Randomized phase III KEYNOTE-045 trial of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine in recurrent advanced urothelial cancer: results of >2 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Novel second-line treatments are needed for patients with advanced urothelial cancer (UC). Interim analysis of the phase III KEYNOTE-045 study showed a superior overall survival (OS) benefit of pembrolizumab, a programmed death 1 inhibitor, versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced UC that progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy. Here we report the long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of KEYNOTE-045. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed UC whose disease progressed after first-line, platinum-containing chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive pembrolizumab [200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W)] or investigator's choice of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 Q3W), docetaxel (75 mg/m2 Q3W), or vinflunine (320 mg/m2 Q3W). Primary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by blinded independent central radiology review (BICR). A key secondary end point was objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. RESULTS: A total of 542 patients were enrolled (pembrolizumab, n = 270; chemotherapy, n = 272). Median follow-up as of 26 October 2017 was 27.7 months. Median 1- and 2-year OS rates were higher with pembrolizumab (44.2% and 26.9%, respectively) than chemotherapy (29.8% and 14.3%, respectively). PFS rates did not differ between treatment arms; however, 1- and 2-year PFS rates were higher with pembrolizumab. The objective response rate was also higher with pembrolizumab (21.1% versus 11.0%). Median duration of response to pembrolizumab was not reached (range 1.6+ to 30.0+ months) versus chemotherapy (4.4 months; range 1.4+ to 29.9+ months). Pembrolizumab had lower rates of any grade (62.0% versus 90.6%) and grade ≥3 (16.5% versus 50.2%) treatment-related adverse events than chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results (>2 years' follow-up) were consistent with those of previously reported analyses, demonstrating continued clinical benefit of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy for efficacy and safety for treatment of locally advanced/metastatic, platinum-refractory UC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02256436.

Germline single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with response of urothelial carcinoma to platinum-based therapy: the role of the host.

BACKGROUND: Variations in urothelial carcinoma (UC) response to platinum chemotherapy are common and frequently attributed to genetic and epigenetic variations of somatic DNA. We hypothesized that variations in germline DNA may contribute to UC chemosensitivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: DNA from 210 UC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy was genotyped for 80 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Logistic regression was used to examine the association between SNPs and response, and a multivariable predictive model was created. Significant SNPs were combined to form a SNP score predicting response. Eleven UC cell lines were genotyped as validation. RESULTS: Six SNPs were significantly associated with 101 complete or partial responses (48%). Four SNPs retained independence association and were incorporated into a response prediction model. Each additional risk allele was associated with a nearly 50% decrease in odds of response [odds ratio (OR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.39-0.65, P = 1.05 × 10(-7)). The bootstrap-adjusted area under the curves of this model was greater than clinical prognostic factors alone (0.78 versus 0.64). The SNP score showed a positive trend with chemosensitivity in cell lines (P = 0.115). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variants associated with response of UC to platinum-based therapy were identified in germline DNA. A model using these genetic variants may predict response to chemotherapy better than clinical factors alone.

Phase I study of the effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of satraplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Satraplatin is an oral platinum analog with demonstrated activity in a range of malignancies. The current study was designed to evaluate the effect of varying degrees of renal impairment on the safety and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of satraplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors, refractory to standard therapies, were eligible. The study included four cohorts of patients with varying levels of renal function, and eight patients per cohort: Group 1 (G1) = normal renal function; G2 = mild renal impairment [creatinine clearance (CrCl) 50-80 ml/min]; G3 = moderate impairment (CrCl 30 to <50 ml/min); G4 = severe impairment (CrCl <30 ml/min). Satraplatin was administered orally at 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 every 35 days. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were enrolled, 8 patients in each renal function group. Each group tolerated the dose of 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 every 35 days without the need for dose deescalation. The most common adverse events were fatigue (63%), nausea (56%), diarrhea (53%), anorexia (47%), constipation (38%), vomiting (28%), anemia, dyspnea, and thrombocytopenia (25%). There were no dose-limiting toxic effects in any study group. There was increased exposure to plasma platinum and plasma ultrafiltrate platinum in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Satraplatin PKs was altered in patients with renal impairment. However, a corresponding increase in satraplatin-related toxic effects was not observed.

Detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with urothelial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) respond to chemotherapy and several months of therapy is required to assess for radiographic response. Blood-based biomarkers may identify patients in whom a specific therapy provides clinical benefit, and this study sought to characterize circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with metastatic UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood from patients with metastatic UC was evaluated for CTCs using the CellSearch system. We assessed for associations between CTC counts and the number and sites of metastatic disease. RESULTS: CTC evaluations were carried out in 33 patients with metastatic UC. Fourteen of 33 patients (44%; 95% confidence interval 27% to 59%) had a positive assay (range 0-87 cells/7.5 ml of blood) with 10 patients (31%) having five or more CTCs. A significantly higher number of CTCs was seen in patients with two or more sites of metastases compared with those with less than one or one site of metastases (3.5 versus 0, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: CTCs, detected by antibody capture technology, are present in 44% of patients with metastatic UC. Higher numbers of CTCs are seen in patients with a greater number of metastatic sites. One-third of patients have five or more CTCs providing a potential early marker to monitor response to chemotherapy.

Phase II study of bortezomib in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial tract transitional cell carcinoma: CALGB 90207.

BACKGROUND: There is no standard second-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Response rates to second-line chemotherapy for advanced UC are low and response duration is short. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with preclinical activity against UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment consisted of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) i.v. twice weekly for two consecutive weeks, followed by a 1-week break. The primary end point was objective response rate (complete response + partial response) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Secondary end points included safety, toxicity, and progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: In all, 25 patients with advanced UC previously treated with combination chemotherapy were enrolled in a multi-institutional single-arm trial from December 2003 through April 2005. Only 29% of patients had node-only metastases. Grade 3/4 drug-related toxic effects included thrombocytopenia (4%), anemia (8%), lymphopenia (8%), sensory neuropathy (6%), hyperglycemia (4%), hypernatremia (4%), fatigue (4%), neuropathic pain (6%), dehydration (4%), and vomiting (4%). No objective responses were observed [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0-12]. The median time to progression was 1.4 months (95% CI = 1.1-2.0 months), and the median survival time was 5.7 months (95% CI = 3.6-8.4 months). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Although bortezomib is well tolerated, it does not have antitumor activity as second-line therapy in UC.

Commentary on "DNA damage response and repair gene alterations are associated with improved survival in patients with platinum-treated advanced urothelial carcinoma."

PURPOSE: Platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma by inducing DNA damage. We hypothesize that somatic alterations in DNA damage response and repair (DDR) genes are associated with improved sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with diagnosis of locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapy who had exon sequencing with the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) assay were identified. Patients were dichotomized based on the presence/absence of alterations in a panel of 34 DDR genes. DDR alteration status was correlated with clinical outcomes and disease features. RESULTS: One hundred patients were identified, of which 47 harbored alterations in DDR genes. Patients with DDR alterations had improved progression-free survival (9.3 vs. 6.0 months, log-rank P = 0.007) and overall survival (23.7 vs. 13.0 months, log-rank P = 0.006). DDR alterations were also associated with higher number mutations and copy-number alterations. A trend toward positive correlation between DDR status and nodal metastases and inverse correlation with visceral metastases were observed. Different DDR pathways also suggested variable effect on clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Somatic DDR alteration is associated with improved clinical outcomes in platinum-treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Once validated, it can improve patient selection for clinical practice and future study enrollment.

Phase II trial of high-dose carboplatin and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation in first-line therapy for patients with poor-risk germ cell tumors.

BACKGROUND: Between 20% and 30% of patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCTs) fail to have durable complete response to conventional cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy. However, third-line therapy with high-dose carboplatin and etoposide plus autologous bone marrow transplantation (AuBMT) has induced durable complete response in 10%-20% of patients with cisplatin-resistant GCT. PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II trial of first-line therapy that included high-dose carboplatin and etoposide plus AuBMT in untreated men with advanced GCTs and unfavorable prognosis (i.e., "poor-risk" patients). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were treated with a conventional-dose, cisplatin-containing regimen (VAB-6 [cisplatin, vinblastine, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, dactinomycin]) with or without high-dose carboplatin (1500 mg/m2) and etoposide (1200 mg/m2) plus AuBMT. Twenty-two of these patients were selected for treatment with two cycles of high-dose carboplatin and etoposide plus AuBMT when reduced clearance of serum tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] or human chorionic gonadotropin [HCG]), as evidenced by prolonged half-life (> 7 days for AFP and > 3 days for HCG), was observed after two cycles of conventional treatment. RESULTS: Fifteen (56%) of 27 patients considered assessable for response achieved a complete response (12 treated with high-dose chemotherapy plus AuBMT). Sixteen (57%) are alive; 13 (46%) are free of disease at a median follow-up of 31.2 months. For 36 cycles of high-dose chemotherapy, the median duration from bone marrow infusion until a granulocyte count of 0.5/mm3 and a platelet count of 50,000/mm3 was 16 days (range, 7-41 days and 8-30 days, respectively). Analysis showed a trend toward improved survival (P = .07) in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy in this study, compared with 68 poor-risk patients with GCT treated with conventional-dose therapy alone in two earlier studies. Toxicity was not cumulative, and recovery of blood counts after AuBMT was generally rapid. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of high-dose carboplatin-containing chemotherapy in treatment of poor-risk GCT patients is feasible when serum tumor marker half-life is used to predict resistance to standard cisplatin-based therapy. High-dose therapy in this setting was well tolerated. IMPLICATIONS: Early use of a dose-intensive regimen may increase survival compared with conventional-dose therapy alone. Further studies with standard induction therapy and intensive high-dose therapy using hematopoietic growth factor support are warranted, followed by a randomized trial comparing this strategy with standard therapy.

Genetic analysis as an aid in diagnosis for patients with midline carcinomas of uncertain histologies.

The tumors of nine patients with carcinomas of uncertain histogenesis (eight with poorly differentiated carcinomas involving primarily midline structures and one with a diagnosis of seminoma and atypical clinical features) were studied by cytogenetic and Southern blot analyses. Four of the eight patients with poorly differentiated carcinomas had abnormalities of chromosome 12 consistent with a diagnosis of germ cell tumor. These abnormalities comprised an i(12p) in two patients and a del(12q) in a third patient detected by cytogenetic analysis and multiple copies of 12p detected by Southern blot analysis in a fourth patient. Three of these four patients with a diagnosis of germ cell tumor established by genetic analysis achieved a complete response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The tumor biopsy of one patient showed a t(11;22) (q24;q12), and this patient had chemotherapy directed to neuroepithelioma. Cytogenetic analysis was unsuccessful for the tumors of three patients; these tumors did not have multiple copies of 12p detected by Southern blot analysis. These patients did not respond to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. One patient with a diagnosis of extragonadal seminoma failed to respond to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and had a second tumor biopsy performed that demonstrated a t(8;14) (q24;q32). This patient's diagnosis was changed to a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Thus, genetic analysis provided a diagnosis in six of nine patients. Cytogenetic and molecular analyses are useful clinical tools for the determination of histogenesis in some patients with poorly differentiated carcinomas of uncertain histology.

Pharmacokinetics of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) after administration in hypertonic saline.

Nephrotoxicity, the dose-limiting toxicity of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP), is ameliorated when administered in hypertonic saline with normal saline hydration. To determine whether the diminished nephrotoxicity is associated with alteration of the pharmacokinetics of CDDP, we examined the pharmacokinetics of free and total platinum, platinum renal excretion, and urine electrolytes in patients given CDDP in hypertonic saline and in patients given CDDP in a conventional manner. The pharmacokinetics of free and total platinum for equal doses of CDDP were similar regardless of the vehicle of administration and the method of hydration. CDDP given in a vehicle of high chloride concentration with normal saline hydration resulted in a statistically significant increase in both urine volume and chloruresis compared to the conventional regimen. The decreased nephrotoxicity associated with administration of CDDP in hypertonic saline with saline diuresis may be related to increased chloruresis, urinary volume, or a combination of both, but did not appear to be related to an alteration in the pharmacokinetics.

Phase I evaluation of a combination of monoclonal antibody R24 and interleukin 2 in patients with metastatic melanoma.

A combination of recombinant human interleukin 2 (rhIL-2) and mouse monoclonal antibody R24 (recognizing the ganglioside GD3) was evaluated in patients with metastatic melanoma in a phase I trial. rhIL-2 was given at a constant daily dose of 1 x 10(6) units/m2 i.v. over 6 h on days 1-5 and 8-12. R24 was given on days 8-12 at four dose levels (1, 3, 8, and 12 mg/m2 daily). Twenty patients were evaluable for toxicity and response, five at each dose level. The toxicity of the combination was not overlapping and generally mild. There was a rebound peripheral blood T-lymphocytosis at the end of treatment increasing with the dose of R24. The median lymphocyte count on day 12 of treatment was 3108 +/- 554/ml in patients treated at R24 doses of 8 and 12 mg/m2 versus 2239 +/- 672/ml at doses of 1 and 3 mg/m2. This evidence and other data suggested that R24 enhanced IL-2-mediated T-cell activation in vivo. Two patients demonstrated increases in R24-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity for GD3-expressing cells during treatment. rhIL-2 appeared to accelerate the development of human anti-mouse antibody; three patients developed human anti-mouse antibody by the fifth day of R24 treatment, earlier than observed in prior studies using R24 alone and one patient during the first week of rhIL-2 alone, prior to R24 treatment. One patient had a partial response in soft tissue sites lasting 6 months and two patients had minor responses. This clinical trial extends the previous observation that R24 enhances lymphocyte proliferation in vitro.

Phase II trial of suramin in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: treatment results, pharmacokinetics, and tumor growth factor expression.

Twenty-six patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were treated with suramin administered by continuous infusion, with dosing determined by a nomogram. One patient achieved a partial response and five patients achieved a minor response or had stable disease for > 3 months. Toxicities included an immune-mediated thrombocytopenia in one patient and Staphylococcus sepsis that was not associated with neutropenia in five patients. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by the ADAPT II MAP-Bayesian parameter estimation program. Patient data were fit using a two-compartment open model and first-order rate elimination. This showed a wide interpatient variation in time to target level (median, 13.8 days), volume of distribution (median, 15.2 liters/m2), and t1/2-beta (median, 20.6 days). The patients who achieved a partial response, minor response, or stable disease had a slower elimination rate of suramin, compared to patients with progressive disease. Tumor specimens were obtained prior to therapy and were analyzed for the production of five different growth factor-specific RNA transcripts. These included transforming growth factor alpha, acidic fibroblast growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor types A and B. No difference in the pattern of growth factor expression was seen in tumors of responding and nonresponding patients. Suramin does not have significant antitumor activity in renal cell carcinoma. The wide variability in pharmacokinetics suggests that individual dosing should be used in future trials of suramin for treatment for other malignancies. Pertinent corollary studies of tumor biology and clinical pharmacology should be included whenever possible in clinical trials in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bladder-sparing surgery for invasive bladder cancer: ten-year outcome.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 10-year outcome of patients with invasive (T2-3N0M0, staged according to the tumor, node, metastasis system) bladder cancer who responded completely to a combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin (MVAC) chemotherapy followed by bladder-sparing surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 111 surgical candidates who received neoadjuvant MVAC, 60 (54%) achieved a complete clinical response (T0) on transurethral resection (TUR) of the primary tumor site. Of these, 28 requested follow-up with TUR alone, 15 had a partial cystectomy, and 17 elected a radical cystectomy. The patients were followed up for a median of 10 years (range, 8 to 13 years). RESULTS: Of 43 patients who had bladder-sparing surgery, 32 (74%) are alive, which includes 25 (58%) with an intact functioning bladder. Twenty-four patients (56%) developed bladder tumor recurrences from 5 to 96 months, which were invasive in 13 (30%) and superficial in 11 (26%). Thirteen patients required a salvage cystectomy, of whom 6 died, which includes 4 (9%) from a new invasive neoplasm. Of the 17 patients who had radical cystectomy, 11 (65%) are alive. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with invasive bladder tumors who achieve T0 status after neoadjuvant MVAC chemotherapy preserve their bladders for up to 10 years with bladder-sparing surgery. The bladder remains at risk for new invasive tumors. Cystectomy salvages the majority, but not all, of relapsing patients.

Predicting outcome to chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumors: the value of the rate of decline of human chorionic gonadotrophin and alpha-fetoprotein during therapy.

PURPOSE: The prognostic significance of the rate of decline of the serum tumor marker alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) during the first two cycles of chemotherapy in germ cell tumor (GCT) patients was initially reported by us, but its value has been debated. We re-examined this issue in the context of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) risk classification system and investigated the role of including in the analysis patients whose markers normalized early. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty-nine GCT patients with elevated AFP/HCG marker values treated with platinum-based chemotherapy between 1986 and 1998 were included in this analysis. Patients were classified as good, intermediate, or poor risk by the IGCCCG criteria and as having satisfactory or unsatisfactory marker decline. Risk and marker decline were correlated with response, event-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Satisfactory marker decline predicted improved complete response (CR) proportion and event-free and overall survival (P <.0001). The CR proportion, 2-year event-free, and 2-year overall survival rates for patients with a satisfactory and unsatisfactory marker decline were 92% versus 62%, 91% versus 69%, and 95% versus 72%, respectively. Marker decline remained a significant variable for all three end points when adjusted for risk (P <.01) with the outcome differences most pronounced in the poor-risk group. CONCLUSION: The rate of marker decline during chemotherapy has prognostic value independent of risk and may play a significant role in the management of poor-risk patients. It is appropriate to include patients whose markers normalized early.

High-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide with autologous bone marrow transplantation in first-line therapy for patients with poor-risk germ cell tumors.

PURPOSE: A treatment program that included high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide (CEC) followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation (AuBMT) was investigated as first-line therapy in patients with poor-risk germ cell tumors (GCTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated GCT patients with poor-risk features were treated with etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP) with or without high-dose CEC plus AuBMT. Patients qualified for a change to high-dose CEC if a prolonged clearance of elevated serum tumor markers was observed after two cycles of the cisplatin-containing regimen. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated with VIP alone and 14 with VIP and high-dose CEC. Seventeen patients (57%) achieved a complete response. Twenty are alive (67%) and 15 (50%) are free of disease at a median follow-up time of 30 months. For 23 cycles of high-dose CEC, the median time from AuBMT to a granulocyte count > or = 0.5/microL was 11 days (range, 0 to 14) and to a platelet count 50,000/microL, 19 days (range, 14 to 34). The survival of 58 patients treated in two of our center's programs that incorporated high-dose chemotherapy (high-dose carboplatin plus etoposide [CE] and CEC) was compared with our prior experience with conventional-dose cisplatin chemotherapy alone in poor-risk GCT. Patients treated with marker-dependent, early-intervention high-dose chemotherapy experienced longer survival (P = .001). CONCLUSION: In this setting, high-dose CEC was well tolerated, cumulative toxicity was lacking, and the recovery of blood counts after AuBMT was rapid. A randomized trial has been initiated to investigate further the role of high-dose CEC in first-line therapy for patients with poor-risk GCT.

Ifosfamide- and cisplatin-containing chemotherapy as first-line salvage therapy in germ cell tumors: response and survival.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of ifosfamide- and cisplatin-containing chemotherapy as first-line salvage treatment for patients with germ cell tumors (GCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with advanced GCT resistant to one prior cisplatin-containing regimen were treated with a salvage chemotherapy regimen of ifosfamide, cisplatin, and either vinblastine or etoposide (VeIP/VIP). RESULTS: Twenty of 56 (36%) assessable patients achieved a complete response (CR). Thirteen (23%) are alive and continuously free of disease at a median follow-up time of 52 months; the median survival duration was 18 months. Among patients with a testis primary tumor site and a prior CR to first-line therapy, 65% are alive and 41% continuously disease-free, and the median survival time has not been reached. In contrast, for patients with an extragonadal primary tumor or with a testis primary tumor site and an incomplete response (IR) to first-line therapy, 31% are alive and 15% continuously free of disease, with a median survival time of 12 months (P < .03). CONCLUSION: Ifosfamide- and cisplatin-containing therapy achieves a durable CR in a minority of patients with resistant GCT as first-line therapy. Patients with a primary testis site who relapsed from a CR to first-line cisplatin therapy have a better prognosis than patients with an extragonadal primary tumor site or an IR to first-line therapy. Risk-directed clinical trials to improve response and survival in both subsets are warranted.

Advanced seminoma: treatment results, survival, and prognostic factors in 142 patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy and to assess the relationship between selected pretreatment characteristics and survival in patients with advanced seminoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-two patients with advanced seminoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were the subject of this study. Treatment regimens included cisplatin, vinblastine, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin (VAB-6) (45 patients), a six-cycle regimen of VAB-6 alternating with etoposide and cisplatin (two patients), cisplatin and etoposide (60 patients), and etoposide and carboplatin (35 patients). RESULTS: One hundred thirty of 140 (93%) assessable patients treated with platinum-based therapy achieved a favorable response (complete response or a partial response with negative serum tumor markers). One hundred twenty-five patients (88%) are alive and 120 (86%) remain progression-free at a median follow-up duration of 43 months. Fifty-seven of 60 patients (95%) who were treated with cisplatin and etoposide achieved a favorable response; 55 (92%) remain progression-free. The relative risks of death or of an event (death or relapse) related to human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) elevation were 1.8 (P = .04) and 1.96 (P = .001), respectively. The relative risks of death or of an event associated with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) elevation were 2.6 (P = .05) and 2.7 (P = .02), respectively. All 19 patients with a mediastinal primary tumor site achieved a complete response, and 18 of 19 (95%) remain progression-free. CONCLUSION: Four cycles of cisplatin and etoposide is highly effective therapy for seminoma and is the standard therapy at our center. Elevation of the serum markers HCG and LDH were of prognostic significance, while an extragonadal primary tumor site was not associated with an adverse prognosis. Studies of tumor biology, including genetic analysis, are ongoing to determine other parameters that may correlate with response and survival.

High-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide for patients with refractory germ cell tumors: treatment results and prognostic factors for survival and toxicity.

PURPOSE: The efficacy and toxicity of high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide with autologous bone marrow transplantation (AuBMT) was investigated in a prospective trial for patients with cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumor (GCT). Prognostic factors for survival and treatment-related toxicity were identified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with refractory GCT were treated with high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide plus AuBMT. Prognostic factors for toxicity and survival were examined in multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (40%) achieved a complete response and 12 (21%) are alive and free of disease at a median follow-up time of 28 months. Myelosuppression was severe and there were seven (12%) treatment-related deaths. Independently predictive factors that resulted in faster blood count recovery were the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for the number of days to neutrophil count recovery (P = .013) and prior treatment with cisplatin limited to six cycles or less for the number of days to platelet count recovery (P = .0012). Both were predictive for the number of days of hospitalization (P = .04 and .03, respectively). The two independently predictive variables for survival were pretreatment level of HCG; human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; < or = 100 times the upper limit of normal [xnl] v > 100 xnl, P = .02) and the presence of retroperitoneal metastases (yes or no, P = .04). Patients grouped by HCG < or = 100 xnl with retroperitoneal metastases, HCG < or = 100 xnl without retroperitoneal metastases, and all patients with HCG more than 100 xnl had median survival times of 14, 11, and 3 months, respectively (P = .04). CONCLUSION: High-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide is an effective therapy for patients with refractory GCT, and results in a complete response proportion of 40% and a 2-year survival rate of 31% at a median follow-up time of 28 months. This was accomplished in a group of patients with a dismal prognosis to conventional-dose therapy.

Metastatic germ cell tumors: modeling for response to chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study sought to determine factors that predict response to chemotherapy for patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCTs), to evaluate different methods by which serum tumor markers can be used to predict response independent of assay method, and to develop criteria to guide allocation to clinical trials. METHODS: Pretreatment data from 796 patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy on Memorial Hospital protocols from 1975 to 1990 were analyzed. Multivariate analyses were performed on a developmental data set (n = 597) to assess for independently significant predictors of response. Predictive models developed using these methods were confirmed on the validation set (n = 199). RESULTS: Independently significant factors for response included a mediastinal primary tumor (.015), pure seminomatous histology (.002), metastases to nonpulmonary visceral sites (bone, liver, and brain; .0001), and the pretreatment values of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; .0001) and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG; .0001). The likelihood of complete response (CR) was increased by seminomatous histology and decreased by the other factors. Serum levels of HCG and LDH could predict outcome independent of assay methodology. A model to predict good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk categories with CR rates of 92%, 76%, and 39%, respectively, was developed. CONCLUSION: The independent prognostic factors of serum tumor markers LDH and HCG, the sites of metastases, and the primary origin of GCTs can predict outcome in patients with advanced GCT. These factors should be considered in the allocation of patients with advanced disease to clinical trials and have been included in the new tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging systems developed for the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC).

Randomized trial of etoposide and cisplatin versus etoposide and carboplatin in patients with good-risk germ cell tumors: a multiinstitutional study.

PURPOSE: This multicenter, randomized phase III clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of etoposide plus carboplatin (EC) versus etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) in good-risk germ cell tumor (GCT) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1986 and December 1990, 270 patients with good-risk GCTs were randomized to receive four cycles of either EP or EC. The etoposide dose in all patients was 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5. EP patients received cisplatin at 20 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5 and therapy was recycled at 21-day intervals. For EC patients, the carboplatin dose was 500 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle and the EC recycling interval was 28 days. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-five patients were assessable: 131 patients treated with EC and 134 treated with EP. One hundred fifteen of 131 assessable patients (88%) treated with EC achieved a complete response (CR) versus 121 of 134 patients (90%) treated with EP (P = .32). Sixteen patients (12%) treated with EC relapsed from CR versus four patients (3%) treated with EP. Therefore, 32 patients (24%) who received carboplatin experienced an event (incomplete response [IR] or relapse) compared with 17 of 134 patients (13%) who received cisplatin (P = .02). At a median follow-up of 22.4 months, event-free and relapse-free survival were inferior for patients treated with EC (P = .02 and P = .005, respectively). No difference in overall survival was evident (P = .52). CONCLUSION: Two-drug therapy with EC using this dose and schedule was inferior to therapy with EP. Cisplatin remains as the standard platinum analog in the treatment of patients with good-risk GCTs. Carboplatin should be restricted to investigational trials in GCT.