Voltage mapping and pulmonary vein isolation in master athletes with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Master athletes encompass a wide range of exercise enthusiasts. At the extreme, there is an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). Therapies aimed at rate or rhythm control are often limited given unfavorable side effects. Although studies suggest an increase in left atrial (LA) fibrosis in this population, minimal electrophysiologic data exist regarding the LA voltage mapping and the efficacy of AF ablation with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study, we reviewed AF ablations (pulmonary vein isolation and assessment/ablation of non-pulmonary vein triggers) performed in extreme master athletes with AF. We define "extreme" as those who have repeatedly competed in long distance endurance events for a > 10-year period. Bipolar voltage mappings obtained through PENTARAY Catheter (Biosense Webster) were reviewed using CARTO. LA scarring was defined as an area of less than 0.1 mV. All patients were monitored as outpatients for AF recurrence. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and February 2022, 16 patients (11 marathon runners, four long distance cyclers, and one marathon swimmer) underwent AF ablations. All patients in the cohort were male with an average CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1.2 ± 0.8 and left atrial volume of 34.4 cc/m2  ± 9.9. A total of eight patients (50%) had persistent AF. One patient (6.3%) had LA scar on bipolar voltage mapping, whom also had a non-pulmonary vein trigger of AF. Bidirectional blocks of the four pulmonary veins were achieved by radiofrequency (RF) ablation in all patients. Freedom from documented recurrence of AF up to 24 months was 93.8%. One patient (6.3%) had recurrence of AF at 14 months and underwent successful cardioversion. CONCLUSION: In our series of extreme master athletes with AF, the incidence of LA scarring on bipolar voltage mapping was low and the recurrence of AF following PVI by RF ablation was minimal.

Multiple procedure outcomes for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation: Left atrial posterior wall isolation versus stepwise ablation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare multiple-procedure catheter ablation outcomes of a stepwise approach versus left atrial posterior wall isolation (LA PWI) in patients undergoing nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) ablation. BACKGROUND: Unfavorable outcomes for stepwise ablation of NPAF in large clinical trials may be attributable to proarrhythmic effects of incomplete ablation lines. It is unknown if a more extensive initial ablation strategy results in improved outcomes following multiple ablation procedures. METHODS: Two hundred twenty two consecutive patients with NPAF underwent first-time ablation using a contact-force sensing ablation catheter utilizing either a stepwise (Group 1, n = 111) or LA PWI (Group 2, n = 111) approach. The duration of follow-up was 36 months. The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial arrhythmia >30 s. Secondary endpoints were freedom from persistent arrhythmia, repeat ablation, and recurrent arrhythmia after repeat ablation. RESULTS: There was similar freedom from atrial arrhythmias after index ablation for both stepwise and LA PWI groups at 36 months (60% vs. 69%, p = .1). The stepwise group was more likely to present with persistent recurrent arrhythmia (29% vs. 14%, p = .005) and more likely to undergo second catheter ablation (32% vs. 12%, p < .001) compared to LA PWI patients. Recurrent arrhythmia after repeat ablation was more likely in the stepwise group compared to the LA PWI group (15% vs. 4%, p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a stepwise approach, LA PWI for patients with NPAF resulted in a similar incidence of any atrial arrhythmia, lower incidence of persistent arrhythmia, and fewer repeat ablations. Results for repeat ablation were not improved with a more extensive initial approach.

Leadless pacemakers: Where are we?

Pacemakers have been the cornerstone of brady-arrhythmia management since the mid-20th century. Despite the widespread use and success of traditional transvenous pacemakers, they are associated with an estimated 15 % complication rate at three years. Driven by the advantages over traditional transvenous pacemakers including a lack of transvenous leads, resistance to infection, and ease of implantation, the number of leadless pacemakers placed annually in the United States has dramatically increased since their initial approval. While current iterations of leadless pacemakers lack the versatility offered by transvenous devices, recent advances in leadless pacing offer an increasingly diverse range of therapeutic options. This review will discuss the past, present, and future emerging technologies, and strategies in leadless pacing.

Cardioneuroablation for Drug Refractory Vasovagal Syncope After COVID-19 Infection.

Cardioneuroablation is a novel approach to treat patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope (VVS), targeting the ganglionated plexi around the atria and thus reducing the vagal input to the heart. This study reports a case of drug-refractory VVS after COVID-19 infection, successfully managed with cardioneuroablation.

The utility and impact of outpatient telemetry monitoring in post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients.

BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances are a common complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Mobile Cardiac Telemetry (MCT) allows for continuous monitoring with near "real time" alerts and has allowed for timely detection of conduction abnormalities and pacemaker placement in small trials. A standardized, systematic approach utilizing MCT devices post TAVR has not been widely implemented, leading to variation in use across hospital systems. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the utility of a standardized, systematic approach utilizing routine MCT to facilitate safe and earlier discharge by identifying conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) placement. We also sought to assess the occurrence of actionable arrhythmias in post-TAVR patients. METHODS: Using guidance from the JACC Scientific Expert Panel, a protocol was implemented starting in December 2019 to guide PPM placement post-TAVR across our health system. All patients who underwent TAVR from December 2019 to June 2021 across four hospitals within Northwell Health, who did not receive or have a pre-existing PPM received an MCT device at discharge and were monitored for 30 days. Clinical and follow-up data were collected and compared to pre initiative patients. RESULTS: During the initiative 693 patients were monitored with MCT upon discharge, 21 of whom required PPM placement. Eight of these patients had no conduction abnormality on initial or discharge ECG. 59 (8.6 %) patients were found to have new atrial fibrillation or flutter via MCT monitoring. There were no adverse events in the initiative group. Prior to the initiative, 1281 patients underwent TAVR over a one-year period. The initiative group had significantly shorter length of stay than pre-initiative patients (2.5 ± 4.5 vs 3.0 ± 3.8 days, p < 0.001) and lower overall PPM placement rate within 30 days post-TAVR (16 % vs 20.5 %, P = 0.0125). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, implementation of a standardized, systematic approach utilizing MCT in post-TAVR patients was safe and allowed for timely detection of conduction abnormalities requiring pacemaker placement. This strategy also detected new atrial fibrillation and flutter. Reduction in post TAVR pacemaker rate and length of stay were also noted although this effect is multifactorial.

Durvalumab-Associated Myocarditis Initially Presenting With Sinus Bradycardia Progressing Into Complete Heart Block.

Durvalumab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1). It has been recently approved for the treatment of advanced urothelial and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a more favorable side effect profile compared to traditional chemotherapy agents. We present a case of durvalumab-induced myocarditis complicated by complete heart block (CHB). A 71-year-old male with a history of atrial flutter status post ablation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) recently started on durvalumab, presented with new sinus bradycardia on electrocardiogram (EKG). His initial labs were notable for a troponin T of 207 ng/L (normal range ≤50). Transthoracic echo (TTE) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the coronaries were unremarkable. The hospital course was complicated by CHB on telemetry for 15 minutes. Given hemodynamic instability, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could not be obtained. The patient received transvenous pacing. Electrophysiology and cardiology-oncology were consulted to evaluate for pacemaker implantation as well as management for durvalumab-induced myocarditis. Methylprednisolone 1000 mg intravenous (IV) was started with an improvement in troponin levels but without improvement in CHB. His course was further complicated by polymorphic ventricular tachycardia prompting the placement of a permanent dual-chamber pacemaker. The patient was discharged on a prednisone taper, and durvalumab was discontinued. A diagnosis of durvalumab-induced myocarditis was made based on elevated troponin levels, with the exclusion of coronary artery disease with CTA of the coronaries. The persistence of conduction abnormalities despite treatment with steroids leads to the placement of a permanent pacemaker. Durvalumab falls under the category of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy which are novel agents that have more favorable side effect profiles compared to traditional chemotherapeutic agents. A review of the literature shows myocarditis with arrhythmias as a potentially rare side effect of ICI therapy. Corticosteroid therapy seems to be promising as a potential therapy.

A Case of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Caused by Extension of Type A Aortic Dissection into the Left Main Coronary Artery.

Aortic dissection extending into the left main coronary artery is rare and carries high mortality, especially when resulting in extensive myocardial infarction. Here we report a case of retrograde extension of type A aortic dissection into the left main coronary artery causing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction managed by complex percutaneous coronary intervention, which resulted in temporary stabilization of the patient. We briefly review current literature on this approach.

Concomitant leadless pacing in pacemaker-dependent patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction for active infection: Mid-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The rate of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) due to cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection continues to rise. CIED infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Temporary pacing in patients with active CIED infections after TLE can be challenging. Leadless pacing has emerged as an alternative approach in this patient population. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of a strategy using concomitant leadless pacemaker implantation and TLE in patients with active infections and ongoing pacing requirements. METHODS: This study involved all leadless pacemaker implantation procedures performed during TLE between June 2018 and September 2022 in the setting of active infection. Demographic characteristics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 86 patients with indications for ongoing pacing, 60 (70%) men with mean age 77.4 ± 10.5 years, who underwent TLE and concomitant leadless pacemaker implantation in the setting of active infection. There were no procedure-related complications. Sixty-five patients (76%) had evidence of bacteremia, 80% of whom were discharged to complete their antimicrobial treatment. During a median follow-up of 163 days (interquartile range 57-403 days), there were no recurrent infections. Of the 25 deaths (29%) during the study period, 22 (88%) were unrelated to the initial infection. Nine deceased patients (36%) had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Candida infections, 3 of whom had persistent infection despite TLE. CONCLUSION: Leadless pacing is a safe and efficacious approach for the management of patients with pacing requirements that undergo CIED extraction in the setting of active infection.