Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Bioanalysis ; 14(11): 831-844, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35735172

RESUMO

Background: This study compared the performance of plasma infliximab and adalimumab quantification using a commercially available kit (mAbXmise kit) and mass spectrometry readout to that of two ELISA methods in patients treated for inflammatory bowel disease. Methods & results: The mAbXmise method based on liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was linear from 2 to 100 µg/ml. It was validated according to international guidelines. Regarding cross-validation for infliximab (n = 70), the mean bias with LC-MS/MS assay was approximately threefold higher with the commercial ELISA assay compared with the in-house ELISA (-6.1 vs -1.8 µg/ml, respectively). The mean bias between the LC-MS/MS assay and in-house ELISA was -1.2 µg/ml for adalimumab (n = 35). Conclusion: The LC-MS/MS method is a powerful alternative to immunoassays to monitor concentrations of infliximab and adalimumab.


Assuntos
Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem , Adalimumab , Cromatografia Líquida/métodos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Humanos , Infliximab , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA