Intensive care-related loss of quality of life and autonomy at 6 months post-discharge: Does COVID-19 really make things worse?

OBJECTIVE: To compare old patients hospitalized in ICU for respiratory distress due to COVID-19 with old patients hospitalized in ICU for a non-COVID-19-related reason in terms of autonomy and quality of life. DESIGN: Comparison of two prospective multi-centric studies. SETTING: This study was based on two prospective multi-centric studies, the Senior-COVID-Rea cohort (COVID-19-diagnosed ICU-admitted patients aged over 60) and the FRAGIREA cohort (ICU-admitted patients aged over 70). PATIENTS: We included herein the patients from both cohorts who had been evaluated at day 180 after admission (ADL score and quality of life). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 93 COVID-19 patients and 185 control-ICU patients were included. Both groups were not balanced on age, body mass index, mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and ADL and SAPS II scores. We modeled with ordered logistic regression the influence of COVID-19 on the quality of life and the ADL score. After adjustment on these factors, we observed COVID-19 patients were less likely to have a loss of usual activities (aOR [95% CI] 0.47 [0.23; 0.94]), a loss of mobility (aOR [95% CI] 0.30 [0.14; 0.63]), and a loss of ADL score (aOR [95% CI] 0.30 [0.14; 0.63]). On day 180, 52 (56%) COVID-19 patients presented signs of dyspnea, 37 (40%) still used analgesics, 17 (18%) used anxiolytics, and 14 (13%) used antidepressant. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19-related ICU stay was not associated with a lower quality of life or lower autonomy compared to non-COVID-19-related ICU stay.

Generating genomic platforms to study Candida albicans pathogenesis.

The advent of the genomic era has made elucidating gene function on a large scale a pressing challenge. ORFeome collections, whereby almost all ORFs of a given species are cloned and can be subsequently leveraged in multiple functional genomic approaches, represent valuable resources toward this endeavor. Here we provide novel, genome-scale tools for the study of Candida albicans, a commensal yeast that is also responsible for frequent superficial and disseminated infections in humans. We have generated an ORFeome collection composed of 5099 ORFs cloned in a Gateway™ donor vector, representing 83% of the currently annotated coding sequences of C. albicans. Sequencing data of the cloned ORFs are available in the CandidaOrfDB database at http://candidaorfeome.eu. We also engineered 49 expression vectors with a choice of promoters, tags and selection markers and demonstrated their applicability to the study of target ORFs transferred from the C. albicans ORFeome. In addition, the use of the ORFeome in the detection of protein-protein interaction was demonstrated. Mating-compatible strains as well as Gateway™-compatible two-hybrid vectors were engineered, validated and used in a proof of concept experiment. These unique and valuable resources should greatly facilitate future functional studies in C. albicans and the elucidation of mechanisms that underlie its pathogenicity.

Under Which Conditions Can Older Participants Maintain Information In Working Memory?

Background/Study Context: Age-related deficits in working memory (WM) are commonly described in the literature. However, age-related deficits in WM maintenance mechanisms have received less attention. Based on recent models of WM, the present study aims at determining the conditions under which older adults are able to maintain information. More precisely, we wondered whether the cognitive load effect, taken as evidence for active maintenance in WM, is observed in normal aging and whether it interacts with the level of interference of a concurrent task. METHODS: Young (mean age = 21.62; SD = 2.51) and healthy older (mean age = 71.92; SD = 5.18) participants performed a complex WM task. They had to remember five images while reading three words presented after each image. We compared trials in which every word was new (inducing high interference) with trials where words were repeated (inducing low interference). The pace at which the reading task was performed was either fast or slow, resulting in a high or a low cognitive load. RESULTS: As suggested in the literature, young participants presented better performance at slow pace compared with fast pace but were not influenced by interference. Older participants also performed better at slow pace but only when interference was low. Interestingly, the older population showed negative correlations between slow-pace trials and switching abilities. Finally, although computational simulations with time-based resource sharing* (TBRS*) provide a good fit for young adult performance, several parameters had to be adjusted to fit the older participants' performance, including duration of trace refreshing. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a decrease in WM performance with aging can be explained by a difficulty in taking advantage of WM maintenance opportunities, especially in conditions of high interference. The computational investigations are consistent with this interpretation given that the parameters to be adjusted involve maintenance in WM. Finally, the computational approach seems a relevant way to address causes of forgetting in aging.

Association between out-of-bed mobilization during the ICU stay of elderly patients and long-term autonomy: A cohort study.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to estimate the impact of the absence of Out-of-Bed (OoB) mobilization during intensive care unit (ICU) stay among patients ≥70 years on their long-term autonomy. METHODS: We conducted an ancillary study of the multicenter FRAGIREA study, including patients aged over 70 years, admitted to ICU for more than 48 h. We excluded the patients who died before day 180, who were lost to follow-up, and for whom the baseline autonomy (ADL) score was not available. Patients were classified into the OoB or non-OoB-mobilization group, and the impact of OoB mobilization on the decreased 6-month autonomy was estimated. RESULTS: Among the 548 patients of the FRAGIREA cohort, 276 were included in the present study. Among them, 226 had OoB mobilization and 50 did not. 220/276 (80%) patients experienced the transfer to chair as rehabilitation therapy, passive mobilization and transfer to upright sitting were also frequently performed. A decrease in the 6-month autonomy was observed for 63 (23%) patients. After the elimination of potential confounders, non-OoB-mobilization patients had a greater risk of 6-month decreased autonomy (aOR 2.43 [1.18; 4.98]). CONCLUSIONS: Mobilization during the ICU stay of elderly ICU patient survivors was associated with a lower decreased autonomy at 6 months.

Digestive perforations related to endoscopy procedures: a local management charter based on local evidence and experts' opinion.

Background and study aims Perforations are a known adverse event of endoscopy procedures; a proposal for appropriate management should be available in each center as recommended by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The objective of this study was to establish a charter for the management of endoscopic perforations, based on local evidence. Patients and methods Patients were included if they experienced partial or complete perforation during an endoscopic procedure between 2008 and 2018 (retrospectively until 2016, then prospectively). Perforations (size, location, closure) and management (imagery, antibiotics, surgery) were analyzed. Using these results, a panel of experts was asked to propose a consensual management charter. Results A total of 105 patients were included. Perforations occurred mainly during therapeutic procedures (91, 86.7%). Of the perforations, 78 (74.3 %) were diagnosed immediately and managed during the procedure; 69 of 78 (88.5 %) were successfully closed. Closures were more effective during therapeutic procedures (60 of 66, 90.9 %) than during diagnostic procedures (9 of 12, 75.0 %, P  = 0.06). Endoscopic closure was effective for 37 of 38 perforations (97.4 %) < 0.5 cm, and for 26 of 34 perforations (76.5 %) ≥ 0.5 cm ( P  < 0.05). For perforations < 0.5 cm, systematic computed tomography (CT) scan, antibiotics, or surgical evaluation did not improve the outcome. Four of 105 deaths (3.8 %) occurred after perforation, one of which was attributable to the perforation itself. Conclusions Detection and closure of perforations during endoscopic procedure had a better outcome compared to delayed perforations; perforations < 0.5 cm had a very good prognosis and CT scan, surgeon evaluation, or antibiotics are probably not necessary when the endoscopic closure is confidently performed. This work led to proposal of a local management charter.