Emergency Resection for Colonic Cancer Has an Independent and Unfavorable Effect on Long-Term Oncologic Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes in patients undergoing emergency versus elective resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) remain controversial. This study aims to assess short- and long-term outcomes of emergency versus elective CRC surgery. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing emergency or elective colonic resections for CRC from January 2013 to December 2017 were included. Primary outcome was long-term survival. As secondary outcomes, we sought to analyze potential differences on postoperative morbidity and concerning the oncological standard of surgical resection. The Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare survival between the groups. RESULTS: Overall, 225 CRC patients were included. Of these 192 (85.3%) had an elective and 33 (14.7%) an emergency operation. Emergency indications were due to obstruction, perforation, or bleeding. Patients in the emergency group had higher ASA score (p = 0.023), higher Charlsson comorbidity index (CCI, p = 0.012), and were older than those in the elective group, with median age 70 (IQR 63-79) years and 78 (IQR 68-83) years, for elective and emergency, respectively (p = 0.020). No other preoperative differences were observed. Patients in the emergency group experienced significantly more major complications (12.1% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.037), more anastomotic leakage (12.1% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.001), need for reoperation (12.1% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.021), and postoperative mortality (2 patients vs. 0, p < 0.001). No differences in terms of final pathological stage, nor in accuracy of lymphadenectomy were observed. Overall survival was significantly worse in case of emergency operation, with estimated median 41 months vs. not reached in elective cases (p < 0.001). At the multivariate analysis, emergency operation was confirmed as independent unfavorable determinant of survival (with hazard rate HR = 1.97, p = 0.028), together with age (HR = 1.05, p < 0.001), postoperative major morbidity (HR = 3.18, p = 0.012), advanced stage (HR = 5.85, p < 0.001), and need for transfusion (HR = 2.10, p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Postoperative morbidity and mortality were increased in emergency versus elective CRC resections. Despite no significant differences in terms of accuracy of resection and pathological stages, overall survival was significantly worse in patients who underwent emergency procedure, and independent of other determinants of survival.

Follow-up after bariatric surgery: is it time to tailor it? Analysis of early predictive factors of 3-year weight loss predictors of unsuccess in bariatric patients.

Bariatric surgery (BS) is the most effective treatment strategy for obesity. Nevertheless, a subset of patients does not reach a successful weight loss or experience long-term weight regain. Conflicting evidence exists regarding predictors of BS outcomes. We aimed to define the early factors linked to 3 year unsuccessful weight loss in order to promote a tailored close follow-up. We enrolled 443 patients who underwent BS from January 2014 to December 2018 with a 3 year follow-up. An unsuccessful BS outcome was defined as a percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) < 20. We compared the characteristics between successful and unsuccessful patients in order to identify predictor factors of unsuccess after surgery. We found that the proportion of patients with unsuccessful weight loss progressively increased from one to three years after BS. In a multiple regression model, only 1 month %TWL and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were significantly associated with 3 year unsuccessful weight loss. We stratified our cohort in four groups according to the risk of BS unsuccess, in terms of 1 month %TWL and type of surgery (SG vs gastric bypass). Interestingly, groups showed a significant difference in terms of %TWL at each follow-up point. Patients submitted to SG with lower 1 month %TWL must be considered at higher risk of future weight regain; consequently, they require a tailored and closer follow-up.

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score and Micronutrient Deficiency in Bariatric Patients: Midterm Outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Two of the most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide are Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Comparative data regarding nutritional status are lacking and no previous study focus on malnutrition according to a validated score. METHODS: Retrospective data from a single institution were reviewed. Anthropometric variables and nutritional data were assessed. The primary aim was to analyze and compare the nutritional status before and 3 years after RYGB vs OAGB using the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score. The incidence of micronutrient deficiency and the remission of comorbidities in each group were defined as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients in each arm were enrolled. A 3-year mild malnutrition (CONUT score 2-3) was found in 38% and 37.05% in the RYGB and OAGB groups, respectively (p > 0.05). In terms of percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) and percentage of adjustable weight loss (%AWL), no differences were found between OAGB and RYGB groups. OAGB and RYGB patients had similar vitamin deficiencies. Anemia, hypoproteinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hypocalcemia were comparable between groups. At 3-year follow-up, total protein and albumin values were similar between arms while prealbumin deficit was more frequent after OAGB than after RYGB. The rate of type 2 diabetes (87.5% in OAGB and 92% in RYGB), arterial hypertension (51.6% in OAGB and 58.3% in RYGB), and dyslipidemia (69.7% in OAGB and 78.6% in RYGB) remission was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative CONUT score, micronutrient deficiency, comorbidity remission, and improvement of anthropometric parameters 3 years postoperatively were comparable between RYGB and OAGB groups.