Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Inj Prev ; 23(2): 93-101, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27815418

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Childhood poisonings are common, placing a substantial burden on health services. Case-control studies have found inconsistent evidence about modifiable risk factors for poisonings among children aged 0-4 years. This study quantifies associations between poison prevention practices and medically attended poisonings in children aged 0-4 years. METHODS: Multicentre case-control study conducted at hospitals, minor injury units and family practices from four study centres in England between 2010 and 2013. Participants comprised 567 children presenting with unintentional poisoning occurring at home and 2320 community control participants matched on age, sex, date of event and study centre. Parents/caregivers provided data on safety practices, safety equipment use, home hazards and potential confounders by means of self-completion questionnaires. Data were analysed using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared with community controls, parents of poisoned children were significantly more likely not to store medicines out of reach (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.59; 95% CI 1.21 to 2.09; population attributable fraction (PAF) 15%), not to store medicines safely (locked or out of reach (AOR 1.83; 95% CI 1.38 to 2.42; PAF 16%) and not to have put all medicines (AOR 2.11; 95% CI 1.54 to 2.90; PAF 20%) or household products (AOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.48; PAF 11%) away immediately after use. CONCLUSIONS: Not storing medicines out of reach or locked away and not putting medicines and household products away immediately after use increased the odds of secondary care attended poisonings in children aged 0-4 years. If associations are causal, implementing these poison prevention practices could each prevent between 11% and 20% of poisonings.


Assuntos
Prevenção de Acidentes/métodos , Acidentes Domésticos/prevenção & controle , Produtos Domésticos/intoxicação , Pais/educação , Intoxicação/prevenção & controle , Equipamentos de Proteção/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevenção de Acidentes/instrumentação , Acidentes Domésticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Pré-Escolar , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Educação em Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Intoxicação/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Inj Prev ; 20(5): 336-42, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24591447

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To measure the validity of safety behaviours, safety equipment use and hazards reported on a questionnaire by parents/carers with children aged under 5 years participating in a series of home safety case-control studies. METHODS: The questionnaire measured safety behaviours, safety equipment use and hazards being used as exposures in five case-control studies. Responses to questions were compared with observations made during a home visit. The researchers making observations were blind to questionnaire responses. RESULTS: In total, 162 families participated in the study. Overall agreement between reported and observed values of the safety practices ranged from 48.5% to 97.3%. Only 3 safety practices (stair gate at the top of stairs, stair gate at the bottom of stairs, stairs are carpeted) had substantial agreement based on the κ statistic (k=0.65, 0.72, 0.74, respectively). Sensitivity was high (≥70%) for 19 of the 30 safety practices, and specificity was high (≥70%) for 20 of the 30 practices. Overall for 24 safety practices, a higher proportion of respondents over-reported than under-reported safe practice (negative predictive value>positive predictive value). For six safety practices, a higher proportion of respondents under-reported than over-reported safe practice (negative predictive value

Assuntos
Prevenção de Acidentes/normas , Acidentes Domésticos/prevenção & controle , Segurança , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Prevenção de Acidentes/instrumentação , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Pré-Escolar , Inglaterra , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Equipamentos de Proteção/estatística & dados numéricos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
Inj Prev ; 20(5): e10, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24711594

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Childhood unintentional and suspected poisonings are a serious public health problem. Evidence from systematic reviews demonstrates that home safety education in combination with safety equipment provision increases the safe storage of medicines and other products. There is lack of evidence that poisoning prevention practices reduce poisoning rates. OBJECTIVES: To estimate ORs for medically attended poisonings in children aged 0-4 years for items of safety equipment, home hazards and parental safety practices aimed at preventing poisoning, and to explore differential effects by child and family factors. DESIGN: Multicentre case-control study in UK hospitals with validation of parent-reported exposures using home observations. Cases are aged 0-4 years with a medically attended poisoning occurring at home, matched on age and sex with community controls. Children attending hospital for other types of injury will serve as unmatched hospital controls. Matched analyses will use conditional logistic regression; unmatched analyses will use unconditional logistic regression to adjust for confounding variables. The study requires 266 poisoning cases and 1064 matched controls to detect an OR of 0.64 for safe storage of medicinal products and of 0.65 for non-medicinal products, with 80% power, a 5% significance level and a correlation between exposures in cases and controls of 0.1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Unintentional childhood poisoning. DISCUSSION: This will be the largest study to date exploring modifiable risk factors for poisoning in young children. Findings will inform: policy makers developing poison prevention strategies, practitioners delivering poison prevention interventions, parents to reduce the risk of poisoning in their homes.


Assuntos
Prevenção de Acidentes/métodos , Acidentes Domésticos/prevenção & controle , Intoxicação/prevenção & controle , Segurança , Acidentes Domésticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Pais/educação , Intoxicação/epidemiologia , Intoxicação/etiologia , Prevalência , Equipamentos de Proteção/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
4.
BMC Public Health ; 14: 1256, 2014 Dec 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25492496

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To improve the translation of public health evidence into practice, there is a need to increase practitioner involvement in initiative development, to place greater emphasis on contextual knowledge, and to address intervention processes and outcomes. Evidence that demonstrates the need to reduce childhood fire-related injuries is compelling but its translation into practice is inconsistent and limited. With this knowledge the Keeping Children Safe programme developed an "Injury Prevention Briefing (IPB)" using a 7 step process to combine scientific evidence with practitioner contextual knowledge. The IPB was designed specifically for children's centres (CCs) to support delivery of key fire safety messages to parents. This paper reports the findings of a nested qualitative study within a clustered randomised controlled trial of the IPB, in which staff described their experiences of IPB implementation to aid understanding of why or how the intervention worked. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with key staff at 24 CCs participating in the two intervention arms: 1) IPB supplemented by initial training and regular facilitation; 2) IPB sent by post with no facilitation. Framework Analysis was applied to these interview data to explore intervention adherence including; exposure or dose; quality of delivery; participant responsiveness; programme differentiation; and staff experience of IPB implementation. This included barriers, facilitators and suggested improvements. RESULTS: 83% of CCs regarded the IPB as a simple, accessible tool which raised awareness, and stimulated discussion and behaviour change. 15 CCs suggested minor modifications to format and content. Four levels of implementation were identified according to content, frequency, duration and coverage. Most CCs (75%) achieved 'extended' or 'essential' IPB implementation. Three universal factors affected all CCs: organisational change and resourcing; working with hard to engage groups; additional demands of participating in a research study. Six specific factors were associated with the implementation level achieved: staff engagement and training; staff continuity; adaptability and flexibility; other agency support; conflicting priorities; facilitation. CCs achieving high implementation levels increased from 58% (no facilitation) to 92% with facilitation. CONCLUSION: Incorporating service provider perspectives and scientific evidence into health education initiatives enhances potential for successful implementation, particularly when supplemented by ongoing training and facilitation.


Assuntos
Incêndios , Promoção da Saúde , Desenvolvimento de Programas/métodos , Segurança , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controle , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Reino Unido
5.
Top Stroke Rehabil ; 26(6): 440-447, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31170035

RESUMO

Objective: To identify the key components of a biopsychosocial support intervention to improve mental wellbeing for informal stroke carers within the first year post-stroke based on the combined perspectives of experts in the field of psychological care after stroke and informal stroke carers themselves. Methods: After reviewing the existing literature a cross-sectional mixed-methods design was adopted comprising 1) focus groups with informal stroke carers about their psychological support needs, and 2) nominal group technique with academic and clinical stroke care experts to reach consensus on intervention priorities. Transcripts were thematically analyzed and combined with the ranked priorities from the nominal group to identify key components for intervention content. Results: Key themes for informal stroke carers were associated with: 1) changes in relationships, roles, and dynamics; 2) emotional impact and acceptance; 3) drawing on inner resources; 4) looking for information, solutions, and explanations; 5) support from others. The expert nominal group placed priority on eight ranked areas: 1) acknowledging "normal" emotions; 2) education about the effects of a stroke; 3) reactions to loss and adjustment; 4) recognizing signs and symptoms of not coping; 5) knowing how and when to access practical and emotional support; 6) strategies for taking care of own health; 7) dealing with difficult emotions; and 8) problem solving skills. Conclusions: Themes from the informal carer focus groups, and ranked priority areas will inform the development of a biopsychosocial support intervention for stroke carers to be tested in a feasibility randomized controlled trial.


Assuntos
Cuidadores/psicologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/psicologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Adaptação Psicológica , Consenso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação das Necessidades , Sistemas de Apoio Psicossocial
6.
BMJ Open ; 7(10): e018309, 2017 Oct 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29061630

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Reducing length of hospital stay for stroke survivors often creates a shift in the responsibility of care towards informal carers. Adjustment to the caregiving process is experienced by many carers as overwhelming, complex and demanding and can have a detrimental impact on mental and physical health and well-being. National policy guidelines recommend that carers' needs are considered and addressed; despite this, few interventions have been developed and empirically evaluated. We developed a biopsychosocial intervention in collaboration with carers of stroke survivors. Our aim is to determine whether the intervention can be delivered in a group setting and evaluated using a randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Feasibility RCT and nested qualitative interview study. We aim to recruit up to 40 stroke carers within 1 year of the stroke onset. Carers are randomised to usual care or usual care plus biopsychosocial intervention. Each intervention group will consist of five stroke carers. The intervention will focus on: psychoeducation, psychological adjustment to stroke, strategies for reducing unwanted negative thoughts and emotions and problem-solving strategies. The main outcome is the feasibility of conducting an RCT. Carer outcomes at 6 months include: anxiety and depression, quality of life and carer strain. Data are also collected from stroke survivors at baseline and 6 months including: level of disability, anxiety and depression, and quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Favourable ethical opinion was provided by East Midlands - Nottingham2 Research Ethics Committee (14/EMI/1264). This study will determine whether delivery of the biopsychosocial intervention is feasible and acceptable to stroke carers within a group format. It will also determine whether it is feasible to evaluate the effects of the biopsychosocial intervention in an RCT. We will disseminate our findings through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15643456; Pre-results.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/terapia , Cuidadores/psicologia , Depressão/terapia , Psicoterapia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Adaptação Psicológica , Ansiedade/psicologia , Depressão/psicologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa
7.
Burns ; 42(8): 1831-1843, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27576925

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between a range of modifiable risk factors and medically attended scalds in children under the age of 5 years. METHODS: Multicentre matched case-control study in acute hospitals, minor injury units and GP practices in four study centres in England. Cases comprised 338 children under 5 presenting with a scald, and 1438 control participants matched on age, gender, date of event and study centre. Parents/caregivers completed questionnaires on safety practices, safety equipment use, home hazards and potential confounders. Odds ratios were estimated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Parents of cases were significantly more likely than parents of controls to have left hot drinks within reach of their child (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.33, 95%CI 1.63 to 3.31; population attributable fraction (PAF) 31%). They were more likely not to have taught children rules about climbing on kitchen objects (AOR 1.66, 95%CI 1.12 to 2.47; PAF 20%); what to do or not do when parents are cooking (AOR 1.95, 95%CI 1.33 to 2.85; PAF 26%); and about hot things in the kitchen (AOR 1.89, 95%CI 1.30 to 2.75; PAF 26%). CONCLUSIONS: Some scald injuries may be prevented by parents keeping hot drinks out of reach of children and by teaching children rules about not climbing on objects in the kitchen, what to do or not do whilst parents are cooking using the top of the cooker and about hot objects in the kitchen. Further studies, providing a more sophisticated exploration of the immediate antecedents of scalds are required to quantify associations between other hazards and behaviours and scalds in young children.


Assuntos
Acidentes Domésticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Comportamento Infantil , Culinária , Pais/educação , Acidentes Domésticos/prevenção & controle , Queimaduras/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Pré-Escolar , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Educação em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA