An open label, pilot study of Aerosurf® combined with nCPAP to prevent RDS in preterm neonates.

BACKGROUND: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is an accepted mode of respiratory support for preterm infants with respiratory insufficiency. To avoid potential sequelae of endotracheal (ET) intubation and mechanical ventilation, prophylactic aerosolization of surfactant delivered via nCPAP has been attempted with limited success. METHODS: To determine the feasibility and safety of prophylactic aerosolization of a peptide-containing synthetic surfactant, Aerosurf® (lucinactant for inhalation) was delivered by nCPAP to preterm infants at risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Neonates were enrolled into treatment group 1 (Aerosurf retreatment separated by at least 3 h) or treatment group 2 (Aerosurf retreatment separated by at least 1 h). A vibrating membrane nebulizer Aeroneb Pro® was used to aerosolize 20 mg/mL Aerosurf. All neonates received the initial 3-h treatment, and three retreatments were permitted within 48 h based on clinical response. RESULTS: Seventeen infants were enrolled. Aerosurf was well tolerated, with transient desaturations observed during dosing without bradycardia or hypotension. Variability in output rates of the Aeroneb Pro was observed leading to different average dispensed drug volumes per treatment per patient. All infants survived; 29.4% required subsequent ET surfactant replacement therapy, 23.5% were diagnosed with RDS at 24 h, and 11.8% with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 28 days of life. Mean FiO2 was 0.4 at baseline, and 0.32 at 4 h posttreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Aerosurf can be safely administered via nCPAP in preterm infants at risk for RDS and may provide an alternative to surfactant administration via an ET tube. Further studies are required to evaluate this delivery approach.

A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of lucinactant versus poractant alfa among very premature infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Available therapeutic surfactants are either animal-derived or non-protein-containing synthetic products. Animal-derived surfactants contain variable amounts of surfactant apoproteins, whereas the older-generation synthetic products contain only phospholipids and lack surfactant proteins (SPs). Both decrease morbidity and mortality rates associated with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) among preterm infants, compared with placebo. However, excess mortality rates have been observed with non-protein-containing synthetic surfactants, compared with the animal-derived products. Evidence suggests that synthetic surfactants consisting solely of phospholipids can be improved with the addition of peptides that are functional analogs of SPs. Lucinactant is a new synthetic peptide-containing surfactant that contains sinapultide, a novel, 21-amino acid peptide (leucine and lysine repeating units, KL4 peptide) designed to mimic human SP-B. It is completely devoid of animal-derived components. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the outcomes for premature infants treated with lucinactant and poractant alfa would be similar. Therefore, we compared lucinactant (Surfaxin; Discovery Laboratories, Doylestown, PA) with porcine-derived, poractant alfa (Curosurf; Chiesi Farmaceutici, Parma, Italy) in a trial to test for noninferiority. METHODS: A total of 252 infants born between 24 and 28 weeks of completed gestation, with birth weights between 600 and 1250 g, were assigned randomly in a multicenter, multinational, noninferiority, randomized, controlled study to receive either lucinactant (n = 124) or poractant alfa (n = 128) within 30 minutes of life. The primary outcome was the incidence of being alive without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) through 28 days of age. Key secondary outcomes included death at day 28 and 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), air leaks, neuroimaging abnormalities, and other complications related to either prematurity or RDS. An independent, international, data and safety monitoring committee monitored the trial. RESULTS: The treatment difference between lucinactant and poractant alfa for survival without BPD through 28 days was 4.75% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.3% to 16.8%) in favor of lucinactant, with the lower boundary of the 95% CI for the difference, ie, -7.3%, being greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin of -14.5%. At 28 days, 45 of 119 infants given lucinactant were alive without BPD (37.8%; 95% CI: 29.1-46.5%), compared with 41 of 124 given poractant alfa (33.1%; 95% CI: 24.8-41.3%); at 36 weeks PMA, the rates were 64.7% and 66.9%, respectively. The corresponding mortality rate through day 28 for the lucinactant group was lower than that for the poractant alfa group (11.8% [95% CI: 6.0-17.6%] vs 16.1% [95% CI: 9.7-22.6%]), as was the rate at 36 weeks PMA (16% and 18.5%, respectively). There were no differences in major dosing complications. In addition, no significant differences were observed in the incidences of common complications of prematurity, including intraventricular hemorrhage (grades 3 and 4) and cystic periventricular leukomalacia (lucinactant: 14.3%; poractant alfa: 16.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Lucinactant and poractant alfa were similar in terms of efficacy and safety when used for the prevention and treatment of RDS among preterm infants. The ability to enhance the performance of a synthetic surfactant with the addition of a peptide that mimics the action of SP-B, such as sinapultide, brings potential advantages to exogenous surfactant therapy.

A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing Surfaxin (Lucinactant) lavage with standard care for treatment of meconium aspiration syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Infants with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) have marked surfactant dysfunction. Airways and alveoli of affected neonates contain meconium, inflammatory cells, inflammatory mediators, edema fluid, protein, and other debris. The objective of this study was to compare treatment with bronchoalveolar lavage using dilute Surfaxin with standard therapy in a population of newborn infants with MAS. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were 1) gestational age > or =35 weeks, 2) enrollment within 72 hours of birth, 3) diagnosis of MAS, 4) need for mechanical ventilation, and 5) an oxygenation index > or =8 and < or =25. Subjects were randomized to either lavage with Surfaxin or standard care (2:1 proportion). In lavaged infants, a volume of 8 mL/kg dilute Surfaxin (2.5 mg/mL) was instilled into each lung over approximately 20 seconds followed by suctioning after 5 ventilator breaths. The procedure was repeated twice. The third and final lavage was with a more concentrated solution (10 mg/mL) of Surfaxin. RESULTS: Twenty-two infants were enrolled (15 Surfaxin and 7 control). Demographic characteristics were similar. There were trends (not significant) for Surfaxin-lavaged infants to be weaned from mechanical ventilation earlier (mean of 6.3 vs 9.9 days, respectively), as well as to have a more rapid decline in their oxygenation indexes compared with control infants, the latter difference persisting for the 96-hour-long study period. The therapy was safe and generally well tolerated by the infants. CONCLUSIONS: Dilute Surfaxin lavage seems to be a safe and potentially effective therapy in the treatment of MAS. Data from this investigation support future prospective, controlled clinical trials of bronchoalveolar lavage with Surfaxin in neonates with MAS.