Cost-effectiveness analysis of leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: The Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) system is a novel technology used to treat patients with dyssynchronous heart failure (HF) by providing leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Observational studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy profile, however, the treatment cost-effectiveness has not previously been examined. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness evaluation of the WiSE-CRT System was performed using a cohort-based economic model adopting a "proportion in state" structure. In addition to the primary analysis, scenario analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to test for uncertainty in input parameters. Outcomes were quantified in terms of quality-adjusted life year (QALY) differences. RESULTS: The primary analysis demonstrated that treatment with the WiSE-CRT system is likely to be cost-effective over a lifetime horizon at a QALY reimbursement threshold of £20 000, with a net monetary benefit (NMB) of £3781 per QALY. Cost-effectiveness declines at time horizons shorter than 10 years. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that average system battery life had the largest impact on potential cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Within the model limitations, these findings support the use of WiSE-CRT in indicated patients from an economic standpoint. However, improving battery technology should be prioritized to maximize cost-effectiveness in times when health services are under significant financial pressures.

The long-term outcomes of cardiac implantable electronic devices implanted via the femoral route.

BACKGROUND: Conventional superior access for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is not always possible and femoral CIEDs (F-CIED) are an alternative option when leadless systems are not suitable. The long-term outcomes and extraction experiences with F-CIEDs, in particular complex F-CIED (ICD/CRT devices), remain poorly understood. METHODS: Patients referred for F-CIEDs implantation between 2002 and 2019 at two tertiary centers were included. Early complications were defined as ≤30 days following implant and late complications >30 days. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (66% male; age 56 ± 20 years; 35% [11] patients with congenital heart disease) were implanted with F-CIEDs (10 ICD/CRT and 21 pacemakers). Early complications were observed in 6.5% of patients: two lead displacements. Late complications at 6.8 ± 4.4 years occurred in 29.0% of patients. This was higher with complex F-CIED compared to simple F-CIED (60.0% vs. 14.3%, p = .02). Late complications were predominantly generator site related (n = 8, 25.8%) including seven infections/erosions and one generator migration. Eight femoral generators and 14 leads (median duration in situ seven [range 6-11] years) were extracted without complication. CONCLUSIONS: Procedural success with F-CIEDs is high with clinically acceptable early complication rates. There is a notable risk of late complications, particularly involving the generator site of complex devices following repeat femoral procedures. Extraction of chronic F-CIED in experienced centers is feasible and safe.

Dispersion of repolarization increases with cardiac resynchronization therapy and is associated with left ventricular reverse remodeling.

PURPOSE: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces ventricular activation times and electrical dyssynchrony, however the effect on repolarization is unclear. In this study, we sought to investigate the effect of CRT and left ventricular (LV) remodeling on dispersion of repolarization using electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi). METHODS: 11 patients with heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony underwent ECGi 1-day and 6-months post CRT. Reconstructed epicardial electrograms were used to create maps of activation time, repolarization time (RT) and activation recovery intervals (ARI) and calculate measures of RT, ARI and their dispersion. ARI was corrected for heart rate (cARI). RESULTS: Compared to baseline rhythm, LV cARI dispersion was significantly higher at 6 months (28.2 ± 7.7 vs 36.4 ± 7.2 ms; P = 0.03) but not after 1 day (28.2 ± 7.7 vs 34.4 ± 6.8 ms; P = 0.12). There were no significant differences from baseline to CRT for mean LV cARI or RT metrics. Significant LV remodeling (>15% reduction in end-systolic volume) was an independent predictor of increase in LV cARI dispersion (P = 0.04) and there was a moderate correlation between the degree of LV remodeling and the relative increase in LV cARI dispersion (R = -0.49) though this was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: CRT increases LV cARI dispersion, but this change was not fully apparent until 6 months post implant. The effects of CRT on LV cARI dispersion appeared to be dependent on LV reverse remodeling, which is in keeping with evidence that the risk of ventricular arrhythmia after CRT is higher in non-responders compared to responders.

Feasibility of intraprocedural integration of cardiac CT to guide left ventricular lead implantation for CRT upgrades.

BACKGROUND: Optimal positioning of the left ventricular (LV) lead is an important determinant of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the feasibility of intraprocedural integration of cardiac computed tomography (CT) to guide LV lead implantation for CRT upgrades. METHODS: Patients undergoing LV lead upgrade underwent ECG-gated cardiac CT dyssynchrony and LV scar assessment. Target American Heart Association segment selection was determined using latest non-scarred mechanically activating segments overlaid onto real-time fluoroscopy with image co-registration to guide optimal LV lead implantation. Hemodynamic validation was performed using a pressure wire in the LV cavity (dP/dtmax) ). RESULTS: 18 patients (male 94%, 55.6% ischemic cardiomyopathy) with RV pacing burden 60.0 ± 43.7% and mean QRS duration 154 ± 30 ms underwent cardiac CT. 10/10 ischemic patients had CT evidence of scar and these segments were excluded as targets. Seventeen out of 18 (94%) patients underwent successful LV lead implantation with delivery to the CT target segment in 15 out of 18 (83%) of patients. Acute hemodynamic response (dP/dtmax ≥ 10%) was superior with LV stimulation in CT target versus nontarget segments (83.3% vs. 25.0%; p = .012). Reverse remodeling at 6 months (LV end-systolic volume improvement ≥15%) occurred in 60% of subjects (4/8 [50.0%] ischemic cardiomyopathy vs. 5/7 [71.4%] nonischemic cardiomyopathy, p = .608). CONCLUSION: Intraprocedural integration of cardiac CT to guide optimal LV lead placement is feasible with superior hemodynamics when pacing in CT target segments and favorable volumetric response rates, despite a high proportion of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Multicentre, randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate whether intraprocedural integration of cardiac CT is superior to standard care.

Post-operative cardiac implantable electronic devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a contemporary experience.

AIMS: Optimum timing of pacemaker implantation following cardiac surgery is a clinical challenge. European and American guidelines recommend observation, to assess recovery of atrioventricular block (AVB) (up to 7 days) and sinus node (5 days to weeks) after cardiac surgery. This study aims to determine rates of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implants post-surgery at a high-volume tertiary centre over 3 years. Implant timing, patient characteristics and outcomes at 6 months including pacemaker utilization were assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: All cardiac operations (n = 5950) were screened for CIED implantation following surgery, during the same admission, from 2015 to 2018. Data collection included patient, operative, and device characteristics; pacing utilization and complications at 6 months. A total of 250 (4.2%) implants occurred; 232 (3.9%) for bradycardia. Advanced age, infective endocarditis, left ventricle systolic impairment, and valve surgery were independent predictors for CIED implants (P < 0.0001). Relative risk (RR) of CIED implants and proportion of AVB increased with valve numbers operated (single-triple) vs. non-valve surgery: RR 5.4 (95% CI 3.9-7.6)-21.0 (11.4-38.9) CIEDs. Follow-up pacing utilization data were available in 91%. Significant utilization occurred in 82% and underutilization (<1% A and V paced) in 18%. There were no significant differences comparing utilization rates in early (≤day 5 post-operatively) vs. late implants (P = 0.55). CONCLUSION: Multi-valve surgery has a particularly high incidence of CIED implants (14.9% double, 25.6% triple valve). Age, left ventricle systolic impairment, endocarditis, and valve surgery were independent predictors of CIED implants. Device underutilization was infrequent and uninfluenced by implant timing. Early implantation (≤5 days) should be considered in AVB post-multi-valve surgery.

Leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing for CRT upgrades in previously failed and high-risk patients in comparison with coronary sinus CRT upgrades.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrades may be less likely to improve following intervention. Leadless left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing has been used for patients with previously failed CRT or high-risk upgrades. We compared procedural and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing coronary sinus (CS) CRT upgrades with high-risk and previously failed CRT upgrades undergoing LV endocardial upgrades. METHOD AND RESULTS: Prospective consecutive CS upgrades between 2015 and 2019 were compared with those undergoing WiSE-CRT implantation. Cardiac resynchronization therapy response at 6 months was defined as improvement in clinical composite score (CCS) and a reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) ≥15%. A total of 225 patients were analysed; 121 CS and 104 endocardial upgrades. Patients receiving WiSE-CRT tended to have more comorbidities and were more likely to have previous cardiac surgery (30.9% vs. 16.5%; P = 0.012), hypertension (59.2% vs. 34.7%; P < 0.001), chronic obstructive airways disease (19.4% vs. 9.9%; P = 0.046), and chronic kidney disease (46.4% vs. 21.5%; P < 0.01) but similar LV ejection fraction (30.0 ± 8.3% vs. 29.5 ± 8.6%; P = 0.678). WiSE-CRT upgrades were successful in 97.1% with procedure-related mortality in 1.9%. Coronary sinus upgrades were successful in 97.5% of cases with a 2.5% rate of CS dissection and 5.6% lead malfunction/displacement. At 6 months, 91 WiSE-CRT upgrades and 107 CS upgrades had similar improvements in CCS (76.3% vs. 68.5%; P = 0.210) and reduction in LVESV ≥15% (54.2% vs. 56.3%; P = 0.835). CONCLUSION: Despite prior failed upgrades and high-risk patients with more comorbidities, WiSE-CRT upgrades had high rates of procedural success and similar improvements in CCS and LV remodelling with CS upgrades.

The fatal consequence of inappropriate therapy in a single VF zone primary prevention defibrillator.

We report a case of inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy due to single ventricular fibrillation (VF) zone programming leading to patient death. A remote transmission was received from a patient with a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator showing sinus tachycardia in the VF detection zone initiating inappropriate shocks and resulting in shock refractory VF. This case report highlights the importance of manufacturer specific ICD programming. In devices without discrimination in the VF zone, a higher rate single VF detection zone and/or addition of a ventricular tachycardia zone with supraventricular tachycardia discrimination should be considered.

A multi-center experience of ablation index for evaluating lesion delivery in typical atrial flutter.

BACKGROUND: Anatomical studies demonstrate significant variation in cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) architecture. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients underwent CTI ablation at two tertiary centers. Operators delivered 682 lesions with a target ablation index (AI) of 600 Wgs. Ablation parameters were recorded every 10-20 ms. Post hoc, Visitags were trisected according to CTI position: inferior vena cava (IVC), middle (Mid), or ventricular (V) lesions. RESULTS: There were no complications. 92.1% of patients (n = 35) remained in sinus rhythm after 14.6 ± 3.4 months. For the whole CTI, peak AI correlated with mean impedance drop (ID) (R2  = 0.89, p < .0001). However, analysis by anatomical site demonstrated a non-linear relationship Mid CTI (R2  = 0.15, p = .21). Accordingly, while mean AI was highest Mid CTI (IVC: 473.1 ± 122.1 Wgs, Mid: 539.6 ± 103.5 Wgs, V: 486.2 ± 111.8 Wgs, ANOVA p < .0001), mean ID was lower (IVC: 10.7 ± 7.5Ω, Mid: 9.0 ± 6.5Ω, V: 10.9 ± 7.3Ω, p = .011), and rate of ID was slower (IVC: 0.37 ± 0.05 Ω/s, Mid: 0.18 ± 0.08 Ω/s, V: 0.29 ± 0.06 Ω/s, p < .0001). Mean contact force was similar at all sites; however, temporal fluctuations in contact force (IVC: 19.3 ± 12.0 mg/s, Mid: 188.8 ± 92.1 mg/s, V: 102.8 ± 32.3 mg/s, p < .0001) and catheter angle (IVC: 0.42°/s, Mid: 3.4°/s, V: 0.28°/s, p < .0001) were greatest Mid CTI. Use of a long sheath attenuated these fluctuations and improved energy delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Ablation characteristics vary across the CTI. At the Mid CTI, higher AI values do not necessarily deliver more effective ablation; this may reflect localized fluctuations in catheter angle and contact force.

Tracking the motion of intracardiac structures aids the development of future leadless pacing systems.

BACKGROUND: Leadless pacemakers preclude the need for permanent leads to pace endocardium. However, it is yet to be determined whether a leadless pacemaker of a similar design to those manufactured for the right ventricle (RV) fits within the left ventricle (LV), without interfering with intracardiac structures. METHODS: Cardiac computed tomography scans were obtained from 30 patients indicated for cardiac resynchronisation therapy upgrade. The mitral valve annulus, chordae tendineae, papillary muscles and LV endocardial wall were marked in the end-diastolic frame. Intracardiac structures motions were tracked through the cardiac cycle. Two pacemaker designs similar to commercially manufactured leadless systems (Abbott's Nanostim LCP and Medtronic's Micra TPS) as well as theoretical designs with calculated optimal dimensions were evaluated. Pacemakers were virtually placed across the LV endocardial surface and collisions between them and intracardiac structures were detected throughout the cycle. RESULTS: Probability maps of LV intracardiac structures collisions on a 16-segment AHA model indicated possible placement for the Nanostim LCP, Micra TPS, and theoretical designs. Thresholding these maps at a 20% chance of collision revealed only about 36% of the endocardial surface remained collision-free with the deployment of Micra TPS design. The same threshold left no collision-free surface in the case of the Nanostim LCP. To reach at least half of the LV endocardium, the volume of Micra TPS, which is the smaller design, needed to be decreased by 41%. CONCLUSION: Due to the presence of intracardiac structures, placement of leadless pacemakers with dimensions similar to commercially manufactured RV systems would be limited to apical regions.

Electrical latency predicts the optimal left ventricular endocardial pacing site: results from a multicentre international registry.

Aims: The optimal site for biventricular endocardial (BIVENDO) pacing remains undefined. Acute haemodynamic response (AHR) is reproducible marker of left ventricular (LV) contractility, best expressed as the change in the maximum rate of LV pressure (LV-dp/dtmax), from a baseline state. We examined the relationship between factors known to impact LV contractility, whilst delivering BIVENDO pacing at a variety of LV endocardial (LVENDO) locations. Methods and results: We compiled a registry of acute LVENDO pacing studies from five international centres: Johns Hopkins-USA, Bordeaux-France, Eindhoven-The Netherlands, Oxford-United Kingdom, and Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London-UK. In all, 104 patients incorporating 687 endocardial and 93 epicardial pacing locations were studied. Mean age was 66 ± 11 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 24.6 ± 7.7% and mean QRS duration of 163 ± 30 ms. In all, 50% were ischaemic [ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM)]. Scarred segments were associated with worse haemodynamics (dp/dtmax; 890 mmHg/s vs. 982 mmHg/s, P < 0.01). Delivering BiVENDO pacing in areas of electrical latency was associated with greater improvements in AHR (P < 0.01). Stimulating late activating tissue (LVLED >50%) achieved greater increases in AHR than non-late activating tissue (LVLED < 50%) (8.6 ± 9.6% vs. 16.1 ± 16.2%, P = 0.002). However, the LVENDO pacing location with the latest Q-LV, was associated with the optimal AHR in just 62% of cases. Conclusions: Identifying viable LVENDO tissue which displays late electrical activation is crucial to identifying the optimal BiVENDO pacing site. Stimulating late activating tissue (LVLED >50%) yields greater improvements in AHR however, the optimal location is frequently not the site of latest activation.

AV hysteresis causing initiation of recurrent atrial arrhythmias.

A 73-year-old male with dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (Teligen, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) had multiple episodes of automatic mode switch (AMS) during clinical follow-up. Over 50% of these demonstrated a similar pattern of initiation. AV Search+ in combination with sensor rate pacing can cause short-coupled atrial paced intervals that can be proarrhythmic. After programming changes were made AMS burden has significantly decreased.

Predictors and outcomes of patients requiring repeat transvenous lead extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads.

BACKGROUND: A proportion of patients who undergo an initial lead extraction procedure will require a second, repeat extraction. Data regarding this clinical entity are scarce and neither the predisposing risk factors for, nor outcomes from, these procedures have been described previously. We sought to determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of repeat lead extraction. METHODS: A database of extraction procedures from 2001 to 2015 was analyzed. Repeat extraction procedures were identified and the indication for extraction was dichotomized into infection and lead-related problems. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of repeat extraction. RESULTS: 807 extraction procedures were identified in 755 patients of whom 6% required a repeat extraction. At multivariate analysis, only suffering a major complication at the initial extraction procedure (odds ratio [OR] 21.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.69-171.92; P < 0.01), complexity of device (cardiac resynchronization devices/implantable cardioverter defibrillators) (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.2-5.2; P = 0.01), and age (OR 1.02 per year, 95% CI 1.0-1.4; P  =  0.03) were significant predictors of repeat extraction. When repeat extraction was required for infection there was a significant increase in mortality compared with those who did not require a second procedure (36% vs 23%; P  =  0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Repeat lead extraction is required in 6% of cases. Complexity of device, age at extraction, and a major complication at the first extraction were predictors of repeat extraction. Mortality is significantly increased where the repeat procedure is for infection. Clinicians should alert patients to the potential need for further extraction and the increased risks of repeat procedures when indicated for infection.

Substrate-dependent risk stratification for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: The importance of T1 mapping in nonischemic patients.

INTRODUCTION: The role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in nonischemic cardiomyopathy is unclear and better risk-stratification is required. We sought to determine if T1 mapping predicts appropriate defibrillator therapy in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. We studied a mixed cohort of ischemic and nonischemic patients to determine whether different cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) applications (T1 mapping, late gadolinium enhancement, and Grayzone) were selectively predictive of therapies for the different arrhythmic substrates. METHODS AND RESULTS: We undertook a prospective longitudinal study of consecutive patients receiving defibrillators in a tertiary cardiac center. Participants underwent CMR myocardial tissue characterization using T1 mapping and conventional CMR scar assessment before device implantation. QRS duration and fragmentation on the surface electrocardiogram were also assessed. The primary endpoint was appropriate defibrillator therapy. One-hundred thirty patients were followed up for a median of 31 months (IQR ± 9 months). In nonischemic patients, T1_native was the sole predictor of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12 per 10 millisecond increment in value [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.21; P ≤ 0.01]). In ischemic patients, Grayzone_2SD-3SD was the strongest predictor of appropriate therapy (HR 1.34 per 1% left ventricular increment in value [95% CI 1.03-1.76; P = 0.03]). QRS fragmentation correlated well with myocardial scar core (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [ROC AUC] 0.64; P = 0.02) but poorly with T1_native (ROC AUC 0.4) and did not predict appropriate therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In the medium-long term, T1_native mapping was the only independent predictor of therapy in nonischemic patients, whereas Grayzone was a better predictor in ischemic patients. These findings suggest a potential role for T1_native mapping in the selection of patients for ICDs in a nonischemic population.

Biophysical Modeling to Determine the Optimization of Left Ventricular Pacing Site and AV/VV Delays in the Acute and Chronic Phase of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac anatomy and function adapt in response to chronic cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The effects of these changes on the optimal left ventricle (LV) lead location and timing delay settings have yet to be fully explored. OBJECTIVE: To predict the effects of chronic CRT on the optimal LV lead location and device timing settings over time. METHODS: Biophysical computational cardiac models were generated for 3 patients, immediately post-implant (ACUTE) and after at least 6 months of CRT (CHRONIC). Optimal LV pacing area and device settings were predicted by pacing the ACUTE and CHRONIC models across the LV epicardium (49 sites each) with a range of 9 pacing settings and simulating the acute hemodynamic response (AHR) of the heart. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between the distribution of the AHR in the ACUTE and CHRONIC models (P < 0.0005 in all cases). The site delivering the maximal AHR shifted location between the ACUTE and CHRONIC models but provided a negligible improvement (<2%). The majority of the acute optimal LV pacing regions (76-100%) and device settings (76-91%) remained optimal chronically. CONCLUSION: Optimization of the LV pacing location and device settings were important at the time of implant, with a reduced benefit over time, where the majority of the acute optimal LV pacing region and device settings remained optimal with chronic CRT.

Updates in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure: Review of Multisite Pacing.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces the morbidity and mortality of patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and intra-ventricular conduction delay. However, its clinical outcomes are heterogeneous and not all patients show a beneficial response. Multisite pacing (MSP), by stimulating the myocardium from more than one locations, is a potential therapeutic option in patients requiring CRT. This article provides a current update in the methods and outcomes of MSP, as well as in challenges in this field and opportunities for further research and development. RECENT FINDINGS: MSP can be delivered either with multiple leads or with quadripolar LV leads which can stimulate the LV from two separate sites. Initial results are promising but not always consistent across studies. Larger patient subgroups and longer follow-up duration are required for more conclusive evaluation of MSP. Routine use of MSP in clinical practice cannot be advocated at present. In selected patient subgroups, however, MSP could be considered. Newer devices and expanding knowledge are expected to facilitate the more widespread implementation of MSP and the assessment of its effects in the clinical outcomes of CRT.

Improvement of Right Ventricular Hemodynamics with Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular epicardial (BV-CS) or endocardial left ventricular (LV) stimulation (BV-EN) improves LV hemodynamics. The effect of CRT on right ventricular function is less clear, particularly for BV-EN. Our objective was to compare the simultaneous acute hemodynamic response (AHR) of the right and left ventricles (RV and LV) with BV-CS and BV-EN in order to determine the optimal mode of CRT delivery. METHODS: Nine patients with previously implanted CRT devices successfully underwent a temporary pacing study. Pressure wires measured the simultaneous AHR in both ventricles during different pacing protocols. Conventional epicardial CRT was delivered in LV-only (LV-CS) and BV-CS configurations and compared with BV-EN pacing in multiple locations using a roving decapolar catheter. RESULTS: Best BV-EN (optimal AHR of all LV endocardial pacing sites) produced a significantly greater RV AHR compared with LV-CS and BV-CS pacing (P < 0.05). RV AHR had a significantly increased standard deviation compared to LV AHR (P < 0.05) with a weak correlation between RV and LV AHR (Spearman rs = -0.06). Compromised biventricular optimization, whereby RV AHR was increased at the expense of a smaller decrease in LV AHR, was achieved in 56% of cases, all with BV-EN pacing. CONCLUSIONS: BV-EN pacing produces significant increases in both LV and RV AHR, above that achievable with conventional epicardial pacing. RV AHR cannot be used as a surrogate for optimizing LV AHR; however, compromised biventricular optimization is possible. The beneficial effect of endocardial LV pacing on RV function may have important clinical benefits beyond conventional CRT.

Multisite Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Promise and Pitfalls.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces the morbidity and mortality of patients with symptomatic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. However, its clinical outcomes are non-uniform and up to one third of treated patients are subsequently classified as non-responders. Multisite pacing (MSP), i.e. stimulating the myocardium from multiple locations, has emerged as a potential therapeutic option in patients requiring CRT. The rationale for MSP is based on the hypothesis that increasing the pacing locations in the left ventricle results in a more physiologic and coordinated myocardial systole. MSP can be achieved by additional leads in the right or left ventricle but this can lead to high battery drain and more frequent generator replacements. Multipolar left ventricular leads can deliver pacing at multiple sites, and therefore, a single lead can be used for MSP. However, the optimal programming settings and the outcomes of this approach remain yet to be determined.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads provides more pacing vectors compared to bipolar leads. This may avoid phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) and allow optimal lead placement to maximize biventricular pacing. However, a long-term improvement in patient outcome has yet to be demonstrated. METHODS: A total of 721 consecutive patients with conventional CRTD criteria implanted with quadripolar (n = 357) or bipolar (n = 364) LV leads were enrolled into a registry at 3 UK centers. Lead performance and mortality was analyzed over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Patients receiving a quadripolar lead were of similar age and sex to those receiving a bipolar lead, although a lower proportion had ischemic heart disease (62.6% vs. 54.1%, P = 0.02). Both groups had similar rates of procedural success, although lead threshold, impedance, and procedural radiation dose were significantly lower in those receiving a quadripolar lead. PNS was more common in those with quadripolar leads (16.0% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.08), but was eliminated by switching pacing vector in all cases compared with 60% in the bipolar group (P < 0.001). Furthermore, LV lead displacement (1.7% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.03) and repositioning (2.0% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.03) occurred significantly less often in those with a quadripolar lead. All-cause mortality was also significantly lower in the quadripolar compared to bipolar lead group in univariate and multivariate analysis (13.2% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large, multicenter experience, the use of quadripolar LV leads for CRT was associated with elimination of PNS and lower overall mortality. This has important implications for LV pacing lead choice.