Intradiscal Delivery of Anabolic Growth Factors and a Metalloproteinase Inhibitor in a Rabbit Acute Lumbar Disc Injury Model.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to examine the effect of controlled delivery of TGF-ß3, BMP-4, and TIMP-2 with a biocompatible biopolymer, chitosan, on an acutely injured intervertebral disc (IVD) in a rabbit model. METHODS: After conducting an in vitro analysis of the chondrogenic capacity of the biomolecule cocktail use (ie, TGF-ß3, BMP-4, and TIMP-2) and confirming stem cell viability in chitosan hydrogel, 15 New Zealand white rabbits underwent a lateral approach of the L1 to L4 IVDs. In each rabbit, the L2 to L3 IVD was left pristine, whereas the L1 to L2 and the L3 to L4 IVDs in each rabbit underwent nucleotomy via a 25-G needle, and the animal was subsequently randomized to no further treatment (defect only), chitosan alone, Chitosan + TGF-ß3 + BMP-4, or chitosan + TGF-ß3 + BMP-4 + TIMP-2. At 6 weeks after injury and intervention, the rabbits were killed and spines harvested to undergo quantitative T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent histologic analysis. RESULTS: In the in vitro analysis, cells treated with experimental media containing TGF-ß3, BMP-4, and TIMP-2 exhibited staining indicative of GAG production and began to exhibit a chondrocytic morphology. Quantitative T2 MRI mapping demonstrates that discs treated with chitosan, chitosan containing TGF-ß3 and BMP-4, or chitosan containing TGF-ß3, BMP-4, and TIMP-2 had consistently higher T2 relaxation times compared with defect-only discs. When the T2 relaxation times of each treatment group and defect-only discs were normalized to the healthy control disc, it was found that the T2 relaxation time of discs treated with chitosan containing TGF-ß3 and BMP-4 and discs treated with chitosan containing TGF-ß3, BMP-4, and TIMP-2 were significantly greater compared with defect-only discs (P = .048 and P = .013, respectively). Histologically, animals that received chitosan only, or chitosan with TGF-ß3 and BMP-4, showed a significantly higher intensity of Safranin-O staining (P = .016 and P = .02, respectively) compared with control discs, whereas the difference in staining intensity in animals that received chitosan loaded with TGF-ß3, BMP-4, and TIMP-2 failed to achieve significance (P = .161). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of chitosan, TGF-ß3, and BMP-4 was effective at promoting regeneration in an acute disc injury rabbit model, whereas TIMP-2 did not have a significant effect.

Predisposing factors for dural tear in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

OBJECT The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to identify risk factors for incidental durotomies in lumbar spine surgery. The authors hypothesized that the incidence of durotomy would be higher in cases involving multiple operations. METHODS The authors prospectively evaluated 523 patients who underwent lumbar and thoracolumbar spine surgery. They compared data on patients in whom a dural tear occurred and those in whom a dural tear did not occur. Data from patients in whom a dural tear occurred were compared with data from patients who did not experience durotomy. The data included basic demographic information, intraoperative data, and clinical information from a medical record review. RESULTS One hundred thirty-one patients underwent discectomy and 392 patients underwent laminectomy. Among the 131 patients who underwent discectomy 6 patients had a dural tear. Among the 392 patients who underwent discectomy 49 patients had dural tear. Patients with incidental durotomy were older (mean 65 ± 13 vs 60 ± 14 years of age; p = 0.044, t-test), and had longer surgery (146 ± 59 vs 110 ± 54 minutes; p = 0.025, t-test), compared with the patients without dural tear. The incidence of dural tear was more common in patients with a history of previous spine surgery (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients who underwent lumbar and thoracolumbar spine surgery for degenerative problems, previous surgery and older age were found to be predisposing factors for dural tear.

Hidden blood loss during posterior spine fusion surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Posterior spine fusion is associated with significant intra- and postoperative blood losses. When referring to the total blood loss during spine surgery, the standard is to measure the intraoperative bleeding plus the postoperative drainage. This ignores the "hidden" blood loss that was found to be significant in other fields of surgery. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether posterior spine fusion carries a substantial hidden blood loss. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A prospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: We prospectively studied 114 patients undergoing instrumented posterior spinal fusion at one center between January 2011 and April 2011. OUTCOME MEASURES: Total blood loss, visible blood loss, and hidden blood loss. METHODS: For each patient, the hidden blood loss was calculated by deducting the observed perioperative blood loss from the calculated total blood loss based on the hematocrit changes. We compared the percentage of the hidden blood loss out of the total blood loss for primary versus revision posterior spine fusion. RESULTS: Primary decompression and posterior fusion patients had a mean total true loss of 1,439 mL. Their calculated hidden loss was 600 mL, 42% of the total loss. After revision posterior spinal fusion surgery, the mean total blood loss was 1,606 mL. The mean visible loss was 975 mL, and the mean hidden loss was 631 mL, 39% of the total loss. Thus, there was no statistical difference in the hidden blood loss between primary and revision posterior spinal fusion surgeries (p>.05). We did not find a significant difference in the percentage of the hidden blood loss between patients who underwent one, two, or three or more levels of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: After posterior spinal fusion, there may be a large amount of the hidden blood loss.

Three-dimensional dynamic in vivo motion of the cervical spine: assessment of measurement accuracy and preliminary findings.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous research has quantified cervical spine motion with conventional measurement techniques (eg, cadaveric studies, motion capture systems, and fluoroscopy), but these techniques were not designed to accurately measure three-dimensional (3D) dynamic cervical spine motion under in vivo conditions. PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to characterize the accuracy of model-based tracking for measuring 3D dynamic cervical spine kinematics and to demonstrate its in vivo application. STUDY DESIGN: Through accuracy assessment and application of technique, in vivo cervical spine motion was measured. METHODS: The accuracy of model-based tracking for measuring cervical spine motion was determined in an in vitro experiment. Tantalum beads were implanted into the vertebrae of an ovine specimen, and biplane X-ray images were acquired as the specimen's neck was manually moved through neck extension and axial neck rotation. The 3D position and orientation of each cervical vertebra were determined from the biplane X-ray images using model-based tracking. For comparison, the position and orientation of each vertebra were also determined by tracking the position of the implanted beads with dynamic radiostereometric analysis. To demonstrate in vivo application of this technique, biplane X-ray images were acquired as a human subject performed two motion tasks: neck extension and axial neck rotation. The positions and orientations of each cervical vertebra were determined with model-based tracking. Cervical spine motion was reported with standard kinematic descriptions of translation and rotation. RESULTS: The in vitro validation demonstrated that model-based tracking is accurate to within +/-0.6 mm and +/-0.6 degrees for measuring cervical spine motion. For the in vivo application, there were significant rotations about all three anatomical axes for both the neck extension and axial neck rotation motion tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Model-based tracking is an accurate technique for measuring in vivo, 3D, dynamic cervical spine motion. Preliminary data acquired using this technique are in agreement with previous studies. It is anticipated that this experimental approach will enhance our understanding of cervical spine motion under normal and pathologic conditions.

Component position in 2-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty compared to standard total hip arthroplasty.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has sparked controversy in the orthopedic community, including debate regarding the reliability and reproducibility of component placement. We reviewed a single surgeon's 1-year experience by comparing postoperative radiographs of 67 MIS 2-incision THA and 28 standard THA for acetabular inclination, acetabular version, and femoral stem angulation. Acetabular inclination/version averaged 42.2 degrees/16.5 degrees and 38.7 degrees/15.5 degrees for MIS and THA, respectively. Femoral angulation averaged 0.007 degrees varus and 0.411 degrees varus for MIS and standard THA approaches, respectively. Radiographic assessment of component position of THA in 2-incision MIS vs a standard direct lateral approach reveals no significant differences. Components are placed in acceptable positions with both techniques.