use of preoperative statins and beta-blockers significantly reduced the odds of a symptomatic presentation (aOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.53-0.64; P < .001; and aOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.84; P < .001), respectively. Compared with the AAA diameter, the receiver operating characteristic curve for the DHI to predict for symptomatic status was slightly, but significantly, higher (aOR, 0.702; 95% CI, 0.695-0.708; vs aOR, 0.695; 95% CI, 0.688-0.701; P < .001). The DHI increment was associated with a 1.08 greater odds of 30-day mortality (aOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15; P < .001) for those with symptomatic AAAs. Similarly, the hazard of 5-year mortality was increased with an increasing DHI (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.13-1.29; P < .001) only for those with asymptomatic AAAs. CONCLUSIONS: The DHI is a simple tool that could be more effective than the AAA diameter in predicting for symptomatic presentations. The DHI varied by sex and race, which could collectively help to provide an individualized prognosis. The DHI can additionally predict the 5-year mortality after AAA repair for those with asymptomatic AAAs only. However, the odds of 30-day mortality remained similar in both groups.

Frailty as a predictor of outcomes for patients undergoing carotid artery stenting.

OBJECTIVE: The concept of frailty has been proposed to capture the vulnerability resulting from aging and has been implemented for the prediction of perioperative outcomes. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is considered an appropriate minimally invasive procedure for patients considered to high risk to undergo carotid endarterectomy. Recently, the predictive accuracy for perioperative outcomes using the five-item modified frailty index (5mFI) has been reported to be relatively poor for cardiovascular surgery compared with other surgeries. The effects of functional status and the 5mFI on the outcomes after CAS remain unknown. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the relationship between 5mFI, functional status, and perioperative outcomes. METHODS: All the patients who had undergone CAS in the Vascular Quality Initiative from November 15, 2016 to December 31, 2018 were included. Good functional status was defined as the ability to perform all predisease activities without restriction using a new variable added to the Vascular Quality Initiative from November 15, 2016 onward. The 5mFI was calculated using functional status and a history of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. The perioperative outcomes included in-hospital stroke or death within 30 days after CAS, a prolonged postoperative stay (≥2 days), and nonhome discharge. The associations between functional status, 5mFI, and perioperative outcomes were examined using univariate and multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for sex, age, race, degree of stenosis, symptomatic status, and the usage of preoperative medications. An analysis stratified by functional status was also performed. RESULTS: Of the 7836 patients, 188 (2.4%) had experienced perioperative stroke or death, 765 (9.8%) had required a nonhome discharge, and 2584 (33.0%) had required a prolonged postoperative stay. A higher (≥0.6 vs <0.6) 5mFI score was associated with greater odds of perioperative stroke or death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-5.28; P = .003), non-home discharge (aOR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.89-3.85; P < .001), and a prolonged postoperative length of stay (aOR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.56-2.46; P < .001). For the predictive accuracy of the perioperative outcomes, the 5mFI model had an area under the curve for in-hospital stroke or death, nonhome discharge, and prolonged postoperative length of stay of 0.714, 0.767, and 0.668, respectively. The functional status model was not inferior to the 5mFI model for any of these outcomes. In the subgroup analysis, of the asymptomatic patients, a higher 5mFI score was associated with greater odds of perioperative stroke or death (aOR, 7.08; 95% CI, 2.02-24.48; P = .002), nonhome discharge (aOR, 5.87; 95% CI, 2.45-13.90; P < .001), and a prolonged postoperative stay (aOR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.82-3.71; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty, as measured using the 5mFI, and functional status were independent predictors of perioperative stroke or death, nonhome discharge, and an increased length of stay for patients undergoing CAS. These results were greatly pronounced in asymptomatic patients. The results from the present study, thus, caution against the use of CAS for asymptomatic frail patients.

Physician impact on use of fluoroscopy during endovascular procedures to improve radiation safety.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether differences exist in fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure during lower extremity endovascular procedures performed by fellowship trained vascular surgeons vs general surgeons, to minimize radiation exposure to operating room staff. METHODS: A retrospective review of all lower extremity endovascular procedures was performed from August 1, 2014, to January 29, 2016. The procedures were performed by the surgical department's four surgeons with endovascular privileges: two vascular surgeons and two general surgeons. Only procedures involving lower extremity arterial angiograms with balloon angioplasty, stenting, or atherectomy were included. The operative records were reviewed for each case. The total fluoroscopy time and total radiation dose for each procedure were recorded. Procedures were grouped according to the number of endovascular interventions as one to two interventions, three to four interventions, and five or more interventions performed. Statistical analysis was performed with a P value of less than .05 considered significant. RESULTS: About 271 lower extremity endovascular procedures were performed during the study period by 4 surgeons. The average age of the patient population was 70 years. The total number of procedures performed over the study period were 112, 45, 91, and 25 for surgeons 1 through 4, respectively. On average, 3.24 interventions were performed during each procedure. Vascular surgeons were found to have shorter fluoroscopy time for procedures involving one to two (7.8 vs 30.1; P < .01), three to four (9.3 vs 34.2; P < .01), and five or more (11.5 vs 51.9; P < .01) interventions. Vascular surgeons were also found to have less radiation exposure compared with general surgeons in procedures with one to two (1.69 vs 3.53; P = .001) and five or more (2.3 vs 5.4; P = .003) interventions. There was no significant difference in radiation exposure between vascular and general surgeons for procedures with three to four interventions (5.86 vs 5.59; P = .95). CONCLUSIONS: In this small series at our institution, lower extremity endovascular procedures performed by specialty trained vascular surgeons were associated with both decreased operative fluoroscopy time and decreased radiation exposure when compared with general surgeons.

Safety of vascular interventions performed in an office-based laboratory in patients with low/moderate procedural risk.

OBJECTIVE: An exponential increase in number of office-based laboratories (OBLs) has occurred in the United States, since the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services increased reimbursement for outpatient vascular interventions in 2008. This dramatic shift to office-based procedures directed to the objective to assess safety of vascular procedures in OBLs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed to include all procedures performed over a 4-year period at an accredited OBL. The procedures were categorized into groups for analysis; group I, venous procedures; group II, arterial; group III, arteriovenous; and group IV, inferior vena cava filter placement procedures. Local anesthesia, analgesics, and conscious sedation were used in all interventions, individualized to the patient and procedure performed. Arterial closures devices were used in all arterial interventions. Patient selection for procedure at OBL was highly selective to include only patients with low/moderate procedural risk. RESULTS: Nearly 6201 procedures were performed in 2779 patients from 2011 to 2015. The mean age of the study population was 66.5 ± 13.31 years. There were 1852 females (67%) and 928 males (33%). In group I, 5783 venous procedures were performed (3491 vein ablation, 2292 iliac vein stenting); with group II, 238 arterial procedures (125 femoral/popliteal, 71 infrapopliteal, iliac 42); group III, 129 arteriovenous accesses; and group IV, 51 inferior vena cava filter placements. The majority of procedures belonged to American Society of Anesthesiology class II with venous (61%) and arterial (74%) disease. A total of 5% patients were deemed American Society of Anesthesiology class IV (all on hemodialysis). There was no OBL mortality, major bleed, acute limb ischemia, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospital transfer within 72 hours. Minor complications occurred in 14 patients (0.5%). Thirty-day mortality, unrelated to the procedure, was noted in 9 patients (0.32%). No statistically significant differences were noted in outcomes between the four groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that it is safe to use OBL for minimally invasive, noncomplex vascular interventions in patients with a low to moderate cardiovascular procedural risk.

Iliac Vein Stent Placement and the Iliocaval Confluence.

OBJECTIVE: Prior literature has recommended routine iliac vein stent extension into the inferior vena cava (IVC) to assure adequate outflow for iliac vein stenting procedures. Our bias was that only the lesion should be stented without routine stent extension up to the IVC. We report our experience with this limited stenting technique. METHODS: From 2012 to 2015, 844 patients (1,216 limbs) underwent iliac vein stenting for nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs). All limbs were evaluated in accordance with the presenting sign of the Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) score, and duplex scans and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) showing more than 50% cross-sectional area or diameter reduction. All study patients had failed 3 months of conservative management. The procedures of iliac vein stenting were all office based. Two techniques were compared: (1) placement of the iliac vein stent to cover the lesion and terminating cephalad into the IVC if the lesion involved the common iliac vein and (2) placement of the iliac vein stent to cover the lesion only and not passing the iliocaval confluence if the lesion only involved the external iliac vein. Complications were assessed during 30-day follow-up using the duplex scan technique to look for thrombosis. RESULTS: Of the total 844 patients, 543 (64%) were women. The average age was 66 (±14.2) years (range, 21-99 years). The stent was placed in the left lower limb in 474 patients and bilaterally in 370 patients. The presenting sign in accordance with the CEAP classification was C3 = 626, C4 = 404, C5 = 44, and C6 = 141. The average iliac vein stenosis by IVUS was 62% (±12% standard deviation [SD]). We had 715 patients with the iliac vein stent extending into the IVC, and of these, 8 patients had thrombosis within 30 days after the procedure. On the other hand, 501 patients had the iliac vein stent without crossing the iliocaval confluence, and of these, 4 patients had thrombosis within 30 days of the procedure. There was no difference between these 2 groups in regard to gender (P = 0.1) or age (P = 0.3). Laterality was statistically different (P < 0.0001) with more stents to be extended into the IVC if the lesion is in the left lower limb. Comparing these 2 groups in regard to 30-day thrombosis as a complication was not statistically significant (P = 0.6). There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups in regard to the presenting sign CEAP (P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: These results question the need for routine iliac vein stent extension into the IVC in patients with NIVLs. We were not able to demonstrate a significant risk of thrombosis with just placing the stent to cover the lesion only with short-term follow-up.

Early Results of Duplex-Guided Transradial Artery Fistuloplasties.

BACKGROUND: Although arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) are the preferred mode of hemodialysis access because of their high patency rates, they are associated with an appreciable rate of nonmaturation. Balloon-assisted maturation (BAM) has been described to treat this issue. BAM is defined as repeated sequential graduated dilatation of the outflow vein. This study aims to evaluate the short-term complications of using the radial artery as an access for BAM procedures and fisutloplasties. Transradial access was used preferentially with multiple lesions in the AVF that were difficult to access with a single venous puncture. METHODS: Data were collected over 3 years on 44 office-based duplex-guided transradial access BAM procedures in 27 patients of whom 19 were men. BAM with ultrasound guidance was performed in 324 cases using a venous puncture during this period. The indication for the procedures was a failure of AVF maturation, and 5 cases were with short segment thrombectomy. All procedures were performed with local anesthesia only. Access site puncture, vessel cannulation, wire placement, and balloon advancement and insufflation were duplex-guided. The radial artery was punctured with ultrasound guidance and a 4-5 French low-profile sheath was placed. After crossing the lesion(s), 5,000 units of heparin was given. The radial artery was used as the access vessel for all procedures except one, in which the brachial artery was used in addition. Vascular injuries were classified based on the postprocedural duplex assessment. All patients had follow-up duplex scans within a week. RESULTS: The average age was 79 years (±14 SD, range 39-99 years). The types of AVF were 35 radio-cephalic, 1 radio-basilic, 2 brachio-brachial, 2 brachio-cephalic, and 4 brachio-basilic. The number of sites of lesions was 17 on the venous outflow, 7 perianastomotic, and 6 in the radial artery. In the remaining 14 failing AVFs, we were not able to identify any lesion. The balloon size ranged from 3-6 mm (28 patients) and 7-12 mm (16 patients). The most common injury was outflow vein wall injury (25), the formation of wall hematoma of the outflow vein (11), localized extravasation or rupture at the balloon site (4), spasm of the AVF (3), the formation of a puncture-site hematoma (2), and intimal flap (3). Extravasation was controlled with duplex-guided compression. There were no radial artery thromboses, and all the AVFs were patent on completion duplex and follow-up duplex. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the radial artery could be used as a safe access route for BAM procedures with relatively low rates of complication. This approach can be considered as an adjunct in the armamentarium for angioplasty of AVF.

A novel technique for duplex-guided office-based interventions for patients with acute arteriovenous fistula occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to aggressively salvage acutely occluded arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) using duplex imaging as the sole imaging modality for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of acutely thrombosed AVF. METHODS: Over a period of 12 months, 14 patients with acute thrombosis of their AVFs underwent 18 procedures in a single center for AVF salvage. All 14 patients presented with chronic renal failure, and six were diabetic. All patients were treated under duplex guidance alone. Treatment included simple balloon dilation and maceration (group A; n =10 procedures [56%]) for subacute thrombosis or pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (group B; n = 8 procedures [44%]) for more hypoechoic thrombus. A successful procedure was defined as immediate restoration of flow through the AVF. RESULTS: Of the 18 procedures, 13 (72%) were successful. Of the 14 patients, thrombus was located at the perianastomotic AVF in 6 (43%), proximal-mid AVF in 6 (43%), mid AVF in 1 (7%), and distal AVF in 1 (7%). From group A, six (60%) were successful. From group B, seven (88%) were successful. Among the unsuccessful procedures, one group B patient was hypercoagulable (polycythemia vera). Of the 18 procedures, 16 (89%) were treated within 2 weeks from when duplex revealed the presence of thrombus. Early rethrombosis (<1-month patency) occurred in three cases (17%), and these patients received new fistulas. Full restoration of the fistula flow was established in 14 cases (78%). Of these 14 patients, 8 (57%) are currently on hemodialysis via fistula, 3 patients (21%) had newly placed fistulas after failed interventions, 2 patients (14%) are not on dialysis yet, and 1 patient (7%) with polycythemia vera disorder is on dialysis via a Tesio catheter (MedComp, Harleysville, Pa). CONCLUSIONS: The sole use of duplex ultrasound imaging to salvage acutely occluded AVFs using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is a safe and effective alternative to traditional treatment of thrombosed failing/maturing AVF.

Recent Trends in Publications of US and European Directors in Vascular Surgery.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that there may be significant differences between academic productivity of the vascular training programs in the United States (US) and Europe. In an effort to explore this theory, we reviewed the number of vascular publications listed in PubMed from 2010 to 2015 for US and European directors in vascular surgery. METHODS: The list of program directors from the Association of Program Directors in Vascular Surgery (APDVS) and the European Union of Medical Specialists (EUMS) were queried for the names of the directors of vascular surgical training programs at the end of 2015. PubMed listed 5,474 citations published from 2010 to 2015. Three thousand five hundred sixty-one were from Europe while 1,912 were from the US. UK and German programs did not list their directors' names in the EUMS website and were thus not included in the European data. RESULTS: The average number of citations in PubMed per program director was 2.36 per year. In Europe, each of the 273 program directors averaged 2.17 publications per year, whereas each of the 114 US program directors averaged 2.80 publications per year (P = 0.37). Journal of Vascular Surgery (JVS) publications made up 24.0% (12.7% in Europe and 45.0% in the US). In the US, the top third produced 69% of the publications and 77% of the JVS publications, whereas in Europe, the top third produced 87% of the publications and 98% of the JVS publications. In the US, 5 program directors (4.4%) had no publications and 21 (18.4%) had no JVS publications. In Europe, 82 program directors (30.0%) had no publications, whereas 180 (65.9%) had no JVS publications. Abstracts were categorized by topic for comparison. CONCLUSIONS: In both Europe and the US, the top third produced more than two-thirds of the publications, with the disparity being even more pronounced in Europe where the top third produced almost 90% of the total publications. Comparing the topics of the publications from Europe and the US, it was found that the US program directors published a great deal more on Endovenous Lower Extremity, Open Lower Extremity, Education, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, Open Carotid, and Endo Venous, whereas their European counterparts published more in the areas of Vascular Medicine, Replies, and Not Vascular.

Recanalization After Endovenous Thermal Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Endovenous thermal ablation in the form of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) has quickly ascended to a prime position in the treatment of venous insufficiency. Although there are good data examining the rates of thrombotic complications, there is a relative paucity of data examining the recanalization rates after endovenous thermal ablation (ETA). METHODS: Data analysis was performed for 1475 thermal ablations in 485 patients from 2012 to 2015 as a retrospective chart review. RFA was performed in 1027 patients and EVLA in 448 patients. The target veins included the great saphenous vein (GSV) (778), short saphenous vein (SSV) (401), accessory saphenous vein (ASV) (140), and perforator veins (PV) (156). Data were collected from follow-up visit within 1 week of procedure, every 3 months for the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. Recurrence was defined as >500 ms for the GSV, SSV, and ASV and as >350 ms for the PV. Data for recanalization were also correlated with age, gender, laterality, presenting symptoms, and treated targeted vein. RESULTS: The average age of the study population was 64.7 years (SD ± 15.6) with 66% women and 326 bilateral veins. At 1-week follow-up, women (2.6%) had higher recanalization rate (P = 0.018). Failure rate of obliteration for GSV and SSV were 0.8% and 0.8%, respectively (P = 0.98). PV had the highest failure rate (16.6%), followed by ASV (2.9%) (P < 0.001). At mean follow-up after 13.5 ± 12 months, PV (41.2%) and ASV (14.85) had higher recanalization rate than GSV (7.7%) and SSV (8.5%) (P < 0.001). Excluding PVs, no difference with recurrence rates between RFA (10%) and EVLA (8.8%) was observed at 1-week and 1-year follow-ups (P = 0.54). Also, 56% of patients with recanalization were symptomatic. Among these 1475 procedures, redo for recurrent symptoms were performed in 76. At 1 week, there was no difference between nonrepeated (92.7%) and repeated procedures (89.5%) (P = 0.41). However, 1 year later, there was significant difference between obliteration rate in nonrepeated (86.9%) and repeated (76.3%) procedures (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: These data do suggest low overall rates of recanalization after thermal ablation of the GSV and SSV. However, at 1-year follow-up, accessory veins had almost twice the recurrence rate as compared with GSV and SSV, and PV had almost 5 times the recurrence rate. There was no significant difference between RFA and EVLA in recanalization rates. Redo procedures in recanalized veins after venous ablation are effective with a success rate at 76.5%.

A Trainee Perspective to Issues Needing Redressal in Current Vascular Surgery Training Programs: Survey Results from 2004 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: Vascular surgery training and practice have been constantly evolving in the last 2 decades. The goal of this study is to report the changing trends in perspectives of vascular surgery trainees on current training program and issues that need redressal in vascular training and practice. METHODS: Vascular surgery trainees in the United States, who attended the Society of Clinical Vascular Surgery meeting from 2004 to 2015, were surveyed annually with an anonymous questionnaire during the meet. Questions pertaining to their endovascular and open surgical learning experience, independent performance of procedures, challenges of job search, starting an independent practice, and their perception of issues in vascular surgery training were analyzed. Responses from the first half of the decade (2004-2009) were compared with the second half (2010-2015) to identify evolving trends in trainee perception. RESULTS: Among the 908 vascular surgery trainees who attended the annual meeting from 2004 to 2015, 670 (74%) trainees responded to the questionnaire. The mean age of vascular trainees was 32.5 years. In the latter half of the decade, there was a 2-fold increase in female trainees, from 12.3% to 23.6% (P = 0.002), and the integrated program trainees also increased from 0% to 12% of respondents (P = 0.0023). Trainee satisfaction with endovascular training improved from 78% to 90% (P = 0.0001), and satisfaction with open surgical experience was unchanged at 83% over the 10-year period (P = 0.16). The perception of vascular laboratory experience improved with only 35% vs. 27% (P = 0.016) of respondents dissatisfied, despite only a third of respondents actually performing the noninvasive tests in both the former and the latter half of the decade, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the quality of vascular cases during training has improved, vascular trainees desire shorter training paradigms, and vascular laboratory education is still viewed as deficient. These findings can be used by training programs to re-examine their curricula and implement changes to improve the quality of training the next generation of vascular surgeons.

Intraoperative venoplasty to facilitate placement of tunneled catheters for hemodialysis.

Objective With the implementation of the K-DOQI guidelines, more patients are in need of long-term dialysis catheters until maturation of the arteriovenous fistula. However, on occasion, when placing a tunneled cuffed catheter for hemodialysis, we have encountered difficulty with passing the guidewire in spite of demonstration of a patent cervical portion of the internal jugular vein on duplex. Herein, we review our experience with intraoperative venoplasty for placement of Tesio™ catheters (Medcomp Harleysville, PA). Methods Of the 1147 Tesio™ catheters placed since 1997 by our service, 35 venograms were performed due to difficulty encountered with placement of the guidewire. Patent veins were all crossed with the use of angle-guiding catheters, angled glidewires, and a torque vise. If chronically occluded intrathoracic veins were identified, an alternate site was selected for the placement of the Tesio™ catheter. Results Of the 35 cases with difficulty in catheter placement, venogram demonstrated a patent but tortuous vein in 9, chronically occluded intrathoracic veins in 6, and severe stenosis of the intrathoracic veins in 20. In 19 cases with severe stenosis of the intrathoracic veins, balloon angioplasty with an 8-mm balloon was successfully performed, which allowed successful placement of a functional Tesio™ catheter. In the additional one case, the catheter was not able to be placed despite angioplasty. Seven lesions that underwent balloon angioplasty were in the innominate vein, 11 were in the proximal internal jugular vein, and two were in the superior vena cava. Conclusion Venous balloon angioplasty can be used to maintain options for the site of access for tunneled cuffed catheters and may be necessary to assist with placement of long term cuffed dialysis catheters.

Utilization of stent grafts in the management of arteriovenous access pseudoaneurysms.

Objective Endovascular stent graft repair for exclusion of pseudoaneurysm is currently being explored to replace open surgical repair as current management. The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of endovascular stent graft intervention in pseudoaneurysms complicating arteriovenous reconstructions in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Methods A retrospective analysis of all pseudoaneurysms treated with stent grafts at our institution over a period of five years was performed. The indications for endovascular intervention included bleeding from the pseudoaneurysm, infection, and significant skin compromise overlying the pseudoaneurysm or combination of the above. The rates of technical success, complication, and primary patency were measured at one-week, one-month, and six-month follow-up. Results A total of 33 endovascular stent graft interventions in 29 patients were performed for the treatment of pseudoaneurysms. The average age of patients was 68 years (range 31-90 years), with 13 female. Diabetes and hypertension were present in 15 and 22 patients, respectively. In eight patients, there was evidence of active infection at the fistula site. The choice of stent grafts include Viabahn ( n = 31), Wallgraft ( n = 1), and i-Cast ( n = 1). The initial technical success rate was 94%. The two failed interventions included occlusion of inflow artery with immediate conversion to open procedure ( n = 1) and incomplete pseudoaneurysm exclusion ( n = 1). Primary patency at one month and six months was 83 and 60%, respectively. An additional balloon angioplasty of outflow tract or central stenosis was performed in 18 cases (54%). The explanation of stent grafts due to persistent or recurrent bacteremia/site infection was required in four out of eight patients. The average time to explanation was 93 days (range 6-204 days). Conclusion The stent graft implantation is a safe, minimally invasive and efficient way to control and manage arteriovenous accesses with pseudoaneurysms. In the presence of infection, this approach may be less durable.

Clinical correlation of the area of inferior vena cava, iliac and femoral veins for stent use.

Objective The purpose of the study is to evaluate normal anatomical areas of infrarenal inferior vena cava, common iliac, external iliac and common femoral veins by intravascular ultrasound with the goal of assisting the development of venous-specific stents in the treatment of iliac vein stenosis. Method From February 2012 to December 2013, 656 office-based venograms were performed in our facility. Among them, 576 were stented and 80 were not. The measurements of veins were done intraoperatively using an intravascular ultrasound catheter to record areas of the inferior vena cava, proximal, middle and distal segments of common iliac vein, external iliac vein and common femoral vein. The data were compared between non-diseased segments of patients who were stented and those not stented. The stented diseased segments were excluded. Results The mean patient age was 67.33 years (range 22-96, SD ±13.99). Our data included 218 males, 438 females and 324 right lower extremities and 332 left lower extremities. The presenting symptoms of these patients based on CEAP were C1(0), C2 (185), C3(233), C4(107), C5(89) and C6(42). No correlation was found between area of veins and age, gender, laterality and CEAP score (P > .13). Comparison of the areas of non-diseased iliac vein segments between patients not stented and patients who underwent stenting showed a significant difference, with larger areas in non-stented patients in the distal common iliac vein (P = .039) and inferior vena cava (P = .012). Younger age (P = .03) and male gender (P < .0001) were associated with increased area of iliac vein segments. Conclusion Utilizing the intravascular ultrasound-guided technique, we were able to define normal anatomical areas of non-diseased inferior vena cava, iliac and femoral veins, which could be employed to guide the development of appropriate-sized stents and other tools needed for the treatment of venous insufficiency. There is specific variability in areas of normal vein segments with age and gender with/without stents.

Clinical outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants after lower extremity arterial procedures.

Objectives The use of postoperative anticoagulation is not uncommon for patients undergoing lower extremity arterial procedures as adjunctive therapy. Longer postoperative length of stay is necessary to achieve adequate therapeutic international normalized ratio with traditional protocols that call for the use of unfractionated heparin and warfarin therapy. We hypothesized the direct oral anticoagulants are an attractive alternative to provide adequate anticoagulation in patients who undergo lower extremity arterial procedures. Methods We retrospectively studied patients who had lower extremity arterial procedures between 2012 and 2015 to examine the safety and efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulants in a single institution. Patency, freedom from re-intervention, and major adverse limb event were evaluated. The direct oral anticoagulant agents used included dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. The primary patency, adverse effects and freedom from re-intervention were then compared to a control group of patients who were treated with traditional heparin-warfarin therapy after lower extremity bypass procedures. Results Direct oral anticoagulants were utilized in a total of 23 patients (48% men; mean age 69 ± 11 years) during the study period. Indication for use of direct oral anticoagulant after procedure included use of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bypass graft below the knee joint or after lower extremity angioplasty with disadvantaged runoff. Mean follow-up of the drugs was 23 months (SD ± 16 months). At the end of follow-up, the direct oral anticoagulants have been discontinued in four patients, who are currently only on plavix. Among 82.6% of patients who were given direct oral anticoagulants for PTFE bypasses, graft patency, freedom from re-intervention, and major adverse limb event were 100%, 100%, and 0%, respectively. Patients (17.4%) treated with direct oral anticoagulants for disadvantaged runoff after balloon angioplasty of the lower extremity, patency, freedom from re-intervention, and major adverse limb event were 100%, 100%, and 0%, respectively. For the patients who underwent direct oral anticoagulant administration for disadvantaged runoff primary patency was 100%. One patient developed wound dehiscence which was unrelated to direct oral anticoagulant administration. Our control group consisted of 100 patients who were treated with heparin-warfarin therapy for 30 days after lower extremity bypass procedures. The graft patency, freedom from intervention, and major adverse limb event were 93%, 12%, and 0%, respectively. There was however no statistically significant difference in graft patency rate ( P = .34) or freedom from intervention ( P = .07) between the two groups. Conclusions The preliminary data suggest that there may be a role for using the direct oral anticoagulants with patients who undergo lower extremity arterial procedures for prevention of thrombosis and warrants further investigation.

Demographic and clinical features do not affect the outcome of combined endovenous therapy to treat leg swelling.

Background There have been well-documented implications of race/ethnicity on the outcome of various vascular diseases, yet there are limited data on risk factors and outcome of lower limb swelling. While many patients improve with endovenous therapy (thermal ablation or iliac vein stenting), some patients' symptoms persist. The goal of this study was to identify clinical factors including race/ethnicity related to persistent leg swelling after treatment with both iliac vein stenting and thermal ablation. Methods From February 2012 to February 2014, this observational study analyzed data for 173 patients with chronic venous insufficiency who underwent both iliac vein stent placement as well as thermal ablation (radiofrequency ablation or endovenous laser ablation). All procedures of the thermal ablations and the iliac vein stenting were staged. Iliac vein stenosis was identified using intravascular ultrasound of the iliofemoral venous segment showing >50% cross-sectional area or diameter reduction. The patients were queried to the resolution of their leg swelling after both procedures were performed. The resolution of swelling was correlated with age, gender, presenting sign according to CEAP classification, race/ethnicity and degree of iliac vein stenosis. Patients were categorized by Caucasians ( n = 97), African Americans ( n = 27), or Hispanics ( n = 49). Statistical analysis performed using Chi-square and Student's t test. Results Of the total 173 patients who underwent both endovenous closure and iliac vein stent placements, 117 (67.6%) patients were women. The average age was 67 (±13 SD) years. The average pain score was 2.9(±3.1 SD). The average degree of iliac vein stenosis was 66.5(±13.3 SD). About 56.1% were Caucasians, 15.6% were African Americans, and 28.3% were Hispanics. The number of patients with iliac vein stent thrombosis was 2. One hundred fifty-two (87.9%) patients stated that they had improvement in swelling after combined procedures, 100 (65.8%) patients were women. The average age was 67.3 (±13 SD) years. The average pain score was 2.9 (±3.1 SD). The average degree of iliac vein stenosis was 67.3% (±12.8 SD). About 56.6% were Caucasians, 15.1% were African Americans, and 28.3% were Hispanics. The number of patients with iliac vein stent thrombosis was 1. Twenty-one (12.1%) patients stated they had no improvement after both procedures. Correlating these group factors with the group of patients who improved their swelling after the combined procedures we found the following: 17 (81%) of these patients were females ( P=0.16). The average age was 68.4 (±17 SD) years ( P=0.72 SD). The average pain score was 3.2 (±3.7 SD) ( P=0.68). The average degree of iliac vein stenosis was 60.2% (±15.9 SD) ( P=0.02). Around 52.4% were Caucasians, 19% were African Americans, and 28.6% were Hispanics ( P=0.88). The number of patients with iliac vein stent thrombosis was 1 ( P = 0.1). Conclusion These data suggest that the clinical factors including race are not clinically significant factors in the response to swelling after combined iliac stent and endovenous ablation procedures. Interestingly, a higher degree of iliac vein stenosis was associated with improved resolution of swelling.

Recent trends in publications of US vascular surgery program directors.

Objective In order to examine the academic productivity of US vascular surgery program directors, the number of vascular publications listed in PubMed from 2001 to 2015 for US vascular surgery program directors was reviewed. We suggest that this can be used as a benchmark for academic productivity. Methods The names of the program directors were taken from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) website at two time points: December 2009 (Independent Programs) and December 2015 (Independent + Integrated). This was used to query PubMed, which listed 5196 publications: 3284 from 2001 to 2009 and 1912 from 2010 to 2015. Results There were 104 program directors (2001-2009) and 114 program directors (2010-2015) with average number of publications in PubMed per program director as 3.68/year (SD ± 2.31) and 2.80/year (SD ± 2.73), respectively ( P = .01). From 2001 to 2009, 1215 (37%) and in 2010 to 2015, 860 (45%) of the publications were from Journal of vascular surgery. The top third produced 67% and 69% of publications in the two time-points. No statistical difference was ascertained regionally: northeast, southeast, midwest and west ( P = .46). The numbers of publications/year decreased by 17% compared to first 10 years. From 2001 to 2009, there were no programs with no publications which increased to five and three with no Journal of Vascular Surgery publications which increased to 21 in 2010-2015. The independent and integrated program directors published average of 2.85 (SD ± 2.69) and 3.47 (SD ± 3.1) total publications; 1.25 (SD ± 1.4) and 3.47 (SD ± 1.7) Journal of Vascular Surgery papers/year, respectively ( P = .28, P = .23). Changes in the study subject were noted by percentage of total publications: endovascular lower extremity arterial (4.7% to 8.9%), Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) (4.5% to 9.9%), Arterio-Venous (AV) access (0.0% to 3.0%), basic science (14.7% to 6.8%), open thoracic (3.0% to 0.6%). Conclusion There seems to be a significant decline in the number of publications over the last 15 years. Yet, the subject of the publications has progressed from Open to TEVAR with an increase in endovascular publications. However, basic science publications reduced by half.

Safety and efficacy of stenting nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions in octogenarians and nonagenarians in an office setting.

Objectives Treatment options for venous insufficiency are rapidly evolving in the office setting and include venography, intravascular ultrasound, and venous stenting. Non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions assessment and treatment in an office setting is currently an area of interest. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of evaluating non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion with this office-based procedure in octogenarians and nonagenarians. Methods From January 2012 through December 2013, 300 non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion limbs in 192 patients with venous insufficiency ≥80 years old were evaluated for non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion. Patients were evaluated and treated with venography, intravascular ultrasound, and stent placement for significant lesions demonstrated by greater than 50% diameter or cross-sectional area reduction. Group 1: 168 of these patients were octogenarians; female/male ratio was 1.75:1, bilateral in 89/168 patients (53%), left sided in 131/259 limbs (51%), right sided in 128 limbs (49%), average age 83.5 ± 2.6 years (range 80-89) compared to Group 2: 24 nonagenarians; female/male was 3:1, bilateral in 17/24 patients (70%), left sided in 20/41 limbs (49%), right sided in 21/41 limbs (51%), average age 92.9 ± 2.2 years (range 90-99). Stent related outcomes were evaluated with communication to the patient within 24 h to assess post-procedure pain followed by serial iliocaval ultrasonography. Results Out of the 300 limbs evaluated, in Group 1, 86% of limbs had stents placed compared to 90% in Group 2 and 11% of both groups had two stents placed. Overall improvement in pain, edema, and ulcers was reported in 147 (59%) of octogenarians and 24 (65%) of nonagenarians. There were no surgical site infections, pseudo-aneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas, or femoral artery injuries. No patients required transfusion within three days post-operatively and there were no 30-day mortalities in both sets of patients. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that there is no statistical difference in the outcome of performing venography, intravascular ultrasound, and stent placement in an office-based setting in octogenarians and nonagenarians. Both groups maintained a similar safety profile with low morbidity and mortality. In conclusion, we believe that the treatment of non-thrombotic iliac vein lesion in an office-based setting is safe and efficacious in both groups.

Routine colonoscopy, diabetic eye care, mammogram and pap smear screening in vascular surgery patients.

Objective An increasing emphasis on preventive medicine has been supported by the recent reforms in United States health care system. Majority of the patients seen in vascular surgery clinics are elderly with more extensive medical comorbidities compared to the general population. Thus, these patients would be expected at higher risk for common malignant pathologies such as colon, breast and cervical cancer, and nonmalignant diseases such as diabetic retinopathy. This study looked at the screening compliance of vascular patients compared to data provided by Centers for Disease Control on the national and state levels. Methods The office records of 851 consecutive patients seen in Brooklyn and Staten Island vascular clinics were examined. We queried patients regarding their last colonoscopy, diabetic eye exams, recent mammograms, and Pap smears. Our patient screening compliance was compared between the two clinics as well as to the national and New York state data provided by Centers for Disease Control. Compliance with regard to patient's age was also examined. Results Patients referred to the Staten Island office have a better colonoscopy compliance compared to the Brooklyn office ( P = .0001) and the national Centers for Disease Control average ( P = .026). Compliance for mammography and cervical cancer screening was higher in Staten Island office compared to the Brooklyn office ( P = .0001, P < .0001), respectively. Compliance was lower for Pap smear ( P = .0273) in Brooklyn when compared to the national average. Compliance for colonoscopy increased with age for both clinics ( P = .001, P < .001), while Pap smear decreased ( P < .001, P = .004). Conclusion Patients in vascular clinics in an urban setting had better adherence to screening protocol than the national and state average, with the exception of female patients for colonoscopy in our Brooklyn vascular office. There exists variability in both patient populations based on sub-specific locality and demographics including socioeconomic status. Overall, however patients in Staten Island had better compliance and adherence to the screening protocol than Brooklyn vascular clinic.

Perforator Vein Access for Venous Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis.

A 28-year-old Hispanic female with a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) presented to the emergency room with left lower extremity swelling and pain. On duplex venous examination, an extensive left lower extremity DVT extending to her left common iliac vein was identified. A perforator vein measuring 2.6 mm located in the midcalf area was used to access and perform mechanical and chemical thrombolysis. Complete resolution of symptoms was observed.