RESUMO
Objective Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is rare in the pediatric population, with most data from the Western world. We aimed to describe the clinical presentation, treatment intervention, histopathological characteristics, complications, follow-up, and response to treatment in 17 patients with DTC at or below the age of 20 years. Interventions This was a retrospective cohort study at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. We included patients aged younger than 20 years with DTC. Total or near-total thyroidectomy was performed in 82% of the patients, central and/or lateral neck dissection in 35% of cases, and radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation in 76% of cases. Results The study included 17 patients (14 females), with a median age of 16 years at the time of diagnosis. Thyroid nodules were the main complaint in 88% of the patients. Thyroid ultrasonography was the main method for the initial evaluation. Papillary cancer was the most common type of tumor, and lymph node spread was found in 82% of the patients. Moreover, 40% of the patients exhibited excellent responses to therapy, with 35% showing indeterminate results. Only 23.5% of the patients developed hypocalcemia postoperatively. Conclusions Classical papillary thyroid carcinoma was the predominant histopathological type, and most patients showed excellent responses to therapy, followed by indeterminate in most of the cases. The most common presentation was a neck nodule, signifying the role of thorough physical neck examinations. Finally, recurrence occurred in a minority of patients. However, none of these patients died.
RESUMO
Opioids are the mainstay of treatment for acute pain in the emergency department. However, its misuse led to the investigation of alternative effective analgesic options for acute pain complaints such as ketamine. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of ketamine in comparison to opioids in the management of acute pain. This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing ketamine to opioids for the relief of acute pain in the ED. Eligible studies were identified by searching the following electronic databases: Medline, Embase, and Central. Studies utilizing either the visual analog scale (VAS) or the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain scoring in ketamine vs opioids were included. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was utilized. A random-effects model was performed, and all outcomes were pooled by the inverse variance weighting method. The total number of studies that met the criteria of systematic reviews was nine of which seven of them were included in the meta-analysis with 789 participants. The overall effect of NRS trials was the standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.31 to 0.17, P-value = 0.56, I2 =85%. While VAS trials showed an overall effect of SMD = -0.02, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.18, P = 0.84, I2 = 59%). Moreover, higher adverse events were reported in opioids; however, this was not statistically significant (SMD = 1.23, 95% CI 0.93-1.64, P = 0.15, I2 =38%). Ketamine for immediate pain relief at 15 minutes could be an effective alternative to opioids, but its overall effect in comparison to opioids for improving the pain has not shown a statistically significant difference. There was high heterogeneity in the included studies; thus, a sub-group analysis was performed.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) infection among patients receiving cancer chemotherapy and to identify risk factors for latent TB reactivation. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Patients were surveyed for TB risk factors, their records were reviewed for previous TB infection or disease, and blood samples were collected for interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs). RESULTS: A total of 203 patients were included. One hundred and twenty-five were females (62%). Median age was 52 years, and mean age was significantly higher in positive IGRA patients compared to negative IGRA (57.32 vs. 47.27; p = 0.009). Twenty-five patients (12.3%) had evidence of TB infection, 16 (68%) among them had a latent TB infection, while the rest received treatment for an active TB disease. The rate of active disease among cancer patients was 8 (3.9%). Additionally, 92% (23) of those with positive IGRA had solid cancers (p = 0.007), and all active TB cases occurred in this group of solid cancers. CONCLUSION: TB prevalence was higher in chemotherapy patients compared to the general Saudi population. Patients with solid tumors and older age had a greater risk of developing the infection, signifying the importance of preventing TB and malignancy coexistence by initiating screening policies in cancer patients.