Concurrent and Prospective Associations Between Communicated Emotional Arousal and Adjustment Among Couples Coping With Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The experience of cancer can create considerable emotional distress for patients and their committed partners. How couples communicate about cancer-related concerns can have important implications for adjustment. However, past research has primarily utilized cross-sectional designs and retrospective self-reports of couple communication. While informative, little is known about how patients and partners express emotion during conversations about cancer, and how these emotional patterns predict individual and relational adjustment. PURPOSE: The current investigation examined how patterns of emotional arousal within couples' communication about cancer was associated with concurrent and prospective individual psychological and relational adjustment. METHODS: At baseline, 133 patients with stage II- breast, lung, or colorectal cancer and their partners completed a conversation about a cancer-related concern. Vocally expressed emotional arousal (f0) was extracted from recorded conversations. Couples completed self-report measures of individual psychological and relational adjustment at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 months later. RESULTS: Couples who started the conversation higher in f0 (i.e., greater emotional arousal) reported better individual and relational adjustment at baseline. If the non-cancer partner had lower f0 relative to patients, this predicted worse individual adjustment across follow-up. Additionally, couples who maintained their level of f0 rather than decreasing later in the conversation reported improvements in individual adjustment across follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated emotional arousal within a cancer-related conversation may be adaptive for adjustment, as it may reflect greater emotional engagement and processing of an important topic. These results may suggest ways for therapists to guide emotional engagement to enhance resilience in couples experiencing cancer.

Cancer is a stressful experience for patients and their partners. We know that how couples communicate about cancer is important, but we do not know much about how couples express emotion during cancer conversations and how those emotional expressions affect well-being. Our study looked at how couples' emotional arousal within cancer conversations relate to individual and relationship well-being. At the beginning of the study, cancer patients and their partners had a conversation about cancer. Within these conversations, we tracked the emotional arousal expressed in their voices. Couples also completed surveys about their well-being at the beginning of the study and later in time (4, 8, and 12 months later). We found that couples who started the conversation with higher emotional arousal had better initial well-being. Couples who remained higher in arousal later in the conversation improved in their individual well-being over time. We also found that if the non-cancer partner was low in arousal compared with patients, this predicted worse well-being over time. More research is needed, but these findings suggest that being emotionally aroused during conversations about important topics like cancer might be helpful for well-being, potentially because couples are discussing concerns and not backing off when it feels challenging.

Family therapy for persons with schizophrenia: neglected yet important.

Since the 1950s, the observed disturbances in family relationships in which a member has been diagnosed as having schizophrenia has led many systemic family therapists to the hypothesis that these family interactions may have preceded the onset of illness and contributed to it. However, attempts at using traditional family therapy with families of patients with schizophrenia were not successful or widely adopted. With the introduction of neuroleptic medication, the treatment of schizophrenia changed dramatically, and patients often returned to their family in varying stages of partial remission, increasing the burden on relatives. Furthermore, research based on the expressed emotion concept demonstrated that the chance of relapse increases by a factor of 2.5 when a patient returns to a high-EE-family in contrast to a low-EE-family environment; consequently, the vulnerability-stress model started to guide treatment development. Based on these developments, since 1980, several psychoeducational family management programs have been evaluated showing a significant reduction in relapse when compared to standard psychiatric care from 49 to 13%. To date, at least 50 RCT studies have been published showing the effectiveness of family interventions in various culturally diverse countries. Therefore, according to the NICE and other guidelines, family intervention should be offered to all families of people with psychosis who live with or are in close contact with the patient, in conjunction with neuroleptic treatment. Despite this strong recommendation, family involvement is under-implemented in mental health care, despite its strong scientific, economic, legal and moral basis. To improve the psychosocial health of patients with psychotic disorders and their relatives, more research is necessary, as well as more training for professionals in effective family interventions.

Couple-based communication intervention for head and neck cancer: a randomized pilot trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a couple-based supportive communication (CSC) intervention for head and neck cancer (HNC) delivered during patients' oncology treatment. METHODS: Twenty couples were randomly assigned to either a four-session CSC or a treatment-as-usual (TAU) condition. The CSC intervention primarily focused on increasing couple emotional disclosure, supportive listening, and social support. Patients and partners completed measures of individual and relationship functioning at baseline, post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Ninety-eight percent of CSC sessions were completed and couples reported high levels of satisfaction with the intervention. Between-group effect sizes indicated that patients and partners in CSC reported improvements in individual and relationship functioning, relative to those in the TAU condition. CONCLUSIONS: A couple-based communication intervention delivered during oncology treatment is feasible and acceptable in the context of HNC and may lead to improvements in individual and relationship functioning. Preliminary efficacy results are interpreted in the context of social-cognitive processing and intimacy theories. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01785576) first posted on February 7, 2013.

Love in the time of COVID-19: A brief report on relationship and individual functioning among committed couples in the United States while under shelter-in-place orders.

The COVID-19 pandemic in the United States has changed many aspects of people's daily life, including increased time at home in response to shelter-in-place orders, heightened stress about health effects of COVID-19, and shifts in other domains of life (e.g., employment). These lifestyle changes are likely to impact the well-being of individuals and their romantic relationships. This investigation examined how COVID-19 influenced couple and individual well-being in real-time during the early phase of the pandemic. Data were collected in early May 2020 during shelter-in-place orders in the United States. Participants in committed relationships (n = 332) completed an online survey assessing their experiences currently and before the pandemic. Results suggested that while couple functioning overall maintained or even improved, individual well-being was more negatively impacted by the pandemic. Moreover, some groups who are at higher risk of a poor health outcome from COVID-19 or experience unique challenges as a result of COVID-19 reported worse outcomes (e.g., those whose employment changed) while others did not decline in their psychological and couple functioning (e.g., Black individuals and older individuals). These findings suggest that the pandemic has had varied impacts on couples and individuals, as well as across different virus-related risk factors. Further research is needed to understand the nuanced effects of this pandemic on couples and individuals across time.

La pandemia de la COVID-19 en los Estados Unidos ha cambiado muchos aspectos de la vida diaria de las personas, por ejemplo, el aumento del tiempo que pasan en sus hogares en respuesta a órdenes de confinamiento, un estrés más elevado por los efectos de la COVID-19 en la salud, y cambios en otros aspectos de la vida (p. ej.: en el empleo). Estos cambios en el estilo de vida probablemente repercutan en el bienestar de las personas y en sus relaciones amorosas. En esta investigación se analizó cómo la COVID-19 influyó en el bienestar de las parejas y de los individuos en tiempo real durante la primera fase de la pandemia. A principios de mayo de 2020 se recopilaron datos durante las órdenes de confinamiento en los Estados Unidos. Los participantes que estaban en relaciones de pareja estables (n=332) contestaron una encuesta en línea donde se evaluaron sus experiencias de ese momento y las anteriores a la pandemia. Los resultados indicaron que, si bien el funcionamiento de la pareja en general se mantuvo o incluso mejoró, la pandemia afectó más negativamente el bienestar individual. Además, algunos grupos que tienen mayor riesgo de resultados desfavorables en la salud como consecuencia de la COVID-19 o enfrentan dificultades singulares como resultado de la COVID-19 informaron peores resultados (p. ej.: aquellos cuyos empleos cambiaron), mientras que otros no tuvieron un empeoramiento de su funcionamiento psicológico y de pareja (p. ej.: las personas de color y las personas mayores). Estos resultados sugieren que la pandemia ha tenido efectos variados en las parejas y en los individuos, así como entre los diferentes factores de riesgo relacionados con el virus. Se necesitan más investigaciones para comprender los efectos sutiles de esta pandemia en las parejas y en los individuos con el transcurso del tiempo.

Cognitive-behavioral couple therapy for same-sex female couples: A pilot study.

Despite comparable levels of relationship satisfaction and intimacy, same-sex couples break up faster and more often than different-sex couples, highlighting a need for quality couple therapy. Research suggests that culturally tailored services are desired by same-sex couples and may be more effective and better received. Although efficacious couple therapies exist to treat relationship distress, they have been overwhelmingly studied with different-sex couples. Sexual minority (SM) affirming couple therapies have not been systematically developed or evaluated. The current study involved developing and pilot testing a couple therapy tailored for distressed same-sex female couples. This treatment integrates the SM stress model with the empirically supported cognitive-behavioral couple therapy framework and is the first culturally tailored couple therapy for same-sex couples to be empirically evaluated. Therapists delivered the treatment in an open-trial format to a pilot sample of 11 same-sex female couples experiencing relationship distress and SM stress. Treatment was delivered with high adherence to the treatment manual. Participants reported high treatment satisfaction. As hypothesized, participants experienced significant decreases in relationship distress and improvements in couple coping with SM stress from pre- to post-therapy. Limitations precluded clear conclusions regarding anticipated improvements in individual mental health. Participants experienced comparable or stronger improvements in relationship functioning compared to couples in a similar benchmark study. Given this is a small pilot study, results are interpreted with caution. Implications for culturally tailoring evidence-based couple therapy for marginalized groups are discussed.

A pesar de los niveles comparables de satisfacción con la relación y de intimidad, las parejas del mismo sexo se separan más rápidamente y con más frecuencia que las parejas de distinto sexo, lo cual destaca la necesidad de una terapia de pareja de calidad. Las investigaciones indican que las parejas del mismo sexo desean recibir servicios adaptados a las culturas, los cuales pueden ser más eficaces y mejor recibidos. Aunque existen terapias de pareja eficaces para tratar el distrés en las relaciones, estas se han estudiado en su mayoría con parejas de distinto sexo. Las terapias de pareja dedicadas a las minorías sexuales no se han desarrollado ni evaluado sistemáticamente. El presente estudio implicó el desarrollo y la prueba piloto de una terapia de pareja adaptada para parejas femeninas del mismo sexo con distrés. Este tratamiento integra el modelo de estrés de las minorías sexuales con el marco de la terapia de pareja cognitivo-conductual respaldado empíricamente, y es la primera terapia de pareja adaptada culturalmente para parejas del mismo sexo que se evalúa empíricamente. Los terapeutas administraron el tratamiento en un formato de estudio abierto a una muestra piloto de 11 parejas femeninas del mismo sexo que sufrían distrés relacional y estrés por minoría sexual. El tratamiento se aplicó con una alta adhesión al manual de tratamiento. Las participantes informaron una alta satisfacción con el tratamiento. Como se planteó en la hipótesis, las participantes disminuyeron considerablemente el distrés relacional y mejoraron en el afrontamiento del estrés por minoría sexual de la pareja después de la terapia respecto de antes de la terapia. Las limitaciones impidieron sacar conclusiones claras con respecto a la previsión de mejorías en la salud mental individual. Las participantes tuvieron mejorías comparables o más marcadas en el funcionamiento de la relación respecto de las parejas de un estudio comparativo similar. Teniendo en cuenta que este es un estudio piloto pequeño, los resultados se interpretan con cautela. Se comentan las implicancias para adaptar culturalmente la terapia de pareja factual para grupos marginados.

Escalation and Regulation of Emotional Arousal in Couples Predicts Relationship Satisfaction Concurrently and 25 Years Later.

Relationship distress and divorce are major risk factors for the development or exacerbation of psychopathology and psychosocial impairments. Given that heightened negative emotions within couples' interactions may portend negative relationship outcomes, it is critical to understand how emotions unfold across a conversation and how partners may influence each other's immediate emotional experiences. This study examined whether these regulatory dynamics within one interaction predicted relationship satisfaction concurrently and 25 years later. Vocally-encoded emotional arousal (f0 ) was measured during couples' (N = 25 couples) conversations about a relationship issue. Across different analytical strategies, results demonstrate that one partner's f0 dynamics had immediate and long-term associations with the other partner's satisfaction. Partners were less satisfied if the other partner (a) expressed higher f0 overall and (b) escalated more in f0 across the conversation. Yet, partners were more satisfied when their f0 escalated across the conversation. Also, women specifically were more satisfied if their f0 remained elevated longer before regulating back to their emotional baseline. Thus, higher f0 was associated with higher satisfaction in the same partner, but associated with less satisfaction in the other partner-particularly when these emotions come from women. It may be that partners have to decide whether to prioritize expressing their emotions fully or limit expression in the service of their partner's happiness. These findings challenge us to think of ways to address this "win-lose" scenario so that couples can balance both partners' emotional needs and preserve relationship quality across the life span.

El distrés relacional y el divorcio son grandes factores de riesgo para el desarrollo o la exacerbación de alteraciones psicopatológicas y psicosociales. Teniendo en cuenta que las emociones negativas intensificadas dentro de las interacciones de las parejas pueden predecir consecuencias negativas en las relaciones, es fundamental comprender cómo se revelan las emociones a lo largo de una conversación y cómo los integrantes de la pareja pueden influenciar las experiencias emocionales inmediatas del otro. Este estudio examinó si esta dinámica reguladora dentro de una interacción predijo la satisfacción con la relación inmediatamente y 25 años después. Se midió la codificación vocal de la excitación emocional (f0 ) durante las conversaciones de las parejas (N = 25 parejas) acerca de un problema en la relación. Entre diferentes estrategias analíticas, los resultados demuestran que la dinámica de la f0 de uno de los integrantes de la pareja tuvo asociaciones inmediatas y a largo plazo con la satisfacción del otro integrante de la pareja. Los integrantes de la pareja se sentían menos satisfechos si el otro integrante de la pareja (a) expresaba una f0 más elevada en general y (b) escalaba más en la f0 durante la conversación. Sin embargo, los integrantes de la pareja estaban más satisfechos cuando su f0 escalaba a lo largo de la conversación. También, las mujeres estaban específicamente más satisfechas si su f0 se mantenía elevada más tiempo antes de regularla para volver a su momento basal emocional. Por lo tanto, una f0 más elevada se asoció con una mayor satisfacción en el mismo integrante de la pareja, pero se asoció con una menor satisfacción en el otro integrante de la pareja, particularmente cuando estas emociones vienen de las mujeres. Es posible que los integrantes de la pareja tengan que decidir si priorizar la expresión completa de sus emociones o limitar la expresión al servicio de la felicidad de su pareja. Estos resultados nos plantean el desafío de pensar en maneras de abordar esta situación en la que "se gana o se pierde", de manera que las parejas puedan equilibrar las necesidades emocionales de ambos integrantes de la pareja y conservar la calidad de la relación durante su tiempo de vida.

Individual and Relationship Predictors of Couple-Level Sexual Concurrency in Heterosexual South African Couples.

One of the major goals of couple-based HIV prevention programs in sub-Saharan Africa is to reduce outside sex partners, known as sexual concurrency. This cross-sectional study examined sexual concurrency at the couple-level and differentiated couples based on whether neither, one, or both partners engaged in sexual concurrency over the past 6 months. Individual predictors (alcohol use and lifetime history of physical or sexual trauma) and relationship predictors (mistrust, relationship inequity, relationship satisfaction, and sexual satisfaction) were used as predictors of couple-level sexual concurrency. A quantitative investigation using path analysis was carried out with data collected from 286 South African heterosexual couples. Results showed that alcohol use for both sexes, relationship dissatisfaction for women, and mistrust among women were predictive of different types of sexual concurrency. Findings suggest that consideration of the experiences and behavior of both partners may be useful in understanding different reasons for engagement in sexual concurrency.

When the "U" is not Inverted: Trajectories of Expressed Emotional Arousal Predict Relationship Satisfaction.

Maladaptive emotional reactivity and dysfunctional communication during couple conflict are both destructive to couple functioning, and observational research has elucidated how conflict escalates. However, much of the evidence is based on measures that combine content (i.e., what was said) and the emotion with which it was said, which are then examined using sequential analyses. Despite the general presumptions about underlying emotional reactivity and escalation in negative emotions as part of relationship distress and deterioration, little empirical data are available that directly examine these continuous shifts in emotions. The current study examined concurrent and longitudinal associations between relationship satisfaction and trajectories of change in vocally expressed emotional arousal during couple conflict in 62 couples who participated in a relationship education program. Contrary to expectations and patterns found in distressed couples, trajectories followed a U-shape rather than an inverted U-shape curve, with steeper and more persistent decreases in emotional arousal predicting more stable relationship satisfaction over time. In addition, there were within-couple effects. These results suggest that early signs for relationship deterioration may be less in the form of overt escalation as would be seen in distressed couples. Instead, couples who subsequently deteriorate more are less effective in calming emotional arousal. They also are less able to remain at lower emotional arousal. It is possible that the more pronounced escalation toward the end of the conversation in more at-risk couples is a precursor of the greater escalation patterns seen in distressed couples; this should be examined empirically. Limitations and implications are discussed.

La reactividad emocional desadaptativa y la comunicación disfuncional durante el conflicto de pareja son destructivas para el funcionamiento de la pareja, y la investigación observacional ha dilucidado cómo escala el conflicto. Sin embargo, gran parte de la evidencia está basada en mediciones que combinan el contenido (p. ej.: lo que se dijo) y la emoción con la que se dijo, que luego se analizan usando análisis secuenciales. A pesar de las presunciones generales acerca de la reactividad emocional subyacente y la escalada de las emociones negativas como parte del distrés y el deterioro de la relación, existen pocos datos empíricos que analicen directamente estos cambios continuos en las emociones. El presente estudio analizó las asociaciones simultáneas y longitudinales entre la satisfacción con la relación y las trayectorias de cambio en la agitación emocional expresada vocalmente durante el conflicto de pareja en 62 parejas que participaron en un programa de capacitación en relaciones. Contrariamente a las expectativas y los patrones hallados en las parejas problemáticas, las trayectorias siguieron una forma de U en lugar de una curva con forma de U invertida, con disminuciones más pronunciadas y más constantes de la agitación emocional que predicen una satisfacción más estable con la relación en el transcurso del tiempo. Además, hubo efectos dentro de la pareja. Estos resultados sugieren que las primeras señales de deterioro de la relación pueden ser menores en forma de escalada abierta de lo que se vería en las parejas problemáticas. En cambio, las parejas que posteriormente se deterioran más son menos eficaces a la hora de calmar la agitación emocional. También son menos capaces de permanecer en una agitación emocional más baja. Es posible que la escalada más pronunciada hacia el final de la conversación en las parejas con mayor riesgo sea una precursora de los patrones de mayor escalada observados en las parejas problemáticas; esto debería analizarse empíricamente. Se debaten las limitaciones y las consecuencias.

The Association between Symptom Accommodation and Emotional Coregulation in Couples with Binge Eating Disorder.

Intense negative emotions and maladaptive behavioral strategies to reduce emotional distress occur not only in patients with various forms of psychopathology but also in their committed partners. One common strategy to reduce distress is for partners to accommodate to the symptoms of the disorder, which reduces distress short term but maintains symptoms long term. Accommodation is believed to be motivated by the partner reacting behaviorally to the patient's emotions, but the emotions of the partner in this context have yet to be examined. This pilot study examined how partner accommodation related to specific patterns of emotional coregulation between patients with binge eating disorder (BED) and their partners, before and after a couple-based intervention for BED. Vocally encoded emotional arousal was measured during couples' (n = 11) conversations about BED. As predicted, partners' emotional reactivity to patients' emotional arousal was associated with high accommodation before treatment. Thus, partners may use accommodation as a strategy to reduce both the patients' and their own distress. After treatment, partners' arousal was no longer associated with the patients' emotional arousal; instead, partners showed greater emotional stability over time, specifically when accommodation was low. Additionally, patients were less emotionally aroused after treatment. Therefore, treatment may have decreased overall emotionality of patients and altered the association between accommodation and partners' emotional reactivity. If replicated, this understanding of the emotional context associated with accommodation in BED can inform couple-based treatment by targeting specific emotional precipitants of behaviors that maintain symptoms.

La emociones negativas intensas y las estrategias conductuales desadaptativas para reducir el distrés emocional se producen no solo en pacientes con varias formas de psicopatología, sino también en sus parejas estables. Una estrategia común para disminuir el distrés es que las parejas se adapten a los síntomas del trastorno, lo cual reduce el distrés a corto plazo pero mantiene los síntomas a largo plazo. Se cree que la adaptación está motivada por la reacción conductual de la pareja a las emociones del paciente, pero las emociones de la pareja en este contexto aún no se han analizado. Este estudio piloto examinó cómo la adaptación de la pareja está relacionada con patrones específicos de corregulación emocional entre los pacientes con trastorno por atracón de alimentos y sus parejas, antes y después de una intervención en la pareja por trastorno por atracón de alimentos. Se midió la excitación emocional codificada en la voz durante conversaciones de las parejas (n = 11) acerca del trastorno por atracón de alimentos. Como se anticipó, la reacción emocional de las parejas a la excitación emocional de los pacientes estuvo asociada con una alta adaptación antes del tratamiento. Por lo tanto, las parejas pueden usar la adaptación como estrategia para reducir tanto el distrés de los pacientes como el propio. Después del tratamiento, la excitación de las parejas dejó de estar asociada con la excitación emocional de los pacientes. En cambio, las parejas demostraron una mayor estabilidad emocional con el tiempo, específicamente cuando la adaptación fue baja. Además, los pacientes estuvieron menos excitados emocionalmente después del tratamiento. En consecuencia, el tratamiento pudo haber disminuido la emocionalidad general de los pacientes y modificado la asociación entre la adaptación y la reacción emocional de las parejas. Si se reproduce, esta comprensión del contexto emocional asociada con la adaptación en los trastornos por atracón de alimentos puede fundamentar el tratamiento basado en la pareja abordando precipitantes emocionales específicos de conductas que mantienen los síntomas.

Family involvement in eating disorder treatment among Latinas.

Latinos are less likely to seek health care for eating disorders and more likely to drop out of treatment than members of other ethnic groups, highlighting existing challenges to engagement in traditional mental health care. This study explored the role of family in the treatment of adult Latinas with eating disorders through content analysis of family sessions adjunctive to cognitive behavioral therapy. This study yielded insight into the experiences of 10 Latinas with eating disorders (M age = 39.90 years) and 10 relatives (M age = 39.50) from the Promoviendo una Alimentación Saludable trial who were randomly selected to receive six family enhancement sessions. Data from 53 sessions were analyzed using a qualitative content analysis approach. Family intervention might serve as a valuable adjunct to conventional treatment by positively influencing social, family, and emotional support for Latinas with eating disorders.

A pilot open trial of UNITE-BED: A couple-based intervention for binge-eating disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a couple-based intervention for binge-eating disorder (BED), called UNiting couples In the Treatment of Eating disorders-BED edition (UNITE-BED). METHOD: In an open pilot trial, 11 couples in which one or both adult partners had a diagnosis of DSM-5 threshold or sub-threshold BED participated in 22 weekly sessions of UNITE-BED. Patients also received individual treatment, outside of the context of the trial. Couples completed measures on treatment satisfaction, eating disorder symptom severity, depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, and relational functioning at post-treatment and 3-month follow-up. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify change over the course of treatment. RESULTS: UNITE was feasible and acceptable to the majority of couples (9% dropout; high satisfaction ratings). Objective binge abstinence was 81.8% and subjective binge abstinence was 45.5% by post-treatment. Patient binge-eating symptomatology reduced over the course of treatment with results maintained at follow up. Patients' depression symptoms decreased and patients' emotion regulation improved at both time points. DISCUSSION: Including partners in treatment for BED may be beneficial. Results support further evaluation of the efficacy of couple-based interventions for BED in larger randomized-controlled trials.

Couple-based Intervention for Depression: An Effectiveness Study in the National Health Service in England.

This study represents an effectiveness study and service evaluation of a cognitive behavioral, couple-based treatment for depression (BCT-D) provided in London services that are part of the "Improving Access to Psychological Therapies" (IAPT) program in England. Twenty-three therapists in community clinics were trained in BCT-D during a 5-day workshop, followed by monthly group supervision for 1 year. The BCT-D treatment outcome findings are based on 63 couples in which at least one partner was depressed and elected to receive BCT-D. Eighty-five percent of couples also demonstrated relationship distress, and 49% of the nonclient partners also met caseness for depression or anxiety. Findings demonstrated a recovery rate of 57% with BCT-D, compared to 41% for all IAPT treatments for depression in London. Nonclient partners who met caseness demonstrated a 48% recovery rate with BCT-D, although they were not the focus of treatment. BCT-D was equally effective for clients regardless of the clinical status of the nonclient partner, suggesting its effectiveness in assisting both members of the couple simultaneously. Likewise, treatment was equally effective whether or not both partners reported relationship distress. The findings are promising regarding the successful application of BCT-D in routine clinical settings.

A randomized pilot trial of a videoconference couples communication intervention for advanced GI cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a couple-based communication intervention for advanced GI cancer delivered via videoconference. METHODS: Thirty-two couples were randomly assigned to either couples communication skills training (CCST) or an education comparison intervention, both delivered via videoconference. Participation was limited to couples who reported communication difficulties at screening. Patients and partners completed measures of relationship functioning and individual functioning at baseline and post-intervention. RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent of randomized dyads completed all six sessions and reported high levels of satisfaction with the intervention. Between-group effect sizes suggested that the CCST intervention led to improvements in relationship satisfaction for patients and partners and to improvements in intimacy and communication for patients. CONCLUSIONS: A couples-based communication intervention delivered via videoconference is feasible and acceptable in the context of advanced cancer. Preliminary findings suggest that the intervention shows promise in contributing to enhanced relationship functioning. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Worried About us: Evaluating an Intervention for Relationship-Based Anxiety.

Although romantic relationships are commonly a source of pleasure and comfort, for some individuals they can be a source of persistent anxiety. The aim of the current investigation was to explore the construct of relationship-based anxiety and to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief couple-based psychoeducational session for this issue. Common behavioral patterns and cognitive tendencies seen among individuals with relationship-based anxiety were examined, including excessive reassurance-seeking, self-silencing, and partner accommodation. In the current investigation, a single psychoeducational session was developed to address these maladaptive interactive patterns of behavior specifically. The session was administered to a sample of 21 couples and was found to decrease levels of reassurance-seeking and self-silencing significantly among individuals with relationship anxiety, and to decrease levels of maladaptive accommodation behaviors significantly in their partners.

Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapies: Review of the Evidence for the Treatment of Relationship Distress, Psychopathology, and Chronic Health Conditions.

Cognitive-behavioral couple therapy (CBCT) is an approach to assisting couples that has strong empirical support for alleviating relationship distress. This paper provides a review of the empirical status of CBCT along with behavioral couple therapy (BCT), as well as the evidence for recent applications of CBCT principles to couple-based interventions for individual psychopathology and medical conditions. Several meta-analyses and major reviews have confirmed the efficacy of BCT and CBCT across trials in the United States, Europe, and Australia, and there is little evidence to support differential effectiveness of various forms of couple therapy derived from behavioral principles. A much smaller number of effectiveness studies have shown that successful implementation in community settings is possible, although effect sizes tend to be somewhat lower than those evidenced in randomized controlled trials. Adapted for individual problems, cognitive-behavioral couple-based interventions appear to be at least as effective as individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) across a variety of psychological disorders, and often more effective, especially when partners are substantially involved in treatment. In addition, couple-based interventions tend to have the unique added benefit of improving relationship functioning. Findings on couple-based interventions for medical conditions are more varied and more complex to interpret given the greater range of target outcomes (psychological, relational, and medical variables).

Partner distress in the context of adult anorexia nervosa: the role of patients' perceived negative consequences of AN and partner behaviors.

OBJECTIVE: Romantic partners can play an important role in the recovery from anorexia nervosa (AN). It is important to understand partners' behaviors and variables associated with their own distress. The aim was to examine associations of patients' perceived negative consequences of AN, behavioral strategies employed by partners, and partner distress. METHOD: We used a cross-sectional design to assess associations between self-reports of patients' perceived negative consequences of AN, partners' caregiver distress, negative affect, relationship satisfaction, and observational coding measures of partners' behavioral strategies of change promotion and acceptance/validation. Sixteen adult patient-partner dyads in committed relationships were assessed at baseline of a couple-based intervention for AN. RESULTS: Partners' change promotion moderated the association between patients' perceived negative consequences of AN and partners' caregiver distress. Partners' acceptance/validation was associated with partners' negative affect. DISCUSSION: This report represents the first description of specific partner behaviors in the context of AN. Partners who reported the least distress were those who were trying to promote changes in AN behaviors in patients who reported high negative consequences of AN, and partners who were trying to show understanding of the patients' experience. Future studies should examine the impact of partner behaviors on AN treatment outcome.

Couple-Based Interventions for Adults With Eating Disorders.

A significant number of adults with eating disorders fail to achieve relief from the disorder, with many dropping out of treatment or relapsing. The standard treatment remains individual therapy despite partners being negatively affected and typically wanting to help in an effective and loving way. We propose that couple-based interventions, which leverage the support of a partner and the relationship in treatment, may improve outcome and recovery rates for adults with eating disorders. In this article, we survey the empirical literature supporting the treatment of adults in a couple context and describe our existing and emerging couple-based interventions for eating disorders.

Couple-based interventions for psychopathology: a renewed direction for the field.

This article provides a rationale and empirical support for providing couple-based interventions when one partner in a relationship is experiencing individual psychopathology. Several investigations indicate that relationship distress and psychopathology are associated and reciprocally influence each other, such that the existence of relationship distress predicts the development of subsequent psychopathology and vice versa. Furthermore, findings indicate that for several disorders, individual psychotherapy is less effective if the client is in a distressed relationship. Finally, even within happy relationships, partners often inadvertently behave in ways that maintain or exacerbate symptoms for the other individual. Thus, within both satisfied and distressed relationships, including the partner in a couple-based intervention provides an opportunity to use the partner and the relationship as a resource rather than a stressor for an individual experiencing some form of psychological distress. The authors propose that a promising approach to including the partner in treatment involves (a) integrating intervention principles from empirically supported interventions for individual therapy for specific disorders with (b) knowledge of how to employ relationships to promote individual and dyadic change. Based on this logic, the article includes several examples to demonstrate how couple-based interventions can be focused on a specific type of psychopathology, including encouraging empirical findings for these interventions. The article concludes with recommendations for how clinicians and researchers can adapt their knowledge of couple therapy to assist couples in which one partner is experiencing notable psychological distress or diagnosable psychopathology.

The partners for life program: a couples approach to cardiac risk reduction.

Morbidity and mortality are reliably lower for the married compared with the unmarried across a variety of illnesses. What is less well understood is how a couple uses their relationship for recommended lifestyle changes associated with decreased risk for illness. Partners for Life compared a patient and partner approach to behavior change with a patient only approach on such factors as exercise, nutrition, and medication adherence. Ninety-three patients and their spouses/partners consented to participate (26% of those eligible) and were randomized into either the individual or couples condition. However, only 80 couples, distributed across conditions, contributed data to the analyses, due to missing data and missing data points. For exercise, there was a significant effect of couples treatment on the increase in activity and a significant effect of couples treatment on the acceleration of treatment over time. In addition, there was an interaction between marital satisfaction and treatment condition such that patients who reported higher levels of marital distress in the individuals condition did not maintain their physical activity gains by the end of treatment, while both distressed and nondistressed patients in the couples treatment exhibited accelerating gains throughout treatment. In terms of medication adherence, patients in the couples treatment exhibited virtually no change in medication adherence over time, while patients in the individuals treatment showed a 9% relative decrease across time. There were no condition or time effects for nutritional outcomes. Finally, there was an interaction between baseline marital satisfaction and treatment condition such that patients in the individuals condition who reported lower levels of initial marital satisfaction showed deterioration in marital satisfaction, while non satisfied patients in the couples treatment showed improvement over time.

Dual-substance use disorder couples: An integrative review and proposed theoretical model.

Committed romantic relationships between two individuals with Substance Use Disorder (or dual-SUD couples) are prevalent. Dual-SUD couples have poor treatment engagement and outcomes. Research has established a reciprocal link between relationship dynamics (e.g., conflict, intimacy) and substance use. Thus, the couple's relationship presents a distinct social context for both partner's substance use. Dual-SUD couples face unique challenges due to substance use being a shared behavior that may serve as a rewarding source of compatibility, closeness, and short-term relationship satisfaction despite it being at the cost of other alternative sources of substance-free reinforcement. Yet, treatment options for these couples are scarce. Dual-maladaptive health behaviors (e.g., dual-substance use) are challenging to treat; however, theory and preliminary research suggests that transformation of couple's joint motivation toward adaptive health behavior change may result in a more satisfying relationship and improved treatment outcomes for both individuals. The current paper reviews the extant literature on dual-SUD couples from theoretical, empirical, and treatment research and proposes an expanded paradigm regarding how we understand dual-SUD couples with the aim of informing basic research and treatment development.