Pancreatic polypeptide response to food and cerulein in patients with total gastrectomy.

In order to investigate the intestinal phase of pancreatic polypeptide (PP) release, the hormonal response to food and cerulein was measured in 19 patients with truncal vagotomy and total gastrectomy (10 with simple esophagojejunal anastomosis and 9 with an additional duodenojejunal anastomosis) and in 7 healthy subjects. After gastrectomy, the early peak of the physiologic biphasic PP response to food was lost but the late predominant phase was unchanged so that the overall postprandial release of the hormone was not significantly lowered. Gastrectomized patients with duodenal bypass had postprandial serum levels only slightly lower than those of patients with preserved duodenal transit of food. Serum PP response to cerulein stimulation was significantly lower in vagotomized patients than in healthy subjects. However, in operated patients as well as in controls, cerulein infusion did induce a rapid increase of plasma PP, followed by persistently elevated levels. The PP response to cerulein was abolished by atropine pretreatment. Our findings indicate that the intestinal phase of meal-stimulated PP response is not dependent on the integrity of vagal pancreatic innervation and that the preservation of the duodenal transit of food after total gastrectomy is not crucial for the maintenance of the enteroinsular axis.

No effect of long-term treatment with pancreatic extract on recurrent abdominal pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to investigate the effect of long-term treatment with high-protease pancreatic extract on the recurrent abdominal pain of patients with chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with a firm diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and a pattern of recurrent pain were recruited and randomly assigned to treatment with pancreatic extract (Pancrex-Duo capsules, each containing 34,375 USP units of protease in enteric-coated microspheres) or placebo, at a dose of four capsules four times daily, for 4 months. At the end of the first period patients were switched to the other medication for the next 4 months. Four patients did not complete the study because of unbearable recurring pain or inadequate compliance with treatment. The other 22 patients daily recorded the presence, intensity, and duration of pain and the consumption of analgesics, for 8 months. RESULTS: No difference was found when intraindividual records during placebo and extract treatment periods were compared. Conversely, in the second 4 months of follow-up, regardless of the treatment given in the first period, there was a significant reduction in the cumulative pain score (median, 95; range, 0-1005, versus 134; 0-972; p < 0.05), in the number of days (8; 0-132, versus 13; 0-126; p < 0.02) and hours (54; 0-680, versus 80; 0-602; p < 0.05) of pain, and in the analgesic consumption score (0; 0-22, versus 12; 0-44; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic supplementation with pancreatic extract is not beneficial in the management of recurrent pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

New enteric-coated high-lipase pancreatic extract in the treatment of pancreatic steatorrhea.

We studied a new enteric-coated pancreatic extract with very high lipase content in 12 patients with steatorrhea due to chronic pancreatitis. Fecal fat was measured under standard dietary conditions (100 g lipid/day) with no enzyme supplementation and during treatment with 75,000, 150,000, or 225,000 IU of lipase per day. The median fecal fat output (g/day) was significantly (p < 0.005) lower after each increase in dosage: basal, 20.5 (range, 10.3-92.2); 3 cps/day at meals, 13.3 (6.4-38.2); 6 cps/day, 9.9 (4.8-31.4); 9 cps/day, 7.3 (2.6-17.3). For the five patients with a basal fecal fat output of < 15 g/day, steatorrhea was totally corrected by 3 cps a day. Of the seven patients with more severe steatorrhea, the fecal fat output of only two was not normalized with the highest dose of 9 cps/day: for one it was reduced to 13.3 g/day from a basal of 92.2 g/day and for the other to 17.3 g/day from 25.4 g/day. This pilot study demonstrates that the tested pancreatic extract very effectively corrects pancreatic steatorrhea in a simple low-dose regimen. Good compliance can be expected.

Pancreatic polypeptide secretion after insulin infusion and protein meal in juvenile type 1 diabetic subjects.

An impaired pancreatic polypeptide response (PP) after hypoglycemia has been described in type I diabetic patients with overt autonomic neuropathy. Some authors have suggested that PP release might be useful as sensitive indicator of autonomic neuropathy. The meal test is safer and simpler than the insulin infusion test as PP stimulus. The aim of this study was to compare PP response to insulin infusion and protein meal test and to correlate these responses to the presence of measurable neuropathic disturbances. We thus studied 13 IDDM children and adolescents and 6 normal children. In diabetics the PP response to both tests was not different from that of the control subjects, but PP response to insulin infusion was inversely correlated to the duration of illness and was significantly lower in subjects with pathological heart rate response when compared to the control group. PP responses to the two stimuli were not correlated. We suggest that reduced PP response to hypoglycemia is an early sign of autonomic neuropathy as well as impairment of beat-to-beat variation when impaired PP response to meal test is still not evident.

Determination of CA 19-9 antigen in serum and pancreatic juice for differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis.

Serum CA 19-9 levels were measured in 63 patients with ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma and in 49 patients with chronic pancreatitis. Concentrations were abnormally high (greater than 40 U/ml) in 57 (90%) patients with cancer and only in 5 (10%) patients with chronic pancreatitis. All patients with falsely normal serum values had poorly differentiated carcinomas. Median CA 19-9 concentrations were progressively higher in patients with more advanced cancer. Fifteen of 16 (93%) patients with localized cancer has abnormal serum levels but only 5 (31%) of them had values greater than 120 U/ml, which was the highest score observed in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Pure pancreatic juice was obtained endoscopically from 23 patients with pancreatic cancer and from 20 with chronic pancreatitis. CA 19-9 concentrations in pancreatic juice were significantly higher in patients with cancer than in non-neoplastic patients. All 11 patients with resectable cancer investigated had a ratio of CA 19-9 to secretory protein concentration in pancreatic juice above the range of patients with chronic pancreatitis. We conclude that serum CA 19-9 determination is highly sensitive and specific for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer versus chronic pancreatitis. However, moderately increased values (less than 120 U/ml), as seen in patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma, are not conclusive for malignancy. The measurement of CA 19-9 to total protein ratio in pure pancreatic juice is proposed as an adjunctive, accurate diagnostic marker for early stages of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Partial regression of Barrett's esophagus by long-term therapy with high-dose omeprazole.

BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus is mainly regarded as an acquired condition related to increased gastroesophageal reflux. Thus it is conceivable that abolition of acid reflux would lead to its regression. The aim of this study was to assess whether long-term treatment with high-dose omeprazole (60 mg/day) produces a consistent control of gastric acid production and normalizes the esophageal acid exposure, thus reducing the length of Barrett's epithelium. METHODS: Fourteen patients (8 men and 6 women, mean age 52 years) with histologic diagnosis of columnar epithelium longer than 3 cm in the distal part of the esophagus were enrolled and began receiving 60 mg of omeprazole in a single daily morning dose. Before therapy and after 6 and 12 months of therapy, all patients had endoscopy with four-quadrant biopsies at 2 cm intervals. A 24-hour esophagogastric pH recording was performed at entry and after 10 days, 6 months, and 12 months of treatment in all patients. RESULTS: The initial length of Barrett's epithelium (4.5 +/- 1.9 cm) was significantly reduced after 6 months (3.1 +/- 1.1; p < 0.01) and 12 months (2.1 +/- 1.6; p < 0.005) of treatment. Values were significantly lower at 12 than at 6 months (p < 0.03). The 24-hour mean gastric pH after 10 days (5.89 +/- 0.58), 6 months (5.71 +/- 0.55), and 12 months (5.54 +/- 0.76) of therapy was always higher (p < 0.001) than the basal level (1.9 +/- 0.49). No significant difference in gastric pH was seen over the treatment period. The 24-hour mean percent of time in which pH in the esophagus was below 4.0 decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from a basal rate of 29.4% to 3.5%, 3.0%, and 4.9% in the various time intervals of therapy. There was a normalization of esophageal acid exposure in all patients but two. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that the antisecretory effect of 60 mg/day of omeprazole is consistent and is kept constant throughout the entire 1-year treatment period. The consequent normalization of esophageal acid exposure in almost all patients in our series led to a partial, but significant, regression in the length of Barrett's epithelium.