Large Variations in the Prices of Urologic Procedures at Academic Medical Centers 1 Year After Implementation of the Price Transparency Final Rule.

Importance: Patients with urologic diseases often experience financial toxicity, defined as high levels of financial burden and concern, after receiving care. The Price Transparency Final Rule, which requires hospitals to disclose both the commercial and cash prices for at least 300 services, was implemented to facilitate price shopping, decrease price dispersion, and lower health care costs. Objective: To evaluate compliance with the Price Transparency Final Rule and to quantify variations in the price of urologic procedures among academic hospitals and by insurance class. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study that determined the prices of 5 common urologic procedures among academic medical centers and by insurance class. Prices were obtained from the Turquoise Health Database on March 24, 2022. Academic hospitals were identified from the Association of American Medical Colleges website. The 5 most common urologic procedures were cystourethroscopy, prostate biopsy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, transurethral resection of the prostate, and ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy. Using the corresponding Current Procedural Terminology codes, the Turquoise Health Database was queried to identify the cash price, Medicare price, Medicaid price, and commercial insurance price for these procedures. Exposures: The Price Transparency Final Rule, which went into effect January 1, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Variability in procedure price among academic medical centers and by insurance class (Medicare, Medicaid, commercial, and cash price). Results: Of 153 hospitals, only 20 (13%) listed a commercial price for all 5 procedures. The commercial price was reported most often for cystourethroscopy (86 hospitals [56%]) and least often for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (45 hospitals [29%]). The cash price was lower than the Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial price at 24 hospitals (16%). Prices varied substantially across hospitals for all 5 procedures. There were significant variations in the prices of cystoscopy (χ23 = 85.9; P = .001), prostate biopsy (χ23 = 64.6; P = .001), prostatectomy (χ23 = 24.4; P = .001), transurethral resection of the prostate (χ23 = 51.3; P = .001), and ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy (χ23 = 63.0; P = .001) by insurance type. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that, more than 1 year after the implementation of the Price Transparency Final Rule, there are still large variations in the prices of urologic procedures among academic hospitals and by insurance class. Currently, in certain situations, health care costs could be reduced if patients paid out of pocket. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services may improve price transparency by better enforcing penalties for noncompliance, increasing penalties, and ensuring that hospitals report prices in a way that is easy for patients to access and understand.

A Novel Approach to Teaching Fundoscopy Using a Virtual Format.

Introduction: Ophthalmology education has been underemphasized in medical school curricula despite the fact that patient eye-related complaints are commonplace across primary care specialties. Although previous curricula used direct ophthalmoscopy to teach medical students the fundamentals of ophthalmic examination, there has been a growing call to teach these fundamentals through reading fundus photos due to the increasing prevalence and decreased costs of fundus cameras in primary care settings. We developed a virtual workshop to teach ophthalmoscopy to medical students using fundus photography. Methods: First-year medical students were enrolled in a 2-hour, synchronous, virtual ophthalmoscopy workshop as part of an advanced physical exam curriculum at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Students participated in a pretest, introductory lecture, interactive small-group session, and posttest. Breakout groups were led by senior medical students or residents. We compared pre- and posttest results for improved understanding of concepts covered in the workshop. Results: Of 147 students, the average scores on the pretest and posttest were 39% and 75%, respectively (p < .01). Students were significantly more confident in their ability to identify various pathologies on fundus photography. After the workshop, the student preceptors indicated increased comfort in a teaching role and greater interest in medical education. The preceptors were also more confident in their own ability to interpret fundus photography and in their understanding of various ocular pathologies. Discussion: Our virtual, interactive workshop is effective in teaching medical students a systematic approach to the interpretation of fundus photographs.

Aggregative Adherence and Intestinal Colonization by Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli Are Produced by Interactions among Multiple Surface Factors.

Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) bacteria are exceptional colonizers that are associated with diarrhea. The genome of EAEC strain 042, a diarrheal pathogen validated in a human challenge study, encodes multiple colonization factors. Notable among them are aggregative adherence fimbriae (AAF/II) and a secreted antiaggregation protein (Aap). Deletion of aap is known to increase adherence, autoaggregation, and biofilm formation, so it was proposed that Aap counteracts AAF/II-mediated interactions. We hypothesized that Aap sterically masks heat-resistant agglutinin 1 (Hra1), an integral outer membrane protein recently identified as an accessory colonization factor. We propose that this masking accounts for reduced in vivo colonization upon hra1 deletion and yet no colonization-associated phenotypes when hra1 is deleted in vitro. Using single and double mutants of hra1, aap, and the AAF/II structural protein gene aafA, we demonstrated that increased adherence in aap mutants occurs even when AAF/II proteins are genetically or chemically removed. Deletion of hra1 together with aap abolishes the hyperadherence phenotype, demonstrating that Aap indeed masks Hra1. The presence of all three colonization factors, however, is necessary for optimal colonization and for rapidly building stacked-brick patterns on slides and cultured monolayers, the signature EAEC phenotype. Altogether, our data demonstrate that Aap serves to mask nonstructural adhesins such as Hra1 and that optimal colonization by EAEC is mediated through interactions among multiple surface factors. IMPORTANCE Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) bacteria are exceptional colonizers of the human intestine and can cause diarrhea. Compared to other E. coli pathogens, little is known about the genes and pathogenic mechanisms that differentiate EAEC from harmless commensal E. coli. EAEC bacteria attach via multiple proteins and structures, including long appendages produced by assembling molecules of AafA and a short surface protein called Hra1. EAEC also secretes an antiadherence protein (Aap; also known as dispersin) which remains loosely attached to the cell surface. This report shows that dispersin covers Hra1 such that the adhesive properties of EAEC seen in the laboratory are largely produced by AafA structures. When the bacteria colonize worms, dispersin is sloughed off, or otherwise removed, such that Hra1-mediated adherence occurs. All three factors are required for optimal colonization, as well as to produce the signature EAEC stacked-brick adherence pattern. Interplay among multiple colonization factors may be an essential feature of exceptional colonizers.