Endoscopic Lateral Approach for Dorsal Root Ganglion Burst Stimulation: Technical Note and Illustrative Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation demonstrated superiority over traditional spinal cord stimulation with better pain relief and greater improvement of quality of life. However, leads specifically designed for DRG stimulation are difficult to implant in patients who previously underwent spinal surgery and show epidural scarring at the desired site of implantation because of the reduced stiffness of the lead. Nevertheless, recurrent leg or arm pain after spinal surgery usually manifests as a single level radiculopathy, which should theoretically be amenable to DRG stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present the percutaneous transforaminal placement of cylindrical leads through a lateral endoscopic approach for DRG stimulation in burst mode. RESULTS: We could successfully show that percutaneous transforaminal lead placement is feasible in three illustrative cases. CONCLUSION: This technical note combines two innovations, one linked to the other. The first innovation involves a novel endoscopic lateral transforaminal approach to insert a cylindrical lead to the DRG. Because this electrode is compatible with burst stimulation-enabled devices, a second innovation consists of the application of burst stimulation on the DRG.

A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to examine the effectiveness of burst spinal cord stimulation patterns for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of chronic pain is a well-established therapy. However, the requirement that paresthesia be continually felt by the patient has important downsides. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a new paresthesia-free SCS paradigm, called burst stimulation, for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) with a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with FBSS and a preexisting SCS system each received three treatment allocations in random order for a period of one week: 500-Hz tonic stimulation, burst stimulation, and placebo stimulation. The primary outcome measure was pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measures were pain quality measured using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SFMPQ) and safety. Additional data were collected relating to pain-related disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: The lowest mean NRS and SFMPQ scores were observed under burst stimulation. For the burst stimulation treatment group, mean NRS and SFMPQ scores were significantly decreased compared with the other treatment groups. Mean NRS and SFMPQ scores were not significantly different between 500-Hz tonic stimulation and placebo stimulation. Although the lowest mean ODI score was observed under burst stimulation, no significant differences were found between the ODI categories. No adverse events occurred, and burst stimulation was significantly preferred by 16 patients (80%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, burst stimulation resulted in significantly better pain relief and improved pain quality in the short term compared with 500-Hz tonic stimulation and placebo stimulation and was preferred by the majority of patients.

Fatal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in a Deep Brain Stimulation Patient: Displacement of Stimulation Leads for Deep Brain Stimulation Indicate Subarachnoid Hemorrhage on X-ray.

We depict the rare case of a patient with aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhage previously treated with deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Initial CT scans showed a Fisher grade 4 subarachnoid hemorrhage with lead displacement due to midline-shift. CT angiogram revealed a supra-ophthalmic aneurysm of the internal carotid artery. The patient subsequently underwent clipping of the aneurysm and decompressive hemicraniecomy.

[Functional-neurosurgical treatment options for functional pelvic floor disorders : Value of sacral neuromodulation]. / Funktionell-neurochirurgische Therapieoptionen bei Funktionsstörungen des Beckenbodens : Stellenwert der sakralen Neuromodulation.

BACKGROUND: Sacral neuromodulation is an established minimally invasive therapy indicated for the treatment of functional pelvic floor disorders. While it received its original US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of overactive bladder symptoms, it is now regarded as a therapeutic option to treat both urinary/fecal incontinence and retention. In addition, it has proven to be a valuable tool in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain, and preliminary results indicate a potential to elicit improvements in sexual functioning. OBJECTIVE: This article serves to provide a summary of the therapy and its applications. METHOD: Selective literature review. RESULTS: Sacral neuromodulation implants allow for the controlled shifting of the autonomic control of bladder and rectum towards an inhibition or facilitation of voiding, dependent on the patient's needs and under the patient's control. At the same time and depending on the applied stimulation, the implants can interfere with the nerve's conduction of pain signals. This makes them a therapeutic option for pelvic pain that fails to respond to conventional treatment. Finally, there have been first reports suggesting improvements in sexual dysfunction under sacral neuromodulation, thus, potentially opening up a new line of therapy for those disorders. DISCUSSION: Sacral neuromodulation is a flexible and efficient form of therapy for functional disorders of the pelvic floor. Specifically, the same intervention can treat seemingly contradictory disorders such as urinary/fecal incontinence and retention as well as chronic pain.

Bipolar Lumbar Radiofrequency Medial Branch Neurotomy in a Patient with Deep Brain Stimulation Implant.

Chronic axial lower back pain is one of the most common conditions that patients seek medical attention for in pain practices. About 15 to 40% of axial lower back pain is due to facet-mediated pain. Diagnostic blocks of the medial branch reliably identify the facet joint as the pain generator and offer a prognostic factor for response to radiofrequency neurotomy of the identified facet joints resulting in profound pain relief. However, deep brain stimulation implants have been considered a contraindication for neurotomy. We present an illustrative case of a patient with deep brain stimulation system treated with bipolar medial branch neurotomy using a two-needle technique.

Initial study on an expert system for spine diseases screening using inertial measurement unit.

In recent times, widely understood spine diseases have advanced to one of the most urgetn problems where quick diagnosis and treatment are needed. To diagnose its specifics (e.g. to decide whether this is a scoliosis or sagittal imbalance) and assess its extend, various kind of imaging diagnostic methods (such as X-Ray, CT, MRI scan or ST) are used. However, despite their common use, some may be regarded as (to a level) invasive methods and there are cases where there are contraindications to using them. Besides, which is even more of a problem, these are very expensive methods and whilst their use for pure diagnostic purposes is absolutely valid, then due to their cost, they cannot rather be considered as tools which would be equally valid for bad posture screening programs purposes. This paper provides an initial evaluation of the alternative approach to the spine diseases diagnostic/screening using inertial measurement unit and we propose policy-based computing as the core for the inference systems. Although the methodology presented herein is potentially applicable to a variety of spine diseases, in the nearest future we will focus specifically on sagittal imbalance detection.

Cervical epidural abscess due to implantation of a spinal cord stimulation lead.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for intractable pain syndromes has become a pillar of modern pain management. Common complications include lead migration, implant infection, cerebral spinal fluid leak, and lead fracture. Spinal epidural abscess due to spinal cord stimulator implantation is a very rare occurrence with only two cases reported in the literature so far. We present an illustrative case and discuss the pathophysiology and best clinical management for this very rate entity.

Patient Safety Comparison of Frameless and Frame-Based Stereotactic Navigation for Brain Biopsy-A Single Center Cohort Study.

Leksell stereotactic system-based aspiration biopsy is a common procedure in the neurosurgical treatment of deep-seated or multiple brain lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of frameless biopsy using VarioGuide compared to frame-based biopsy using the Leksell stereotactic system (LSS). We analyzed all brain biopsies using VarioGuide or LSS at our neurooncological Department of Neurosurgery in the University Hospital of Bonn between January 2018 and August 2020. We analyzed demographic data, duration of surgery, size of lesion, localization, and early complications. Uni-variable analyses were carried out on data from both groups. In total, 109 biopsies were compared (40 VarioGuide vs. 69 LSS). Patients with VarioGuide were significant older (74 (62−80) years vs. 67 (57−76) years; p = 0.03) and had a shorter duration of general anesthesia (163 (138−194) min vs. 193 (167−215) min, p < 0.001). We found no significant differences in surgery duration (VarioGuide median 28 min (IQR 20−38); LSS: median 30 min (IQR 25−39); p = 0.1352) or in early complication rates (5% vs. 7%; p = 0.644). A slightly higher false negative biopsy rate was registered in the LSS group (3 vs. 1; p = 0.1347). The size of the lesions also did not differ significantly between the two groups (18.31 ± 26.35 cm3 vs. 12.63 ± 14.62; p = 0.15). Our data showed that biopsies performed using VarioGuide took significantly less time than LSS biopsies and did not differ in complication rates. Both systems offered a high degree of patient safety.

Safety Evaluation of Cervical Dorsal Instrumentation in Geriatric Patients: Experience at a Level 1 Center for Spinal Surgery-A Single Center Cohort Study.

Objective: Dorsal instrumentation of the cervical spine is an established treatment in spine surgery. However, careful planning is required, particularly in elderly patients. This study evaluates early clinical outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing complex spine surgery. Methods: In this retrospective, single center cohort study, we included all geriatric patients (aged ≥65 years) who underwent dorsal instrumentation between January 2013 and December 2020. We analyzed postoperative complications and the 30-day in-hospital mortality rate. Furthermore, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and Clavien-Dindo grading system (CDG) were used to assess the patients' comorbidity burden. Results: In total, 153 patients were identified and included. The mean age of patients was 78 years (SD ± 7). Traumatic injury (53.6%) was the most common reason for surgery. 60.8% of the patients underwent dorsal instrumentation with 3 or more levels. The most common comorbidities were arterial hypertension (64%), diabetes mellitus (22.2%), coronary heart disease and atrial fibrillation (19.6%). The most common adverse event (AE) was pneumonia (4%) and the most common surgery-related complication was wound infection (5.2%). Among patients categorized as high risk for AE (CCI > 5), 14.6% suffered a postoperative AE. In our univariate analysis, we found no risk factors for high rates of complications or mortality. Conclusion: Our data demonstrates that older patients were at no significant risk of postoperative complications. The CCI/CDG scores may identify patients at higher risk for adverse events after dorsal instrumentation, and these assessments should become an essential component of stratification in this older patient population.

Placement of Surgical Spinal Cord Stimulation Leads Using Spinal Process Splitting Laminotomy: Technical Note.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation has become an established method within the therapy of chronic pain allowing for significant pain relief. Surgical leads usually must be implanted via a surgical procedure involving unilateral or bilateral muscle detachment and partial laminectomy. METHODS: We present the application of a novel minimal invasive microsurgical approach for lead placement, which combines the beneficial advantages of anatomic midline lead placement while preserving the midline structures, avoiding muscle detachments, and thus ensuring spinal stability: spinal process splitting laminotomy. CONCLUSIONS: The spinal process splitting laminotomy technique can be successfully applied to introduce the surgical leads for spinal cord stimulation.

Indications for early revision surgery for material failure in spinal instrumentation: experience at a level 1 center for spinal surgery - a single-center study.

ABSTRACT: Posterior instrumentation is an established treatment for a range of spinal disorders. Material failure is not uncommon, and the indications for a revision are very heterogeneous. This study aimed to evaluate the indications and timing for early revision spinal surgery due to material failure.In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, patients underwent spinal posterior instrumentation between January 2017 and July 2019. They were followed up at 3, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. The time of onset of material failure which led to revision surgery was analyzed. In addition, the relationship between the indications for revision surgery and independent variables was examined using a multivariate logistic regression model.A total of one hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled. Radiolucent zones were found in 30 patients (20%) after 3 months, whereas 48 patients (31%) had radiolucent zones after 12 months. Revision surgery was performed in 13 patients (8.5%). The peak time for revision due to instability was within the first four months of the primary surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed that location, pathology, ASA score, and smoking had no significant impact on the indication for revision surgery, and neither did BMI (P = .042). Non-fusion (P = .007) and radiolucent zones (P = .004), in combination with increased pain (P = .006), were predictors for revision.Our data show that the peak time for early revision of material failure after posterior instrumentation was within the first 4 months of primary surgery. The abnormalities (e.g., radiolucent zones) surrounding the screws without fusion, including persistence of pain, were predictors for revision surgery.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Spinal Surgery Does Not Impact Patient Safety-A Single Center Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Antithrombotic therapy is common in older patients to avoid thromboembolic events. Careful planning is required, particularly in the perioperative environment. There are no clearly date guidelines on the best timing for interrupting the use of anticoagulation in the case of spinal surgery. This study evaluates early per procedural clinical outcomes in patients whose antithrombotic therapy was interrupted for spinal surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. All patients who underwent dorsal instrumentation from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020 were included. In group A, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were suspended for 5 days and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for 3 days. In group B, antiplatelet agents (APA) were paused for at least 7 days before surgery to prevent perioperative bleeding. Patients not taking anticoagulation medication were gathered into control group C. We analyzed demographic data, ASA status, blood loss, comorbidities, duration of surgery, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, complications, thromboembolism, and 30 day in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analyses from the three groups were further analyzed and conducted. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were operated and included. Twenty-eight patients taking VKA/DOAC (group A), 37 patients using APA (group B), and 152 patients without anticoagulation (group C) underwent spinal surgery. Those using anticoagulants were significantly older and often with multimorbidity, but did not differ significantly in procedural bleeding, time of surgery, length of hospital stay, complication rate, thromboembolism, or 30 day in-hospital mortality (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data show that dorsal instrumentation safely took place in patients whose antithrombotic therapy was interrupted.

Can neuromodulation support the fight against the COVID19 pandemic? Transcutaneous non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation as a potential targeted treatment of fulminant acute respiratory distress syndrome.

The COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly spread all over the world and caused a major health care crisis. About 20% of patients develop severe disease and require hospitalisation, which is associated with a high mortality rate of up to 97% in those being ventilated and respiratory failure being the leading cause of death. Despite many therapeutic agents being under current investigation there is yet no panacea available. With increasing rates of infection throughout the world, there is an urgent need for new therapeutic approaches to counteract the infection. As the nervous system has shown to be a strong modulator of respiratory function and the immune response, we want to highlight pathways involved in regulation of respiratory function, the neuro-immune axis as well as the rationale for a potential targeted treatment of fulminant acute respiratory distress syndrome via transcutaneous non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation in critically-ill COVID-19 patients.