Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 15(8): 44, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26149585

RESUMO

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a safe and effective treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the USA has approved three SLIT tablets for the treatment of AR and ARC in relation to pollen. Specifically, Grastek® and Oralair® are two formulations approved to treat patients suffering with AR/ARC to grass pollen, and Ragwitek™ is a formulation approved to treat patients suffering with AR/ARC to ragweed pollen. Although these approvals provide support for physicians to prescribe SLIT, barriers to prescribing SLIT still remain such as FDA approval for additional formulations, a standard dose and dosing schedule, and cost/insurance coverage. In order to further support the use of SLIT, research is currently being conducted to expand the indication for SLIT to other common comorbidities to AR/ARC. For example, allergic asthma, food allergies, and atopic dermatitis are other diseases which are being explored. The future of SLIT in the USA is unknown; however, education will be necessary for both providers and patients.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia Sublingual , Animais , Asma/imunologia , Asma/terapia , Dermatite Atópica/imunologia , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Humanos , Rinite Alérgica/terapia , Imunoterapia Sublingual/economia , Imunoterapia Sublingual/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
2.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 34(5): 391-407, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23998236

RESUMO

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are an effective therapy for the treatment of persistent asthma of all severities because they reduce symptoms, improve lung function, and reduce underlying inflammation. Although ICSs are generally safe for long- term use, there is concern among physicians and patients about potential systemic side effects, including growth inhibition in children. This continued concern of systemic side effects may negatively affect the compliance to ICS treatment. Based on the current guidance to industry from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), some efficacy and safety studies on ICSs performed in the 1990s had limitations in their design to evaluate the effect of ICS therapy on growth as a safety end point. A review of studies performed with currently available ICSs and their level of conformance with the FDA guidance are presented in this article. The 1-year studies show a small, dose-dependent effect of most ICSs on childhood growth, with some differences across various ICS molecules and across individual children. Some ICSs at the doses studied did not affect childhood growth using rigorous study designs. Most studies did not conform completely with the FDA guidance. The data on effects of childhood ICS use on final adult height are conflicting, but one recent well-designed study showed an effect, clearly warranting additional studies.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Crescimento , Administração por Inalação , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Animais , Estatura/efeitos dos fármacos , Criança , Crescimento/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Sistema Hipófise-Suprarrenal/efeitos dos fármacos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
3.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 14(6): 582-90, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25188717

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is indicated for the use in pediatric patients suffering from allergic rhinitis or allergic rhinoconjunctivitis caused by environmental allergens, such as ragweed pollen, grass pollen, and dust mite. This review focuses on recent and relevant studies associated with the use of SLIT for these allergens in children by examining efficacy, safety, and immunological data in comparison to subcutaneous immunotherapy, therapeutic treatments, and placebo. RECENT FINDINGS: In several of the case studies examined in this article, involving mainly grass and dust mite allergic patients, SLIT has been shown to have similar efficacy to subcutaneous immunotherapy. SLIT has been proven as a safer therapy. In comparing the adverse events related to both therapies, SLIT has fewer cases of anaphylaxis and fewer incidents of local reactions of mild-to-moderate severity. In comparison to therapeutic treatments and placebo, SLIT significantly improved symptom and medication scores. In addition to allergic rhinitis and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, additional uses for SLIT in pediatric patients, such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, and food allergies, are under development. SUMMARY: SLIT treatment is a well tolerated and effective approach to treat allergic rhinitis and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in pediatric patients. Three SLIT tablets are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat grass and ragweed allergies. The research discussed in this review will further the knowledge of physicians searching for an alternative treatment for their pediatric patients.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/uso terapêutico , Conjuntivite Alérgica/terapia , Rinite Alérgica/terapia , Imunoterapia Sublingual/métodos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Conjuntivite Alérgica/imunologia , Conjuntivite Alérgica/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Rinite Alérgica/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica/patologia
4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 1(3): 214-26; quiz 227, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24565478

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common pediatric problem that significantly affects sleep, learning, performance, and quality of life. In addition, it is associated with significant comorbidities and complications. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to provide an update on the epidemiology, comorbidities, pathophysiology, current treatment, and future direction of pediatric AR. METHODS: Literature reviews in each of these areas were conducted, and the results were incorporated. RESULTS: The prevalence of AR is increasing in the pediatric population and is associated with significant morbidity, comorbidities, and complications. The mainstay of current treatment strategies includes allergen avoidance, pharmacotherapy, and allergen specific immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In the future, diagnosis will be improved by microarrayed recombinant allergen testing and therapy will be expanded to include emerging treatments such as sublingual immunotherapy and combination products.


Assuntos
Rinite Alérgica Perene/terapia , Criança , Comorbidade , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Previsões/métodos , Humanos , Prevalência , Rinite Alérgica , Rinite Alérgica Perene/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica Perene/epidemiologia , Rinite Alérgica Perene/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA