Ethnic Minority Representation in Female Sexual Dysfunction Questionnaire Validation: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is a significant cause of distress for an estimated 12-24% of women, and over the past 5 decades several questionnaires have been developed for clinical practice. AIM: The purpose of this scoping review is to evaluate the ethnic representation of sample populations used in the studies to validate FSD questionnaires. METHODS: A scoping review was performed using electronic databases, including PubMed and Scopus, to identify FSD questionnaires validated between 1976 and 2021. Weighted averages from the combined ethnicity data were compared to population data from 2019 US census data and 2018 healthcare workforce reports to evaluate epidemiologic diversity. Ethnicity data from each questionnaire were also investigated longitudinally to evaluate trends in representation over the past 50 years. OUTCOMES: Our outcome of interest was comparison of the weighted averages for ethnicity categories from validation populations to the US female general population, US female health care workforce, and US census data. RESULTS: 48 validation studies were reviewed and showed that the average ethnic representation of the study populations relative to the US general population and US female health care workforce, respectively, was: Caucasian (83.7% vs 62.7% and 68.5%), Black (7.8% vs 13.3% and 8.3%), Hispanic (3.6% vs 16.0% and 9.6%), Native American (0.1% vs 0.8% and 0.3%), Asian (0.6% vs 6.4% and 6.2%), and Other (3.1% vs 0.7% and 1.4%). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: FSD questionnaires are relied upon in research and clinical settings, so lack of diversity in validation populations could lead to under recognition and undertreatment in ethnic minority women. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Our results are dependent on the quality of data available from previously published validation studies. We attempted to account for biases in lack of data and size of validation populations by using weighted averages for making comparisons. We chose the US general population and female healthcare workforce for comparison and analyzed validation populations across multiple decades and geographic locations. Many of the validation studies were performed at least 10 years ago and may not reflect the current state of FSD and potential of questionnaire responses of ethnic minority women. This manuscript raises critical awareness regarding the lack of validated instruments for FSD in ethnically diverse women. CONCLUSION: Study populations used to validate FSD questionnaires demonstrate a trend of ethnic minority underrepresentation relative to the US female general and healthcare workforce populations. Battle CR, Rubin RS, Kingsberg SA, et al. Ethnic Minority Representation in Female Sexual Dysfunction Questionnaire Validation: A Scoping Review. J Sex Med 2022;19:1824-1838.

Barriers to Low-Vision Rehabilitation Services for Visually Impaired Patients in a Multidisciplinary Ophthalmology Outpatient Practice.

Low-vision rehabilitation (LVR) has significant benefit in improving the quality of life of visually impaired patients. However, these services are highly underutilized in ophthalmology practices. A quality improvement study was performed to investigate barriers to LVR services for patients at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) between 2010 and 2020. Low vision was defined as the best corrected visual acuity of 20/70 or worse in the better-seeing eye or a visual field less than 20 degrees. Potential subjects were screened (n = 577) from the electronic medical record using International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes for legal blindness, impaired vision, and low vision. Chart review identified 190 subjects who met criteria for low-vision analysis. Patients who received LVR referrals to attend at least one LVR service visit from the eligible subjects were contacted for participation in phone interviews regarding their LVR experience. Practicing eye care providers (ECPs) at UTMB completed a questionnaire to capture their referral patterns. Of the eligible subjects, 64% were referred to LVR services by ECPs. Reported patient barriers included mental health issues (76%), denial of need for low-vision aid (71%), poor physical health (67%), lack of transportation (57.1%), and lack of referrals (36%). EPCs reported patient's overall health (67%), older age (44%), lack of social support (44%), poor cognitive function (44%), and low likelihood of follow-up (44%) as barriers to referring patients to LVR. This study identified several modifiable barriers that can be addressed to access LVR services for low-vision patients. Changing referral patterns, eliminating variations in referral criteria, and increasing patient awareness and knowledge of LVR resources may tremendously improve the quality of life of low-vision patients.