Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 25(2): 123-31, 2007 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17229237

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal infections result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Fluoroquinolones are among the various regimens that are used for the treatment of these infections. AIM: To evaluate the available data from laboratory and clinical studies regarding the use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections. METHODS: We searched for relevant laboratory and clinical studies in the PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases. RESULTS: Good pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of fluoroquinolones in inflamed abdominal tissue are reported in several laboratory studies. In six prospective non-randomized clinical studies of patients with intra-abdominal infections, the clinical success achieved with the use of fluoroquinolones ranged from 77% to 94%. In 10 randomized-controlled trials fluoroquinolone-based regimens were compared with other commonly used (mainly beta-lactam-based) regimens. Clinical success, bacterial eradication, withdrawal because of toxicity and mortality were similar between the compared treatment arms except from two randomized-controlled trials, in which clinical success was statistically higher in the fluoroquinolone treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolones seem to be an effective and relatively safe option for the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections.


Assuntos
Abscesso Abdominal/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Peritonite/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
J Chemother ; 19(2): 178-84, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17434827

RESUMO

Based on the instructions of the National Organization of Pharmaceutical Agents (Greece) from July 1, 2003, quinolones, 3( rd )and 4(th )generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams, glycopeptides, oxazolidinones, and streptogramins were considered as "restricted" antibiotics that could be used only with the approval of an Infectious Disease specialist. We analyzed the effect of the policy on the consumption and cost of antibiotics as a group and of specific classes, adjusted for the patient load, as well as on the antimicrobial resistance of isolated bacteria. We analyzed 5 trimesters (2 prior and 3 after the implementation of the new policy). A 20% and 16% reduction in adjusted consumption [in daily defined doses (DDDs)] and cost, respectively, of the restricted antibiotics was accomplished during the first trimester after implementation of the new policy. However, this was accompanied by a 36% and 56% increase in adjusted consumption and cost, respectively, of unrestricted antibiotics. A logistic regression model that we performed showed that the new policy had an independent positive effect on the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p=0.051) but not of Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli isolates. Our data suggest that there are considerable limitations to the programs aiming to reduce the consumption of restricted antibiotics through the approval of their use by specialists, at least in some settings.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes , Controle de Infecções , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/economia , Uso de Medicamentos , Grécia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Análise Multivariada , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde
3.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 26(12): 849-56, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17712583

RESUMO

We reviewed the bibliographic evidence from comparative trials regarding the role of rifampin as adjuvant treatment in the treatment of Gram-positive infections [PubMed (1/1950-7/2006)]. Only studies reporting comparative outcome data in patients treated with an antibiotic regimen with the addition or not of rifampin were included. Eight comparative studies were identified [all were randomized controlled trials (RCTs)], five reporting on infections caused by staphylococci (S. aureus in 97% of patients) and three by streptococci. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the treatment arms (with and without rifampin) in any of the included studies. Clinical cure was achieved more commonly (p < 0.05) in the rifampin treatment arm in 3/8 studies; in staphylococcal infections of orthopedic stable implants and in beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis in children (one RCT each), and in one RCT that reported on patients with various staphylococcal infections. However, no statistically significant difference in cure of the infection between the two groups was found after pooling data from two RCTs (121 patients) that reported on patients with various staphylococcal infections (odds ratio = 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.27-1.17). No differences were noted between the two groups regarding relapse of infection or adverse events. There is only limited evidence from comparative trials regarding the role of rifampin as adjuvant therapeutic agent for infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria, not allowing for definitive conclusions on this important management question. More controlled trials are necessary for better evaluation of this practice.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Rifampina/uso terapêutico , Humanos
4.
Infection ; 34(1): 46-8, 2006 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16501904

RESUMO

The use of a mesh has been an advance in hernia repair and subsequently has become prevalent worldwide. However, the use of mesh may be associated with both non-infectious and infectious complications. We present here a representative case of a mesh-related infection due to Staphylococcus aureus and review the available data about the incidence, etiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, management, and prevention of this emerging type of foreign body infections.


Assuntos
Hérnia Abdominal/cirurgia , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
5.
Infection ; 34(6): 315-21, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17180585

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Morganella morganii is a commensal Gram-negative bacillus of the intestinal tract of humans and other mammals and reptiles. Few reports exist in the literature regarding infections caused by this organism. METHODS: A retrospective study at the 650-bed University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece was performed during a 4-year period (2001-2004) to identify and analyze infections caused by M. morganii. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients had M. morganii isolated from clinical specimens during the study period. Thirteen patients (54%) suffered from skin and soft tissue infections, five from pyelonephritis, three from female genital tract infections, one from pneumonia, one from gangrenous appendicitis, and one from tonsillitis. M. morganii was a constituent of polymicrobial infections in 14 patients (58%). The patients received various antibiotics, i.e., six patients received ciprofloxacin, four piperacillin/tazobactam, two amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, one ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, one ceftriaxone, one imipenem, and one cefuroxime monotherapy, whereas the remaining eight received antibiotic combinations. Two (both debilitated) of 24 patients (8%) died, despite antibiotic treatment. CONCLUSION: Skin and soft tissue infection was the commonest type of infection due to M. morganii in our series. M. morganii is commonly a part of polymicrobial infections and can rarely cause fatalities in debilitated patients.


Assuntos
Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Morganella morganii/patogenicidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Grécia/epidemiologia , Hospitais com mais de 500 Leitos , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morganella morganii/efeitos dos fármacos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/epidemiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/microbiologia
6.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 24(5): 342-6, 2005 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15834594

RESUMO

In order to expand upon the limited literature estimating the quantity and quality of worldwide research production in the field of microbiology, a bibliometric analysis was conducted for the period 1995-2003 using the PubMed and Journal Citation Reports databases. By searching the "microbiology" category of the Journal Citation Reports database, a total of 74 journals were identified that were also included in PubMed. From these journals, a total of 89,527 articles were identified for analysis, and data on the country in which the research originated was available for 88,456 (98.8%) of them. The individual countries were separated into nine world regions. In terms of research production for the period studied, Western Europe exceeded all other world regions, with the USA ranking second. The mean impact factor was highest for the USA at 3.4, while it was 2.8 for Western Europe and 2.4 for the rest of the world combined. The research productivity per unit of expenditure for research and development was higher for Canada and Western Europe than for the USA. The three regions in which research productivity increased the most were Asia, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.


Assuntos
Bibliometria , Microbiologia/tendências , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa/tendências , África , América , Europa (Continente) , Microbiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/tendências , Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA