Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 81(1): 37-42, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30779160

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lavender is commonly used in aromatherapy and in a broad range of personal and household products. It has been identified as a contact sensitizer, and has been reported to cause allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with contact allergy and ACD caused by lavender, and to raise awareness of lavender as a potential contact allergen. METHOD: A retrospective database review was performed of patients attending patch testing clinics at the Skin and Cancer Foundation, Victoria, Australia, from January 1, 1993 to December 31, 2017. RESULTS: Among the 2178 patients patch tested with lavender over this period, a total of 58 positive reactions were recorded in 49 individuals, giving a positive patch test prevalence for patients tested with lavender of 2.2%. Twenty-seven patients were diagnosed with ACD. The most common sources of exposure to lavender were personal care products and essential oils. Of the patients with ACD, 74% were tested with lavender absolute, with positive results in 90% of cases. CONCLUSION: Lavender is an uncommon cause of ACD but is important to consider, given the potential for exposure through the use of personal care items and essential oils.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Lavandula/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/química , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Óleos Voláteis/efeitos adversos , Óleos Voláteis/química , Testes do Emplastro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 97(9): 1114-1119, 2017 Oct 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28561874

RESUMO

Epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) is a rare heritable skin fragility disorder, most commonly caused by dominant mutations in KRT5 and KRT14. EBS shows clinical heterogeneity with localised, intermediate and generalised severe forms, which tend to correlate with the location and nature of the disease causing mutations. We therefore aimed to identify the KRT5 and KRT14 mutations in patients diagnosed with EBS in Australia, and explore in depth the genotype to the phenotype correlations in patients with novel variants. Australian patients who were diagnosed with EBS after referral to the Australian National Diagnostic Laboratory for EB were offered mutation screening in the KRT5 and KRT14 genes. From this, 32 different mutations in KRT5 and KRT14 were identified within 39 of 52 pedigrees. Ten of these mutations from 9 different pedigrees were novel, a further fatal case caused by KRT5 E477K is reported and in addition the third reported case of digenic inheritance in EBS was also observed.


Assuntos
Epidermólise Bolhosa Simples/genética , Queratina-14/genética , Queratina-5/genética , Mutação , Austrália , Estudos Transversais , Genótipo , Humanos , Linhagem , Fenótipo
3.
Australas J Dermatol ; 58(3): 214-218, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26914597

RESUMO

Capillary malformations (CM) cause significant psychosocial complications. Pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment at 6-12-weekly intervals under general anaesthesia (GA) commencing in infants at 6 months of age remains the standard of care in order to achieve maximal improvement prior to school age. The safety of repeated GA in children is controversial. Shortening the time between treatments increases the number that can be delivered prior to 6 months of age, thus reducing the number of subsequent treatments needed under GA. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of more frequent PDL treatment of CM in infancy via a pilot, prospective patient-controlled study of 10 patients. Using 595 nm (Vbeam) PDL, the entire CM was treated initially, then half the CM randomly allocated to 2-weekly and half to 3-monthly intervals for two further treatments. Photographs of the CM taken 3 months after treatment completion were evaluated by an independent, blinded dermatologist. Nine infants completed the study. Three infants (33%) had more improvement on the 2-weekly treated side and four (44%) had more improvement on the 3-monthly treated side. Two patients (22%) showed no difference between sides. Treatments were well tolerated without complications. We conclude that 2-weekly PDL treatments of CM in infants aged under 6 months is effective and well tolerated without adverse effects. Our preliminary data suggest a possible superior efficacy with 3-monthly treatment intervals; however, larger studies are warranted for stronger evidence. More frequent non-GA treatment of CM in infants should be further investigated to decrease the risk of repeated GA exposure in young children.


Assuntos
Lasers de Corante/uso terapêutico , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Mancha Vinho do Porto/radioterapia , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Lasers de Corante/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA