Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(1): 261-267, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37622526

RESUMO

Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing and 3-dimensional (3D) printing techniques have revolutionized the approach to bone tissue engineering for the repair of craniomaxillofacial skeletal defects. Ample research has been performed to gain a fundamental understanding of the optimal 3D-printed scaffold design and composition to facilitate appropriate bone formation and healing. Benchtop and preclinical, small animal model testing of 3D-printed bioactive ceramic scaffolds augmented with pharmacological/biological agents have yielded promising results given their potential combined osteogenic and osteoinductive capacity. However, other factors must be evaluated before newly developed constructs may be considered analogous alternatives to the "gold standard" autologous graft for defect repair. More specifically, the 3D-printed bioactive ceramic scaffold's long-term safety profile, biocompatibility, and resorption kinetics must be studied. The ultimate goal is to successfully regenerate bone that is comparable in volume, density, histologic composition, and mechanical strength to that of native bone. In vivo studies of these newly developed bone tissue engineering in translational animal models continue to make strides toward addressing regulatory and clinically relevant topics. These include the use of skeletally immature animal models to address the challenges posed by craniomaxillofacial defect repair in pediatric patients. This manuscript reviews the most recent preclinical animal studies seeking to assess 3D-printed ceramic scaffolds for improved repair of critical-sized craniofacial bony defects.


Assuntos
Engenharia Tecidual , Alicerces Teciduais , Animais , Humanos , Criança , Engenharia Tecidual/métodos , Regeneração Óssea , Osso e Ossos , Osteogênese , Impressão Tridimensional
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 36(3): 561-568, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34115072

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of unsplinted implant-supported single crowns placed in adolescents, ages 10 to 19 years, and followed up from 5 to 15 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective case series evaluated the outcomes of implant-supported single crowns placed in adolescents between June 2002 and January 2015. The patients were treated with locking-taper connection implants under a two-stage rehabilitation technique. The variables assessed included patient identification, age and reason for implant placement, implant dimensions, follow-up time, status at follow-up, and event description. To analyze peri-implant changes, bone crest level relative to the adjacent tooth was measured from periapical radiographs taken after implantation and the latest follow-up. A paired t test was performed to determine initial and follow-up differences, and data are shown as mean and 95% confidence interval. Cumulative Kaplan-Meier survival rates for implants and prostheses were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-one adolescent patients with ages ranging from 14 to 19 years, mainly 16 to 18 years, received a total of 37 implant-supported single crowns more frequently placed in the anterior maxilla as a result of congenital aplasia and trauma. Mean changes in bone crests were 1.99 (± 0.4) mm at the day of crown insertion and 2.23 (± 0.4) mm at the latest follow-up (average: 10 years; P = .08). No implant was lost during the follow-up period, leading to 100% implant survival. A total of 34 surviving crowns and 3 crown failures at the time of the latest follow-up led to a cumulative survival rate of 70%. The most commonly observed event was loss of proximal contacts and infraocclusion, which were handled chairside by adding resin composite. CONCLUSION: Unsplinted implant-supported single crowns placed in adolescents showed high implant and prosthesis survival rates, with a mean bone crest level increase of approximately 0.23 mm relative to the adjacent teeth.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar , Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente , Implantes Dentários , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Coroas , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/efeitos adversos , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Int J Prosthodont ; 33(5): 527-535, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32956434

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To establish the most effective cementation protocol for bonding zirconia crowns to Ti-Base CAD/CAM abutments in terms of abutment height, cement type, and surface pretreatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Zirconia crowns were designed to fit abutments of 2.5-mm (short) and 4.0-mm (tall) height. The retention of conventional resin cement with a universal adhesive (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE) was compared to self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, 3M ESPE) following different surface pretreatments (n = 10/group): (1) no treatment (NT); (2) Ti-Base abutment surface blasting with alumina particles (SB); (3) zirconia crown tribochemical surface blasting with silica-coated alumina particles (TBS); and (4) a combination of SB + TBS. Pull-out testing was performed in a universal testing machine. Data were statistically evaluated using a linear mixed model following least significant difference post hoc test. RESULTS: Pull-out data as a function of Ti-Base height demonstrated higher retention for tall compared to short abutments (P < .001). Ultimate outperformed U200 cement (data collapsed over height and pretreatment) (P < .001). Analysis of pretreatment depicted higher retention for SB + TBS, followed by SB, TBS, and NT (P < .04). The interaction between Ti-Base height and cement type highlighted the superior adhesive strength of Ultimate compared to U200 for both heights (P < .001). Irrespective of type of pretreatment, surface pretreatment improved the retention for U200 cement and short Ti-Base (P < .03 compared to NT). In contrast, higher retention was demonstrated for SB + TBS, followed by SB, TBS, and NT, for Ultimate cement combined with tall Ti-Base (P < .02) (data collapsed over height and cement, respectively). CONCLUSION: There was a direct relationship among Ti-Base height, micromechanical and/or chemical pretreatment, and conventional adhesive bonding in improving the retention of zirconia crowns.


Assuntos
Cimentação , Titânio , Desenho Assistido por Computador , Coroas , Dente Suporte , Análise do Estresse Dentário , Teste de Materiais , Cimentos de Resina , Zircônio
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA