RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) is one of the most widely used arterial stiffness variables for assessing vascular risk. The abiPWV is a device that calculates various PWVs and the blood pressure ankle-brachial index (ABI). The device can also determine baPWV. The aim of this study was to calculate the baPWV with abiPWV, validate it with a reference device (VaSera) and study its clinical usefulness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 113 patients (mean age, 53±12years), 59 (52%) of whom were women, and 10 (8.8%) of whom had a previous cardiovascular event. The participants were classified according to cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) into groupI (none), groupII (1 or 2 CRFs) and groupIII (3 or more CRFs). The patients with a previous cardiovascular event were included in groupIII. All participants had their baPWV measured with abiPWV and VaSera. RESULTS: The baPWV correlation between the 2 devices was r=0.93 (P<.001), and the percentage error calculated with the Bland-Altman analysis was 4.5%. The baPWV measured with abiPWV (in m/s) was as follows: groupI, 10.5±1.6; groupII, 13.8±2.9 (P<.001 when compared with groupI); and groupIII, 14.1±2.7 (P<.001 when compared with groupI). There were no differences between groupsII and III. The results with VaSera were comparable to those of abiPWV. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring baPWV with the abiPWV is safe and has a similar clinical utility to that of VaSera. Incorporating this function into the options of abiPWV makes it a complete device for assessing arterial stiffness.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) is one of the most widely used arterial stiffness variables for assessing vascular risk. The abiPWV is a device that calculates various PWVs and the blood pressure ankle-brachial index (ABI). The device can also determine baPWV. The aim of this study was to calculate the baPWV with abiPWV, validate it with a reference device (VaSera) and study its clinical usefulness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 113 patients (mean age, 53⯱â¯12 years), 59 (52%) of whom were women, and 10 (8.8%) of whom had a previous cardiovascular event. The participants were classified according to cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) into group I (none), group II (1 or 2 CRFs) and group III (3 or more CRFs). The patients with a previous cardiovascular event were included in group III. All participants had their baPWV measured with abiPWV and VaSera. RESULTS: The baPWV correlation between the 2 devices was râ¯=â¯0.93 (pâ¯<â¯.001), and the percentage error calculated with the Bland-Altman analysis was 4.5%. The baPWV measured with abiPWV (in m/s) was as follows: group I, 10.5⯱â¯1.6; group II, 13.8⯱â¯2.9 (pâ¯<â¯.001 when compared with group I); and group III, 14.1⯱â¯2.7 (pâ¯<â¯.001 when compared with group I). There were no differences between groups II and III. The results with VaSera were comparable to those of abiPWV. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring baPWV with the abiPWV is safe and has a similar clinical utility to that of VaSera. Incorporating this function into the options of abiPWV makes it a complete device for assessing arterial stiffness.
Assuntos
Índice Tornozelo-Braço , Rigidez Vascular , Adulto , Idoso , Tornozelo , Artéria Braquial , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Onda de PulsoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the behavior of meningiomas in diffusion-weighted sequences and the correlation of these findings with the histological findings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively included all patients operated on for meningiomas at our hospital during two years. We studied 30 meningiomas in 28 patients aged 31 to 85 years old. All patients underwent MRI prior to surgery, including diffusion-weighted sequences, in a 1.5 T scanner. We evaluated the signal intensity in T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted images (b=1,000), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps within the tumor and in the parietal white matter as a reference. In the histological study, cellularity, proliferation index, histological grade, and cerebral invasion were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 30 meningiomas, 22 were World Health Organization (WHO) grade I and 8 were atypical or WHO grade II. The overall mean value of the ADC was 89.19+/-13.95x10(-3) mm2/s; the mean ADC value was 82+/-13.69x10(-3) mm2/s in the atypical group and 92.21+/-13.21x10(-3) mm2/s in the typical group. No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups. Two subtypes of typical meningiomas, secretory and angiomatous meningiomas, had the highest values in the ADC maps. In the histological analysis, there was a significant association between tumor cellularity and the signal in the ADC map. CONCLUSION: Meningiomas show moderately restricted diffusion. The signal on the ADC map is associated with tumor cellularity but we have not demonstrated its usefulness for predicting the histological grade.