Decreasing Pain and Fear in Medical Procedures with a Pediatric Population (DREAM): A Pilot Randomized Within-Subject Trial.

BACKGROUND: Many children with injuries, including burns and fractures, experience moderate to severe pain during medical procedures. Recent studies claim that nonpharmacologic pain management using virtual reality (VR) could distract children from procedural pain by engaging multiple senses. AIMS: The aims of this pilot randomized clinical trial were to assess the acceptability and feasibility of VR distraction in children with burns or fractures undergoing painful medical procedures, as well as the staff nurses, and assess the preliminary efficacy of VR distraction on pain intensity, pain-related fear, and subsequent recall of both. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A within-subject study design, in which participants served as their own control, was used. A total of 20 children from 7 to 17 years old with an injury were recruited at the surgical-trauma outpatient clinics of the Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHU Sainte-Justine). Each participant received both standard and experimental treatments through randomized order. Pain (numerical rating scale) and pain-related fear (Children's Fear Scale) measures were taken before the procedure and after each sequence, followed by a measure of children's (graphic rating scale) and nurses' acceptability of the intervention through their satisfaction level. Recall of pain intensity and pain-related fear were assessed 24 hours after the procedure. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used, with a significance level at 0.05. RESULTS: Results showed that VR distraction was an acceptable and feasible intervention for children and nurses of these outpatient clinics. Preliminary effects showed that, compared to standard of care, children participants reported a significant decrease in pain intensity (p = .023) and pain-related fear (p = .011) during VR as well as less recalled pain-related fear (p = .012) at 24 hours after the procedure. No side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: VR is a promising intervention with children undergoing painful procedures because it is immersive and engages multiple senses. It is a low-cost intervention well accepted by children and nursing staff at this clinical site and is easy to implement in daily practice for procedural pain management.

Immersive virtual reality vs. non-immersive distraction for pain management of children during bone pins and sutures removal: A randomized clinical trial protocol.

AIMS: To examine the efficacy of an immersive virtual reality distraction compared with an active non-immersive distraction, such as video games on a tablet, for pain and anxiety management and memory of pain and anxiety in children requiring percutaneous bone pins and/or suture removal procedures. DESIGN: Three-centre randomized clinical trial using a parallel design with two groups: experimental and control. METHODS: Study to take place in the orthopaedic department of three children hospital of the Montreal region starting in 2019. Children, from 7-17 years old, requiring bone pins and/or suture removal procedures will be recruited. The intervention group (N = 94) will receive a virtual reality game (Dreamland), whereas the control group (N = 94) will receive a tablet with video games. The primary outcomes will be both the mean self-reported pain score measured by the Numerical Rating Scale and mean anxiety score, measured by the Child Fear Scale. Recalls of pain and anxiety will be measured 1 week after the procedure using the same scales. We aim to recruit 188 children to achieve a power of 80% with a significance level (alpha) of 5%. DISCUSSION: While multiple pharmacological methods have previously been tested for children, no studies have evaluated the impact of immersive virtual reality distraction for pain and anxiety management in the orthopaedic setting. IMPACT: Improved pain management can be achieved using virtual reality during medical procedures for children. This method is innovative, non-pharmacological, adapted to the hospital setting, and user-friendly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03680625, registered on clinicaltrials.gov.

Distraction Kits for Pain Management of Children Undergoing Painful Procedures in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study.

To assess the feasibility, usefulness, and acceptability of using distraction kits, tailored to age, for procedural pain management of young children visiting the emergency department and requiring a needle-related procedure. A pre-experimental design was piloted. A kit, tailored to age (infants-toddlers: 3 months-2 years; preschoolers: 3-5 years), was provided to parents before their child's needle-related procedure. Data was collected to assess feasibility, usefulness, and acceptability of the kits by parents and nurses. Pain was measured pre-, peri-, and postprocedure using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale. A total of 25 infants and toddlers (mean age: 1.4 ± .7 years) and 25 preschoolers (mean age: 4.0 ± .9) participated in the study. Parents and nurses considered the kits useful and acceptable for distraction in the emergency department, especially in the postprocedural period. Addition of more animated and interactive toys to the kits was suggested. In the infants-toddlers group, mean pain scores were 1.6 ± 2.5 preprocedure, 7.1 ± 3.0 periprocedure, and 2.5 ± 2.5 postprocedure. In the preschoolers group, mean pain scores were 1.6 ± 3.0 preprocedure, 4.8 ± 3.4 periprocedure, and 2.0 ± 3.2 postprocedure. Distraction kits were deemed useful and acceptable by parents and emergency nurses. They are an interesting nonpharmacologic option for nurses to distract children, giving them a sense of control over their pain and improving their hospital experience. Future research should address the feasibility of distraction kits for a broader population of patients and a variety of painful procedures.

[Different philosophical traditions for knowledge development in nursing sciences]. / Différentes traditions philosophiques pour le développement des connaissances en sciences infirmières.

INTRODUCTION: doctoral studies in nursing engage a critical reflections about philosophical traditions inherent to knowledge development. BACKGROUND: critical realism, hermeneutics, postmodernism and poststructuralism refer to philosophical traditions that are generally less explored in nursing, although they are attracting greater attention. OBJECTIVE: this paper offers an introductory presentation to these traditions as the authors also reflect upon their contribution to nursing knowledge development in. METHOD: for each tradition, ontological and epistemological properties are presented to provide an overview of their main features. Contributions to nursing knowledge development are then discussed. RESULTS: ontology refers to stratified, fixed and changing, or multiple realities, depending on the philosophical tradition. Likewise, epistemology emphasizes the explanatory power of knowledge, intersubjectivity, or inherent power dynamics. DISCUSSION: the diversity of philosophical traditions represents an asset that can significantly contribute to the advancement of the nursing discipline. CONCLUSION: clarification of the philosophical dimensions that underlie knowledge development is essential for doctoral nursing students in the process of developing their research projects and future programmes of research.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of olfactive stimulation interventions to manage procedural pain in preterm and full-term neonates.

BACKGROUND: Preterm and full-term neonates undergo many painful procedures during their hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit. Unrelieved and repeated pain can have important repercussions on their motor and intellectual development. Still, pain management interventions are limited for neonates. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of olfactive stimulation interventions on the pain response of preterm and full-term infants during painful procedures. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search was conducted from inception to August 2019 in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Sciences, CENTRAL, Scopus and ProQuest. REVIEW METHODS: Study selection, data extraction, assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence were performed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: 3311 studies were screened. Of the 14 studies included studies (n = 1028 infants), results from 10 were combined in meta-analysis. The latter demonstrated that olfactive stimulation interventions using a familiar odor were effective compared to standard care on pain reactivity (SMD -0.69; 95% CI -0.93 to -0.44; I2 = 20%, p < 0.00001), pain regulation (SMD -0.40; 95% CI -0.66 to -0.14; I2 = 13%, p = 0.002), crying duration during (SMD -0.42; 95% CI -0.73 to -0.10; I2 = 47%, p = 0.009) and after the procedure (SMD -0.37; 95% CI -0.68 to -0.07; I2 = 0%, p = 0.01), heart rate after the procedure (MD -3.87; 95% CI -7.36 to -0.38; I2 = 99%, p = 0.03), oxygen saturation during (MD -0.47; 95% CI -0.86 to -0.08; I2 = 91%, p = 0.02) and after the procedure (MD -0.56; 95% CI -0.99 to -0.13; I2 = 99%, p = 0.01). No adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: These findings are based on low to very low quality of evidence limiting our confidence in effect estimates. More rigorous trials with a larger sample size are needed to enhance the comprehension of the mechanisms underlying olfactive stimulation interventions and the interventions' efficacy.

Risk factors for severe opioid-induced respiratory depression in hospitalized adults: A case-control study.

Background: Opioids are commonly prescribed to hospitalized adults to promote adequate pain relief, yet they can cause potentially fatal respiratory depression. Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors for the development of severe opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) in hospitalized adults to ensure adequate monitoring of high-risk patients. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted using data from the medical records of a university-affiliated hospital in Canada. Cases were eligible if they were adults (≥18 years old) and received opioid analgesia within 24 h of naloxone administration for respiratory depression. Controls had the same eligibility criteria, except for respiratory depression and naloxone administration. The case-control ratio was 1:1, and they were matched based on sex, type of unit, opioid molecule and the presence/absence of medication errors. Results: A total of 133 cases and 133 controls were included. Following cumulative risk factor analysis, renal failure (odds ratio [OR] = 2.176, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.021-4.640, P = 0.044), the first 24 h of opioid administration (OR = 1.899, 95% CI, 1.090-3.309, P = 0.024), concomitant central nervous system (CNS) depressants (OR = 1.785, 95% CI, 1.023-3.113, P = 0.041), and increasing age (OR = 1.019, 95% CI, 1.002-1.035, P = 0.028) were positively associated with severe OIRD. Conclusions: Some adult hospitalized patients were at higher risk of experiencing severe OIRD, such as those with renal failure, those in their first 24 h of opioid administration, those receiving CNS depressants in addition to opioids, and those with an advanced age. These results will assist with the screening of patients at higher risk for severe OIRD, which is key to implementing appropriate monitoring and enhancing the safety of opioid use in hospital settings.

Contexte: Les opioïdes sont couramment prescrits aux adultes hospitalisés pour favoriser un soulagement adéquat de la douleur, mais ils peuvent provoquer une dépression respiratoire potentiellement mortelle.Objectif: Examiner les facteurs de risque du développement d'une dépression respiratoire sévère induite par un opioïde chez les adultes hospitalisés afin d'assurer un suivi adéquat des patients à haut risque.Méthodes: Une étude rétrospective cas - témoins a été menée en utilisant les données des dossiers médicaux d'un hôpital universitaire au Canada. Les cas étaient admissibles s'ils étaient adultes (≥ 18 ans) et avaient reçu une analgésie opioïde dans les 24 heures suivant l'administration de naloxone pour une dépression respiratoire. Les critères d'admissibilité étaient les mêmes pour les témoins, à l'exception de la dépression respiratoire et de l'administration de naloxone. Le rapport cas/témoins était de 1:1 et ceux-ci étaient appariés en fonction du sexe, du type d'unité, de la molécule opioïde et de la présence ou absence d'erreurs de médication.Résultats: Un total de 133 cas et 133 témoins ont été inclus. Après analyse des facteurs de risque cumulés, l'insuffisance rénale (RC = 2,176, IC à 95 % : 1,021 - 4,640, p = 0,044), les premières 24 heures d'administration d'opioïdes (RC = 1,899, IC à 95 % : 1,090 -3, 309, p = .024), les dépresseurs du SNC concomitants (RC = 1,785, IC à 95 % : 1,023-3,113, p = 0,041) et l'augmentation de l'âge par âge avancé (RC = 1,019, IC à 95 % : 1,002 - 1,035, p = 0,028) ont été positivement associés à des dépressions respiratoires sévères induites par un opioïde.Conclusions: Certains patients adultes hospitalisés présentaient un risque plus élevé de souffrir d'une dépression respiratoire sévère induite par un opioïde, notamment les personnes souffrant d'insuffisance rénale, celles à qui un opoïde a été administré dans les dernières 24 heures, celles qui ont reçu ds dépresseurs du SNC en plus d'un opioïde et celles qui étaient plus âgées. Ces résultats permettront d'identifier les patients à haut risque de souffrir d'une dépression respiratoire sévère induite par un opioïde, ce qui est essentiel pour mettre en place un suivi approprié et améliorer la sécurité de l'utilisation des opioïdes en milieu hospitalier.

Effects of a projector-based hybrid virtual reality on pain in young children with burn injuries during hydrotherapy sessions: A within-subject randomized crossover trial.

AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a water-friendly Projector-Based Hybrid Virtual Reality (VR) dome environment combined with standard pharmacological treatment on pain in young children undergoing burn wound care in hydrotherapy. METHODS: This study was a prospective, within-subject crossover trial of 38 children aged 6 months to 7 years old (mean age=1.8 years old). Each hydrotherapy procedure was divided into two equivalent wound care segments (No hybrid VR during one segment vs. Hybrid VR during the other segment, treatment order was randomized). Pain was measured using the 0-10 FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry Consolability scale) and the 0-10 NRS-obs (Numerical Rating Scale-obs). RESULTS: Projector-Based Hybrid VR significantly reduced procedural pain levels measured by the FLACC (p=0.026) and significantly increased patients' comfort levels (p=0.002). Patients' pain levels rated by the nurses using the NRS-obs were non-significant between both groups (p=0.135). No side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Projector-Based Hybrid VR helped in reducing the pain related to hydrotherapy procedures in young children with burn wound injuries. This is the first study using virtual reality distraction with young children, and our findings are especially important because a large percentage of pediatric burn patients are very young. Additional research and development are recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02986464, registered on June 12, 2016.

Efficacy of the Buzzy Device for Pain Management During Needle-related Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of the Buzzy device combining cold and vibration for needle-related procedural pain in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Databases search was conducted from inception to December 2017 to identify randomized controlled trials using the Buzzy device for pain management in children undergoing needle-related procedures. Selection of studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence were independently performed by 2 reviewers. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies involving 1138 participants aged between 3 and 18 years old were included in the systematic review and 7 were suitable for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis compared the Buzzy device with a no-treatment comparator and the effect of the device was significant in reducing self-report procedural pain (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.52 to -0.70; P<0.0001), parent-reported procedural pain (SMD: -0.94; 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.27; P=0.006), observer-report procedural pain (SMD: -1.19; 95% CI: -1.90 to -0.47; P=0.001), observer-reported procedural anxiety (SMD -1.37; 95% CI: -1.77 to -0.96; P<0.00001), and parent-reported procedural anxiety (SMD -1.36; 95% CI: -2.11 to -0.61; P=0.0004). There was no significant difference for the success of the procedure at first attempt and the occurrence of adverse events. DISCUSSION: The Buzzy device seems to be a promising intervention for procedural pain management in children. However, the comparative effect is uncertain due to the presence of significant heterogeneity and very low-quality evidence. There is a need to improve the methodological quality and rigor in the design of future trials to conclude to the efficacy of the Buzzy device.

External cold and vibration for pain management of children undergoing needle-related procedures in the emergency department: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Needle-related procedures are considered as the most important source of pain and distress in children in hospital settings. Considering the physiological and psychological consequences that could result from these procedures, management of pain and distress through pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods is essential. Therefore, it is important to have interventions that are rapid, easy-to-use and likely to be translated into clinical practice for routine use. The aim of this study will be to determine whether a device combining cold and vibration (Buzzy) is non-inferior to a topical anaesthetic (liposomal lidocaine 4% cream) for pain management of children undergoing needle-related procedures in the emergency department. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing the Buzzy device to liposomal lidocaine 4% cream for needle-related pain management. A total of 346 participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two study groups. The primary outcome will be the mean difference in pain intensity between groups during needle-related procedures. A non-inferiority margin of 0.70 on the Color Analogue Scale will be considered. A Non-inferiority margin of 0.70 on the Color Analogue Scale will be considered. The secondary outcomes will be the level of distress during the procedure, the success of the procedure at first attempt, the occurrence of adverse events, the satisfaction of both interventions and the memory of pain 24 hours after the procedure. The primary outcome will be assessed for non-inferiority and the secondary outcomes for superiority. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of the study setting. Findings of this trial will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02616419.

Effect of implementation interventions on nurses' behaviour in clinical practice: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression protocol.

BACKGROUND: Practitioner-level implementation interventions such as audit and feedback, communities of practice, and local opinion leaders have shown potential to change nurses' behaviour in clinical practice and improve patients' health. However, their effectiveness remains unclear. Moreover, we have a paucity of data regarding the use of theory in implementation studies with nurses, the causal processes-i.e. mechanisms of action-targeted by interventions to change nurses' behaviour in clinical practice, and the constituent components-i.e. behaviour change techniques-included in interventions. Thus, our objectives are threefold: (1) to examine the effectiveness of practitioner-level implementation interventions in changing nurses' behaviour in clinical practice; (2) to identify, in included studies, the type and degree of theory use, the mechanisms of action targeted by interventions and the behaviour change techniques constituting interventions and (3) to examine whether intervention effectiveness is associated with the use of theory or with specific mechanisms of action and behaviour change techniques. METHODS: We will conduct a systematic review based on the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) Group guidelines. We will search six databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science) with no time limitation for experimental and quasi-experimental studies that evaluated practitioner-level implementation interventions aiming to change nurses' behaviour in clinical practice. We will also hand-search reference lists of included studies. We will perform screening, full-text review, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction independently with the Covidence systematic review software. We will assess the quality of evidence using the GRADEpro software. We will code included studies independently for theory use (Theory Coding Scheme), mechanisms of action (coding guidelines from Michie) and behaviour change techniques (Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1) with QSR International's NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Meta-analyses will be performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) software. Meta-regression analyses will be performed with IBM SPSS Statistics software. DISCUSSION: This review will inform knowledge users and researchers interested in designing, developing and evaluating implementation interventions to support nurses' behaviour change in clinical practice. Results will provide key insights regarding which causal processes-i.e. mechanisms of action-should be targeted by these interventions, and which constituent components-i.e. behaviour change techniques-should be included in these interventions to increase their effectiveness. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42019130446).

Efficacy of the Buzzy® device for pain management of children during needle-related procedures: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Needle-related procedures are the most important source of pain in children in hospital setting. Unmanaged pain could result in short- and long-term physiological, psychological, and emotional consequences. Although the efficacy of numerous interventions has been evaluated, procedural pain management is often suboptimal in children undergoing needle-related procedures. The main objective of this systematic review is to examine the evidence for the efficacy of the Buzzy® device for needle-related procedural pain in children. METHODS: An electronic search will be conducted in the following databases: CENTRAL, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL. There will be no restriction regarding the language, date of publication, and publication status. Eligible studies will be randomized controlled trials using the Buzzy® device for pain management in children undergoing needle-related procedures. Selection of studies, data extraction and management, assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence will be performed by two independent reviewers. A third researcher will be consulted in case of discrepancies. Depending on the availability and quality of the data as well as clinical and statistical heterogeneity, a meta-analysis will be performed. Otherwise, findings will be qualitatively reported. DISCUSSION: This will be the first systematic review to examine the efficacy of the Buzzy® device on pain management of children during needle-related procedures. Results of this review will guide clinical practice and recommendations for further research to improve procedural pediatric pain management. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017076531.

Projector-based virtual reality dome environment for procedural pain and anxiety in young children with burn injuries: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) is a non-pharmacological method to distract from pain during painful procedures. However, it was never tested in young children with burn injuries undergoing wound care. AIM: We aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the study process and the use of VR for procedural pain management. METHODS: From June 2016 to January 2017, we recruited children from 2 months to 10 years of age with burn injuries requiring a hydrotherapy session in a pediatric university teaching hospital in Montreal. Each child received the projector-based VR intervention in addition to the standard pharmacological treatment. Data on intervention and study feasibility and acceptability in addition to measures on pain (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale), baseline (Modified Smith Scale) and procedural (Procedure Behavior Check List) anxiety, comfort (OCCEB-BECCO [behavioral observational scale of comfort level for child burn victims]), and sedation (Ramsay Sedation Scale) were collected before, during, and after the procedure. Data analyses included descriptive and non-parametric inferential statistics. RESULTS: We recruited 15 children with a mean age of 2.2±2.1 years and a mean total body surface area of 5% (±4). Mean pain score during the procedure was low (2.9/10, ±3), as was the discomfort level (2.9/10, ±2.8). Most children were cooperative, oriented, and calm. Assessing anxiety was not feasible with our sample of participants. The prototype did not interfere with the procedure and was considered useful for procedural pain management by most health care professionals. CONCLUSION: The projector-based VR is a feasible and acceptable intervention for procedural pain management in young children with burn injuries. A larger trial with a control group is required to assess its efficacy.

Comparison of the psychometric properties of 3 pain scales used in the pediatric emergency department: Visual Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, and Colour Analogue Scale.

Appropriate pain measurement relies on the use of valid, reliable tools. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the psychometric properties of 3 self-reported pain scales commonly used in the pediatric emergency department (ED). The inclusion criteria were children aged 6 to 17 years presenting to the ED with a musculoskeletal injury and self-reported pain scores ≥30 mm on the mechanical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Self-reported pain intensity was assessed using the mechanical VAS, Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R), and Colour Analogue Scale (CAS). Convergent validity was assessed by Pearson correlations and the Bland-Altman method; responsiveness to change was assessed using paired sample t tests and standardized mean responses; and reliability was estimated using relative and absolute indices. A total of 456 participants were included, with a mean age of 11.9 years ± 2.7 and a majority were boys (252/456, 55.3%). Correlations between each pair of scales were 0.78 (VAS/FPS-R), 0.92 (VAS/CAS), and 0.79 (CAS/FPS-R). Limits of agreement (95% confidence interval) were -3.77 to 2.33 (VAS/FPS-R), -1.74 to 1.75 (VAS/CAS), and -2.21 to 3.62 (CAS/FPS-R). Responsiveness to change was demonstrated by significant differences in mean pain scores among the scales (P < 0.0001). Intraclass correlation coefficient and coefficient of repeatability estimates suggested acceptable reliability for the 3 scales at, respectively, 0.79 and ±2.29 (VAS), 0.82 and ±2.07 (CAS), and 0.76 and ±2.82 (FPS-R). The scales demonstrated good psychometric properties for children with acute pain in the ED. The VAS and CAS showed a strong convergent validity, whereas FPS-R was not in agreement with the other scales.

Prevalence of low back pain in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common spinal deformity occurring in adolescents and its established prevalence varies from 2 to 3%. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has been identified as a potential risk factor for the development of low back pain in adolescents. The purpose of this study was to systematically review studies of the prevalence of low back pain in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis in order to establish the quality of the evidence and determine whether the prevalence estimates could be statistically pooled. METHODS: Systematic electronic searches were undertaken in PubMed, CINAHL, and CENTRAL without any restrictions. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported the prevalence of low back pain in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Studies were excluded if they detailed the prevalence of pain in post-surgical subjects or were published in languages other than English or French. Data were reported qualitatively, since there was insufficient evidence for statistical pooling. RESULTS: The electronic search strategies yielded 1811 unique studies. Only two studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The prevalence of low back pain in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis ranged from 34.7 to 42.0%. However, these prevalence estimates should be viewed cautiously as the included studies were at high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review indicate that adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis frequently experience low back pain. However, there was insufficient evidence to confidently estimate low back pain prevalence in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and further studies are needed in this area.

Revisiting the psychometric properties of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) French version.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is among the most common spinal deformities affecting adolescents. The Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire is commonly used to assess health-related quality of life in AIS patients, including pain. The objective of this study is to verify the psychometric properties of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 French version (SRS-22fv) questionnaire. METHODS: A prospective methodological design was used to verify the psychometric properties of the French version of the SRS-22fv. Participants were initially recruited from the orthopaedic scoliosis department at Sainte-Justine Hospital (Montreal, Canada) and completed the SRS-22fv and the SF-12 questionnaire. The SRS-22fv's structure was evaluated through principal component analysis (PCA). Linear regression was used to assess convergent validity between the SRS-22fv and the SF-12. RESULTS: Data was available from 352 participants with AIS. Most participants were female (87%, n = 307), and the average age was 14.3 (SD = 1.8) years. The mean thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles were 27.9° (SD = 3.3) and 23.6° (SD = 9.4), respectively. Overall, 71.4% (n = 252) of the participants presented with spinal pain. About one-third (29%) reported thoracic pain, and almost half (44%) experienced lumbar pain. The PCA identified four redundant items, which resulted in a modified 18-item questionnaire. In comparison to the original questionnaire, the modified version showed higher levels of internal consistency for four of the five factors, explained a greater proportion of the total variance (63.3%), and generated higher inter-item total correlations. CONCLUSION: We propose a shorter version of the SRS-22fv, thus the Canadian SRS-18fv, which showed an improved internal consistency and scale structure compared to the original SRS-22fv. We believe that this modified version would be better suited to assess the quality of life of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Validation of the scale on Satisfaction of Adolescents with Postoperative pain management - idiopathic Scoliosis (SAP-S).

BACKGROUND: Spinal fusion is a common orthopedic surgery in children and adolescents and is associated with high pain levels postoperatively. If the pain is not well managed, negative outcomes may ensue. To our knowledge, there is no measure in English that assesses patient's satisfaction with postoperative pain management following idiopathic scoliosis surgery. The aim of the present study was to assess the psychometric properties of the satisfaction subscale of the English version of the Satisfaction of Adolescents with Postoperative pain management - idiopathic Scoliosis (SAP-S) scale. METHODS: Eighty-two participants aged 10-18 years, who had undergone spinal fusion surgery, fully completed the SAP-S scale at 10-14 days postdischarge. Construct validity was assessed through a principal component analysis using varimax rotation. RESULTS: Principal component analysis indicated a three-factor structure of the 13-item satisfaction subscale of the SAP-S scale. Factors referred to satisfaction regarding current medication received (Factor 1), actions taken by nurses and doctors to manage pain (Factor 2) and information received after surgery (Factor 3). Cronbach's alpha was 0.91, showing very good internal consistency. Data on satisfaction and clinical outcomes were also reported. CONCLUSION: The SAP-S is a valid and reliable measure of satisfaction with postoperative pain management that can be used in both research and clinical settings to improve pain management practices. Although it was developed and validated with adolescents who had undergone spinal fusion surgery, it can be used, with further validation, to assess adolescents' satisfaction with pain management in other postoperative contexts.

Développement et validation de la version canadienne-française de l'échelle de Satisfaction des Adolescents de la gestion de la Douleur postopératoire - Scoliose idiopathique (SAD-S).

Background: Spinal fusion for scoliosis generates moderate to severe pain intensity. There are currently no instruments available to measure adolescents' satisfaction regarding post-spinal fusion pain management. Aims: To develop and validate a scale on satisfaction of adolescents regarding pain management following spinal fusion for scoliosis. Methods: A methodological design was used to develop and validate the French-Canadian scale "Satisfaction des Adolescents de la gestion de la Douleur postopératoire - Scoliose idiopathique (SAD-S)". A modified Delphi method, with seven healthcare professionals and 10 adolescents, was used to establish content validity of the SAD-S. A pre-test of the scale was conducted with 10 adolescents post-spinal fusion. The final version of the scale was validated through a pilot study with 98 adolescents following their surgery. Results: The SAD-S scale includes a total of 13 items. Principal component analysis yielded a two-factor structure (2 subscales): 1) Pain management education and 2) Education regarding medication. These two factors explained 47,8% of the total variance for satisfaction. A Cronbach's alpha of 0,84 was obtained for internal consistency. Conclusion: Validation of the SAD-S scale showed that it has good psychometric properties with this population. Further validation is required with a larger sample to pursue its validation.

Introduction: La chirurgie correctrice de la scoliose génère de la douleur postopératoire d'intensité modérée à sévère. Il n'existe pas d'instruments sur la satisfaction d'adolescents ayant eu recours à ce type de chirurgie quant à la gestion de leur douleur.Objectifs: Développement et validation d'une échelle pour mesurer la satisfaction d'adolescents ayant subi une chirurgie correctrice de la scoliose quant à la gestion de leur douleur postopératoire.Méthodes: Un devis méthodologique a été utilisé pour développer l'Échelle de Satisfaction des Adolescents de la gestion de la Douleur postopératoire ­ Scoliose idiopathique (SAD-S). La validité de contenu du SAD-S a été évaluée selon la méthode Delphi modifiée avec sept professionnels de la santé et 10 adolescents. Un pré-test de l'instrument a été effectué auprès de 10 autres adolescents ayant subi cette chirurgie. Une étude de validation a ensuite été menée auprès de 98 adolescents en phase postopératoire.Résultats: Le SAD-S comprend 13 énoncés. L'analyse en composantes principales a permis de déterminer une structure à deux facteurs (sous-échelles): 1) enseignement sur la gestion de la douleur et 2) enseignement sur la médication. Ces facteurs permettent d'expliquer 47,8 % de la variance totale pour la satisfaction. Un alpha de Cronbach de 0,84 a été obtenu pour la consistance interne de l'échelle.Conclusion: Le SAD-S possède de bonnes propriétés psychométriques pour la mesure de la satisfaction auprès de cette clientèle. La validation de cet instrument devra être poursuivie à l'aide d'un échantillon plus grand.

Oral Analgesics Utilization for Children With Musculoskeletal Injury (OUCH Trial): An RCT.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal injuries (MSK-Is) are a common and painful condition among children that remains poorly treated in the emergency department (ED). We aimed to test the efficacy of a combination of an anti-inflammatory drug with an opioid for pain management of MSK-I in children presenting to the ED. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled children between 6 and 17 years presenting to the ED with an MSK-I and a pain score >29 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS). Participants were randomly assigned to oral morphine (0.2 mg/kg) + ibuprofen (10 mg/kg) (morphine + ibuprofen) or morphine (0.2 mg/kg) + placebo of ibuprofen or ibuprofen (10 mg/kg) + placebo of morphine. Primary outcome was children with VAS pain score <30 mm at 60 minutes postmedication administration. RESULTS: A total of 501 participants were enrolled and 456 were included in primary analyses (morphine + ibuprofen = 177; morphine = 188; ibuprofen = 91). Only 29.9% (morphine + ibuprofen), 29.3% (morphine), and 33.0% (ibuprofen) of participants achieved the primary outcome (P = .81). Mean VAS pain reduction at 60 minutes were -18.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -21.9 to -16.6) (morphine + ibuprofen), -17.0 (95% CI: -20.0 to -13.9) (morphine), -18.6 (95% CI: -22.9 to -14.2) (ibuprofen) (P = .69). Children in the morphine + ibuprofen group (P < .001) and in the morphine group (P < .001) experienced more side effects than those in the ibuprofen group. No serious adverse event was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of morphine with ibuprofen did not provide adequate pain relief for children with MSK-I in the ED. None of the study medication provided an optimal pain management because most of children did not reach a mild pain score (NCT02064894).