Validated programmed cell death ligand 1 immunohistochemistry assays (E1L3N and SP142) reveal similar immune cell staining patterns in melanoma when using the same sensitive detection system.

AIMS: Tumour cell and/or immune cell programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is considered as a potential biomarker for anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy. Currently, different PD-L1 assays are used. This study aims to compare the staining patterns of two PD-L1 antibody clones in melanoma metastases and correlate them with PD-L1 mRNA expression. METHODS AND RESULTS: The immunohistochemistry assays were optimized and validated independently on a Ventana Benchmark Ultra (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) (E1L3N) and XT (SP142), using the same detection system. In total, 46 melanoma metastases were stained with both validated immunohistochemistry assays. Stained slides were digitized for qualitative and semi-quantitative evaluation; done by pathologist and semi-automated software analysis. A subset of 21 melanoma metastases was selected for quantification of the PD-L1 mRNA expression. Accuracy and precision criteria were met for both assays. PD-L1 protein and mRNA expression showed remarkably good Spearman's coefficients of 0.90 (E1L3N) and 0.87 (SP142). Despite the remarkable correlation between both PD-L1 assays in expression patterns and quantification values (ρ > 0.90), E1L3N showed significantly more tumour cell staining than SP142. CONCLUSIONS: E1L3N and SP142 IHC assays were optimized and validated successfully and independently for sensitive and accurate PD-L1 detection. Concordance was best for immune cell scoring, while E1L3N tended to detect more tumour cells. Determination of the clinically relevant cut-off values for immune cell versus tumour cell detection requires further research.

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: focus on potential molecular mechanisms of drug resistance.

Targeted therapy against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of the most promising molecular therapeutics for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). EGFR is overexpressed in a wide range of malignancies, including HNSCC, and initiates important signal transduction pathways in HNSCC carcinogenesis. However, primary and acquired resistance are serious problems and are responsible for low single-agent response rate and tumor recurrence. Therefore, an improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms of resistance to EGFR inhibitors may provide valuable indications to identify biomarkers that can be used clinically to predict response to EGFR blockade and to establish new treatment options to overcome resistance. To date, no predictive biomarker for HNSCC is available in the clinic. Therapeutic resistance to anti-EGFR therapy may arise from mechanisms that can compensate for reduced EGFR signaling and/or mechanisms that can modulate EGFR-dependent signaling. In this review, we will summarize some of these molecular mechanisms and describe strategies to overcome that resistance.

Optimal Evaluation of Programmed Death Ligand-1 on Tumor Cells Versus Immune Cells Requires Different Detection Methods.

CONTEXT: - The benefit of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a method to select patients who may benefit from programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 immunotherapies remains uncertain in many tumor indications. OBJECTIVES: - To compare the commercially available, approved PD-L1 IHC assays (22C3, 28-8, SP142, SP263), specifically identifying the changes in staining output created by altering the detection method. DESIGN: - This pilot study investigates the respective PD-L1 kit assay staining patterns and related scoring of tumor cells and immune cells on lung carcinoma and melanoma. Furthermore, the influence of the detection method (platform and related reagents) on PD-L1 antibody performance is studied. RESULTS: - The SP142 kit reveals more immune cell staining but less tumor cell staining than the other PD-L1 kits. Alternatively, the 22C3 and 28-8 kits show good tumor cell sensitivity, but less pronounced immune cell staining, even in tonsil. Tumor cell staining by the SP263 kit is comparable to that of 22C3 and 28-8 kits, while immune cell staining is better. Strikingly, the selection of the detection method has a major impact on the sensitivity of the assay for PD-L1 detection per cell type. Switching the detection method of the kits could largely circumvent the observed staining differences. CONCLUSIONS: - The diverse sensitivities caused by the choice of the detection method should be taken into consideration when selecting PD-L1 kits or developing PD-L1 IHC laboratory-developed tests. When using alternative kits or laboratory-developed tests, it is strongly recommended to reestablish their clinical utility per therapeutic agent or compare them with the original kit.

Establishment and characterization of cetuximab resistant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines: focus on the contribution of the AP-1 transcription factor.

BACKGROUND: After an initial response to EGFR targeted therapy, secondary resistance almost invariably ensues, thereby limiting the clinical benefit of the drug. Hence, it has been recognized that the successful implementation of targeted therapy in the treatment of HNSCC cancer is very much dependent on predictive biomarkers for patient selection. METHODS: We generated an in vitro model of acquired cetuximab resistance by chronically exposing three HNSCC cell lines to increasing cetuximab doses. Gene expression profiles of sensitive parental cells and resistant daughter cells were compared using microarray analysis. Growth inhibitory experiments were performed with an HB-EGF antibody and the MMP inhibitor, both in combination with cetuximab. Characteristics of EMT were analyzed using migration and invasion assays, immunofluorescent vimentin staining and qRT-PCR for several genes involved in this process. The function of the transcription factor AP-1 was investigated using qRT-PCR for several genes upregulated or downregulated in cetuximab resistant cells. Furthermore, anchorage-independent growth was investigated using the soft agar assay. RESULTS: Gene expression profiling shows that cetuximab resistant cells upregulate several genes, including interleukin 8, the EGFR ligand HB-EGF and the metalloproteinase ADAM19. Cytotoxicity experiments with neutralizing HB-EGF antibody could not induce any growth inhibition, whereas an MMP inhibitor inhibited cell growth in cetuximab resistant cells. However, no synergetic effects combined with cetuximab could be observed. Cetuximab resistant cells showed traits of EMT, as witnessed by increased migratory potential, increased invasive potential, increased vimentine expression and increased expression of several genes involved in EMT. Furthermore, expression of upregulated genes could be repressed by the treatment with apigenin. The cetuximab resistant LICR-HN2 R10.3 cells tend to behave differently in cell culture, forming spheres. Therefore, soft agar assay was performed and showed more and larger colonies when challenged with cetuximab compared to PBS challenged cells. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our results indicate that increased expression of the ligand HB-EGF could contribute to resistance towards cetuximab in our cetuximab resistant HNSCC cells. Furthermore, several genes upregulated or downregulated in cetuximab resistant cells are under control of the AP-1 transcription factor. However, more studies are warranted to further unravel the role of AP-1 in cetuximab resistance.

The hypoxic tumor microenvironment and drug resistance against EGFR inhibitors: preclinical study in cetuximab-sensitive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.

BACKGROUND: Increased expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is observed in more than 90% of all head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Therefore, EGFR has emerged as a promising therapeutic target. Nevertheless, drug resistance remains a major challenge and an important potential mechanism of drug resistance involves the hypoxic tumor microenvironment. Therefore, we investigated the cytotoxic effect of the EGFR-targeting agents cetuximab and erlotinib under normoxia versus hypoxia. FINDINGS: Three cetuximab-sensitive HNSCC cell lines (SC263, LICR-HN2 and LICR-HN5) were treated with either cetuximab or erlotinib. Cells were incubated under normal or reduced oxygen conditions (<0.1% O2) for 24 or 72 h immediately after drug addition. Cell survival was assessed with the sulforhodamine B assay. Cetuximab and erlotinib established a dose-dependent growth inhibition under both normal and prolonged reduced oxygen conditions in all three HNSCC cell lines. However, a significantly increased sensitivity to cetuximab was observed in SC263 cells exposed to hypoxia for 72 h (p = 0.05), with IC50 values of 2.38 ± 0.59 nM, 0.64 ± 0.38 nM, and 0.10 ± 0.05 nM under normoxia, hypoxia for 24 h and hypoxia for 72 h, respectively. LICR-HN5 cells showed an increased sensitivity towards erlotinib when cells were incubated under hypoxia for 24 h (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that both EGFR-inhibitors cetuximab and erlotinib maintain their growth inhibitory effect under hypoxia. These results suggest that resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in HNSCC is probably not the result of hypoxic regions within the tumor and other mechanisms are involved.

Overcoming cetuximab resistance in HNSCC: the role of AURKB and DUSP proteins.

Unraveling the underlying mechanisms of cetuximab resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is of major importance as many tumors remain non-responsive or become resistant. Our microarray results suggest that "resistant" cells still exhibit RAS-MAPK pathway signaling contributing to drug resistance, as witnessed by low expression of DUSP5 and DUSP6, negative regulators of ERK1/2, and increased expression of AURKB, a key regulator of mitosis. Therefore, interrupting the RAS-MAPK pathway by an ERK1/2 inhibitor (apigenin) or an AURKB inhibitor (barasertib) might be a new strategy for overcoming cetuximab resistance in HNSCC.

Mutation analysis of genes in the EGFR pathway in Head and Neck cancer patients: implications for anti-EGFR treatment response.

BACKGROUND: Targeted therapy against the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is among the most promising molecular therapeutics for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). However, drug resistance limits the clinical efficacy of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and no predictive biomarker has entered the clinic yet. METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was performed utilizing pathological specimens from 52 newly diagnosed HNSCC patients. These patients were screened for mutations in EGFR and KRAS. Tyrosine kinase mutations in EGFR and KRAS mutations were evaluated by high resolution melting analysis (HRMA), whereas EGFRvIII was determined using one-step real-time PCR. Finally, patient samples were screened for HPV-DNA by GP5+/6+ PCR. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and significance was calculated using log-rank statistic. RESULTS: In our study population no EGFRvIII mutations were present. However, two silent mutations were found; T785T in exon 20 and R836R in exon 21 of the EGFR gene. Additionally, HRMA revealed an abnormal KRAS melting pattern in 7.0% of the samples. However, the KRAS StripAssay could confirm only one sample with a G12S mutation and none of these samples could be confirmed by direct sequencing. HPV DNA was present in 3/25 larynx and 9/27 oropharynx tumors. CONCLUSION: The low rate of EGFR and KRAS mutations in this Belgian HNSCC population suggests that these genes will probably not play a major role in predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy in HNSCC. Hence, other predictive markers need to be discovered in order to optimize EGFR targeting therapy.

The intriguing interplay between therapies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, the hypoxic microenvironment and hypoxia-inducible factors.

Despite their individual key roles in promoting cancer progression and treatment resistance, our knowledge about the impact of tumor hypoxia on the activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway in cancer and vice versa remains limited. Preclinical and clinical studies support an important link between hypoxia and upregulation of EGFR in cancers that do not display genetic alterations of the receptor. Subsequent EGFR signaling stimulates hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) signaling and thus augments induction of proteins that promote cellular survival in a hostile microenvironment. Considering the effects of EGFR-targeting agents under reduced oxygen conditions, it is now accepted that, together with their demonstrated antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects, the antiangiogenic activity of these drugs also contributes to their overall antitumor activity in vivo. Treatment of human tumor cells with EGFR inhibitors leads to decreased HIF-1α and VEGF secretion by tumor cells, resulting in vascular normalization, improved blood flow and thus improved oxygenation. These findings may have major implications with respect to the efficacy of both radiotherapy and subsequent chemotherapy when combined with EGFR inhibitors. A major challenge remains to assess which sequence of these drugs with radiation or chemotherapy is optimal. Moreover, recent data suggest that the lack of clinical responses to EGFR-directed therapy may be circumvented by supplementation of the anti-EGFR therapy with additional approaches targeting HIF-1α or VEGF. Further studies thus are warranted to define the precise mechanistic and therapeutic implications of the hypoxic response relative to the EGFR signaling pathway in cancer.

Expression analysis on archival material revisited: isolation and quantification of RNA extracted from FFPE samples.

BACKGROUND: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the most readily available source of RNA for the gene expression studies. The main disadvantage is the poor quality of isolated RNA. Our group recently compared 5 commercially available RNA isolation kits and concluded that the RNeasy FFPE kit from Qiagen was the most appropriate one. However, this kit has been discontinued and replaced by a new version. In this study both kits were compared, and spectrophotometric and fluorometric analyses for quantification of RNA samples extracted from FFPE tissue. METHODS: Both RNeasy FFPE kits were compared for the total RNA and DNA yields, purity, and raw cycle threshold. Quantity and quality of the isolated RNA was measured using the NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer and Qubit 2.0 fluorometer. RESULTS: The average concentration of RNA extracted from FFPE tissue measured using the NanoDrop was 32.0%±9.5% higher than the concentration measured using the Qubit. When measuring an RNA sample extracted from a cell line, the concentration measured using both methods was similar. When comparing both RNeasy FFPE kits, marginal differences were observed for total RNA yield, purity, and raw cycle threshold. However, the residual DNA in the samples isolated using the old kit was higher than in the samples isolated using the new kit. CONCLUSIONS: A fluorometric analysis is more suitable for quantification of RNA samples extracted from FFPE tissue compared with spectrophotometric analysis. For RNA isolation from FFPE tissue, both old and new RNeasy FFPE kits were adequate. The new kit resulted in more efficient DNA removal.

Expression analysis on archival material: comparison of 5 commercially available RNA isolation kits for FFPE material.

BACKGROUND: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the most common tissue specimen widely available. Moreover, long clinical follow-up is on hand. Therefore, FFPE material is a precious source of material for identifying predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers in cancer research on the basis of gene expression. However, the main drawback of FFPE tissue is the significant reduction in quantity and quality of the extracted RNA. The aim of this study is the comparison of different commercially available kits for the RNA isolation in FFPE tissue material. METHODS: Five commercially available RNA isolation kits were tested and the concentration, purity, integrity, and raw cycle threshold values were determined. RESULTS: The mean total RNA concentrations were as follows: Qiagen 25957±19417 ng, Ambion 8249±2898 ng, SA Biosciences 8070±3700 ng, and Macherey-Nagel 622±394 ng. The mean A260/A280 ratios were as follows: Qiagen: 1.81, SA Biosciences: 0.66, Ambion: 1.03, and Macherey-Nagel: 1.04. The mean A260/A230 ratios were as follows: Qiagen: 1.88, SA Biosciences: 1.61, Ambion: 1.54, and Macherey-Nagel: 1.88. The RNA extractions from Epicentre could not be measured by the Nanodrop and, therefore, were excluded from further analysis. The mean RNA integrity number (range, 2.09 to 2.47) and the mean raw cycle threshold values (range, 33.43 to 35.37) were more or less the same for all the tested RNA isolation kits. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, on the basis of the number of adequate isolations, the kit from Qiagen seems to be the most appropriate kit to be used in our further studies that require RNA isolation from FFPE material.