Levosimendan and prostaglandin E1 for uptitration of beta-blockade in patients with refractory, advanced chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: In advanced chronic heart failure (CHF) 20% of patients do not tolerate beta-blockers and 50% do not reach target doses. AIM: To test whether levosimendan or prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) can facilitate uptitration of beta-blockers in advanced CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-five advanced CHF patients (LVEF<35%, NYHA class IIIb or IV) intolerant to beta-blocker uptitration to target doses (10 mg bisoprolol/day) were randomised to a monthly 24 h infusion with levosimendan (n=39) or a chronic infusion with PGE1 (n=36) for 3 months. Bisoprolol was uptitrated following predefined criteria. At 12 weeks, bisoprolol dose increased from 4 mg to 10 mg in both groups. Heart failure worsening occurred in 29 levosimendan patients (74%) versus 16 PGE1 patients (44%, p=0.008). Uptitration was impossible in 9 levosimendan patients (23%) versus 2 PGE1 patients (6%, p=0.03). The combined endpoint of death or urgent heart transplantation or implantation of a ventricular assist device was reached by 12 levosimendan patients (31%) versus 4 PGE1 patients (11%, p=0.04). After 1 year, LVEF increased from 23+/-7% to 28+/-11% (p=0.0004), and BNP decreased from 994+/-806 to 659+/-564 pg/ml (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Levosimendan and PGE1 facilitate uptitration of beta-blockers in previously intolerant CHF patients. PGE1 treatment allowed uptitration in more patients and resulted in a better clinical outcome compared to levosimendan. This approach increased LVEF and decreased BNP after 1 year.

B-type natriuretic peptide predicts sudden death in patients with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Given the high incidence of sudden death in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and the efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, an appropriate tool for the prediction of sudden death is desirable. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has prognostic significance in CHF, and the stimuli for its production cause electrophysiological abnormalities. This study tests BNP levels as a predictor of sudden death. METHODS AND RESULTS: BNP levels, in addition to other neurohormonal, clinical, and hemodynamic variables, were obtained from 452 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =35%. For prediction of sudden death, only survivors without heart transplantation (HTx) or a mechanical assist device and patients who died suddenly were analyzed. Up to 3 years, 293 patients survived without HTx or a mechanical assist device, 89 patients died, and 65 patients underwent HTx. Mode of death was sudden in 44 patients (49%), whereas 31 patients (35%) had pump failure and 14 patients (16%) died from other causes. Univariate risk factors of sudden death were log BNP (P=0.0006), log N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide (P=0.003), LVEF (P=0.005), log N-terminal BNP (P=0.006), systolic blood pressure (P=0.01), big endothelin (P=0.03), and NYHA class (P=0.04). In the multivariate model, log BNP level was the only independent predictor of sudden death (P=0.0006). Using a cutoff point of log BNP <2.11 (130 pg/mL), Kaplan-Meier sudden death-free survival rates were significantly higher in patients below (99%) compared with patients above (81%) this cutoff point (P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: BNP levels are a strong, independent predictor of sudden death in patients with CHF.

Short-term effects of levosimendan and prostaglandin E1 on hemodynamic parameters and B-type natriuretic peptide levels in patients with decompensated chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Both levosimendan and prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) have beneficial effects on hemodynamic parameters and outcome compared to dobutamine in decompensated chronic heart failure (CHF). AIMS: We compared short-term effects of levosimendan versus PGE1 on hemodynamic parameters and B-type natriuretic peptide levels (BNP) in patients with decompensated CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: 73 patients (cardiac index < 2.5 L/min/m2, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCP) >15 mmHg) with decompensated CHF were randomised to treatment with either a 24 h-infusion of levosimendan (n=38) or a chronic infusion of PGE1 (n = 35). Hemodynamic parameters and BNP were measured at baseline, 24 and 48 h, BNP levels were also measured after 1 week. Baseline characteristics including concomitant medication were similar in both groups. Levosimendan and PGE1 increased cardiac output (CO) after 24 and 48 h. Levosimendan increased CO twice as much as PGE1 (24 h: Levosimendan +1.1 +/- 0.1 L/min, PGE1 +0.6 +/- 0.1 L/min, p < 0.001). Both drugs produced a comparable reduction in PCP and pulmonary artery pressure after 24 and 48 h. Levosimendan decreased BNP by 28% after 24 h and 22% after 48 h, but effects disappeared after 1 week. In contrast, PGE1 decreased BNP by 15% after 48 h (no change at 24 h), but a decrease of 20% was sustained at 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: The differential beneficial effects of levosimendan (greater increase in CO) and PGE1 (sustained decrease in BNP) may have a potential impact on clinical outcome.

Prognostic power of neurohumoral parameters in chronic heart failure depends on clinical stage and observation period.

BACKGROUND: Endothelin (ET) and natriuretic peptides have prognostic significance in chronic heart failure (CHF). Because stimuli for forming these neurohormones differ, this study investigates whether their prognostic power depends on clinical stage and on length of the observation period. METHODS: Plasma big ET, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal BNP (N-BNP), and N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide (N-ANP), in addition to 11 clinical and hemodynamic variables, were obtained from 452 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)

Impact of hypoxic hepatitis on mortality in the intensive care unit.

PURPOSE: Hypoxic hepatitis (HH) is a form of hepatic injury following arterial hypoxemia, ischemia, and passive congestion of the liver. We investigated the incidence and the prognostic implications of HH in the medical intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A total of 1,066 consecutive ICU admissions at three medical ICUs of a university hospital were included in this prospective cohort study. All patients were screened prospectively for the presence of HH according to established criteria. Independent risk factors of mortality in this cohort of critically ill patients were identified by a multivariate Poisson regression model. RESULTS: A total of 118 admissions (11%) had HH during their ICU stay. These patients had different baseline characteristics, longer median ICU stay (8 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001), and decreased ICU survival (43 vs. 83%, p < 0.001). The crude mortality rate ratio of admissions with HH was 4.62 (95% CI 3.63-5.86, p < 0.001). Regression analysis demonstrated strong mortality risk for admissions with HH requiring vasopressor therapy (adjusted rate ratio 4.91; 95% CI 2.51-9.60, p < 0.001), whereas HH was not significantly associated with mortality in admissions without vasopressor therapy (adjusted rate ratio 1.79, 95% CI 0.52-6.23, p = 0.359). CONCLUSIONS: Hypoxic hepatitis (HH) occurs frequently in the medical ICU. The presence of HH is a strong risk factor for mortality in the ICU in patients requiring vasopressor therapy.

Hypoxic hepatitis: underlying conditions and risk factors for mortality in critically ill patients.

PURPOSE: Hypoxic hepatitis (HH) is a frequent cause of acute hepatocellular damage at the intensive care unit. Although mortality is reported to be high, risk factors for mortality in this population are unknown. METHODS: One-hundred and seventeen consecutive patients with HH were studied prospectively at three medical intensive care units of a university hospital. RESULTS: The main causes of hypoxic hepatitis were low cardiac output and septic shock, and most patients (74%) had more than one underlying factor. Peak aspartate transaminase (P = 0.02), lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.03), INR (P < 0.001) and lactate (P < 0.01) were higher in non-survivors. Prolonged duration of HH caused higher overall mortality rate (P = 0.03). INR > 2 (P = 0.02), septic shock (P = 0.01) and SOFA score >10 (P = 0.04) were risk factors of mortality in the regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoxic hepatitis is the consequence of multiorgan injury. Outcome is influenced by the severity of liver impairment and the etiology and severity of the basic disease.