Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BJU Int ; 103(8): 1069-73; discussion 1073, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19021604

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of infective events between a single dose and 3-day antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either one preoperative dose consisting of two ciprofloxacin 500 mg tablets 2 h before prostate biopsy, or 3 days of ciprofloxacin treatment. They had a clinical examination at study inclusion, the day of the biopsy and 3 weeks later. The day after the procedure all patients were contacted by telephone to inquire about any significant event. Biological testing and urine cultures were conducted 5 days before and then 5 and 15 days after the biopsy; a self-administered symptom questionnaire was completed by the patient 5 days before and then at 5 and 15 days. RESULTS: The study group included 288 men, of whom 139 were randomized to the single-dose arm and 149 to the 3-day arm. Six patients in each group had an asymptomatic bacteriuria with no leukocyturia. One patient in each group had documented prostatitis, with Escherichia coli identified on urine culture. The strain identified in the patient from the 3-day group was resistant to ciprofloxacin. There was no difference between groups in symptoms at 5 and 21 days after biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Current TRUS-guided prostate biopsy techniques lead to very few clinical infectious complications when accompanied by antibiotic prophylaxis. We found no argument to advocate the use of more than one dose of antibiotic prophylaxis.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Bacteriúria/prevenção & controle , Ciprofloxacina/administração & dosagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Ultrassom Focalizado Transretal de Alta Intensidade/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Esquema de Medicação , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
2.
Urol Int ; 83(2): 160-5, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19752610

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The percentage of positive prostate biopsy cores (%PBC) has been shown to be a prognostic factor in localized prostate cancer. We hypothesized that it would predict time to hormonal independence and survival in prostate cancer patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used clinical data from 403 men treated with ADT between 1980 and 1999 and focused on a subgroup of 220 patients treated with GnRH analogue. %PBC was defined as the number of positive biopsy cores multiplied by 100 and divided by the total number of biopsy cores. RESULTS: Median %PBC was 83.3% (16.7-100%). Mean follow-up was 57.4 months. Survival at 5 years in men with 83.3% PBC or less was 62.3, 89.1 and 82.6% for recurrence-free, specific and overall survival, respectively, significantly better than that of men with a %PBC of more than 83.3% (32.2, 74.7 and 67.7%, respectively; p < 0.004). Among the factors available in the pretreatment setting, namely age, clinical stage, PSA, Gleason score, bone scan and %PBC, the latter was independently associated with survival in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: %PBC may improve the ability to predict time to hormonal resistance and survival in patients treated with ADT for prostate cancer. This finding warrants further investigation.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/análogos & derivados , Orquiectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Idoso , Biópsia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
Prog Urol ; 16(4): 461-3, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17069040

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Although macroscopic haematuria during the month following transurethral resection of the prostate, due to sloughing of necrotic tissue, is a phenomenon well known to urologists since introduction of endoscopic resection, its pathophysiological and epidemiological characteristics are poorly defined. The objective of this retrospective study was to define the incidence of serious macroscopic haematuria after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and to identify the risk factors for macroscopic haematuria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The hospital database was used to identify patients treated by TURP between 1997 and 2004 and rehospitalized during the 31 days following the procedure. Files of patients presenting with haematuria and bladder clots were selected and analysed. RESULTS: Ten of a series of 624 patients undergoing TURP were hospitalised for bladder clots and their case files were analysed: median age: 72 years, median duration of TURP: 45 min and median weight of resection: 12 g. The operators' experience and the duration of post-TURP catheterization were not informative. In 2 cases, prostate cancer was diagnosed after analysis of resection chips. Two patients were treated by anticoagulants. Patients were essentially rehospitalized during the 2nd week (median: 11th day). A bladder catheter for was inserted for lavage in each case. No patient required reoperation or removal of clots under general anaesthesia. Two patients were transfused. CONCLUSION: We did not identify any risk factor for sloughing leading to macroscopic haematuria during the month following TURP. Macroscopic haematuria justifying rehospitalization is a rare event. However, in view of this low incidence, optimal analysis could only be performed in the context of a national prospective register.


Assuntos
Hematúria/epidemiologia , Hematúria/etiologia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA