Complications related to the prehabilitation with preoperative pneumoperitoneum in loss of domain hernias: our experience in 180 consecutive cases.

OBJECTIVE: Progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) is useful tool in the preparation of patients with loss of domain hernias (LODH). The purpose of this observational retrospective study was to report our experience in the management of complications associated with the PPP procedure after treating 180 patients with LODH and to report preventive measures to avoid them. METHODS: Of the 971 patients with a ventral incisional hernia operated on between June 2012 and July 2022, 180 consecutive patients with LODH were retrospectively analysed. Diameters of abdominal cavity, and volumes of incisional hernia and abdominal cavity were calculated from CT scan, based on the modified index of Tanaka. Complications related to the PPP procedure (catheter placement and following insufflations of air) were recorded by Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Complications associated to PPP were 26.6%. No complications occurred during the administration of botulinum toxin (BT). Eighteen patients (10% of 180 patients) developed subcutaneous emphysema during the last days of the insufflations; there were 2 accidental perforations of the small bowel and four punctures with liver and splenic hematomas, detected during catheter placement; a laparotomy, however, was not needed because it was solved with conservative treatment. We diagnosed it as a peritoneum-cutaneous fistula due to the cutaneous atrophy secondary to chronic eventration. CONCLUSION: PPP is a safe technique well tolerated by patients, although at the cost of some specific complications. Hernia surgeons must understand these complications to prevent them and to inform the LODH patient about their existence.

A systematic review of the use of progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum since its inception.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) is a technique that has been used since 1947 to expand the abdominal cavity volume, for presurgical preparation of patients with large hernias. This systematic review attempts to answer some unresolved questions about PPP, while using the evidence to clarify the different forms that the procedure has taken over time. PURPOSE: The purpose of the paper was to analyze the literature about PPP and gather information about the procedure and its indications, advantages, and disadvantages. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The database searches, in English and Spanish, were made using the terms "preoperative pneumoperitoneum," "progressive pneumoperitoneum," "preoperative pneumoperitoneum," and "progressive pneumoperitoneum," for the period between 1 January 1940 and 31 May 2019. Indications, techniques, results, and complications were registered. The statistical analysis was based on means, standard deviations, medians, mode, and interquartile ranges for quantitative variables, and frequencies and percentages for categories. RESULTS: The qualitative synthesis was made on the basis of 53 articles that reported the treatment of a total of 1216 patients. The most frequent indication for PPP was a large incisional hernia with loss of domain. The most common technique employed a spinal needle or multipurpose catheter by the anatomical method in the left hypochondrium. In spite of the heterogeneity of the data and the management of different volumes of air and daily insufflations, 99.6% of visceral reintroduction and 86% of primary fascial closure was achieved. Complications had an incidence of 12%, mostly minor, and there were five mortalities. CONCLUSION: Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) is a beneficial and safe technique to use in preparing patients with large hernias, but the procedure is not free of complications. The technique has evolved through the years and, although many variations exist, it is possible to establish an algorithm for its application.

Component separation and large incisional hernia: predictive factors of recurrence.

PURPOSE: To clarify the factors related to recurrence after component separation technique (CST). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of 381 patients who underwent CST between May 2006 and May 2017 at a tertiary center. All patients had a transverse hernia defect grade W3 in EHS classification. Recurrence rate was determined by clinical examination plus confirmation by abdominal CT scan. RESULTS: At a median of 61.6 months of postoperative follow-up, we reported 34 cases of hernia recurrence (8.9%). On multivariate analysis, BMI > 30 (OR 2.20; CI 1.10-3.91, p = 0.031), immunosuppressive drug use (OR 1.06 CI 1.48-2.75, p = 0.003) and development of surgical site infection (OR 2.7; CI 1.53-4.01, p = 0.002) were factors of recurrence after CST. There was no difference in recurrence rate among repairs of primary and recurrent hernias, urgent repair, operative time, type of prosthesis, or concomitant procedures, even planned or unplanned enterotomies. CONCLUSION: Obesity (BMI > 30), immunosuppressive drug use, and postoperative wound infections were predictors of recurrence after CST.

Modified components separation technique: experience treating large, complex ventral hernias at a University Hospital.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients have large or complex abdominal wall defects. Component separation technique (CST) is a very effective method for reconstructing complex midline abdominal wall defects in a manner that restores innervated muscle function without excessive tension. Our goal is to show our results by a modified CST for treating large ventral hernias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 351 patients with complex ventral hernias have been treated over a 10-year period. Pre- and postoperative CT scans were performed in all patients. All ventral hernias were W3, according to the EHS classification 1. We analyzed demographic variables, co-morbidities, hernia characteristics, operative, and postoperative variables. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy patients (48.4%) were men; the average age of the study population was 51.6 ± 23.2 years with an average BMI of 32.3 ± 1.3. The hernia was located in the midline in 321 cases (91.5%) versus the flank in 30 (8.5%). In 45 patients, preoperative botulinum toxin (BT) and progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) were needed due to giant hernia defects when the VIH/VAC ratio was >20%. Postoperative complications related to the surgical site were seroma (35.1%), hematoma (9.1%), infection (7.2%), and wound necrosis (8.8%). Complications related to the repair were evisceration in 3 patients (1.1%), small bowel fistula in 4 patients (1.5%), 11 cases of mesh infection (2.9%), and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in 2 patients. There were 29 hernia recurrences (8.2%) with a mean follow-up of 31.6 ± 8.1 months. CONCLUSION: The modified CST is an effective strategy for managing complex ventral hernias that enables primary fascial closure with low rates of morbidity and hernia recurrence.