Initial experiences of adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and high-risk glycemic control after starting flash glucose monitoring - a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: This study explored early experiences with a flash glucose monitoring system among adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and high-risk glycemic control. METHODS: Adolescents and young adults with high-risk glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 75 mmol/mol (9.0%) in the previous 6 months) who had recently commenced on flash glucose monitoring as part of a trial took part in a semi-structured interview exploring their experiences with the technology. All interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using an inductive approach. RESULTS: Fifteen interviews were conducted. Overall, participants enjoyed flash glucose monitoring and planned to continue using their system. Key findings included flash glucose monitoring reduced diabetes management burden and increased glucose monitoring. Other impacts of flash glucose monitoring use included perceived improved mood and energy, increased capacity for physical activity and less parental conflict. While participants reported healthier glycemic control, participants' mean interstitial glucose level remained above the target range of 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL) over the first month of flash glucose monitoring. Common challenges included premature sensor loss and decreased scanning over the first month of use. CONCLUSIONS: Flash glucose monitoring may be an acceptable self-management tool to increase monitoring frequency in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes and high-risk glycemic control, with the potential to improve long-term glycemic control. Initial support efforts should focus on practical strategies to prolong sensor wear and motivate frequent scanning as well as education on interpreting glucose data and making informed treatment decisions to maximize the benefits of this technology.

Newborn Vitamin K Prophylaxis: A Historical Perspective to Understand Modern Barriers to Uptake.

Since its initial discovery almost a century ago, vitamin K has been labeled as both lifesaving and malignancy causing. This has led to debate of not only its use in general but also regarding its appropriate dose and route. In this article, we review through a historical lens the past 90 years of newborn vitamin K from its discovery through to its modern use of preventing vitamin K deficiency bleeding (VKDB). Although researchers in surveillance studies have shown considerable reductions in VKDB following intramuscular vitamin K prophylaxis, ongoing barriers to the universal uptake of vitamin K prophylaxis remain. Reviewing the history of newborn vitamin K provides an opportunity for a greater understanding of the current barriers to uptake that we face. Although at times difficult, improving this understanding may allow us to address contentious issues related to parental and health professional beliefs and values as well as improve overall communication. The ultimate goal is to improve and maintain the uptake of vitamin K to prevent VKDB in newborns.

The influence of patient variables on insulin total daily dose in paediatric inpatients with new onset type 1 diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: Insulin dose requirements at new diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) vary widely. Current guidelines recommend an initial total daily dose (TDD) ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 IU/kg/day. It often takes several days of frequent dose adjustments before an optimal insulin dose is achieved. The aim of this study was to identify the influence of patient variables on the dose-requirement of insulin in newly diagnosed children with T1DM. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of children (≤ 18 years old) admitted to hospital between 2010 and 2016 due to new onset T1DM was undertaken. Demographic, clinical, insulin dosing, and laboratory data were recorded. The influence of patient characteristics on insulin TDD was analysed statistically by performing univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Complete clinical records for 70 patients were available for analysis. The median insulin TDD on first day of admission was 21 (4.5 to 75 units) and that on the day before discharge was 27 (5.5 to 124 units). In the multivariate regression analysis, body size (total body weight and fat-free mass), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C), and blood ketone concentration were found to be significant predictors of optimal insulin TDD (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In addition to body size, HbA1c and ketone concentrations are useful in calculating initial TDD in newly diagnosed children with T1DM. This could potentially decrease the number of days needed to reach a stable dose and result in improved early glycaemic control.

Clinical review: the misreporting of logbook, download, and verbal self-measured blood glucose in adults and children with type I diabetes.

Despite advances in technology, the frequent self-measurement of blood glucose (SMBG) remains fundamental to the management of 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Once measured, SMBG results are routinely reported back to health professionals and other interested parties, either verbally, via a logbook, or electronically downloaded from a pump or meter. The misreporting of SMBG using various techniques represents a classic non-adherence behavior and carries with it both acute and chronic dangers. In addition, while this behavior appears very prevalent, many aspects remain largely unstudied. With this in mind, we aimed to summarize literature addressing the misreporting of SMBG in T1DM via a detailed literature search. This produced both recent and past literature. While most of these studies examined the prevalence of deliberate misreporting in a verbal or logbook context, others focused on the motivations behind this behavior, and alternative forms of misreporting, including deliberate manipulation of meters to produce inaccurate results and true technological errors. This timely review covers all aspects of misreporting and highlights multiple patient techniques, which are clearly adapting to advances in technology. We believe that further understanding and attention to this aspect of adherence may lead not only to improvements in glycemic control and safety, but also to the psychological well-being of those affected by type 1 diabetes.

Exploring the motivations behind misreporting self-measured blood glucose in adolescents with type 1 diabetes - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in diabetes management, the reporting and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) remains fundamental. While previous work has established that the misreporting of SMBG to family and medical professionals is surprisingly common, the motivations behind this behaviour have never been examined. We aimed to investigate the motivations behind misreporting of SMBG in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). METHODS: Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with adolescents (aged 12-19 inclusive) with T1DM recruited through diabetes clinics across the Otago/Southland region of New Zealand from November 2015 to January 2016. These were transcribed and content analysis performed to identify themes and subthemes in misreporting behaviour. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 15.7 years, 60 % were male, with 67 % using multiple daily insulin injections, and 33 % on insulin pumps. Their median HbA1c was 84 mmol/mol, range 52-130. Misreporting behaviour was described for both electronic pump records and written logbooks, as well as verbally. Multiple motivations for misreporting were given, spanning three major themes: Achieving potential benefits; the avoidance of negative consequences; and the avoidance of worry/concern (in self or in others). The main suggestion of participants to reduce misreporting behaviour was to reduce the negative reactions of others to suboptimal blood glucose readings. CONCLUSION: Electronic, written, and verbal SMBG misreporting remains common. This study provides deeper insight into the motivations leading to this behaviour in adolescents, suggesting that further understanding and attention to this aspect of adherence may lead to improvements not only in glycaemic control and safety, but also to the psychological wellbeing of those with T1DM.