Eyes on the Prize: Decoding the Ophthalmic Product Regulations and Intricacies of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval.

The dynamic and continuously evolving field of ophthalmology necessitates rigorous regulatory oversight in the United States. This review outlines the multifaceted Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) approval process for ophthalmic products, detailing the classifications, pathways, and regulatory compliance for devices, drugs, biologics, and combination products. Particular emphasis is placed on distinct frameworks for Class I, II, and III devices, as well as regulations for drugs, biologics, and combination products. The organizational structure of the FDA is detailed, with highlights on specific Ophthalmology oversight divisions, historical regulatory evolution, and initiatives such as Patient-Focused Drug Development. An in-depth examination of the regulatory journey, ranging from initial research to post-marketing surveillance, includes practical guidance through stages such as Pre-Investigational New Drug/Pre-Submission consultations, clinical trials, new drug application/biologics license application/premarket approval submissions, and FDA advisory committee interactions. The article underscores the importance of early interactions with the health authorities, interdisciplinary team collaboration, adherence to current standards, and the anticipation of policy changes to ensure patient safety. It concludes with an analysis of 4 key FDA-approved ophthalmic products, including Eylea®, Luxturna®, Alphagan P®, and the Raindrop® Near Vision Inlay, detailing their contributions to ophthalmic care and offering valuable insights into their respective clinical trials, regulatory pathways, and potential implications. These case studies are included to illustrate both successful and failed ophthalmic product launches, thereby highlighting the importance of alignment with regulatory compliance.

A novel liposomal bupivacaine formulation to produce ultralong-acting analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Currently available local anesthetics have relatively brief durations of action. An ultralong-acting local anesthetic would benefit patients with acute and chronic pain. The authors prepared and characterized a novel liposomal bupivacaine formulation using remote loading of bupivacaine along an ammonium sulfate gradient and assessed its efficacy in humans. METHODS: A large multivesicular liposomal bupivacaine formulation was prepared by subjecting small unilamellar vesicles to successive freeze-and-thaw cycles. Bupivacaine hydrochloride was then remotely loaded into the liposomes along an ammonium sulfate gradient ([(NH4)2SO4)]intraliposome/[(NH4)2SO4)]medium > 1000). The liposomes were then characterized for size distribution; drug-to-phospholipid ratio; in vitro release profile at 4 degree, 21 degree C, and 37 degree C; sterility; and pyrogenicity. Six subjects each received six intradermal injections in the lower back with 0.5 ml of 0.5, 1.0, and 2% liposomal bupivacaine; 0.5% standard bupivacaine; saline; and "empty" liposomes. Duration of analgesia was assessed using pinprick testing of the skin directly over the injection sites. Results were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The mean large multivesicular vesicle size was 2439 +/- 544 nm, with a drug-to-phospholipid ratio of 1.8, fivefold greater than results previously reported. In vitro release was slowest at 4 degree C. The median duration of analgesia with 0.5% standard bupivacaine was 1 h. The median durations of analgesia after 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0% liposomal bupivacaine were 19, 38, and 48 h, respectively. Neither saline nor "empty" liposomes produced analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: This novel liposomal formulation had a favorable drug-to-phospholipid ratio and prolonged the duration of bupivacaine analgesia in a dose-dependent manner. If these results in healthy volunteers can be duplicated in the clinical setting, this formulation has the potential to significantly impact the management of pain.