Ultrasound findings of finger, wrist and knee joints in Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I.

INTRODUCTION: Musculoskeletal findings in MPS can progress after enzyme replacement. Our aim was to examine synovial recesses, tendons, retinacula and pulleys using ultrasonography for structural and inflammatory changes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal and distal interphalangeal (PIP and DIP) joints, the finger flexor tendons and the knee including entheses of quadriceps and patella tendons were assessed clinically. Ultrasonography of the various synovial recesses of the wrist as well as the extensor retinaculum, carpal tunnel, MCP, PIP and DIP joints of the second finger, extensor and flexor tendons, A1-5 pulleys and the knee joint including relevant entheses followed. Significance of differences between patient values and available normative data were assessed using t-tests. RESULTS: Ultrasonography showed significant abnormal intraarticular material in the wrist without a clear distribution to synovial recesses and without effusions. Doppler signals were found in a perisynovial distribution and not intrasynovial as expected in in inflammatory arthritis. Findings were similar in the knee but not the fingers. Flexor and extensor tendons were also mostly normal in their structure but significant thickening of retinaculae and the flexor tendon pulleys was seen (p<0.0001 compared to normal). CONCLUSION: MPS I patients showed intraarticular deposition of abnormal material in the wrist and knee but not in the finger joints where significant thickening of retinaculae/pulleys controlling tendon position was dominant. No ultrasound findings of inflammatory pathology were demonstrated but rather a secondary reaction to abnormal deposition and direct damage of GAG.

Ottawa Panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Foot Care in the Management of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To create evidence-based guidelines evaluating foot care interventions for the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). DATA SOURCES: An electronic literature search of the following databases from database inception to May 2015 was conducted: MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), Cochrane CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov. STUDY SELECTION: The Ottawa Panel selection criteria targeted studies that assessed foot care or foot orthotic interventions for the management of JIA in those aged 0 to ≤18 years. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale was used to evaluate study quality, of which only high-quality studies were included (score, ≥5). A total of 362 records were screened, resulting in 3 full-text articles and 1 additional citation containing supplementary information included for the analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted study data (intervention, comparator, outcome, time period, study design) from the included studies by using standardized data extraction forms. Directed by Cochrane Collaboration methodology, the statistical analysis produced figures and graphs representing the strength of intervention outcomes and their corresponding grades (A, B, C+, C, C-, D+, D, D-). Clinical significance was achieved when an improvement of ≥30% between the intervention and control groups was present, whereas P>.05 indicated statistical significance. An expert panel Delphi consensus (≥80%) was required for the endorsement of recommendations. DATA SYNTHESIS: All included studies were of high quality and analyzed the effects of multidisciplinary foot care, customized foot orthotics, and shoe inserts for the management of JIA. Custom-made foot orthotics and prefabricated shoe inserts displayed the greatest improvement in pain intensity, activity limitation, foot pain, and disability reduction (grades A, C+). CONCLUSIONS: The use of customized foot orthotics and prefabricated shoe inserts seems to be a good choice for managing foot pain and function in JIA.