Complement Inhibitors in the Management of Complement-Mediated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome and Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria.

BACKGROUND: Complement-mediated HUS (CM-HUS) and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) are rare hematologic disorders that cause dysregulation and hyperactivation of the complement system. Historically, treatment of CM-HUS involved plasma exchange (PLEX), often with limited benefit and variable tolerance. Conversely, PNH was treated with supportive care or hemopoietic stem cell transplant. Within the last decade, monoclonal antibody therapies that block terminal complement pathway activation, have emerged as less invasive and more efficacious options for management of both disorders. This manuscript seeks to discuss a relevant clinical case of CM-HUS and the evolving landscape of complement inhibitor therapies for CM-HUS and PNH. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: Eculizumab, the first humanized anti-C5 monoclonal antibody, has been the standard of care in treating CM-HUS and PNH for over a decade. Although eculizumab has remained an effective agent, the variability in ease and frequency of administration has remained an obstacle for patients. The development of novel complement inhibitor therapies with longer half-lives, has allowed for changes in frequency and route of administration, thus improving patient QOL. However, there are limited prospective clinical trial data given disease rarity, and limited information on variable infusion frequency and length of treatment. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: Recently, there has been a push to formulate complement inhibitors that improve QOL while maintaining efficacy. Ravulizumab, a derivative of eculizumab, was developed to allow for less frequent administration, while remaining efficacious. In addition, the novel oral and subcutaneous therapies, danicopan and crovalimab, respectively, along with pegcetacoplan are currently undergoing active clinical trials, and poised to further reduce treatment burden. CONCLUSION: Complement inhibitor therapies have changed the treatment landscape for CM-HUS and PNH. With a significant emphasis on patient QOL, novel therapies continue to emerge and require an in-depth review of their appropriate use and efficacy in these rare disorders. CLINICAL CASE: A 47-year-old woman with hypertension and hyperlipidemia presented with shortness of breath and was found to have hypertensive emergency in the setting of acute renal failure. Her serum creatinine was 13.9 mg/dL; elevated from 1.43 mg/dL 2 years before. The differential diagnosis for her acute kidney injury (AKI) included infectious, autoimmune, and hematologic processes. Infectious work-up was negative. ADAMTS13 activity level was not low at 72.9%, ruling out thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Patient underwent a renal biopsy, which revealed acute on chronic thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). A trial of eculizumab was initiated with concurrent hemodialysis. The diagnosis of CM-HUS was later confirmed by a heterozygous mutation in complement factor I (CFI), resulting in increased membrane attack complex (MAC) cascade activation. The patient was maintained on biweekly eculizumab and was eventually transitioned to ravulizumab infusions as an outpatient. Her renal failure did not recover, and the patient remains on hemodialysis while awaiting kidney transplantation.

Gilteritinib clinical activity in relapsed/refractory FLT3 mutated acute myeloid leukemia previously treated with FLT3 inhibitors.

Gilteritinib is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an FLT3-mutation (FLT3mut+ ). However, the gilteritinib phase 3 ADMIRAL study (Perl et al NEJM 2019) was conducted prior to widespread adoption of either midostaurin as a component of standard intensive induction and consolidation or posttransplant FLT3 inhibitor maintenance. We performed a retrospective analysis using data from 11 US centers and where we identified 113 patients who received gilteritinib alone or as combination therapy for the treatment of R/R FLT3mut+ AML. The composite complete remission (CR) rate (CRc, defined as CR + CRi + CR with incomplete platelet recovery [CRp]) was 48.7% (n = 55). The CRc rate after treatment with gilteritinib in patients who were treated with only prior 7+3 and midostaurin with or without consolidation was 58% with a median survival of 7.8 months. Survival was longest in patients who obtained a CR, particularly a cMRD (clinical minimal or measurable residual disease) negative response; this remained significant after censoring at the time of stem cell transplant. The mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activating mutations that are known for gilteritinib resistance (NRAS, KRAS, and PTPN11) had lower CRc (35% vs. 60.5%) and lower median overall survival than patients' whose leukemia did not express these mutations (4.9 months vs. 7.8 months) (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1. 5.4) p value <.01.

Less is more: An analysis of venetoclax and hypomethylating agent post-induction treatment modifications in AML.

Venetoclax (Ven) combined with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) enhances survival in elderly/unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, yet often necessitates regimen modifications due to intolerance. However, it is unclear how these modifications affect patient outcome. This retrospective cohort study evaluates the impact of post-induction HMA/Ven regimen modifications on disease progression and survival. This study reviewed 142 AML patients treated with HMA/Ven within the Northwell Health System from January 2019 to December 2022. To assess the impact of post-induction regimen modifications, patients were grouped according to median days between cycles (≤34 or ≥35 days cycle intervals) and median Ven days per cycle (≤14 or ≥15 days/cycle) based on only cycle 3 and beyond. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were employed for univariate and multivariate assessments, respectively. There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival (mPFS)(11.6 vs 11.8 months, p = 0.73) or median overall survival (mOS)(15.1 vs 21.8 months, p = 0.16) between cycle interval groups. However, there was a clinically and statistically significant advantage in mPFS (15.8 vs 8.7 months, p = 0.01) and mOS (24.7 vs 11.3 months, p = 0.006) for patients with a median of ≤14 Ven days/cycle compared to ≥15 Ven days/cycle. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ≤14 days of Ven for cycle 3 and beyond was an independent predictor of decreased mortality (HR 0.18, CI 0.07-0.48, p = 0.0007). Extended cycle intervals did not adversely affect mortality while reduced Ven duration per cycle post-induction was associated with improved survival in elderly AML patients.

Poor Outcome of Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma with Current Available Therapy: An Experience of Two Centers.

INTRODUCTION: Adult T-cell leukemia lymphoma (ATLL) is an aggressive mature T-cell neoplasm caused by human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection. Despite its poor prognosis, there is no standard therapy for ATLL due to its low incidence and the disease affecting only endemic geographical clusters. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patients with the diagnosis of ATLL at Moffitt Cancer Center and Memorial Healthcare System was done to identify patients and disease characteristics along with the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the different therapies used. RESULTS: The 61 patients analyzed showed a median age of 58 with 82.5% of them being of African American descent. The acute variant contributed to the majority of cases (43.9%), followed by 36.8% presenting as a lymphoma variant. There was no statistical difference in the PFS (6.4 m, 3.1 m, 2.1 m; p = 0.23) or OS (14 m, 8.9 m, 18.5 m; p = 0.14) between cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), intensive chemotherapy regimens, and other modalities, respectively. However, the patients who had complete or partial remission with first-line therapy had better OS (15.9 m vs. 7.2 m; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the poor outcome of the current regimens and the lack of a unifying protocol for this vicious disease. The acute variants were treated with more intensive regimens, but there was no difference in the OS between the three major options of CHOP, intensified chemotherapy, and others. This underscores the need for more clinical trials to develop better outcomes.

Lrp-DNA complex stability determines the level of ON cells in type P fimbriae phase variation.

F165(1) and the pyelonephritis-associated pili (Pap) are two members of the type P family of adhesive factors that play a key role in the establishment of disease caused by extraintestinal Escherichia coli (ExPEC) strains. They are both under the control of an epigenetic and reversible switch that defines the number of fimbriated (ON) and afimbriated (OFF) cells within a clonal population. Our present study demonstrates that the high level of ON cells found during F165(1) phase variation is due to altered stability of the DNA complex formed by the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) at its repressor binding sites 1-3; after each cell cycle, complex formation is also modulated by the local regulator FooI (homologue to PapI) which promotes the transit of Lrp towards its activator binding sites 4-6. Furthermore, we identified two nucleotides (T490, G508) surrounding the Lrp binding site 1 that are critical to maintaining a high OFF to ON switch rate during F165(1) phase variation, as well as switching Pap fimbriae towards the OFF state.

Use of Mogamulizumab for Cutaneous Adult T-cell Leukemia in a Patient Living With HIV.

Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is known to cause a rare form of leukemia/lymphoma called adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL). Although ATLL is known to have a high co-infection rate with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in areas where both viruses are endemic, clinical trials, such as the phase three trial for mogamulizumab, continue to exclude patients living with HIV. We here describe the utilization and therapeutic course of mogamulizumab for ATLL in a patient living with HIV. Unfortunately, due to exclusion of patients with co-viral infections in trials, decisions regarding clinical care in these patients remain challenging with the need to rely on retrospective publications for safety and efficacy.