Factors Influencing Implementation of the Commission on Cancer's Breast Synoptic Operative Report (Alliance A20_Pilot9).

BACKGROUND: The technical aspects of cancer surgery have a significant impact on patient outcomes. To monitor surgical quality, in 2020, the Commission on Cancer (CoC) revised its accreditation standards for cancer surgery and introduced the synoptic operative reports (SORs). The standardization of SORs holds promise, but successful implementation requires strategies to address key implementation barriers. This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing breast SOR within diverse CoC-accredited programs. METHODS: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 health care professionals across diverse CoC-accredited sites. The study used two comprehensive implementation frameworks to guide data collection and analysis. RESULTS: Successful SOR implementation was impeded by disrupted workflows, surgeon resistance to change, low prioritization of resources, and poor flow of information despite CoC's positive reputation. Participants often lacked understanding of the requirements and timeline for breast SOR and were heavily influenced by prior experiences with templates and SOR champion relationships. The perceived lack of monetary benefits (to obtaining CoC accreditation) together with the significant information technology (IT) resource requirements tempered some of the enthusiasm. Additionally, resource constraints and the redirection of personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic were noted as hurdles. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon behavior and workflow change, IT and personnel resources, and communication and networking strategies influenced SOR implementation. During early implementation and the implementation planning phase, the primary focus was on achieving buy-in and initiating successful roll-out rather than effective use or sustainment. These findings have implications for enhancing standardization of surgical cancer care and guidance of future strategies to optimize implementation of CoC accreditation standards.

Geriatric Assessment in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of colorectal surgery among older adults is expected to rise due to the aging population. Geriatric conditions (e.g., frailty) are risk factors for poor surgical outcomes. The goal of this systematic review is to examine how current literature describes geriatric assessment interventions in colorectal surgery and associated outcomes. METHODS: Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were completed. Review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews in health and social care. All cohort studies and randomized trials of adult colorectal surgery patients where geriatric assessment was performed were included. Geriatric assessment with/without management interventions were identified and described. RESULTS: Seven-hundred ninety-three studies were identified. Duplicates (197) were removed. An additional 525 were excluded after title/abstract review. After full-text review, 20 studies met the criteria. Reference list review increased final total to 25 studies. All 25 studies were cohort studies. No randomized clinical trials were identified. Heterogeneous assessments were organized into geriatrics domains (mind, mobility, medications, matters most, and multi-complexity). Incomplete evaluations across geriatric domains were performed with few studies describing the use of assessments to impact management decisions. CONCLUSIONS: There are no randomized trials assessing the impact of geriatric assessment to tailor management strategies and improve outcomes in colorectal surgery. Few studies performed assessments to evaluate the geriatric domain matters most. These findings represent a gap in evidence for the efficacy of geriatric assessment and management strategies in colorectal surgical care.

Perceptions of Mobile Health Technology in Elective Surgery: A Qualitative Study of North American Surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the surgeon-perceived added value of mobile health technologies (mHealth), and determine facilitators of and barriers to implementing mHealth. BACKGROUND: Despite the growing popularity of mHealth and evidence of meaningful use of patient-generated health data in surgery, implementation remains limited. METHODS: This was an exploratory qualitative study following the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. Purposive sampling was used to identify surgeons across the United States and Canada. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research informed development of a semistructured interview guide. Video-based interviews were conducted (September-November 2020) and interview transcripts were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty surgeons from 8 specialties and 6 North American regions were interviewed. Surgeons identified opportunities to integrate mHealth data pre- operatively (eg, expectation-setting, decision-making) and during recovery (eg, remote monitoring, earlier detection of adverse events) among higher risk patients. Perceived advantages of mHealth data compared with surgical and patient-reported outcomes included easier data collection, higher interpretability and objectivity of mHealth data, and the potential to develop more patientcentered and functional measures of health. Surgeons identified a variety of implementation facilitators and barriers around surgeon- and patient buy-in, integration with electronic medical records, regulatory/reimbursement concerns, and personnel responsible for mHealth data. Surgeons described similar considerations regarding perceptions of mHealth among patients, including the potential to address or worsen existing disparities in surgical care. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have the potential to inform the effective and equitable implementation of mHealth for the purposes of supporting patients and surgical care teams throughout the delivery of surgical care.

Association of Kidney Function With Major Postoperative Events After Noncardiac Ambulatory Surgeries: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the association between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or death after ambulatory noncardiac surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) commonly undergo surgical procedures. Although most are performed in an ambulatory setting, the risk of major perioperative outcomes after ambulatory surgery for people with CKD is unknown. METHODS: In this retrospective population-based cohort study using administrative health data from Alberta, Canada, we included adults with measured preoperative kidney function undergoing ambulatory noncardiac surgery between April 1, 2005 and February 28, 2017. Participants were categorized into 6 eGFR categories (in mL/min/1.73m 2 )of ≥60 (G1-2), 45 to 59 (G3a), 30 to 44 (G3b), 15 to 29 (G4), <15 not receiving dialysis (G5ND), and those receiving chronic dialysis (G5D). The odds of AMI or death within 30 days of surgery were estimated using multivariable generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS: We identified 543,160 procedures in 323,521 people with a median age of 66 years (IQR 56-76); 52% were female. Overall, 2338 people (0.7%) died or had an AMI within 30 days of surgery. Compared with the G1-2 category, the adjusted odds ratio of death or AMI increased from 1.1 (95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.3) for G3a to 3.1 (2.6-3.6) for G5D. Emergency Department and Urgent Care Center visits within 30 days were frequent (17%), though similar across eGFR categories. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory surgery was associated with a low risk of major postoperative events. This risk was higher for people with CKD, which may inform their perioperative shared decision-making and management.

Adolescent experiences of the safe surgical checklist and surgical care processes.

PURPOSE: To explore the perceptions, satisfaction, and needs of adolescent surgical patients with their perioperative pathway, including consent, the Safe Surgical Checklist (SSC), and post-operative care. METHODS: We used qualitative methodology to examine adolescent experiences with surgical consent, SSC, and post-operative care. We purposively recruited ten patients aged 13-17 undergoing emergency and elective surgery and obtained consent from parents and patients. Semi-structured interview scripts were co-developed with an adolescent patient advisor, and interviews were performed, recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was based on grounded theory and Participants were recruited and interviewed until thematic saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Four themes emerged in thematic analysis: (1) Autonomy and Inclusion-Adolescents desire to participate in the consent process, including signing their own consent when appropriate, (2) Value of Repetition-Adolescents value the repetition of information in the pre-operative check and feel safer when the team reinforces the information, (3) Importance of Caregiver Involvement - Adolescents valued their caregivers being involved in critical conversations and decision making, and (4) Importance of Transparency in Communication-Adolescents desire to be directly given information about their surgery post-operatively and not told to parents alone. CONCLUSION: Adolescents are situated uniquely between childhood and adulthood. Adolescents desired to be directly involved in the decision-making process of their surgery, including participation in the SSC and discussion of post-operative complications.

Parental perceptions and experiences of care in the surgical neonatal intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Parents endure significant stress when their newborns require surgery while in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Our study aims to explore the surgical NICU experience from the parents' perspective and identify areas that may improve this experience. A secondary objective was to integrate their feedback to refine the implementation strategy of the neonatal enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) guideline. METHODS: In December 2019, five surgical NICU parents participated in a focus group. Conversation surrounded parents' perspectives and experiences of the surgical NICU. Inductive analysis was performed to identify data, themes, and concepts that emerged from the discussion. RESULTS: Participants identified four major interrelated themes that impacted the surgical parents' NICU experience. These themes include (1) parental state, both physical and emotional, (2) the altered parental caregiver role which necessitates identifying alternative meaningful parental experiences, (3) the care team dynamic, incorporating consistency and effective communication, and (4) the discharge process which may be significantly eased through graduated, hands-on training. CONCLUSION: Key elements of the neonatal ERAS® guideline address major themes and stressors identified by parents. The parental perspective may help clinicians appreciate the parent surgical NICU experience and assist in improving family-centered care to surgical infants and their families.

Designing and maintaining a rescue extracorporeal life support program: A holistic simulation approach.

Rescue Extracorporeal Life Support Programs based at non-cardiac surgery centers have unique needs to be able to ensure successful outcomes despite low patient volumes. In this paper we describe the important role simulation had in each stage of development, implementation, and maintenance of our pediatric Rescue ECLS Program. Systems-focused simulations were used to develop robust workflows, processes, and bundles. Simulation-based education targeted the acquisition and maintenance of clinical skills for individual team members, bringing together a multidisciplinary team of local clinicians who do not routinely perform pediatric cannulation related tasks. Translational simulation ensured continued improvement by addressing adverse events or latent safety threats observed during system-focused or educational simulations. Realism of all simulations was our priority, and was achieved through in situ simulations, participation of multidisciplinary teams, use of real equipment and medical supplies, and use of a high-fidelity cannulation manikin. This holistic simulation approach allowed us to overcome the barriers to high quality care, and maintain outcomes comparable to high volume centers. A similar approach can help other centers design simulation for their own Rescue ECLS Program, and can be translated to other high-risk and high-acuity critical care programs.

A novel computerized approach to scoping reviews using Synthesis software: the first 15 years of The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Scoping reviews of innovations in health care characterized by large numbers and types of publications present a unique challenge. A novel software application, Synthesis, can efficiently scan the literature to map the evidence and inform practice. We applied Synthesis to the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), a high-quality database designed to measure risk-adjusted 30-day surgical outcomes for national and international benchmarking. The scoping review describes the breadth of studies in the NSQIP literature. We performed a comprehensive electronic literature search using PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge and Scopus to capture all NSQIP articles published between Jan. 1, 2000, and Dec. 31, 2020. Two reviewers independently reviewed articles to determine their relevance using predefined inclusion criteria. We imported references into Synthesis to semiautomate data management. Extracted data included surgical specialty, study type and year of publication. Of the 4661 NSQIP articles included, 3631 (77.9%) were published within the last 5 years. Among NSQIP-related articles, the most common study types were based on outcomes (46.7%) and association (41.7%), and the most common surgical specialties were general surgery and orthopedic surgery, representing 35.7% and 24.0% of the articles, respectively. Synthesis enabled a rapid review of thousands of NSQIP publications. The scoping review provided an overview of the articles in the NSQIP literature and suggested that the NSQIP is increasingly being described in publications of quality and safety in surgery.

Survival Benefit Associated With the Use of Extracorporeal Life Support for Neonates With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the survival among comparable neonates with CDH supported with and without ECLS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite widespread use in the management of newborns with CDH, ECLS has not been consistently associated with improved survival. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using ECLS-eligible CDH Study Group registry patients born between 2007 and 2019. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Neonates who did and did not receive ECLS were matched based on variables affecting risk for the primary outcome. Iterative propensity score-matched, survival (Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier), and center effects analyses were performed to examine the association of ECLS use and mortality. RESULTS: Of 5855 ECLS-eligible CDH patients, 1701 (29.1%) received ECLS. "High-risk" patients were best defined as those with a lowest achievable first-day arterial partial pressure of CO2 of ≥60 mm Hg. After propensity score matching, mortality was higher with ECLS (47.8% vs 21.8%, odds ratio 3.3, 95% confidence interval 2.7-4.0, hazard ratio 2.3, P < 0.0001). For the subgroup of high-risk patients, there was lower mortality observed with ECLS (64.2% vs 84.4%, odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.65, hazard ratio 0.33, P = 0.001). This survival advantage was persistent using multiple matching approaches. However, this ECLS survival advantage was found to occur primarily at high CDH volume centers that offer frequent ECLS for the high-risk subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ECLS is associated with excess mortality for low- and intermediate-risk neonates with CDH. It is associated with a significant survival advantage among high-risk infants, and this advantage is strongly influenced by center CDH volume and ECLS experience.

Utility of a Device Briefing Tool to Improve Surgical Safety.

INTRODUCTION: Clear communication around surgical device use is crucial to patient safety. We evaluated the utility of the Device Briefing Tool (DBT) as an adjunct to the Surgical Safety Checklist. METHODS: A nonrandomized, controlled pilot of the DBT was conducted with surgical teams at an academic referral center. Intervention departments used the DBT in all cases involving a surgical device for 10 wk. Utility, relative advantage, and implementation effectiveness were evaluated via surveys. Trained observers assessed adherence and team performance using the Oxford NOTECHS system. RESULTS: Of 113 individuals surveyed, 91 responded. Most respondents rated the DBT as moderately to extremely useful. Utility was greatest for complex devices (89%) and new devices (88%). Advantages included insight into the team's familiarity with devices (70%) and improved teamwork and communication (68%). Users found it unrealistic to review all device instructional materials (54%). Free text responses suggested that the DBT heightened awareness of deficiencies in device familiarity and training but lacked a clear mechanism to correct them. DBT adherence was 82%. NOTECHS scores in intervention departments improved over the course of the study but did not significantly differ from comparator departments. CONCLUSIONS: The DBT was rated highly by both surgeons and nurses. Adherence was high and we found no evidence of "checklist fatigue." Centers interested in implementing the DBT should focus on devices that are complex or new to any surgical team member. Guidance for correcting deficiencies identified by the DBT will be provided in future iterations of the tool.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery at Primary and Secondary Hospitals in Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC's): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendation.

BACKGROUND: This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline for primary and secondary hospitals in low-middle-income countries (LMIC's) for elective abdominal and gynecologic care. METHODS: The ERAS LMIC Guidelines group was established by the ERAS® Society in collaboration with different representatives of perioperative care from LMIC's. The group consisted of seven members from the ERAS® Society and eight members from LMIC's. An updated systematic literature search and evaluation of evidence from previous ERAS® guidelines was performed by the leading authors of the Colorectal (2018) and Gynecologic (2019) surgery guidelines (Gustafsson et al in World J Surg 43:6592-695, Nelson et al in Int J Gynecol Cancer 29(4):651-668). Meta-analyses randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies from both HIC's and LMIC's were considered for each perioperative item. The members in the LMIC group then applied the current evidence and adapted the recommendations for each intervention as well as identifying possible new items relevant to LMIC's. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system (GRADE) methodology was used to determine the quality of the published evidence. The strength of the recommendations was based on importance of the problem, quality of evidence, balance between desirable and undesirable effects, acceptability to key stakeholders, cost of implementation and specifically the feasibility of implementing in LMIC's and determined through discussions and consensus. RESULTS: In addition to previously described ERAS® Society interventions, the following items were included, revised or discussed: the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), preoperative routine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in countries with a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS (CD4 and viral load for those patients that are HIV positive), delirium screening and prevention, COVID 19 screening, VTE prophylaxis, immuno-nutrition, prehabilitation, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and a standardized postoperative monitoring guideline. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines are seen as a starting point to address the urgent need to improve perioperative care and to effect data-driven, evidence-based care in LMIC's.

Postoperative complications after gastrointestinal pediatric surgical procedures: outcomes and socio-demographic risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Several socio-demographic characteristics are associated with complications following certain pediatric surgical procedures. In this comprehensive study, we sought to determine socio-demographic risk factors and resource utilization of children with complications after common pediatric surgical procedures. METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study utilizing the 2016 Healthcare Cost and Use Project Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) to identify and characterize pediatric patients (age 0-21 years) in the United States with common inpatient pediatric gastrointestinal surgical procedures: appendectomy, cholecystectomy, colonic resection, pyloromyotomy and small bowel resection. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to identify socio-demographic predictors of postoperative complications. Length of stay and hospitalization costs for patients with and without postoperative complications were compared. RESULTS: A total of 66,157 pediatric surgical hospitalizations were identified. Of these patients, 2,009 had postoperative complications. Male sex, young age, African American and Native American race and treatment in a rural hospital were associated with significantly greater odds of postoperative complications. Mean length of stay was 4.58 days greater and mean total costs were $11,151 (US dollars) higher in the complication cohort compared with patients without complications. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications following inpatient pediatric gastrointestinal surgery were linked to elevated healthcare-related expenditure. The identified socio-demographic risk factors should be considered in the risk stratification before pediatric surgical procedures. Targeted interventions are required to reduce preventable complications and surgical disparities.

Using i-PARIHS to assess implementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist: an international qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Strategies selected to implement the WHO's Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) are key factors in its ability to improve patient safety. Underutilization of implementation frameworks for informing implementation processes hinders our understanding of the checklists' varying effectiveness in different contexts. This study explored the extent to which SSC implementation practices could be assessed through the i-PARIHS framework and examined how it could support development of targeted recommendations to improve SSC implementation in high-income settings. METHODS: This qualitative study utilized interviews with surgical team members and health administrators from five high-income countries to understand the key elements necessary for successful implementation of the SSC. Using thematic analysis, we identified within and across-case themes that were mapped to the i-PARIHS framework constructs. Gaps in current implementation strategies were identified, and the utility of i-PARIHS to guide future efforts was assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-one multi-disciplinary clinicians and health administrators completed interviews. We identified themes that impacted SSC implementation in each of the four i-PARIHS constructs and several that spanned multiple constructs. Within innovation, a disconnect between the clinical outcomes-focused evidence in the literature and interviewees' patient-safety focus on observable results reduced the SSC's perceived relevance. Within recipients, existing surgical team hierarchies impacted checklist engagement, but this could be addressed through a shared leadership model. Within context, organizational priorities resulting in time pressures on surgical teams were at odds with SSC patient safety goals and reduced fidelity. At a health system level, employing surgical team members through the state or health region resulted in significant challenges in enforcing checklist use in private vs public hospitals. Within its facilitation construct, i-PARIHS includes limited definitions of facilitation processes. We identified using multiple interdisciplinary champions; establishing checklist performance feedback mechanisms; and modifying checklist processes, such as implementing a full-team huddle, as facilitators of successful SSC implementation. CONCLUSION: The i-PARIHS framework enabled a comprehensive assessment of current implementation strategies, identifying key gaps and allowed for recommending targeted improvements. i-PARIHS could serve as a guide for planning future SSC implementation efforts, however, further clarification of facilitation processes would improve the framework's utility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No health care intervention was performed.

A population-based analysis of the presentation and outcomes of pediatric patients with osteosarcoma in Canada: a report from CYP-C.

BACKGROUND: Frequently occurring in adolescents, osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone disease, with a reported 15% of patients who present with metastasis. With advances in imaging and improvements in surgical care, an updated analysis is warranted on the outcomes of pediatric patients with osteosarcoma. METHODS: We completed a retrospective review of pediatric patients who presented with osteosarcoma between 2001 and 2017, using The Cancer in Young People in Canada (CYP-C) national database. Data on 304 patients aged younger than 15 years were analyzed. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who presented with metastasis was 23.0%. The overall 5-year survival (OS) for patients who presented with metastasis was 37.4%. Overall survival and event-free survival (EFS) were lower in these patients than in patients with localized disease (hazard ratio [HR] 4.3, p < 0.0001 and HR 3.1, p < 0.0001). For patients who presented with metastatic disease, the OS for those undergoing an operative intervention was 44.1% compared with 17.6% for those who did not undergo resection (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients who presented with metastatic osteosarcoma in our population is higher than previously reported. Overall outcomes of patients with metastatic disease have not changed. Our data reaffirm a role for surgical resection in patients with metastasis with a need to explore new treatment strategies to improve the overall prognosis of these patients.

We Asked the Experts: The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Recommendations for Content and Implementation Adaptations.

BACKGROUND: As surgical systems are forced to adapt and respond to new challenges, so should the patient safety tools within those systems. We sought to determine how the WHO SSC might best be adapted during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: 18 Panelists from five continents and multiple clinical specialties participated in a three-round modified Delphi technique to identify potential recommendations, assess agreement with proposed recommendations and address items not meeting consensus. RESULTS: From an initial 29 recommendations identified in the first round, 12 were identified for inclusion in the second round. After discussion of recommendations without consensus for inclusion or exclusion, four additional recommendations were added for an eventual 16 recommendations. Nine of these recommendations were related to checklist content, while seven recommendations were related to implementation. CONCLUSIONS: This multinational panel has identified 16 recommendations for sites looking to use the surgical safety checklist during the COVID-19 pandemic. These recommendations provide an example of how the SSC can adapt to meet urgent and emerging needs of surgical systems by targeting important processes and encouraging critical discussions.

Impact of implementing a fast-track protocol and standardized guideline for the management of pediatric appendicitis.

Background: In 2017, a provincial guideline was created to fast track and standardize care for pediatric appendicitis in Alberta. We conducted a study to determine the impact of implementation of the guideline at our institution on length of stay (LOS), antibiotic stewardship efforts and costs. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the charts of all patients younger than 18 years of age who underwent appendectomy at our institution in 2 periods: before guideline implementation (Dec. 1, 2016, to May 31, 2017) and after implementation (Dec. 1, 2017, to May 31, 2018). We compared LOS, duration of antibiotic therapy, 30-day postdischarge complication rates and variable cost between the 2 cohorts. Results: Of the 276 total appendectomy procedures performed, 185 were for simple appendicitis (81 before guideline implementation and 104 after implementation), and 91 were for complicated appendicitis (44 and 47, respectively). The median LOS was shorter in the postimplementation cohort for both simple and complicated appendicitis (15.5 h [interquartile range (IQR) 12-19 h] v. 17.0 h [IQR 13-22 h], p = 0.03; and 3.0 d [IQR 2-4 d] v. 3.0 d [IQR 3-5 d], p = 0.05, respectively). Patients with complicated appendicitis had fewer antibiotic days after guideline implementation; the difference was statistically significant for patients without diffuse peritoneal contamination or abscess formation (p = 0.02). There were no differences between the cohorts with respect to 30-day rates of complications, including emergency department visits, readmission and surgical site infections. After guideline implementation, the average variable cost per patient was reduced by $230, equating to a total average annual cost savings of $75 842 for our institution. Conclusion: The implementation of a provincial guideline aimed at standardizing care in pediatric appendicitis at our institution was associated with shortened LOS, improved antibiotic stewardship efforts and reduced cost of care. Other institutions may replicate our model of a standardized pathway in the management of pediatric appendicitis in an effort to improve the quality of patient care and reduce health care costs.

Contexte: En 2017, des lignes directrices provinciales ont vu le jour en Alberta afin d'accélérer et de normaliser les soins pédiatriques pour appendicite. Notre étude visait à déterminer l'effet de leur application, par notre établissement, sur la durée du séjour, la gestion des antibiotiques et les coûts des soins. Méthodes: Nous avons examiné de façon rétrospective le dossier de tous les patients de moins de 18 ans ayant subi une appendicectomie à notre établissement avant l'application des lignes directrices (entre le 1er décembre 2016 et le 31 mai 2017) et après (entre le 1er décembre 2017 et le 31 mai 2018). Les données relatives à la durée du séjour, à la durée de l'antibiothérapie, au taux de complications 30 jours après le congé et aux coûts variables ont été comparées entre les 2 groupes. Résultats: Des 276 appendicectomies totales effectuées, 185 concernaient une appendicite simple (81 avant l'application des lignes directrices et 104 après), et 91, une appendicite compliquée (44 avant l'application et 47 après). La durée médiane du séjour était plus courte dans le groupe postapplication, tant pour l'appendicite simple (15,5 h [écart interquartile (EI) 12­19 h] c. 17,0 h [EI 13­22 h]; p = 0,03) que pour l'appendicite compliquée (3,0 j [EI 2­4 j] c. 3,0 j [EI 3­5 j]; p = 0,05). Les patients qui présentaient une appendicite compliquée avaient une antibiothérapie moins longue après l'application des lignes directrices; la différence était statistiquement significative chez les patients sans contamination péritonéale diffuse ou abcès (p = 0,02). Aucune différence n'a été observée entre les cohortes en ce qui a trait au taux de complications à 30 jours, qui comprenait les consultations à l'urgence, les réadmissions et les infections du site opératoire. L'application des lignes directrices a permis de réduire les coûts variables par patient de 230 $, ce qui représente une économie annuelle moyenne de 75 842 $ pour notre établissement. Conclusion: L'application des lignes directrices provinciales visant à normaliser les soins pédiatriques pour appendicite a été associée, dans notre établissement, à une réduction de la durée du séjour, à l'amélioration de la gestion des antibiotiques et à une diminution des coûts des soins. D'autres établissements pourraient reproduire ce modèle de soins normalisés pour améliorer la qualité et réduire les coûts.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provides Useful Diagnostic Information Following Equivocal Ultrasound in Children With Suspected Appendicitis [Formula: see text].

PURPOSE: In Canada, ultrasonography is the primary imaging modality for children with suspected appendicitis, yet equivocal studies are common. Magnetic resonance imaging provides promise as an adjunct imaging strategy. The primary objective of this study was to determine the proportion of children with suspected appendicitis and equivocal ultrasound where magnetic resonance imaging determined a diagnosis. METHODS: A prospective consecutive cohort of children aged 5-17 years presenting to a tertiary pediatric Emergency Department with suspected appendicitis were enrolled. Participants underwent diagnostic and management strategies according to our local suspected appendicitis pathway, followed by magnetic resonance (Siemens Avanto 1.5 Tesla) imaging. Sub-specialty pediatric radiologists reported all images. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 101 children with suspected appendicitis. The mean age was 11.9 (SD 3.4) years and median Pediatric Appendicitis Score was 6 [IQR 4,8]. Ultrasonography was completed in 98/101 (97.0%). Of 53/98 (54.1%) with equivocal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging provided further diagnostic information in 41 (77.4%; 10 positive, 31 negative; 12 remained equivocal). Secondary findings of appendicitis on magnetic resonance imaging in children with equivocal ultrasound included abdominal free fluid (24, 45.3%), peri-appendiceal fluid (12, 22.6%), intraluminal appendiceal fluid (9, 17.0%), fat stranding (8, 15.1%), appendicolith (2, 3.8%), and peri-appendiceal abscess (1, 1.9%). The observed agreement between magnetic resonance imaging results and final diagnosis was 94.9% (kappa = 0.89).

Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Neonatal Intestinal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guidelines integrate evidence-based practices into multimodal care pathways that have improved outcomes in multiple adult surgical specialties. There are currently no pediatric ERAS® Society guidelines. We created an ERAS® guideline designed to enhance quality of care in neonatal intestinal resection surgery. METHODS: A multidisciplinary guideline generation group defined the scope, population, and guideline topics. Systematic reviews were supplemented by targeted searching and expert identification to identify 3514 publications that were screened to develop and support recommendations. Final recommendations were determined through consensus and were assessed for evidence quality and recommendation strength. Parental input was attained throughout the process. RESULTS: Final recommendations ranged from communication strategies to antibiotic use. Topics with poor-quality and conflicting evidence were eliminated. Several recommendations were combined. The quality of supporting evidence was variable. Seventeen final recommendations are included in the proposed guideline. DISCUSSION: We have developed a comprehensive, evidence-based ERAS guideline for neonates undergoing intestinal resection surgery. This guideline, and its creation process, provides a foundation for future ERAS guideline development and can ultimately lead to improved perioperative care across a variety of pediatric surgical specialties.

Toward Standardized Management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: An Analysis of Practice Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Standardized care may improve outcomes in many diseases including congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Our study assesses the variability of CDH clinical practice guidelines (CPG) among North American centers. METHODS: North American member institutions of the CDH Study Group and the Pediatric Surgical Research Collaborative were solicited to submit their CDH CPG. Elements from each CPG were collected and classified according to therapeutic purpose. Elements were assigned to umbrella topics of prenatal assessment, delivery plus initial resuscitation, ventilatory and cardiovascular management, therapeutic targets, analgesia, and criteria for transitions in care. Descriptive analyses were performed to characterize the scope and variability of CPGs. RESULTS: Sixty-eight centers provided 40 responses (59%). Of these, 29 (73%) had a CDH CPG, of which 27 were obtained for review. All CPGs had a primary focus of preoperative care. Conventional ventilation was the first-line strategy in all CPGs. Ninety-three percent reported a peak inspiratory pressure limit (mean: 25.2 ± 2 cm H2O). Target oxygenation and ventilatory variables had low coefficients of variation. Two-thirds of CPGs discussed echocardiography, with indications for inhaled nitric oxide, sildenafil, and prostaglandins detailed in 81%, 30%, and 22% of CPGs, respectively. Extracorporeal life support and operative indications were specified in 93% and 59%, respectively, although specific targets for each were highly variable. CONCLUSIONS: This synthesis of North American CDH CPGs identifies areas of both alignment and variability and provides objective data about individual institutional guidelines in CDH care. These data may inform the development of a consensus-based, multi-institutional approach to standardized CDH management in North America.